Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Anomalous electroweak physics unraveled via evidential deep learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.16286 v1 pith:EZJVE4GI submitted 2024-12-20 hep-ph

Anomalous electroweak physics unraveled via evidential deep learning

classification hep-ph
keywords modeldeeplearningmodelsanomalouselectroweakevidentialphysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The growth in beyond standard model (BSM) models and parametrizations has placed strong emphasis on systematically intercomparing within the range of possible models with controlled uncertainties. In this setting, the language of uncertainty quantification (UQ) provides quantitative metrics of assessing overlaps and discrepancies between models. We leverage recent machine learning (ML) developments in evidential deep learning (EDL) for UQ to separate data (aleatoric) and knowledge (epistemic) uncertainties in a model discrimination setting. In this study, we construct several potentially BSM-motivated scenarios for the anomalous electroweak interaction (AEWI) of neutrinos with nucleons in deep inelastic scattering ($\nu$DIS). These scenarios are then quantitatively mapped, as a demonstration, alongside Monte Carlo replicas of the CT18 PDFs used to calculate the $\Delta \chi^{2}$ statistic for a typical multi-GeV $\nu$DIS experiment, CDHSW. Our framework effectively highlights areas of model agreement and provides a classification of out-of-distribution (OOD) samples. By offering the opportunity to identify unexplored regions of parameter space while understanding domains of model overlap, the approach presented in this work can help facilitate efficient BSM model exploration and exclusion for future New Physics searches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.