Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 55 references

High-pressure growth effect on the properties of high-Tc iron-based superconductors: A short review

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Growing iron-based superconductors at 0.5 GPa for one hour improves their superconducting properties.

desk verdict Useful consolidated summary of the group's own HP-HTS results, but the '0.5 GPa optimum' is only truly pressure-tested for FeSe0.5Te0.5; the 1144 claim is a confounded protocol comparison and the abstract overgeneralizes past the 1111 negative result. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06516 v1 pith:M6HW7NG5 submitted 2025-01-11 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph

Priya Singh , Manasa Manasa , Mohammad Azam , Shiv J. Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords iron-basedsuperconductorshigh-pressuregrowthHP-HTScriticalcurrentdensitytransitiontemperatureFeSe0.5Te0.5CaKFe4As4SmAs(OF)
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This short review argues that a specific recipe—applying 0.5 GPa of inert-gas pressure for one hour during synthesis in a hot-isostatic-pressing-type furnace—produces better bulk iron-based superconductors than growth at ambient pressure or at other pressures. For the 11-family compound FeSe0.5Te0.5 and the 1144-family compound CaKFe4As4, the treatment raises the transition temperature by 2–3 K and lifts the critical current density by an order of magnitude. The same recipe leaves the 1111-family SmFeAs(O,F) essentially unchanged, with the same impurity phases and only a small enhancement in current density and pinning. The paper's broader point is that high-pressure growth is a practical, controllable route to phase purity and grain connectivity—the properties that determine whether these materials can be turned into wires and tapes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the HP-HTS apparatus, a hot-isostatic-pressing-style chamber with three oil-based pistons that delivers inert-gas pressures up to 1.8 GPa at temperatures up to 1700 °C. The argument is carried by the relationship between growth pressure and phase purity: in the 11 family, 0.5 GPa minimises the hexagonal Fe–Se phase fraction, and in the 1144 family, keeping the sample in an open Ta-tube at 0.5 GPa prevents potassium evaporation; both effects improve intergrain connections and vortex pinning. In other words, the pressure is the control knob that tunes competing phase formation and stoichiometry during growth.

What would settle it

Measure the hexagonal-phase fraction of FeSe0.5Te0.5 bulks grown at pressures spaced 0.05 GPa apart from 0.3 to 0.7 GPa; if the minimum does not sit at 0.5 GPa, or if the 0.5 GPa optimum disappears when the sample is not sealed in a Ta-tube, the claimed optimum is not a reliable rule.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that a growth pressure of 0.5 GPa applied for one hour in the HP-HTS system is sufficient and near-optimal for producing high-quality bulks of iron-based superconductors from the 11 and 1144 families. For FeSe0.5Te0.5, this pressure suppresses the non-superconducting hexagonal phase to a minimum, stabilises the tetragonal phase, raises $T_c$ from about 14–15 K to about 17 K, and increases $J_c$ by an order of magnitude with stronger flux pinning. For CaKFe4As4, growth at 0.5 GPa in an open Ta-tube raises $T_c$ by about 2 K and $J_c$ by an order of magnitude, attributed to higher density, better grain connectivity, and prevention of potassium evaporation. The 1111 compound SmFeAs(O,F) is the exception: pressures up to 1 GPa do not reduce its impurity phases, so its superconducting properties are essentially unchanged, with a modest gain in $J_c$ and pinning for the optimal sample. These results lead the authors to conclude that 0.5 GPa for 1 h is an optimal growth pressure for the families studied, while making clear that the 1111 family still needs a different strategy.

Load-bearing premise

The recommendation of 0.5 GPa as an optimal growth pressure assumes that pressure, rather than composition-specific chemistry, the Ta-tube sealing, or the heating profile, is the dominant control on phase purity and grain connectivity across iron-based superconductor families.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 0.5 GPa, 1 h growth step should be the first condition to try when optimising bulk synthesis of the 11 and 1144 iron-based superconductor families.
  • Longer heating times at high pressure degrade both families, as seen in the two-step 1144 sample (HIP_2) and in long-duration Fe(Se,Te) runs.
  • The 1111 family will not benefit from this treatment alone; its impurity phases persist up to 1 GPa, so a different route is needed.
  • The improvements in $T_c$ and $J_c$ make high-pressure-grown 11 and 1144 bulks better starting materials for wires and tapes, where grain connectivity is the limiting factor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A finer pressure grid (for example 0.35 to 0.65 GPa in 0.05 GPa steps) would show whether the 0.5 GPa optimum is a sharp minimum in hexagonal-phase fraction or just a coarse-grid artifact.
  • The open-Ta-tube success with CaKFe4As4 suggests that pressure, not sealing, is what prevents potassium loss; this may generalise to other alkali-containing superconductors, where sealed tubes can trap the wrong composition.
  • The 1111 family's immunity to pressure implies a kinetic barrier rather than a thermodynamic one, so longer times or precursors that avoid the stable impurity phases (e.g., SmAs) might be more effective than more pressure.
  • Testing the same recipe on other doping levels or related compounds (e.g., FeSe0.4Te0.6 or other 1144 members) would indicate whether the 0.5 GPa condition is a general synthesis strategy or a set of one-off recipes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This short review summarizes the authors' own investigations of high-gas-pressure and high-temperature synthesis (HP-HTS) applied to three iron-based superconductor families: the 11 family (FeSe0.5Te0.5), the 1144 family (CaKFe4As4), and the 1111 family (SmFeAsO0.8F0.2). The paper describes the HP-HTS apparatus, presents data on phase purity, Tc, Jc, and pinning force for representative samples, and concludes that a growth pressure of 0.5 GPa for 1 h under optimized conditions enhances superconducting properties and is sufficient for producing high-quality IBS bulks, with the 1111 family explicitly acknowledged as an exception that shows no substantial improvement.

Significance. If the central claim were robustly supported, the 0.5 GPa/1 h recipe would constitute a practical and easily adopted benchmark for bulk synthesis of at least the 11 and 1144 families, with potential value for wire and tape development. The paper is useful as a compact summary of a specific group's cumulative HP-HTS work, collecting results from several previously published studies into one reference. However, the significance is tempered by the heavy reliance on the authors' own prior papers with no independent replication, and by the fact that the 1111 family, representing the highest-Tc iron-based superconductors, does not follow the claimed trend. The review thus offers a credible but narrowly evidenced synthesis protocol rather than a generally established result.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4 (Conclusion)] The abstract states that 'the high-pressure growth technique significantly enhances the properties of IBS' without qualification, and the Conclusion states that 'an optimal growth pressure of 0.5 GPa for 1 h enhances the superconducting properties.' These statements are contradicted by Section 3.3, which reports 'no substantial improvement in Tc and Jc' for SmFeAs(O,F), the 1111-family representative. The claims should be explicitly restricted to the 11 and 1144 families, or the 1111 exception should be called out in the abstract and conclusion.
  2. [Section 3.2 (1144 family), Table 1 and Figure 3] The claim that 0.5 GPa is an optimal growth pressure for CaKFe4As4 is not supported by the presented data. Both HIP_1 and HIP_2 were prepared at 0.5 GPa, and the observed enhancement of HIP_1 over HIP_2 is attributed to the Ta-tube protocol (open vs. two-step sealed) and the resulting suppression of K evaporation, not to pressure itself. No pressure series for the 1144 family is shown. The sentence 'our study of the 1144 family confirms that the applied growth pressure of 0.5 GPa works as an optimal growth pressure' (end of Section 3.2) is therefore a non-sequitur; it requires either a pressure-dependent comparison for 1144 or a more cautious wording connecting the enhancement to the combined high-pressure/open-tube protocol.
  3. [Section 3.1 (11 family)] The optimal-pressure claim for the 11 family is based on a single composition, FeSe0.5Te0.5. Figure 2 and Table 1 show a pressure series only for this composition, and the paper generalizes to the entire 11 family and to the broader 'IBS' category without data for other chalcogenide stoichiometries or other members. If the 0.5 GPa optimum is composition-specific or depends on the Ta-tube sealing procedure, the broad recommendation in the Conclusion fails. The authors should either limit the recommendation to the compositions actually studied or provide evidence that the optimum is robust across the family.
  4. [Sections 3.1-3.3, Figures 2-4] The figures present selected samples without error bars or indication of batch-to-batch variability. For a review that aims to establish a general synthesis recipe, the absence of reproducibility data (e.g., multiple samples prepared under identical conditions) weakens the quantitative claims, particularly the 'one order of magnitude' Jc enhancements. Reporting uncertainties or at least stating the number of samples per condition would materially strengthen the conclusions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, text near Figure 3] The phrase 'the growth conditions of HIP_2 samples are not suitable' mixes singular and plural; 'sample' would be clearer. Also, Figure 3's caption says 'with respect to the synthesis pressure,' but no pressure variation is shown for the 1144 family; the caption should be reworded to reflect the actual comparison (different Ta-tube protocols at 0.5 GPa).
  2. [Table 1] Units are inconsistent: '0 MPa' and '0 GPa' are used interchangeably for ambient pressure. Choose a single unit (e.g., GPa) for all entries to avoid confusion.
  3. [Reference [29]] The title contains a typo: 'condictions' should be 'conditions'.
  4. [Figure 4 caption] The caption appears to contain stray text ('51 52 53 54 55') that is not explained; the caption should be cleaned up to clearly describe the panels.
  5. [Section 3.3, first paragraph] The text says 'These studies are compared with the parent sample (SmFeAsO0.8F0.2) prepared using CSP-AP,' but the formula is already stated as SmFeAsO1-xFx with x=0.2; the explicit 'SmFeAsO0.8F0.2' notation would be clearer if introduced immediately after the general formula.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review summarizes the authors' own empirical measurements; the 0.5 GPa claim is data-derived, not a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper is an explicit review of the authors' own previously published experimental work on high-pressure growth of iron-based superconductors. The central claim—that 0.5 GPa for 1 h is an optimal growth pressure—is presented as an empirical summary of measured quantities (XRD phase fractions, Tc, Jc, pinning force) across a pressure series for the 11 family (Section 3.1), a two-sample comparison for the 1144 family (Section 3.2), and a pressure series for the 1111 family (Section 3.3). No equation or definition in the paper equates the conclusion to its inputs; the 'derivation' is a data summary, not a formal derivation. The manuscript explicitly reports that the 1111 family does not show substantial improvement, which is a falsifiable negative result and an acknowledged exception. The self-citations (e.g., [15], [24], [27], [28]) are to the primary papers containing the actual measurements, not to unverified assertions or uniqueness theorems. The 1144 evidence is weaker than the 11 evidence because both HP-HTS samples were prepared at 0.5 GPa with different Ta-tube protocols, but this is a concern about experimental design and generalizability, not about circularity: the conclusion does not reduce by construction to its input. The abstract's phrase 'prove that a growth pressure of 0.5 GPa is sufficient' overgeneralizes from the supporting data, but overgeneralization is not circularity under the defined patterns. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. Hence the paper is self-contained as an empirical review and shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new theoretical constructs or entities are introduced. The review's practical claim rests on a single hand-selected synthesis condition (0.5 GPa, 1 h) and on domain assumptions about phase purity, grain connectivity, and stoichiometry stability. All central results are self-cited from the authors' earlier papers.

free parameters (2)
  • Optimal growth pressure = 0.5 GPa
    Chosen as the synthesis pressure that produced the highest Tc and Jc in the authors' FeSe0.5Te0.5 and CaKFe4As4 samples (Sections 3.1, 3.2). Presented as a general condition for all IBS despite limited family coverage.
  • Optimal growth duration = 1 hour
    Used in all optimal 11 and 1144 samples; determined from the authors' prior optimization scans (refs 15, 27). No full time scan is shown in this review.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The hexagonal phase fraction extracted from XRD is the primary limit on Tc and Jc in FeSe0.5Te0.5.
    Section 3.1 argues minimizing hexagonal phase is the key mechanism; no direct causal evidence beyond correlation.
  • domain assumption High-pressure synthesis improves intergrain connectivity and density, which is the cause of Jc enhancement.
    Section 3.2 attributes Jc enhancement to density and grain connections, citing refs [50,16], but no direct microstructural quantification is shown in this review.
  • domain assumption The Ta-tube and high-pressure environment do not significantly alter the stoichiometry except for K evaporation in the two-step 1144 process.
    Discussed in Section 3.2 for HIP_2; the assumption is used to interpret HIP_1 as stoichiometrically pure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-pressure growth effect on the properties of high-Tc iron-based superconductors: A short review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M6HW7NG5

@misc{pith2026250106516,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-pressure growth effect on the properties of high-Tc iron-based superconductors: A short review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M6HW7NG5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06516}
}
read the original abstract

The high-pressure growth technique is a vital approach that facilitates the stabilization of new phases and allows for meticulous control of structural parameters, which significantly impact electronic and magnetic properties. We present a short review of our ongoing investigations into various families of iron-based superconductors (IBS), employing the high-gas pressure and high-temperature synthesis (HP-HTS) method. This technique is capable of producing the gas pressures up to 1.8 GPa and a heating temperature of up to 1700 {\deg}C through a three-zone furnace within a cylindrical chamber. Different kinds of IBS samples are prepared using HPHTS and characterized through various measurements to reach the final conclusions. The results demonstrate that the high-pressure growth technique significantly enhances the properties of IBS, including the transition temperature, critical current density, and pinning force. In addition, the quality of the samples and their density are improved through the intergrain connections. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluations and investigations prove that a growth pressure of 0.5 GPa is sufficient for producing high-quality IBS bulks under the optimized synthesis conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06516 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Block diagram of HP-HTS technique, which includes a three-stage oil-based compressor, a high-pressure chamber, and a control unit monitor. “A” and “B” depict a set of key valves to control the pressure through the oil pump for the three pistons: 1, 2 and 3 sustaining pressures of 0.08 GPa, 0.4 GPa and 1.8 GPa respectively. “C” represents a set of key valves to control the gas pressure for the three pistons [23] [PI… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The synthesis pressure dependence of (a) hexagonal H-phase calculated from XRD patterns, (b) the Tc onset , (c) the Jc values at 0 T and 5 T, and (d) the calculated pinning force (Fp) at the applied magnetic field of 5 T [15] for various FeSe0.5Te0.5 prepared by HP-HTS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The variations of (a) the Tc onset , (b) the Jc value at 0 T and 5 T, (c) the calculated pinning force (Fp) at the applied magnetic field of 5 T [28],[29] for the prepared bulk CaKFe4As4 samples with respect to the synthesis pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The synthesis pressure dependence of (a) the variations of the Tc onset for G0-G4 (G￾batch) and parent (P) samples, and (b) the Jc values at 0.2 T and 8 T, (c) the calculated pinning force (Fp) at 0.2 T, 8 T, and 5 K for G2, G4 and the parent (P) samples [24]. 51 52 53…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction The discovery of iron-based superconductors occurre d in 2008 [1], leading to the identification of over 100 compounds within this hi gh-Tc family. According to the crystal structure of the parent compounds, these high- Tc materials can be classified into six distinct families [2], [3], [4], [5]: RE FeAsO ( RE 1111; RE = rare earth), AFe 2As ...

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    High-Pressure Technique We have used the HP-HTS technique for the synthesis of IBS, and the block diagram of this technique is illustrated in Figure 1 [23]. This app roach is based on the hot isostatic pressing (HIP) technique [30], [31], through which we can achieve an inert gas pressure of 1.8 GPa and a temperature of 1700 °C with precise temperature a ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Effects on the properties of IBS: 3.1 11 family: The simplest iron-based superconductors are FeSe, which belong to the 11 family and exhibit the superconductivity at ~8 K. Through an appropriate doping i.e., chemical pressure, such as Te doping at Se sites, the Tc can reach up to 15 K [12], [33], [34] while by the applied external pressure, Tc can increas...

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O 1- xFx]FeAs ( x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K,

    Conclusion Studies on high-pressure growth utilizing various I BS families demonstrate that an optimal growth pressure of 0.5 GPa for 1 h enhances the sup erconducting properties in comparison to other growth conditions. High-pressure synthesis of CaKFe 4As 4 and Fe(Se,Te) from the 1144 and 11 families has enhanced the Jc by one order of magnitude and rai...

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Re cent advances in iron- based superconductors toward applications,

    H. Hosono, A. Yamamoto, H. Hiramatsu and Y. Ma, "Re cent advances in iron- based superconductors toward applications," Materials Today, vol. 21, pp. 278-302, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Potentials of iron-based supercon ductors for practical future materia ls,

    J. I. Shimoyama, "Potentials of iron-based supercon ductors for practical future materia ls," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 27, p. 044002, 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    High-temperature supercond uctivity in iron-based materials,

    J. Paglione, R. Greene, "High-temperature supercond uctivity in iron-based materials," Nature Physics, vol. 6, pp. 645-658, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    High-temperature su perco nductivity in iron pnictides and chalcogenides,

    Q. Si, R. Yu, and E. Abrahams, "High-temperature su perco nductivity in iron pnictides and chalcogenides," Nat. Rev. Mater., vol. 1, p. 16017, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Bulk and Single Crystal Growth Progress of Iron- Based Superconductors (FBS): 1111 and 1144,

    S. J. Singh and M. Sturza, "Bulk and Single Crystal Growth Progress of Iron- Based Superconductors (FBS): 1111 and 1144," Crystals, vol. 12, p. 20, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Weak-link behaviour observed in iron-based superconductors with thick perovskite-type blocking layers,

    S. J. Singh, H. Ogino, J. Shimoyama and K. Kishio, "Weak-link behaviour observed in iron-based superconductors with thick perovskite-type blocking layers," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 26, p. 105020, 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    Revisiting the Electron-Doped SmFeAsO: Enhanced Superconduc tivity up to 58.6 K by Th and F Codoping,

    X. Wang, J. Yu, B. Ruan, B. Pan, Q. Mu, T. Liu, K. Zhao, G. Chen and Z. Ren, "Revisiting the Electron-Doped SmFeAsO: Enhanced Superconduc tivity up to 58.6 K by Th and F Codoping," Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 34, p. 077401, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Optimization of the crystal growth of the superconductor CaKFe 4As 4 from solution in the FeAs-CaFe 2As 2-KFe 2As 2 system,

    W. R. Meier, T. Kong, S. L. Budko, and P. C. Canfie ld, "Optimization of the crystal growth of the superconductor CaKFe 4As 4 from solution in the FeAs-CaFe 2As 2-KFe 2As 2 system," Phys. Rev. Materials, vol. 1, p. 013401, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Optimization of superconducting properties of the stoichiometric CaKFe 4As 4,

    S. J. Singh, S. J. Cassidy, M. Bristow, S. J. Blundell, S. J. Clarke and A. I. Coldea, "Optimization of superconducting properties of the stoichiometric CaKFe 4As 4," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, p. 025003, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe,

    F. Hsu, J. Luo, K. Yeh, T. Chen, T. Huang, P.M. Wu, Y. Lee, Y. Huang, Y. Chu, D. Yan, M. Wu, "Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 105, pp. 14262-14264, 2008

    2008

  7. [15]

    Review of Fe Chalcogenide s as the Simplest Fe- Based Superconductor,

    Y. Takano, Y. Mizuguchi, "Review of Fe Chalcogenide s as the Simplest Fe- Based Superconductor," J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., vol. 79, p. 102001, 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    Tr ansition Temperature and Upper Critical Field in SmFeAsO 1−x Fx Synthesized at Low Heating Temperatures,

    S. J. Singh, J. Shimoyama, A. Yamamoto, H. Ogino and K. Kishio, "Tr ansition Temperature and Upper Critical Field in SmFeAsO 1−x Fx Synthesized at Low Heating Temperatures," IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 23, p. 7300605, 2013

    2013

  9. [17]

    Cometal Addition Effect on Superconducti ng Properties and Granular Behaviours of Polycrystalline FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ,

    M. Manasa, M. Azam, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. Cetner, A. Morawski, A. Wi śniewski, & S. J. Singh, "Cometal Addition Effect on Superconducti ng Properties and Granular Behaviours of Polycrystalline FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ," Materials, vol. 16, p. 2892, 2023. 13

    2023

  10. [18]

    High-Pressure Synthesis and the Enhancement of the Superconducting Properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ,

    M. Azam, M. Manasa, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. C etner, A. Morawski, J. Wi ęckowski, A. Wi śniewski, S. J. Singh, "High-Pressure Synthesis and the Enhancement of the Superconducting Properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ," Materials, vol. 16, p. 5358, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Pressure effects on iron-based superconductor families: Superconductivity, flux pinning and vortex dynamics,

    L. N. Sang, Z. Li, G. S. Yang, Z. J. Yue, J. X. Liu, C. B. Cai, T. Wu, S. X. Dou, Y. W. Ma, X. L. Wang, "Pressure effects on iron-based superconductor families: Superconductivity, flux pinning and vortex dynamics," Mater.Today Phys., vol. 19, p. 100414, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Superconductivity at 43 K in an iron-based layered compound LaO 1-xFxFeAs,

    H. Takahashi, K. Igawa, K. Arii, Y. Kamihara, M. Hi rano, and H. Hosono , "Superconductivity at 43 K in an iron-based layered compound LaO 1-xFxFeAs," Nature, vol. 453, p. 376–378, 2008

    2008

  13. [21]

    Single crystals of LnFeAsO 1-xFx (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd) and Ba 1- xRb xFe 2As 2: Growth, structure and superconducting properties,

    J. Karpinski, N.D. Zhigadlo, S. Katrych, Z. Bukowsk i, P. Moll, S. Weyeneth, H. Keller, R. Puzniak, M. Tortello, D. Daghero, R. Gonneli, I. Ma ggio-Aprile, Y. Fasano, O. Fischer, K. Rogacki, B.Batlogg, "Single crystals of LnFeAsO 1-xFx (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd) and Ba 1- xRb x...

    2009

  14. [22]

    High intergrain critical current densit y in fine-grain (Ba 0.6 K0.4 )Fe 2As 2 wires and bulks,

    J. D. Weiss, C. Tarantini, J. Jiang, F. Kametani, A . A. Polyanskii, D. C. Larbalestier & E. E. Hellstrom, "High intergrain critical current densit y in fine-grain (Ba 0.6 K0.4 )Fe 2As 2 wires and bulks," Nat. Mater., vol. 11, pp. 682-5, 2012

    2012

  15. [23]

    Single crystals of superconducting SmFeAsO 1-xFy grown at high pressure,

    N. D. Zhigadlo, S. Katrych, Z. Bukowski, S. Weyenet h, R. Puzniak, and J. Karpinski, "Single crystals of superconducting SmFeAsO 1-xFy grown at high pressure," J. P hys.: Condens. Matter, vol. 20, p. 342202, 2009

    2009

  16. [24]

    Significant enhancement of transport Jc in Cu/Ag-sheathed (Ba,K)Fe 2As 2 superconducting tapes by pre- composite technique,

    W. Li, H. Huang, C. Guo, T. Chang, X. Liu, C. Yao, X. Zhang & Y. Ma, "Significant enhancement of transport Jc in Cu/Ag-sheathed (Ba,K)Fe 2As 2 superconducting tapes by pre- composite technique," Sci. China Mater., vol. 66, p. 801–810, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Enhancement of critical current density in (Ba,Na)Fe 2As 2 round wires using high- pressure sintering,

    S. Pyon, D. Miyawaki, T. Tamegai, S. Awaji, H. Kito , S. Ishida and Y. Yoshida, "Enhancement of critical current density in (Ba,Na)Fe 2As 2 round wires using high- pressure sintering," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, p. 065001, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    High Gas Pressure and High- Temperature Synthesis (HP-HTS) Technique and Its Im pact on Iron- Based Superconductors,

    M. Azam, M. Manasa, A. Morawski, T. Cetner & S. J. Singh, "High Gas Pressure and High- Temperature Synthesis (HP-HTS) Technique and Its Im pact on Iron- Based Superconductors," Crystals, vol. 13, p. 1525, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Hig h-pressure growth effects on the superconducting properties of Sm-based oxypnictide superconductors,

    M. Azam, M. Manasa, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. P alasyuk, T. Cetner, A. Morawski, C. Jastrz ębski, A. Szewczyk, M. Wierzbicki, S. J. Singh, "Hig h-pressure growth effects on the superconducting properties of Sm-based oxypnictide superconductors," arXiv:2412.20837, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Antimony Doping Effect on t he Superconducting Properties of SmFeAs (O,F),

    Mohammad Azam, Manasa Manasa, Tatiana Zajarniuk, Ry szard Diduszko, Tomasz Cetner, Andrzej Morawski, Andrzej Wi śniewski, Shiv J Singh, "Antimony Doping Effect on t he Superconducting Properties of SmFeAs (O,F)," IEEE Transactions on Ap plied Superconductivity, vol. 34, p. 730...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Copper doping effects on t he superconducting properties of Sm- based oxypnictides,

    Mohammad Azam, Manasa Manasa, Tatiana Zajarniuk, Ta ras Palasyuk, Ryszard Diduszko, Tomasz Cetner, Andrzej Morawski, Cezariusz Jastrzeb ski, Michał Wierzbicki, Andrzej Wi śniewski, Shiv J. Singh, "Copper doping effects on t he superconducting properties of Sm- based oxypnictid...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Effect of impurity phase and high- pressure synthesis on the superconducting propertie s of CaKFe 4As 4,

    M. Manasa, M. Azam, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. Cetner, A. Morawski, A. Wi śniewski, S. J. Singh, "Effect of impurity phase and high- pressure synthesis on the superconducting propertie s of CaKFe 4As 4," Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 190, p. 111996, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Enhancement of Superconducting Properties of Polycrystalline CaKFe 4As 4 by High- Pressure Growth,

    M. Manasa, M. Azam, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. Cetner, A. Morawski, A. Wi śniewski, Shiv J Singh, "Enhancement of Superconducting Properties of Polycrystalline CaKFe 4As 4 by High- Pressure Growth," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 34, p. 7300605, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Comparison of Gd addition effect on the superconducting properties o f FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 bulks under ambient and high- pressure condictions,

    Manasa Manasa, Mohammad Azam, Tatiana Zajarniu k, Ryszard Diduszko, Jan Mizeracki, Tomasz Cetner, Andrzej Morawski, Andrzej Wi śniewski, Shiv J Singh, "Comparison of Gd addition effect on the superconducting properties o f FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 bulks under ambient and high- pressure...

    2024

  25. [33]

    High gas pressure for HTS single crystals and thin layer technology,

    A. Morawski, T. Lada, A. Paszewin, & K. Przybylski, "High gas pressure for HTS single crystals and thin layer technology," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, p. 193, 1998

    1998

  26. [34]

    Single crystals of Hg 1−x Pb xBa 2Ca n−1 Cu nO2n+2+ δ and infinite-layer CaCuO 2. synthesis at gas pressure 10 kbar, properties and structure,

    J. Karpinski, H. Schwer, I. Mangelschots, K. Conder, A. Morawski, T. Lada, A . Paszewin, "Single crystals of Hg 1−x Pb xBa 2Ca n−1 Cu nO2n+2+ δ and infinite-layer CaCuO 2. synthesis at gas pressure 10 kbar, properties and structure," Physica C: Superconductivity, vol. 234, pp....

    1994

  27. [35]

    Robert Boyle’s landmark book of 1660 with the first experiments.,

    J. B. West, "Robert Boyle’s landmark book of 1660 with the first experiments.," J. Appl. Physiol, vol. 98, pp. 31-39, 2005

    2005

  28. [36]

    Substitution Effects on FeSe Superconductor,

    Y. Mizuguchi, F. Tomioka, S. Tsuda, T. Yamaguchi, Y . Takano, "Substitution Effects on FeSe Superconductor," J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., vol. 78, p. 074712, 2009

    2009

  29. [37]

    Bulk superconductivity at 14 K in single crystals of Fe 1+y Te xSe 1-x,

    B. C. Sales, A. S. Sefat, M. A. McGuire, R. Y. Jin, D. Ma ndrus, and Y. Mozharivskyj, "Bulk superconductivity at 14 K in single crystals of Fe 1+y Te xSe 1-x," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 79, p. 094521, 2009

    2009

  30. [38]

    The Fe–Se (iron-selenium) system,

    H. Okamoto, "The Fe–Se (iron-selenium) system," J. Phase Equilibria, vol. 12, pp. 383- 389, 1991

    1991

  31. [39]

    Tellurium substitution effect on superconductivity of the α-phase iron selenide,

    K. Yeh, T. Huang, Y. Huang, T. Chen, F. Hsu, P. M. Wu, Y. Lee, Y. Chu, C. Chen, J. Luo, D. Yan and M. Wu, "Tellurium substitution effect on superconductivity of the α-phase iron selenide," EPL, vol. 84, p. 37002, 2008

    2008

  32. [40]

    Pressure e volution of the low- temperature crystal structure and bonding of the superconductor FeSe,

    S. Margadonna, Y. Takabayashi, Y. Ohishi, Y. Mizugu chi, Y. Takano, T. Kagayama, T. Nakagawa, M. Takata, and K. Prassides,, "Pressure e volution of the low- temperature crystal structure and bonding of the superconductor FeSe," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 80, p. 064506, 2009

    2009

  33. [41]

    Anisotropy in the upper critical field of FeSe and FeSe 0.33 Te 0.67 single crystals,

    J. L. Her, Y. Kohama, Y. H. Matsuda, K. Kindo, W. Yang, D. A. Chareev, E. S. Mitrofanova, O. S. Volkova, A. N. Vasiliev and J. Lin, "Anisotropy in the upper critical field of FeSe and FeSe 0.33 Te 0.67 single crystals," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 28, p. 045013, 2015

    2015

  34. [42]

    Effect of Fe excess on structural, magnetic and superconducting properties of single-crystallin e Fe 1+x Te 1−y Se y,

    R. Viennois, E. Giannini, D. van der Marel, R. Černý, "Effect of Fe excess on structural, magnetic and superconducting properties of single-crystallin e Fe 1+x Te 1−y Se y," Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 183, pp. 769-775, 2010

    2010

  35. [43]

    Effects of Te- and Fe-doping on the superconducting properties in FeySe 1−x Te x thin films,

    Y. Zhang, T. Wang, Z. Wang and Z. Xing, "Effects of Te- and Fe-doping on the superconducting properties in FeySe 1−x Te x thin films," Sci Rep, vol. 12, p. 391, 2022. 15

    2022

  36. [44]

    Enhanced critical current density in the pressure-induced magnetic state of the high-temperature superconductor FeSe,

    S. G. Jung, J. H. Kang, E. Park, S. Lee, J. Lin, D. A. Chareev, A. N. Vasiliev & T. Park , "Enhanced critical current density in the pressure-induced magnetic state of the high-temperature superconductor FeSe," Sci Rep, vol. 5, p. 16385, 2015

    2015

  37. [45]

    Crystal and Electronic Structure of FeSe at High Pressure and Low Temperature,

    R. S. Kumar, Y. Zhang, S. Sinogeikin, Y. Xiao, S. K umar, P. Chow, A . L. Cornelius, C. Chen, "Crystal and Electronic Structure of FeSe at High Pressure and Low Temperature," J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 114, p. 12597–12606, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    Mag netic phases in superconducting, polycrystalline bulk FeSe samples,

    Q. Nouailhetas, A. K. Veneva, M. R. Koblischka, S. P. K. Naik, F. Schäfer, H. Ogino, C. Motz , K. Berger, B. Douine, Y. Slimani, E. Hannachi, "Mag netic phases in superconducting, polycrystalline bulk FeSe samples," AIP Advances, vol. 11, p. 015230, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Fe(Se,Te) from melting routes: The inf luence of th ermal processing on microstructure and superconducting properties,

    A. Masi, C. Alvani, A. A. Armenio, A. Augieri, L. B arba, G. Campi, G. Celentano, G. Chita, F. Fabbri, C. F. Zignani, A. L. Barbera, L. Piperno, F. Rizzo, A. Rufoloni, E. Silva, A. Vannozzi and F. Varsano, "Fe(Se,Te) from melting routes: The inf luence of th ermal processing o...

    2020

  40. [48]

    Effect of Pb addition on microstructure, transp ort properties, and the critical current density in a polycrystalline FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ,

    S.J. Singh, R. Diduszko, P. Iwanowski, T. Cetner, A. Wisniewski & A. Morawski , "Effect of Pb addition on microstructure, transp ort properties, and the critical current density in a polycrystalline FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ," Appl. Phys. A, vol. 128, p. 476, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Stoichiometry of tetragonal and hexagonal Fe xSe: Phase relations,

    M. Shahbazi, H. E. Cathey and I. D. R. Mackinnon, " Stoichiometry of tetragonal and hexagonal Fe xSe: Phase relations," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, p. 075003, 2020

    2020

  42. [50]

    Synthesis of high- quality FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 polycrystal using an easy one-step technique,

    X. Li, X. Shi, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Zhuang, F. Yua n, & Z. Shi, "Synthesis of high- quality FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 polycrystal using an easy one-step technique," J. Alloys Compd., vol. 644, pp. 523- 527, 2015. [4 8] Shiv J. Singh, Matthew Bristow, William R. Meier, P atrick Taylor, ...

    2015

  43. [51]

    Synthesis of CaKFe 4As 4 bulk samples with high critical curren t density using a spark plasma sintering technique,

    S. Ishida, S. P. K. Naik, Y. Tsuchiya, Y. Mawatari, Y. Yoshida, A. Iyo, Hiroshi Eisaki, Y. Kamiya, K. Kawashima and H. Ogino, "Synthesis of CaKFe 4As 4 bulk samples with high critical curren t density using a spark plasma sintering technique," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 33...

    2020

  44. [52]

    Grain boundar y characteristics of Fe- based superconductors,

    K. Iida, J. Hänisch and A. Yamamoto, "Grain boundar y characteristics of Fe- based superconductors," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, p. 043001, 2020

    2020

  45. [53]

    Combined microstructural and magneto-optical study of current flow in polycrystalline forms of Nd and Sm Fe-oxypnictides,

    F. Kametani, A. A. Polyanskii, A. Yamamoto, J. Jiang, E. E. Hellstrom, A. Gurevich, "Combined microstructural and magneto-optical study of current flow in polycrystalline forms of Nd and Sm Fe-oxypnictides," Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 22, p. 015010, 2009

    2009

  46. [54]

    Superconductivity at 55 K in Iron-Based F-Doped La yered Quaternary Compound Sm[O 1−x Fx ]FeAs,

    R. An, L. Wei, Y. Jie, Y. Wei, S. Li, Z. Cai, C. Ca n, D. Li, S. Ling, Z. Fang and Z. Xian , "Superconductivity at 55 K in Iron-Based F-Doped La yered Quaternary Compound Sm[O 1−x Fx ]FeAs," Chin. Phys. Lett., vol. 25, p. 2215, 2008. 16

    2008

  47. [55]

    Superconductivity in the iron-based F-doped layere d quaternary compound Nd[O 1-xFx]FeAs,

    Z. Ren, J. Yang, W. Lu, W. Yi, X. Shen, Z. Li, G. C he, X. Dong, L. Sun, F. Zhou and Z. Zhao, "Superconductivity in the iron-based F-doped layere d quaternary compound Nd[O 1-xFx]FeAs," Europhys. Lett., vol. 82, p. 57002, 2008. 17 Table 1: A list of the sample codes and synthe...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.