Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Design for light-based spherical aberration correction of ultrafast electron microscopes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Simulations show that a shaped laser pulse near the electron crossover cancels primary spherical aberration in an ultrafast electron microscope, restoring round shadow images over an 8.1 mrad semi-angle.

desk verdict A solid UTEM ponderomotive aberration-correction design study, but the headline 8.1 mrad is an input aperture angle, not a demonstrated output for the actual shaped beams. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05157 v1 pith:6URS7FEQ submitted 2025-01-09 physics.optics quant-ph

Marius Constantin Chirita Mihaila , Martin Kozák This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords sphericalaberrationcorrectionponderomotivephaseplateultrafastelectronmicroscopybeamshapingZernikepolynomialsgradientdescentoptimizationshadowimagingLaguerre-Gaussianbeams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors set out to show that a laser beam can do what bulky magnetic multipoles do in an electron microscope: cancel the lens's spherical aberration. They place the electron-light interaction near the electron crossover, where the local ray angle is proportional to transverse position, and give the laser intensity a quartic (or inverse quartic) transverse profile. The ponderomotive phase an electron picks up is then proportional to the same $\theta^4$ dependence as the aberration, with opposite sign, so the two cancel for all rays up to the aperture edge. Their ray- and wave-optics simulations of 30 keV electrons with $C_s\approx 80$ mm show round, undistorted shadow images of a Si$_3$N$_4$ hole array over an 8.1 mrad semi-angle at 0.2 µJ laser pulse energy. If this holds experimentally, larger probe apertures become usable, raising the low probe currents that currently limit ultrafast electron microscopy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the ponderomotive phase plate: a laser focus that imprints a transverse phase on the electron wavefunction, with the phase proportional to the local laser intensity. In the non-recoil, paraxial, monochromatic limit, an electron crossing the focus acquires $\varphi(x,y)\propto \frac{E_L \lambda_L^2}{E_e} \frac{g^2(x,y)}{\int g^2}$, and because the interaction sits at the electron crossover, the local propagation angle $\theta$ scales with the transverse coordinate $r$, so a quartic or inverse-quartic $g^2$ becomes a $\theta^4$ phase that directly opposes the primary spherical aberration. The practical enabler is the beam-shaping loop: a spatial light modulator displays a phase mask, and a gradient-descent algorithm optimizes the coefficients of Zernike polynomials (plus a charge-3 vortex for the quartic beam) to match the target intensity profile. The paper reports a correlation of 98.5% in the region of interest for the quartic beam.

What would settle it

In an actual 30 keV ultrafast microscope with $C_s\approx 80$ mm, record the shadow image of the Si$_3$N$_4$ hole array with the laser off and then on with the designed quartic or inverse-quartic beam at 0.2 µJ: the central claim is falsified if the round, undistorted shadow is not restored across the 8.1 mrad aperture, or if the measured electron deflection angle does not match $(1/k)\partial\varphi/\partial x$ from Eq. (4). A simpler check is to measure the shaped laser intensity profile directly and verify that the quartic fit reaches $Q^2\approx 0.99$; a realized profile that departs from quartic cannot produce the claimed correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a 30 keV electron lens with spherical aberration coefficient $C_s\approx 80$ mm and focal length 8 mm, the primary spherical aberration phase is $\phi(\theta)=\frac{\pi}{2\lambda_e} C_s \theta^4$. The authors show that a counter-propagating laser pulse with intensity profile $g^2(x,y)=1-r^4$ or $g^2(x,y)=r^4$ produces a ponderomotive phase $\varphi(x,y)=-\frac{\alpha}{2\pi(1+\beta)} \frac{E_L \lambda_L^2}{E_e} \frac{g^2}{\int g^2}$, which, placed near the electron crossover, is exactly the opposite of the lens aberration when the pulse energy is chosen appropriately. With an optimized pulse energy of 0.2 µJ, both positive and negative spherical aberration phases are compensated without introducing defocus, and the simulated shadow images of a hexagonal array of 50 nm holes return to round shapes across the full 8.1 mrad aperture. The required quartic and inverse-quartic light distributions are obtained from a Gaussian beam by a spatial-light-modulator phase mask: a gradient-descent search over radial Zernike coefficients produces an inverse-quartic beam with 71% efficiency and a quartic beam (using a charge-3 vortex plus Zernike terms) with 27% efficiency, with fit qualities $Q^2=0.983$ and $Q^2=0.995$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme stands on the assumption that each electron sees the same laser intensity all along its roughly 20-µm pass through the focus, so the laser acts as a pure thin phase plate; the authors note that this breaks down for numerical apertures above about 0.2, and beam drift also spoils the exact cancellation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spherical aberration can be cancelled without adding defocus, so the correction works at $\Delta z=0$ and does not require retuning the lens current.
  • The usable convergence semi-angle of a 30 keV, $C_s\approx 80$ mm lens extends to 8.1 mrad, which would allow larger objective apertures and therefore higher probe current.
  • Because the phase plate is programmable, the same setup could be adapted to correct higher-order aberrations by adding non-radially symmetric Zernike modes.
  • The shadow-imaging geometry with Si$_3$N$_4$ hole arrays provides an aberration diagnostic suited to ultrafast electron microscopes, where conventional Ronchigrams are impractical.
  • Stable operation requires laser pointing stability at the ~4 nrad level and pulse-energy stability below 1% rms, with beam displacement kept below 1.5% of the corrected beam diameter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One consequence not pursued in the paper: because the ponderomotive phase scales as $E_L \lambda_L^2/E_e$, the same correction at higher electron energies or shorter laser wavelengths would require proportionally more pulse energy, so the scheme is best matched to low- and medium-energy ultrafast instruments.
  • The same spatial-light-modulator phase plate could imprint arbitrary low-order aberrations on demand, turning the corrector into a general programmable electron wavefront shaper; the paper demonstrates only radially symmetric quartic corrections.
  • The shadow-image diagnostic itself could become a routine alignment tool for any electron-light interaction experiment, since it directly visualizes wavefront distortion without needing high electron current.
  • The correction is monochromatic: the residual chromatic aberration from a 0.5 eV energy spread still broadens the probe, so a chromatic corrector or monochromator would be the natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes correcting primary spherical aberration in ultrafast electron microscopes by imprinting a ponderomotive phase on the electron beam with a shaped laser pulse near the electron crossover. The authors derive the condition that the laser intensity profile g^2(x,y) must match a quartic or inverse-quartic form to cancel the Cs theta^4 aberration phase (Eq. 4), and they present ray-optics and wave-optics simulations of electron shadow images that show round hole patterns when this condition is imposed. They then use a gradient-descent algorithm with Zernike polynomials to design phase masks that shape a Gaussian beam into approximate inverse-quartic and quartic intensity distributions, reporting fit qualities Q^2 = 0.983 and 0.995 and efficiencies of 71% and 27%. The abstract claims an aberration-free angle of 8.1 mrad.

Significance. If the proposed scheme works as claimed, it would offer a programmable, light-based alternative to multipole or material-based aberration correctors for UTEMs, potentially enabling larger probe apertures and higher probe currents. The paper's combination of ray and wave optics simulations for the ideal phase plate is internally consistent, and the gradient-descent beam-shaping results with quantified fit quality are a useful design contribution. However, the central demonstration is currently limited to an idealized phase plate: the electron-light simulations use g^2 = 1-r^4 or r^4 directly, and the actual optimized laser beams are not propagated through the electron interaction. The 8.1 mrad figure is an input aperture angle, not a derived performance limit. These gaps mean the paper shows a promising proof-of-principle rather than a validated design for the claimed aberration-free angle.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Figs. 2-4] The electron-light simulations in Fig. 2 set g^2(x,y) in Eq. 4 to the ideal profiles 1-r^4 and r^4 (stated in the paragraph after Fig. 4), while the optimized laser beams in Figs. 3 and 4 are characterized only by Q^2 = 0.983 and 0.995 and efficiencies of 71% and 27%. These two simulation lines are never connected: the actual beam-shaping residuals are not propagated through the electron-light interaction, so the paper does not quantify how deviations from the ideal quartic profiles degrade the round shadow images or the 8.1 mrad claim. This is load-bearing because the correction phase at the aperture edge is about 77 rad for Cs = 80 mm and theta_max = 8.1 mrad, so a relative intensity error of a few percent produces a phase error of order 1 rad, far exceeding a lambda/14 tolerance. The authors should either propagate the optimized beams through the electron simulation or provide a tolerance analysis showing that the achieved Q^2 values are sufficient.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3] The 'aberration free angle of 8.1 mrad' is the input semi-convergence angle determined by the stated lens parameters (130 µm beam diameter, f = 8 mm, hence theta_max = 8.1 mrad), not a derived output of the simulations. The simulations demonstrate correction at that chosen angle under the ideal-profile assumption, but no calculation is given for the maximum correctable angle as a function of available pulse energy, phase-error tolerance, or the NA<0.2 validity limit. Furthermore, because the correction condition phi = -varphi is imposed by construction when choosing g^2, the agreement between ray and wave optics in Fig. 2 confirms the numerical implementation of Eq. 4 but does not by itself validate the physical feasibility beyond an ideal phase plate. The abstract should be reworded to state that 8.1 mrad is an example design point, or the authors should add a derivation of the achievable aberration-free angle from the system constraints.
  3. [Section 2, Eq. 4; Section 4] The phase-imprint model in Eq. 4 assumes the laser intensity is constant along the electron propagation direction over the interaction length and that the electron does not move significantly transversely during the interaction. The authors correctly note in Section 4 that NA > 0.2 could break this assumption, but the proposed laser shaping uses NA = 0.16-0.2 and an interaction length of about 20 µm, while the electron convergence angle is 8.1 mrad. Electrons at the edge of the aperture therefore traverse a transverse intensity gradient during the interaction, and the resulting phase error is not estimated. Because the correction phase is large (~77 rad at the edge), even small axial or transverse variations in the focused laser field could produce non-negligible residual aberration. The authors should validate Eq. 4 for their specific parameters by integrating U(r + vt, t) over the full interaction region for the actual focused field, or by estimating the phase error from the longitudinal intensity profile.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2] There is a typo in the fourth sentence: 'simulate the the electron beam' should read 'simulate the electron beam'.
  2. [Section 3] The word 'Additionaly' in the paragraph describing the mirror hole is misspelled; it should be 'Additionally'.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains 'elipitic shape', which should be 'elliptic shape'. Similar typos appear elsewhere ('intesities', 'Coresponding', 'elipitic').
  4. [Section 3 and Fig. 3] The symbol r0 is used for the electron beam radius in Eq. 5 and for the region of interest in the laser shaping (r0 <= 5 µm in Fig. 3), but the two uses are not explicitly distinguished. Please clarify the definition of r0 in each context, particularly since Section 4 later mentions a 'shaping radius r0 > 5 µm'.
  5. [Appendix C] The misalignment analysis in Eqs. 39-42 considers only static displacement of the correction phase, but the text in Section 4 also recommends 1% rms pulse energy stability. The effect of this intensity noise on the correction phase is not analyzed, even though the large edge phase makes intensity fluctuations a plausible source of residual aberration. A brief estimate would strengthen the practical recommendations.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 8.1 mrad 'aberration-free angle' is the chosen θ_max, and the electron-light simulation is run with g² set to the exact 1−r⁴/r⁴ profiles required by the imposed condition φ = −φ; the actual optimized laser beams are never propagated through the electron model.

  1. self definitional [Section 2, Eq. (4) and the φ = −φ condition; Section 3, Fig. 2 simulation setup]
    "To correct for the electron aberrations acquired in the magnetostatic lens, we need to introduce an opposite phase shift that cancels out the distortions. To achieve ideal aberration correction, the condition φ(θ(x,y)) = −φ(x,y) must be satisfied, which implies that g2(x,y) should exhibit an inverse quartic or quartic profile ... To simulate the images in Fig. 2 (b), (f) and Fig. 2 (d), (h), the g2(x,y) in Eq. 4 was set to 1−r4 and r4, respectively."

    The laser phase φ in Eq. (4) is proportional to g², and the simulation imposes g² = 1−r⁴ or r⁴ selected so that φ is the exact negative of the aberration phase φ. The round shadow images and the cancellation therefore follow from the input by construction (the Fig. 2 caption even states δθ_a = −δθ_L). This is a consistency check of the designed phase profile, not an independent prediction that a realized light field corrects the aberration.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Section 3, electron-beam simulation parameters]
    "Our simulations of electron-light interactions indicate that spherical aberrations can be compensated resulting in an aberration free angle of 8.1 mrad. ... The electron lens has a focal length f = 8 mm (Cs ∝ f3 ~ 80 mm, Δz=0), with a beam diameter at the lens of 130 µm leading to θmax = 8.1 mrad."

    The headline 'aberration free angle of 8.1 mrad' is not a derived output; it is the pre-selected θmax used to set the aperture in the simulation. The simulation demonstrates cancellation over that radius for the ideal g² inserted into Eq. (4), so the quantitative claim is the input parameter renamed as a result, rather than a property established for the actual shaped beams.

full rationale

The paper contains one clearly non-circular component: the gradient-descent beam shaping in Section 3 and Appendix B optimizes a Gaussian beam against external quartic and inverse-quartic target profiles, giving Q² = 0.983 and 0.995; that comparison is meaningful and independent. The circularity is confined to the central electron-light demonstration. The ideal correction phase is defined by the requirement φ = −φ, and then the electron-wave/ray simulations insert exactly the g² = 1−r⁴ and r⁴ forms that make that equality hold (Eq. 4), so the resulting round shadow images and 8.1 mrad 'aberration-free angle' are equivalent to the input by construction. The 8.1 mrad value itself is the chosen θmax, not a predicted limit. Moreover, the actual optimized laser profiles from Figs. 3 and 4 are never propagated through the electron simulation, so residual shaping errors are not quantified in the headline claim. This is a load-bearing gap and a partial circularity, not a full collapse: the concept would still work if a laser field with the ideal quartic/inverse-quartic footprint could be produced, as the authors' stated condition shows. Self-citations for Eq. (4) are not separately counted because the formula is a standard ponderomotive-phase result and is not the locus of the circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central simulation relies on the standard ponderomotive phase model from prior literature (Eq. 4, from Ref. 39) rather than new physics. The only fitted quantities are the Zernike coefficients for the beam-shaping masks and the laser pulse energy chosen to satisfy the correction condition. The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities. The main axiomatic load is the thin phase plate treatment of the laser field and the idealized electron-optical conditions.

free parameters (3)
  • Zernike coefficients for inverse quartic beam (a5, a13, a25, a41, a61, a85) = [0.6547, 0.3183, -0.1863, -0.1290, -0.0024, 0.0298]
    Chosen by gradient descent to shape a Gaussian into an inverse quartic profile; they set the SLM phase mask and are not independently constrained.
  • Zernike coefficients for quartic beam (a5, a13, a25, a41, a61, a85) = [0.6937, 0.0148, -0.3022, 0.0739, 0.0354, -0.0212]
    Chosen by gradient descent combined with an LG03 vortex phase to produce a quartic profile; this is an implementation detail for the correction.
  • Laser pulse energy E_L at the interaction plane = 0.2 microjoule
    Set so the ponderomotive phase amplitude cancels C_s theta^4 in Eq. 1; the total required energy is then E_L divided by the shaping efficiency, so this is a tuned input rather than a prediction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Non-recoil approximation: the electron energy change from the laser is small compared to its mean energy, reducing the Dirac equation to the effective Schroedinger equation (Eq. 2).
    Invoked at the start of Section 2; it underlies the ponderomotive phase formula and is standard for 30 keV electrons at moderate laser intensity.
  • domain assumption Paraxial, monochromatic, counter-propagating geometry for electrons and light in the phase integral leading to Eq. 4.
    Stated after Eq. 4 as limitations; the analytic phase shift and its purely transverse form rely on these conditions.
  • domain assumption Thin sample approximation: the 260 nm Si3N4 film is treated as a binary transmission mask with 0 or 1 transmission, neglecting thickness, elastic scattering, and inelastic effects.
    Stated in Section 3; a real film would attenuate and scatter electrons, which is not modeled.
  • domain assumption Axial uniformity of the laser field over the interaction length, so the laser acts as a thin phase plate.
    Discussion states that a moderate numerical aperture gives an extended depth of focus; the correction formula assumes g^2(x,y) does not vary along the electron path.
  • domain assumption Idealized electron source: fully coherent beam, no vibrations, no higher-order aberrations, no Johnson noise.
    Stated in Section 3 after Fig. 2; these are acknowledged non-idealities that would degrade the correction in practice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design for light-based spherical aberration correction of ultrafast electron microscopes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6URS7FEQ

@misc{pith2026250105157,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design for light-based spherical aberration correction of ultrafast electron microscopes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6URS7FEQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05157}
}
abstract

We theoretically demonstrate that ponderomotive interactions near the electron cross-over can be used for aberration correction in ultrafast electron microscopes. Highly magnified electron shadow images from Si$_3$N$_4$ thin films are utilized to visualize the distortions induced by spherical aberrations. Our simulations of electron-light interactions indicate that spherical aberrations can be compensated resulting in an aberration free angle of \SI{8.1}{mrad}. For achieving the necessary light distribution, we use a gradient descent algorithm to optimize Zernike polynomials and shape the light beam into a modified Gaussian and Laguerre-Gaussian beam.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05157 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Electron trajectories and wavefronts with spherical aberrations (not to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparative illustration of electron-light interaction models at the detector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The intensity distribution of an inverse quartic beam in focus with an NA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Laser beam shaping: (a) Shaped Gaussian beam into a modified LG beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Coresponding intesity profile along a line around the center of images from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Si3N4 thin film at the sample plane. The field of view has a radius of 0.325 µm. the azimuthal frequency such that 𝑛 − |𝑚| is even and |𝑚| ≤ 𝑛. The angle 𝜃𝑧 (expressed in Cartesian coordinates) is defined as follows resulting in values from −𝜋 to 𝜋: 𝜃𝑧 = …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) The Vortex phase mask 𝜙LG03 used as an initial phase (scale bar 1.7 mm) in the gradient descent optimisation algorithm and (b) the Zernike phase mask 𝜙Zsum calculated using the gradient descent algorithm to shape the LG03 into a mode with quartic profile. (c) 𝜙quar…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Theoretical calculation of electron probe shapes: Electron focal spot analysis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Four-dimensional electron microscopy,

    A. H. Zewail, “Four-dimensional electron microscopy,” science328, 187–193 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy: historical development, instrumentation, and applications,

    A. Arbouet, G. M. Caruso, and F. Houdellier, “Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy: historical development, instrumentation, and applications,” Adv. imaging electron physics207, 1–72 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy: Techniques and applications,

    E. Montgomery, D. Leonhardt, and J. Roehling, “Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy: Techniques and applications,” Microsc. Today29, 46–54 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Attosecond electron-beam technology: a review of recent progress,

    Y. Morimoto, “Attosecond electron-beam technology: a review of recent progress,” Microscopy72, 2–17 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy using a laser-driven field emitter: Femtosecond resolution with a high coherence electron beam,

    A. Feist, N. Bach, N. R. da Silva,et al., “Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy using a laser-driven field emitter: Femtosecond resolution with a high coherence electron beam,” Ultramicroscopy176, 63–73 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Development of a high brightness ultrafast transmission electron microscope based on a laser-driven cold field emission source,

    F. Houdellier, G. M. Caruso, S. Weber,et al., “Development of a high brightness ultrafast transmission electron microscope based on a laser-driven cold field emission source,” Ultramicroscopy186, 128–138 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Development of analytical ultrafast transmission electron microscopy based on laser-driven schottky field emission,

    C. Zhu, D. Zheng, H. Wang,et al., “Development of analytical ultrafast transmission electron microscopy based on laser-driven schottky field emission,” Ultramicroscopy209, 112887 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Aspherical-aberration-corrected200kvtransmissionelectronmicroscope,

    M.Haider, H.Rose, S.Uhlemann, et al., “Aspherical-aberration-corrected200kvtransmissionelectronmicroscope,” Ultramicroscopy 75, 53–60 (1998)

    work page 1998

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Advancingthehexapolecs-correctorforthescanningtransmission electron microscope,

    H.Müller,S.Uhlemann,P.Hartel,andM.Haider,“Advancingthehexapolecs-correctorforthescanningtransmission electron microscope,” Microsc. Microanal.12, 442–455 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    Historical aspects of aberration correction,

    H. H. Rose, “Historical aspects of aberration correction,” J. electron microscopy58, 77–85 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    Towards sub-å electron beams,

    O. Krivanek, N. Dellby, and A. Lupini, “Towards sub-å electron beams,” Ultramicroscopy78, 1–11 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Sphericalaberrationcorrectioninascanningtransmissionelectronmicroscope using a sculpted thin film,

    R.Shiloh,R.Remez,P.-H.Lu, et al.,“Sphericalaberrationcorrectioninascanningtransmissionelectronmicroscope using a sculpted thin film,” Ultramicroscopy189, 46–53 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Shaping of electron beams using sculpted thin films,

    D. Roitman, R. Shiloh, P.-H. Lu,et al., “Shaping of electron beams using sculpted thin films,” ACS photonics8, 3394–3405 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Whatspatiallightmodulatorscandoforopticalmicroscopy,

    C.Maurer,A.Jesacher,S.Bernet,andM.Ritsch-Marte,“Whatspatiallightmodulatorscandoforopticalmicroscopy,” Laser & Photonics Rev.5, 81–101 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Roadmap on structured light,

    H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, A. Forbes, M. V. Berry,et al., “Roadmap on structured light,” J. Opt.19, 013001 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging,

    K. M. Hampson, R. Turcotte, D. T. Miller,et al., “Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging,” Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 1–26 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Demonstration of a 2×2 programmable phase plate for electrons,

    J. Verbeeck, A. Béché, K. Müller-Caspary,et al., “Demonstration of a 2×2 programmable phase plate for electrons,” Ultramicroscopy 190, 58–65 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Can a programmable phase plate serve as an aberration corrector in the transmission electron microscope (tem)?

    F. V. Ibáñez, A. Béché, and J. Verbeeck, “Can a programmable phase plate serve as an aberration corrector in the transmission electron microscope (tem)?” (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Design of electrostatic aberration correctors for scanning transmission electron microscopy,

    S. M. Ribet, S. E. Zeltmann, K. C. Bustillo,et al., “Design of electrostatic aberration correctors for scanning transmission electron microscopy,” Microsc. Microanal.29, 1950–1960 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Quantum wavefront shaping with a 48-element programmable phase plate for electrons,

    C.-P. Yu, F. Vega Ibañez, A. Béché, and J. Verbeeck, “Quantum wavefront shaping with a 48-element programmable phase plate for electrons,” SciPost Phys.15, 223 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Generation of nondiffracting electron bessel beams,

    V. Grillo, E. Karimi, G. C. Gazzadi,et al., “Generation of nondiffracting electron bessel beams,” Phys. Rev. X4, 011013 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy,

    B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, and A. H. Zewail, “Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy,” Nature462, 902–906 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Attosecond coherent control of free-electron wave functions using semi-infinite light fields,

    G. M. Vanacore, I. Madan, G. Berruto,et al., “Attosecond coherent control of free-electron wave functions using semi-infinite light fields,” Nat. communications9, 2694 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Ultrafast generation and control of an electron vortex beam via chiral plasmonic near fields,

    G. M. Vanacore, G. Berruto, I. Madan,et al., “Ultrafast generation and control of an electron vortex beam via chiral plasmonic near fields,” Nat. materials18, 573–579 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Electron beam aberration correction using optical near fields,

    A. Konečná and F. J. G. de Abajo, “Electron beam aberration correction using optical near fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030801 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons,

    A. Ben Hayun, O. Reinhardt, J. Nemirovsky,et al., “Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons,” Sci. Adv. 7, eabe4270 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Integrated photonics enables continuous-beam electron phase modulation,

    J.-W. Henke, A. S. Raja, A. Feist,et al., “Integrated photonics enables continuous-beam electron phase modulation,” Nature 600, 653–658 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Imprinting the quantum statistics of photons on free electrons,

    R. Dahan, A. Gorlach, U. Haeusler,et al., “Imprinting the quantum statistics of photons on free electrons,” Science 373, eabj7128 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Cavity-mediated electron-photon pairs,

    A. Feist, G. Huang, G. Arend,et al., “Cavity-mediated electron-photon pairs,” Science377, 777–780 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Ultrafast transverse modulation of free electrons by interaction with shaped optical fields,

    I. Madan, V. Leccese, A. Mazur,et al., “Ultrafast transverse modulation of free electrons by interaction with shaped optical fields,” ACS photonics9, 3215–3224 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Tunable photon-induced spatial modulation of free electrons,

    S. Tsesses, R. Dahan, K. Wang,et al., “Tunable photon-induced spatial modulation of free electrons,” Nat. Mater.22, 345–352 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Spatiotemporal electron beam focusing through parallel interactions with shaped optical fields,

    F. J. García de Abajo and C. Ropers, “Spatiotemporal electron beam focusing through parallel interactions with shaped optical fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 246901 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    High-intensity kapitza-dirac effect,

    P. H. Bucksbaum, D. W. Schumacher, and M. Bashkansky, “High-intensity kapitza-dirac effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1182–1185 (1988)

    1988

  26. [34]

    Observation of the kapitza–dirac effect,

    D. L. Freimund, K. Aflatooni, and H. Batelaan, “Observation of the kapitza–dirac effect,” Nature413, 142–143 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    Femtosecond electron diffraction:‘making the molecular movie’,

    J. R. Dwyer, C. T. Hebeisen, R. Ernstorfer,et al., “Femtosecond electron diffraction:‘making the molecular movie’,” Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.364, 741–778 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    Ponderomotive Generation and Detection of Attosecond Free-Electron Pulse Trains,

    M. Kozák, N. Schönenberger, and P. Hommelhoff, “Ponderomotive Generation and Detection of Attosecond Free-Electron Pulse Trains,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 103203 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Laser phase plate for transmission electron microscopy,

    O. Schwartz, J. J. Axelrod, S. L. Campbell,et al., “Laser phase plate for transmission electron microscopy,” Nat. methods 16, 1016–1020 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Observation of the relativistic reversal of the ponderomotive potential,

    J. J. Axelrod, S. L. Campbell, O. Schwartz,et al., “Observation of the relativistic reversal of the ponderomotive potential,” Phys. review letters124, 174801 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Transverse electron-beam shaping with light,

    M. C. Chirita Mihaila, P. Weber, M. Schneller,et al., “Transverse electron-beam shaping with light,” Phys. Rev. X12, 031043 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free-electron matter waves,

    M. Tsarev, J. W. Thurner, and P. Baum, “Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free-electron matter waves,” Nat. Phys. 19, 1350–1354 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Inelastic electron scattering at a single-beam structured light wave,

    S. Ebel and N. Talebi, “Inelastic electron scattering at a single-beam structured light wave,” Commun. Phys.6, 179 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Electron vortex beams for chirality probing at the nanoscale,

    N. L. Streshkova, P. Koutensk`y, and M. Kozák, “Electron vortex beams for chirality probing at the nanoscale,” Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 054017 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Monochromatization of electron beams with spatially and temporally modulated optical fields,

    N. L. Streshkova, P. Koutensk`y, T. Novotn`y, and M. Kozák, “Monochromatization of electron beams with spatially and temporally modulated optical fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 213801 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Free-space optical modulation of free electrons in the continuous-wave regime,

    C. I. Velasco and F. de Abajo, “Free-space optical modulation of free electrons in the continuous-wave regime,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03410 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Opticalmodulationofelectronbeamsinfreespace,

    F.J.G.deAbajoandA.Konečná, “Opticalmodulationofelectronbeamsinfreespace,”Phys.Rev.Lett. 126, 123901 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Electron round lenses with negative spherical aberration by a tightly focused cylindrically polarized light beam,

    Y. Uesugi, Y. Kozawa, and S. Sato, “Electron round lenses with negative spherical aberration by a tightly focused cylindrically polarized light beam,” Phys. Rev. Appl.16, L011002 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Properties of electron lenses produced by ponderomotive potential with bessel and laguerre–gaussian beams,

    Y. Uesugi, Y. Kozawa, and S. Sato, “Properties of electron lenses produced by ponderomotive potential with bessel and laguerre–gaussian beams,” J. Opt.24, 054013 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    A new way of measuring microscope aberrations,

    W. Saxton, “A new way of measuring microscope aberrations,” Ultramicroscopy81, 41–45 (2000)

    2000

  41. [49]

    Adjustment of a stem instrument by use of shadow images,

    J. Cowley, “Adjustment of a stem instrument by use of shadow images,” Ultramicroscopy4, 413–418 (1979)

    1979

  42. [50]

    Calibration of the operating parameters for an hb5 stem instrument,

    J. Lin and J. Cowley, “Calibration of the operating parameters for an hb5 stem instrument,” Ultramicroscopy19, 31–42 (1986)

    1986

  43. [51]

    Practical aspects of atomic resolution imaging and analysis in stem,

    E. James and N. Browning, “Practical aspects of atomic resolution imaging and analysis in stem,” Ultramicroscopy 78, 125–139 (1999)

    1999

  44. [52]

    Scanning transmission electron microscopy and its application to the study of nanoparticles and nanoparticle systems,

    J. Liu, “Scanning transmission electron microscopy and its application to the study of nanoparticles and nanoparticle systems,” J. electron microscopy54, 251–278 (2005)

    2005

  45. [53]

    Measurementmethodofaberrationfromronchigrambyautocorrelation function,

    H.Sawada,T.Sannomiya,F.Hosokawa, et al.,“Measurementmethodofaberrationfromronchigrambyautocorrelation function,” Ultramicroscopy108, 1467–1475 (2008)

    2008

  46. [54]

    Some simplified methods of determining the optical characteristics of electron lenses,

    K. Spangenberg and L. M. Field, “Some simplified methods of determining the optical characteristics of electron lenses,” Proc. IRE30, 138–144 (1942)

    1942

  47. [55]

    Unipotential electrostatic lenses: Paraxial properties and aberrations of focal length and focal point,

    G. F. Rempfer, “Unipotential electrostatic lenses: Paraxial properties and aberrations of focal length and focal point,” J. applied physics57, 2385–2401 (1985)

    1985

  48. [56]

    Simultaneous correction of spherical and chromatic aberrations with an electron mirror: an electron optical achromat,

    G. F. Rempfer, D. M. Desloge, W. P. Skoczylas, and O. H. Griffith, “Simultaneous correction of spherical and chromatic aberrations with an electron mirror: an electron optical achromat,” Microsc. Microanal.3, 14–27 (1997)

    1997

  49. [57]

    The theoretical resolution limit of the electron microscope,

    O. Scherzer, “The theoretical resolution limit of the electron microscope,” J. Appl. Phys.20, 20–29 (1949)

    1949

  50. [58]

    Optical modulation of electron beams in free space,

    F. J. García de Abajo and A. Konečná, “Optical modulation of electron beams in free space,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 123901 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Electron beam shaping with light,

    M. C. Chirita Mihaila, “Electron beam shaping with light,” Phd diss., University of Vienna (2022). See pp. 39

    2022

  52. [60]

    Thermal magnetic field noise limits resolution in transmission electron microscopy,

    S. Uhlemann, H. Müller, P. Hartel,et al., “Thermal magnetic field noise limits resolution in transmission electron microscopy,” Phys. review letters111, 046101 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    Phase correction for a distorted orbital angular momentum beam using a zernike polynomials-based stochastic-parallel-gradient-descent algorithm,

    G. Xie, Y. Ren, H. Huang,et al., “Phase correction for a distorted orbital angular momentum beam using a zernike polynomials-based stochastic-parallel-gradient-descent algorithm,” Opt. letters40, 1197–1200 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures,

    R. W. Gerchberg, “A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures,” Optik 35, 237–246 (1972)

    1972

  55. [63]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical optimization (Springer, 1999)

    1999

  56. [64]

    Silicon nitride waveguide as a power delivery component for on-chip dielectric laser accelerators,

    S. Tan, Z. Zhao, K. Urbanek,et al., “Silicon nitride waveguide as a power delivery component for on-chip dielectric laser accelerators,” Opt. letters44, 335–338 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Compression of subrelativistic space-charge-dominated electron bunches for single-shot femtosecond electron diffraction,

    T. Van Oudheusden, P. Pasmans, S. Van Der Geer,et al., “Compression of subrelativistic space-charge-dominated electron bunches for single-shot femtosecond electron diffraction,” Phys. review letters105, 264801 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    Femtosecond electron spectroscopy in an electron microscope with high brightness beams,

    F. Zhou, J. Williams, and C.-Y. Ruan, “Femtosecond electron spectroscopy in an electron microscope with high brightness beams,” Chem. Phys. Lett.683, 488–494 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Activecontrolofbrightelectronbeamswithrfopticsforfemtosecondmicroscopy,

    J.Williams,F.Zhou,T.Sun, et al.,“Activecontrolofbrightelectronbeamswithrfopticsforfemtosecondmicroscopy,” Struct. Dyn.4(2017)

    2017

  60. [68]

    Laser-induced skyrmion writing and erasing in an ultrafast cryo-lorentz transmission electron microscope,

    G. Berruto, I. Madan, Y. Murooka,et al., “Laser-induced skyrmion writing and erasing in an ultrafast cryo-lorentz transmission electron microscope,” Phys. review letters120, 117201 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    Nanoscale mapping of ultrafast magnetization dynamics with femtosecond lorentz microscopy,

    N. Rubiano da Silva, M. Möller, A. Feist,et al., “Nanoscale mapping of ultrafast magnetization dynamics with femtosecond lorentz microscopy,” Phys. Rev. X8, 031052 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    Imaging of transient structures using nanosecond in situ tem,

    J. S. Kim, T. LaGrange, B. W. Reed,et al., “Imaging of transient structures using nanosecond in situ tem,” Science 321, 1472–1475 (2008)

    2008

  63. [71]

    Development of an ultrafast pulsed ponderomotive phase plate for cryo-electron tomography,

    D. X. Du, A. C. Bartnik, C. J. Duncan,et al., “Development of an ultrafast pulsed ponderomotive phase plate for cryo-electron tomography,” bioRxiv pp. 2024–03 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Matlab version: 9.13.0 (r2022b),

    T. M. Inc., “Matlab version: 9.13.0 (r2022b),” (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    D. G. Voelz,Computational fourier optics: a MATLAB tutorial , vol. 534 (SPIE press Bellingham, Washington, 2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    Zernike polynomials: a guide,

    V. Lakshminarayanan and A. Fleck, “Zernike polynomials: a guide,” J. Mod. Opt.58, 545–561 (2011)

    2011

  67. [75]

    New phase and amplitude high resolution pulse shaper,

    A. Monmayrant and B. Chatel, “New phase and amplitude high resolution pulse shaper,” Rev. Sci. Instruments75, 2668–2671 (2004)

    2004

  68. [76]

    Susceptibility to and correction of azimuthal aberrations in singular light beams,

    B. R. Boruah and M. Neil, “Susceptibility to and correction of azimuthal aberrations in singular light beams,” Opt. express 14, 10377–10385 (2006)

    2006

  69. [77]

    Wave-front correction and production of zernike modes with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator,

    G. D. Love, “Wave-front correction and production of zernike modes with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator,” Appl. optics36, 1517–1524 (1997)

    1997

  70. [78]

    Upper limits for the residual aberrations of a high-resolution aberration- corrected stem,

    M. Haider, S. Uhlemann, and J. Zach, “Upper limits for the residual aberrations of a high-resolution aberration- corrected stem,” Ultramicroscopy81, 163–175 (2000)

    2000

  71. [79]

    Reimer,Transmission electron microscopy: physics of image formation and microanalysis , vol

    L. Reimer,Transmission electron microscopy: physics of image formation and microanalysis , vol. 36 (Springer, 2013). See pp. 39

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.