Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantifying the Risk of Pastoral Conflict in 4 Central African Countries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.18799 v1 pith:CEW2SRFC submitted 2024-12-25 cs.CY

Quantifying the Risk of Pastoral Conflict in 4 Central African Countries

classification cs.CY
keywords conflictpastoralriskaccuracyafricananalysiscellshigh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Climate change is becoming a widely recognized risk factor of farmer-herder conflict in Africa. Using an 8 year dataset (Jan 2015 to Sep 2022) of detailed weather and terrain data across four African nations, we apply statistical and machine learning methods to analyze pastoral conflict. We test hypotheses linking these variables with pastoral conflict within each country using geospatial and statistical analysis. Complementing this analysis are risk maps automatically updated for decision-makers. Our models estimate which cells have a high likelihood of experiencing pastoral conflict with high predictive accuracy and study the variation of this accuracy with the granularity of the cells.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.