Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Scalable optimal control for inequality-constrained discretizations of scalar conservation laws

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.18685 v1 pith:WAP7TYDN submitted 2024-12-24 math.OC

Scalable optimal control for inequality-constrained discretizations of scalar conservation laws

classification math.OC
keywords propertiessolversconstraintscontrolscalableconservationexcellentflux
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Optimization-based (OB) alternatives to traditional flux limiters couch preservation of properties such as local bounds and maximum principles into optimization problems, which impose these properties through inequality constraints. In this paper, we propose a new potential-target OB approach that enforces these properties using an optimal control formulation, in which the control is the source term expressed through flux potentials. The resulting OB formulation combines superb accuracy with excellent local conservation properties, but complicates the development of scalable iterative solvers, which is greatly influenced by the choice of semi-norms for the objective function. We use this fact to design scalable iterative solvers based on matrix-free trust-region Newton methods with projections onto convex sets. These solvers leverage inexpensive multigrid V-cycles while satisfying all constraints to machine precision. Numerical experiments reveal that the convergence behavior of the solvers can be greatly improved by a simple scaling of the inequality constraints. We demonstrate excellent performance in applications to linear test problems, such as $L^2$ projection and solid body rotation, and to the Cahn-Hilliard equation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.