Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AgoraSpeech: A multi-annotated comprehensive dataset of political discourse through the lens of humans and AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06265 v1 pith:654QOKX7 submitted 2025-01-09 cs.CL

AgoraSpeech: A multi-annotated comprehensive dataset of political discourse through the lens of humans and AI

classification cs.CL
keywords politicaldatasetdiscourseagoraspeechannotationannotationscomprehensivedatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Political discourse datasets are important for gaining political insights, analyzing communication strategies or social science phenomena. Although numerous political discourse corpora exist, comprehensive, high-quality, annotated datasets are scarce. This is largely due to the substantial manual effort, multidisciplinarity, and expertise required for the nuanced annotation of rhetorical strategies and ideological contexts. In this paper, we present AgoraSpeech, a meticulously curated, high-quality dataset of 171 political speeches from six parties during the Greek national elections in 2023. The dataset includes annotations (per paragraph) for six natural language processing (NLP) tasks: text classification, topic identification, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, polarization and populism detection. A two-step annotation was employed, starting with ChatGPT-generated annotations and followed by exhaustive human-in-the-loop validation. The dataset was initially used in a case study to provide insights during the pre-election period. However, it has general applicability by serving as a rich source of information for political and social scientists, journalists, or data scientists, while it can be used for benchmarking and fine-tuning NLP and large language models (LLMs).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CAF-Gen: A Multi-Agent System for Enriching Argumentation Structures

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CAF-Gen uses an iterative multi-agent creator-reviewer process to enrich shallow argument mining outputs into structurally richer CAF-compliant models with claimed improvements over single-pass generation.