REVIEW 1 cited by
ENOLA: Efficient Control-Flow Attestation for Embedded Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ENOLA: Efficient Control-Flow Attestation for Embedded Systems
read the original abstract
Microcontroller-based embedded systems are vital in daily life, but are especially vulnerable to control-flow hijacking attacks due to hardware and software constraints. Control-Flow Attestation (CFA) aims to precisely attest the execution path of a program to a remote verifier. However, existing CFA solutions face challenges with large measurement and/or trace data, limiting these solutions to small programs. In addition, slow software-based measurement calculations limit their feasibility for microcontroller systems. In this paper, we present ENOLA, an efficient control-flow attestation solution for low-end embedded systems. ENOLA introduces a novel authenticator that achieves linear space complexity. Moreover, ENOLA capitalizes on the latest hardware-assisted message authentication code computation capabilities found in commercially-available devices for measurement computation. ENOLA employs a trusted execution environment, and allocates general-purpose registers to thwart memory corruption attacks. We have developed the ENOLA compiler through LLVM passes and attestation engine on the ARMv8.1-M architecture. Our evaluations demonstrate ENOLA's effectiveness in minimizing data transmission, while achieving lower or comparable performance to the existing works.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
TrustMee: Self-Verifying Remote Attestation Evidence
TrustMee enables self-verifying remote attestation evidence by embedding WebAssembly verification logic in attestation bundles for platform-independent validation of confidential VMs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.