Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 98 references

Machine Learning Force-Field Approach for Itinerant Electron Magnets

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A machine-learned force field for spin dynamics predicts local fields in itinerant magnets, reproduces three non-collinear orders, and shows skyrmion crystals freezing into a glassy stripe state.

desk verdict Careful ML-LLG benchmarks on top of an established descriptor, but the headline skyrmion-freezing claim rests on a locality cutoff that needs a direct test before I'd trust it. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06171 v1 pith:ZB3TP27N submitted 2025-01-10 cond-mat.str-el cs.LGphysics.comp-ph

Sheng Zhang , Yunhao Fan , Kotaro Shimizu , Gia-Wei Chern This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcs.LGphysics.comp-ph
keywords machinelearningforcefieldsLandau-Lifshitz-Gilbertdynamicsskyrmioncrystalitinerantelectronmagnetss-dmodelsymmetry-invariantdescriptorsreferenceirreduciblerepresentationsglassystate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a machine-learned force field can replace the expensive quantum-mechanical calculation of local exchange fields in itinerant electron magnets, making large-scale spin-dynamics simulations practical. The approach assumes the effective energy of a spin depends only on its immediate neighborhood, and encodes that neighborhood with descriptors invariant under both global spin rotations and the lattice point group. Trained on exact data from the triangular-lattice s-d model, the method reproduces 120-degree, tetrahedral, and skyrmion-crystal orders. In 150x150 thermal quenches, the skyrmion crystal fails to order globally and freezes into a glassy stripe state of skyrmions and bimerons.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the magnetic descriptor: a mapping from the local spin configuration $C_i$ to invariant feature variables. Starting from bond variables $b_{jk} = \mathbf{S}_j \cdot \mathbf{S}_k$ and scalar chiralities $\chi_{jmn} = \mathbf{S}_j \cdot \mathbf{S}_m \times \mathbf{S}_n$, the paper decomposes them into irreducible representations of the $D_6$ site-symmetry group and uses reference irreducible representations to supply the phase information missing from a power-spectrum descriptor. The resulting features are invariant under global spin rotations and lattice point-group operations, differentiable with respect to spin rotations, and are fed into a feedforward neural network that outputs the local energy $\epsilon_i$; automatic differentiation then yields the local field $\mathbf{H}_i = -\partial E/\partial \mathbf{S}_i$.

What would settle it

Retrain the model with a larger cutoff radius, for example $r_c = 10a$, and repeat the 150x150 thermal quench; if the frozen stripe state and plateaued triple-Q order disappear, the glassy state is a truncation artifact rather than a physical property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a machine-learning force field of the local-energy type, built from reference irreducible representations of the site-symmetry group, gives local effective fields accurate enough to drive faithful Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics for the s-d model. Because the local energy is a symmetry-invariant function of bond and scalar-chirality variables in a cutoff neighborhood, the predicted torques respect the model's global spin-rotation and lattice point-group symmetries by construction. The trained models reproduce the 120-degree, tetrahedral, and triple-Q skyrmion-crystal phases of the triangular-lattice s-d model, with torque errors around $10^{-7}$. Large-scale quenches then reveal that skyrmion crystallization is arrested: the system freezes into disordered stripe structures containing skyrmions and bimerons, with a ring-like structure factor and a plateaued triple-Q order parameter, which the paper interprets as a glassy skyrmion state.

Load-bearing premise

The local energy of a spin is assumed to depend only on spins within roughly six lattice constants, while the electron-mediated interactions that stabilize skyrmion order are long-ranged and oscillatory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • LLG simulations using only ML-predicted local fields reproduce the 120-degree, tetrahedral, and skyrmion-crystal orders, so the energy landscape learned from local neighborhoods is sufficient for these ordered phases.
  • The quench dynamics of the skyrmion crystal show arrested growth of the triple-Q order and a ring-like structure factor, implying the system gets stuck in metastable stripe states rather than crystallizing.
  • The same framework extends to systems with spin-orbit coupling by replacing the separate spin-rotation and lattice symmetries with a combined spin-lattice symmetry group.
  • Because the local field is computed from a fixed-size neural network, simulation cost scales linearly with system size, enabling 150x150 lattices that would be prohibitive with repeated exact diagonalization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The frozen stripe state may be sensitive to the locality cutoff: skyrmion order in s-d models is mediated by long-range oscillatory electron-mediated interactions, so correlations beyond the $6a$ cutoff could in principle change the balance between single-Q and triple-Q states.
  • A direct test is to retrain with increasing cutoff and check whether the arrested phase and glassy state persist; if they vanish, the glass is a truncation artifact.
  • The descriptor construction from bond and chirality variables should transfer to other two-dimensional Bravais lattices and to three-dimensional magnets, where the relevant point groups have larger irreducible representations.
  • The method's ability to reach large systems cheaply makes it a candidate for scanning parameter space of frustrated itinerant models for metastable topological textures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Behler-Parrinello-type machine-learned force field for adiabatic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) dynamics of s-d itinerant electron magnets. The proposed magnetic descriptors decompose bond and chirality variables into irreducible representations (IRs) of the lattice point group and use a reference-IR construction to recover phase information lost in a power-spectrum representation. The authors train feedforward neural networks on KPM-computed local fields for three triangular-lattice s-d models (120-degree order, tetrahedral order, and a triple-Q skyrmion crystal), report torque MSEs on the order of 1e-7, and use the ML surrogate to perform 150x150 thermal quenches. The central new physics claim is that the skyrmion crystal exhibits arrested phase ordering: the system freezes into stripe and bimeron textures rather than forming a large coherent triple-Q skyrmion crystal.

Significance. If the central result holds, the paper is a useful demonstration that ML force fields can extend spin-dynamics simulations of itinerant magnets to system sizes inaccessible to direct KPM or ED, and the reference-IR descriptor construction is a meaningful methodological contribution. The paper ships concrete benchmarks: held-out torque MSEs, a KPM-vs-ML comparison of time-dependent structure factors on 48x48 lattices (Fig. 5), and a stability check of the ML skyrmion crystal under perturbation (Fig. 6). These support accuracy for in-distribution 48x48 dynamics. However, the headline physical result depends on the ML energy landscape being faithful for late-time 150x150 textures whose ordering period equals the locality cutoff, and on the model resolving the near-degeneracy among single-, double-, and triple-Q states. That load-bearing point is not yet benchmarked, so the significance of the central claim is currently conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.C / Section V] The locality cutoff rc=6a is commensurate with the magnetic period of the skyrmion ordering: the ordering wave vectors are Q1=(pi/3a,0) and rotations, so the period along the ordering direction is exactly 6a. The effective spin interactions in s-d models are RKKY-like and long-ranged (Eq. (6) and surrounding text), and Section V states that the single-, double-, and triple-Q states are nearly degenerate in energy. Neither the torque MSE in Fig. 3 nor the 48x48 structure-factor comparison in Fig. 5 establishes that omitting spin correlations beyond rc=6a is harmless for the 150x150 late-time stripe and bimeron configurations. Because the ordering period equals the cutoff, the truncation could bias the relative stability of the competing Q states and manufacture the observed arrested glassy behavior. Please provide a quantitative test, such as a KPM-vs-ML comparison of M(t) and L(t) on the largest feasible lattice (96x96 or 120x120) at late times, and an estimate of the energy contribution from spins beyond rc for representative single-, double-, triple-Q, and late-time stripe states.
  2. [Section V] The paper reports that 'using high precision KPM, we found that the single, double, and triple-Q states are nearly degenerate in energy, with a slightly lowered energy for the triple-Q skyrmion crystal,' but it gives no numerical values for these energy differences and no ML prediction of them. The training loss is dominated by torque MSEs of order 1e-7, but no energy error or energy ranking of the competing states is reported. If the energy differences controlling the Q-state competition are smaller than the ML energy error, the ML landscape can invert the ordering and the arrested phase ordering would be an artifact. Please report the KPM and ML energies for single-Q, double-Q, triple-Q, and the late-time stripe/bimeron configurations, and show that the ML model ranks them in the same order as the exact KPM energies.
  3. [Section IV.A] The dataset provenance is stated inconsistently: the text says the 40,000 configurations were obtained 'from 40 independent ED-LLG simulations' and then says 'The training dataset was obtained from KPM-based LLG simulations on a relatively small 48x48 lattice.' These are different solvers. This matters for reproducibility and for assessing whether the ML model learns exact or approximate local fields. Please clarify which solver generated the training data and whether ED and KPM were cross-checked for the training configurations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV.C / Fig. 3 caption] The heading 'T riple-Q Skyrmion lattice' and the phrase 'tripe-Q structure' in Fig. 3(i) contain typos and should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (34)] In Eq. (34), the first component reads 'cos Q1i - 1/2 cos Q2i - 1/2 Q3i'; the last term is missing the cosine and should presumably be '-1/2 cos Q3i'.
  3. [Section II.B] Eq. (7) defines the neighborhood Ci by a hard cutoff rc, while Eq. (11) introduces a soft cutoff function fc(r) with a smoothing width. Please clarify whether the hard and soft cutoffs are the same radius and whether the soft cutoff is used in the final feature construction.
  4. [Section III.D / Fig. 2(d)] The definition of the six symmetry-related blocks used for the reference IR is not precise: the caption says the blocks 'can partially overlap with each other,' but the assignment rule and the averaging procedure should be specified in the text, because the reference basis depends on this choice.
  5. [General] The paper would benefit from a data/code availability statement. Given the methodological nature of the work, making the descriptor and training code available would substantially improve reproducibility.
  6. [Introduction / Section VI] The relation to prior work by the same group (Refs. [41], [43], [47]) is described only by citations; a short explicit sentence distinguishing the new contribution of this paper (the reference-IR descriptor demonstration with the arrested-ordering result) would help the reader understand the incremental advance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ML model is trained on independent KPM/ED data and its dynamical predictions are benchmarked against exact LLG trajectories, with no fitted quantity renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The ML force field is trained on local energies and fields obtained from KPM/ED solutions of the same s-d Hamiltonian (Sec. IV), and the claimed results are dynamical extrapolations validated by direct comparison with KPM-based LLG simulations on 48x48 lattices, including time-dependent structure factors (Fig. 5) and restored skyrmion crystals (Fig. 6). The locality assumption E = sum_i epsilon(C_i) with C_i within rc=6a (Eqs. 7-8) is a modeling approximation, not an equation that reduces the prediction to its inputs; whether the cutoff is adequate for long-range RKKY-like interactions is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity. The reference-IR descriptor is presented with explicit formulas (Eqs. 16-27), and although it originates from prior same-group work [41,48], that work supplies an explicit algorithm rather than an unverified uniqueness theorem, and the descriptor is not used to forbid alternative choices. Self-citations such as Ref. [47] provide supplementary dynamical benchmarks and are not load-bearing for the paper's main arrested-ordering claim. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation is equivalent by construction to a target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. 'Reference irreducible representations' is a mathematical construction, not a physical entity.

free parameters (5)
  • Neighborhood cutoff radius rc = 6a
    Defines the local environment in Eq. (7); spins beyond 6 lattice constants are ignored. If RKKY interactions extend past this, the ML energy misses them. Chosen by hand, not fitted.
  • Off-center correlation cutoff lc = 2a
    Only bond/chirality variables with |rm - rn| <= lc are included to keep O(M^3) count manageable (Section III.A).
  • Loss function weight eta_E
    Appears in Eq. (29) but its value is not reported; if small, the torque dominates training, if large, energy accuracy dominates. Uncontrolled hyperparameter.
  • Neural network architecture = 2048x1024x512x256x128x64x64x64 with 1806 inputs
    Chosen by hand with no ablation; affects accuracy and generalization.
  • Training dataset size = 40,000 snapshots
    Used for each benchmark; no study of data scaling.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Adiabatic (Born-Oppenheimer) approximation: electrons stay in instantaneous equilibrium with the spin configuration.
    Section II.A, Eqs. (4)-(5): local field is derivative of equilibrium energy. Fails if electron dynamics are slow relative to spins.
  • domain assumption Classical spin approximation |Si|=1.
    Section II.A, after Eq. (1). Appropriate for large local moments, but neglects quantum spin fluctuations.
  • domain assumption Locality principle: local energy depends only on spins within cutoff radius rc.
    Section II.B, Eqs. (7)-(8). Central to the ML force-field construction; long-range RKKY tails beyond rc are truncated.
  • domain assumption Bond and chirality variables (bjk, chi_jmn) generate all SO(3)-invariant spin correlations.
    Section III.A, Eq. (10). The NN nonlinearity is assumed to capture higher-order invariants from these building blocks.
  • standard math D6 point-group decomposition and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for triangular lattice.
    Section III.C-D, Eqs. (16)-(20). Standard group theory, assumed correct for the lattice.
  • standard math Universal approximation theorem for feedforward NNs.
    Section II.B, cited Refs. [64,65]. Justifies NN representation of the local energy function.
  • ad hoc to paper Reference IR averaged over six symmetry-related blocks is stable and representative.
    Section III.D, Fig. 2(d). The choice to average over blocks is a methodological assumption; no proof of robustness is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Machine Learning Force-Field Approach for Itinerant Electron Magnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZB3TP27N

@misc{pith2026250106171,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Machine Learning Force-Field Approach for Itinerant Electron Magnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZB3TP27N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06171}
}
abstract

We review the recent development of machine-learning (ML) force-field frameworks for Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) dynamics simulations of itinerant electron magnets, focusing on the general theory and implementations of symmetry-invariant representations of spin configurations. The crucial properties that such magnetic descriptors must satisfy are differentiability with respect to spin rotations and invariance to both lattice point-group symmetry and internal spin rotation symmetry. We propose an efficient implementation based on the concept of reference irreducible representations, modified from the group-theoretical power-spectrum and bispectrum methods. The ML framework is demonstrated using the s-d models, which are widely applied in spintronics research. We show that LLG simulations based on local fields predicted by the trained ML models successfully reproduce representative non-collinear spin structures, including 120$^\circ$, tetrahedral, and skyrmion crystal orders of the triangular-lattice s-d models. Large-scale thermal quench simulations enabled by ML models further reveal intriguing freezing dynamics and glassy stripe states consisting of skyrmions and bi-merons. Our work highlights the utility of ML force-field approach to dynamical modeling of complex spin orders in itinerant electron magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06171 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of ML force-field model for itinerant electron magnets. A descriptor transforms the neighborhood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Symmetry-invariant descriptor for the neighborhood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Top row: Comparison between the component-wise ML-predicted torques [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Snapshots of local scalar chirality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of time-dependent structure factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. ML-based LLG simulation on a 48 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Snapshots of spin configurations obtained from ML-LLG simulations of thermal quench dynamics. The system size is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Left four panels (a): The structure factor density plots of the ML-LLG 150 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    vortices

    A. N. Bogdanov and D. Yablonskii, Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of magnets, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 95, 178 (1989)

    1989

  2. [2]

    U. K. R¨ oßler, A. N. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Sponta- neous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals, Nature 442, 797 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    M¨ uhlbauer, B

    S. M¨ uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. B¨ oni, Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet, Science 323, 915 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Real-space ob- servation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature 465, 901 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    X. Z. Yu, N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, K. Kimoto, W. Z. Zhang, S. Ishiwata, Y. Matsui, and Y. Tokura, Near room-temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin-films of the helimagnet fege, Nature Materials 10, 106 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    S. Seki, X. Z. Yu, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Observa- tion of skyrmions in a multiferroic material, Science 336, 198 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy 8, 899 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    C. D. Batista, S.-Z. Lin, S. Hayami, and Y. Kamiya, Frus- tration and chiral orderings in correlated electron sys- tems, Rep. Prog. Phys 79, 084504 (2016)

    2016

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Topological spin crystals by itinerant frustration, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, 443001 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Chern, Novel magnetic orders and ice phases in frustrated kondo-lattice models, SPIN 05, 1540006 (2015)

    G.-W. Chern, Novel magnetic orders and ice phases in frustrated kondo-lattice models, SPIN 05, 1540006 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect Exchange Cou- pling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Elec- trons, Phys. Rev. 96, 99 (1954)

    1954

  4. [12]

    Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s Model, Prog

    T. Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s Model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 45 (1956)

    1956

  5. [13]

    Yosida, Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys, Phys

    K. Yosida, Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys, Phys. Rev. 106, 893 (1957)

    1957

  6. [14]

    Martin and C

    I. Martin and C. D. Batista, Itinerant Electron-Driven Chiral Magnetic Ordering and Spontaneous Quantum Hall Effect in Triangular Lattice Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156402 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Chern, Noncoplanar Magnetic Ordering Driven by Itinerant Electrons on the Pyrochlore Lattice, Phys

    G.-W. Chern, Noncoplanar Magnetic Ordering Driven by Itinerant Electrons on the Pyrochlore Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 226403 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Multiple-Q instability by (d− 2)-dimensional connections of Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 90, 060402 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, N´ eel- and Bloch-Type Mag- netic Vortices in Rashba Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 137202 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Z. Wang, Y. Su, S.-Z. Lin, and C. D. Batista, Skyrmion crystal from RKKY interaction mediated by 2d electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 207201 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Square skyrmion crystal in centrosymmetric itinerant magnets, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024439 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    L. D. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion. 8, 153 (1935)

    1935

  13. [21]

    Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in fer- romagnetic materials, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 40, 3443 (2004)

    T. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in fer- romagnetic materials, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 40, 3443 (2004)

    2004

  14. [22]

    Kohn, Density functional and density matrix method scaling linearly with the number of atoms, Phys

    W. Kohn, Density functional and density matrix method scaling linearly with the number of atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3168 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    Prodan and W

    E. Prodan and W. Kohn, Nearsightedness of electronic matter, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 11635 (2005)

    2005

  16. [24]

    Behler and M

    J. Behler and M. Parrinello, Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy sur- faces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    A. P. Bart´ ok, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, and G. Cs´ anyi, Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Z. Li, J. R. Kermode, and A. De Vita, Molecular dy- namics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum- mechanical forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096405 (2015). 17

    2015

  19. [27]

    A. V. Shapeev, Moment tensor potentials: A class of sys- tematically improvable interatomic potentials, Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 14, 1153 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 145, 170901 (2016)

    J. Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 145, 170901 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    V. Botu, R. Batra, J. Chapman, and R. Ramprasad, Ma- chine learning force fields: Construction, validation, and outlook, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, 511 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    J. S. Smith, O. Isayev, and A. E. Roitberg, Ani-1: an extensible neural network potential with dft accuracy at force field computational cost, Chem. Sci. 8, 3192 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Zhang, J

    L. Zhang, J. Han, H. Wang, R. Car, and W. E, Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 143001 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    V. L. Deringer, M. A. Caro, and G. Csanyi, Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for ma- terials science, Advanced Materials 31, 1902765 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    R. T. McGibbon, A. G. Taube, A. G. Donchev, K. Siva, F. Hernandez, C. Hargus, K.-H. Law, J. L. Klepeis, and D. E. Shaw, Improving the accuracy of m¨ oller-plesset per- turbation theory with neural networks, The Journal of Chemical Physics 147, 161725 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    H. Suwa, J. S. Smith, N. Lubbers, C. D. Batista, G.-W. Chern, and K. Barros, Machine learning for molecular dynamics with strongly correlated electrons, Phys. Rev. B 99, 161107 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Chmiela, A

    S. Chmiela, A. Tkatchenko, H. E. Sauceda, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Sch¨ utt, and K.-R. M¨ uller, Machine learning of ac- curate energy-conserving molecular force fields, Science Advances 3, e1603015 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Chmiela, H

    S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, K.-R. M¨ uller, and A. Tkatchenko, Towards exact molecular dynamics sim- ulations with machine-learned force fields, Nature Com- munications 9, 3887 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, S. Chmiela, K.-R. M¨ uller, and A. Tkatchenko, Molecular force fields with gradient- domain machine learning (GDML): Comparison and syn- ergies with classical force fields, The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, 124109 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Sch¨ utt, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. M¨ uller, Machine learning force fields, Chemical Reviews 121, 10142 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Zhang, P

    P. Zhang, P. Saha, and G.-W. Chern, Machine learning dynamics of phase separation in correlated electron mag- nets (2020), arXiv:2006.04205 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Zhang and G.-W

    P. Zhang and G.-W. Chern, Arrested phase separation in double-exchange models: Large-scale simulation en- abled by machine learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 146401 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Zhang, S

    P. Zhang, S. Zhang, and G.-W. Chern, Descriptors for machine learning model of generalized force field in con- densed matter systems (2022), arXiv:2201.00798 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Zhang, P

    S. Zhang, P. Zhang, and G.-W. Chern, Anomalous phase separation in a correlated electron system: Machine- learning enabled large-scale kinetic monte carlo simula- tions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119957119 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Zhang and G.-W

    P. Zhang and G.-W. Chern, Machine learning nonequilib- rium electron forces for spin dynamics of itinerant mag- nets, npj Computational Materials 9, 32 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Cheng, S

    C. Cheng, S. Zhang, and G.-W. Chern, Machine learn- ing for phase ordering dynamics of charge density waves, Phys. Rev. B 108, 014301 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Cheng, S

    X. Cheng, S. Zhang, P. C. H. Nguyen, S. Azarfar, G.-W. Chern, and S. S. Baek, Convolutional neural networks for large-scale dynamical modeling of itinerant magnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033188 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Ghosh, S

    S. Ghosh, S. Zhang, C. Cheng, and G.-W. Chern, Kinet- ics of orbital ordering in cooperative jahn-teller models: Machine-learning enabled large-scale simulations, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 123602 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Y. Fan, S. Zhang, and G.-W. Chern, Coarsening of chi- ral domains in itinerant electron magnets: A machine learning force-field approach, Phys. Rev. B 110, 245105 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    J. Ma, P. Zhang, Y. Tan, A. W. Ghosh, and G.-W. Chern, Machine learning electron correlation in a disor- dered medium, Phys. Rev. B 99, 085118 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Y.-H. Liu, S. Zhang, P. Zhang, T.-K. Lee, and G.- W. Chern, Machine learning predictions for local elec- tronic properties of disordered correlated electron sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 035131 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Z. Tian, S. Zhang, and G.-W. Chern, Machine learning for structure-property mapping of Ising models: Scala- bility and limitations, Phys. Rev. E 108, 065304 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Behler, Atom-centered symmetry functions for con- structing high-dimensional neural network potentials, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 074106 (2011)

    J. Behler, Atom-centered symmetry functions for con- structing high-dimensional neural network potentials, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 074106 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    L. M. Ghiringhelli, J. Vybiral, S. V. Levchenko, C. Draxl, and M. Scheffler, Big data of materials science: Criti- cal role of the descriptor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    A. P. Bart´ ok, R. Kondor, and G. Cs´ anyi, On representing chemical environments, Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Drautz, Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials, Phys

    R. Drautz, Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials, Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Himanen, M

    L. Himanen, M. O. J¨ ager, E. V. Morooka, F. Federici Canova, Y. S. Ranawat, D. Z. Gao, P. Rinke, and A. S. Foster, Dscribe: Library of descriptors for machine learn- ing in materials science, Computer Physics Communica- tions 247, 106949 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Huo and M

    H. Huo and M. Rupp, Unified representation of molecules and crystals for machine learning, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 3, 045017 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    J. L. Garc ´ ıa-Palacios and F. J. L´ azaro, Langevin- dynamics study of the dynamical properties of small mag- netic particles, Phys. Rev. B 58, 14937 (1998)

    1998

  50. [58]

    Marx and J

    D. Marx and J. Hutter, Ab initio molecular dynamics: basic theory and advanced methods (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2009)

    2009

  51. [59]

    Momoi, K

    T. Momoi, K. Kubo, and K. Niki, Possible chiral phase transition in two-dimensional solid 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2081 (1997)

    1997

  52. [60]

    Akagi, M

    Y. Akagi, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, Hidden Multiple-Spin Interactions as an Origin of Spin Scalar Chiral Order in Frustrated Kondo Lattice Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 096401 (2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    Weiße, G

    A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, The kernel polynomial method, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275 (2006)

    2006

  54. [62]

    Barros and Y

    K. Barros and Y. Kato, Efficient langevin simulation of coupled classical fields and fermions, Phys. Rev. B 88, 18 235101 (2013)

    2013

  55. [63]

    Wang, G.-W

    Z. Wang, G.-W. Chern, C. D. Batista, and K. Bar- ros, Gradient-based stochastic estimation of the density matrix, The Journal of Chemical Physics 148, 094107 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Cybenko, Approximation by superpositions of a sig- moidal function, Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems 2, 303 (1989)

    G. Cybenko, Approximation by superpositions of a sig- moidal function, Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems 2, 303 (1989)

    1989

  57. [65]

    Hornik, M

    K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators, Neu- ral Networks 2, 359 (1989)

    1989

  58. [66]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, and A. Lerer, Automatic differentiation in pytorch, in NIPS 2017 Workshop on Autodiff (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    A. G. Baydin, B. A. Pearlmutter, A. A. Radul, and J. M. Siskind, Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey, Journal of Machine Learning Research 18, 1 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    M. Shi, S. Zhang, and G.-W. Chern, Machine learn- ing force-field models for metallic spin glass (2023), arXiv:2311.16964 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Kondor, A novel set of rotationally and transla- tionally invariant features for images based on the non-commutative bispectrum (2007), arXiv:cs/0701127 [cs.CV]

    R. Kondor, A novel set of rotationally and transla- tionally invariant features for images based on the non-commutative bispectrum (2007), arXiv:cs/0701127 [cs.CV]

    2007 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Hamermesh, Group Theory and Its Application to Physical Problems (Dover, New York, 1962)

    M. Hamermesh, Group Theory and Its Application to Physical Problems (Dover, New York, 1962)

    1962

  63. [71]

    Akagi and Y

    Y. Akagi and Y. Motome, Spin chirality ordering and anomalous hall effect in the ferromagnetic kondo lattice model on a triangular lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 79, 083711 (2010)

    2010

  64. [72]

    Y. Kato, I. Martin, and C. D. Batista, Stability of the spontaneous quantum hall state in the triangular kondo- lattice model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 266405 (2010)

    2010

  65. [73]

    Azhar and M

    M. Azhar and M. Mostovoy, Incommensurate spiral order from double-exchange interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 027203 (2017)

    2017

  66. [74]

    Chern and C

    G.-W. Chern and C. D. Batista, Spontaneous quantum hall effect via a thermally induced quadratic fermi point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 156801 (2012)

    2012

  67. [75]

    Nandkishore, G.-W

    R. Nandkishore, G.-W. Chern, and A. V. Chubukov, Itin- erant half-metal spin-density-wave state on the hexagonal lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 227204 (2012)

    2012

  68. [76]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, et al. , Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019)

    2019

  69. [77]

    Nair and G

    V. Nair and G. E. Hinton, Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines, in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’10 (Omnipress, Madison, WI, USA, 2010) p. 807–814

    2010

  70. [78]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization (2014), arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Stone, Cross-validatory choice and assessment of sta- tistical predictions, Journal of the royal statistical soci- ety: Series B (Methodological) 36, 111 (1974)

    M. Stone, Cross-validatory choice and assessment of sta- tistical predictions, Journal of the royal statistical soci- ety: Series B (Methodological) 36, 111 (1974)

    1974

  72. [80]

    J. H. Mentink, M. V. Tretyakov, A. Fasolino, M. I. Kat- snelson, and T. Rasing, Stable and fast semi-implicit in- tegration of the stochastic landau–lifshitz equation, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 22, 176001 (2010)

    2010

  73. [81]

    Chern, K

    G.-W. Chern, K. Barros, Z. Wang, H. Suwa, and C. D. Batista, Semiclassical dynamics of spin density waves, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035120 (2018)

    2018

  74. [82]

    Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1999)

    P. Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1999)

    1999

  75. [83]

    Lacroix, P

    C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, Introduction to frus- trated magnetism: materials, experiments, theory , Vol. 164 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)

    2011

  76. [84]

    A. J. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Advances in Physics 43, 357 (1994)

    1994

  77. [85]

    Puri and V

    S. Puri and V. Wadhawan, Kinetics of phase transitions (CRC press, 2009)

    2009

  78. [86]

    Onuki, Phase Transition Dynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2002)

    A. Onuki, Phase Transition Dynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2002)

    2002

  79. [87]

    Ozawa, S

    R. Ozawa, S. Hayami, K. Barros, and Y. Motome, Shape of magnetic domain walls formed by coupling to mobile charges, Phys. Rev. B 96, 094417 (2017)

    2017

  80. [88]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Long range order and metastability in two dimensional solids and superflu- ids. (application of dislocation theory), J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 5, L124 (1972)

    1972

  81. [89]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  82. [90]

    Halperin, B. I. and Nelson, David R., Theory of two- dimensional melting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 121 (1978)

    1978

  83. [91]

    D. R. Nelson and B. I. Halperin, Dislocation-mediated melting in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B19, 2457 (1979)

    1979

  84. [92]

    A. P. Young, Melting and the vector Coulomb gas in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 19, 1855 (1979)

    1979

  85. [93]

    Ezawa, Compact merons and skyrmions in thin chiral magnetic films, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Compact merons and skyrmions in thin chiral magnetic films, Phys. Rev. B 83, 100408 (2011)

    2011

  86. [94]

    Miyazaki, Equivariant neural networks for spin dy- namics simulations of itinerant magnets, Machine Learn- ing: Science and Technology 4, 045006 (2023)

    Y. Miyazaki, Equivariant neural networks for spin dy- namics simulations of itinerant magnets, Machine Learn- ing: Science and Technology 4, 045006 (2023)

    2023

  87. [95]

    Weiler, M

    M. Weiler, M. Geiger, M. Welling, W. Boomsma, and T. S. Cohen, 3d steerable cnns: Learning rotationally equivariant features in volumetric data, Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems 31 (2018)

    2018

  88. [96]

    Batzner, A

    S. Batzner, A. Musaelian, L. Sun, M. Geiger, J. P. Mailoa, M. Kornbluth, N. Molinari, T. E. Smidt, and B. Kozinsky, E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials, Nature Communications 13, 2453 (2022)

    2022

  89. [97]

    X. Gong, H. Li, N. Zou, R. Xu, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, General framework for e(3)-equivariant neural network representation of density functional theory hamiltonian, Nature Communications 14, 2848 (2023)

    2023

  90. [104]

    skyrmion crystallites lead to formation of stripe struc- tures, with isolated skyrmions and bimerons, that inter- polate between areas of skyrmion lattice

    (c) The characteristic length of the ML-LLG simulations from t = 10 to 10 4. skyrmion crystallites lead to formation of stripe struc- tures, with isolated skyrmions and bimerons, that inter- polate between areas of skyrmion lattice. The stability of these intervening stripes o...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.