REVIEW 6 cited by
Boosting galaxy clustering analyses with non-perturbative modelling of redshift-space distortions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Redshift-space distortions (RSD), caused by the peculiar velocities of galaxies, are a key modelling challenge in galaxy clustering analyses, limiting the scales from which cosmological information can be reliably extracted. Unlike dynamical or galaxy bias effects, RSD imprint features that are sensitive to non-linearities across all scales. Yet, no distinction between these effects is made by the state-of-the-art analytical approach - the effective field theory (EFT) - which applies the same perturbative expansion to each of them. This paper explores an alternative approach, where the non-perturbative nature of RSD is partially preserved, and compares its effectiveness against the EFT in analysing power spectrum and bispectrum multipoles from synthetic samples of luminous red galaxies, using the projected sensitivity of a Stage-IV galaxy survey. Our results demonstrate that this distinct treatment of RSD improves the robustness of model predictions for both statistics, extending the validity range of the EFT from approximately $0.2\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ to $0.35\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ for the one-loop power spectrum and from $0.1\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ to $0.14\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ for the tree-level bispectrum. This leads to a significant enhancement in the precision of cosmological parameter constraints, with uncertainties on the Hubble rate, matter density, and scalar amplitude of fluctuations reduced by $20$-$40\,\%$ for the power spectrum multipoles alone compared to the EFT, and by $25$-$50\,\%$ for joint analyses with the bispectrum. The RSD treatment proposed here may thus play a crucial role in maximising the scientific return of current and future galaxy surveys. To support this advancement, all models for the power spectrum and bispectrum used in this work are made available through an extended version of the Python package COMET.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Galaxy bias renormalization: Two-loop Power Spectrum, One-loop Trispectrum and Bispectrum
Complete fifth-order galaxy bias renormalization in real space enables consistent two-loop power spectrum and one-loop bispectrum/trispectrum calculations for biased tracers with operator-level counterterms.
-
Zel'dovich smearing approximation of the BAO feature for model-agnostic cosmological inference
A flexible, template-free BAO model built on Zel'dovich smearing recovers the BAO ruler and growth rate without cosmological bias in mock DESI-like data.
-
One-Loop Galaxy Bispectrum: Consistent Theory, Efficient Analysis with COBRA, and Implications for Cosmological Parameters
Using the COBRA basis, the one-loop EFT galaxy bispectrum runs in about one second per cosmology and recovers the input cosmology of PTChallenge simulations up to k_max = 0.15 h/Mpc (monopole) and 0.12 h/Mpc (higher m...
-
FolpsD: combining EFT and phenomenological approaches for joint power spectrum and bispectrum analyses
FolpsD combines EFT power spectrum and tree-level bispectrum with damping to enable joint analyses that improve cosmological constraints from DESI-like galaxy mocks by up to 30% on As and omega_cdm while extending the...
-
Impact of fiducial cosmology in model-agnostic cosmological inference with the BAO feature
The Zel'dovich smearing approximation for model-agnostic BAO inference is extended to include fiducial cosmology distortions and validated on AbacusSummit simulations of DESI- and Euclid-like samples, producing unbias...
-
Large-scale structures of the Universe: physics, phenomenology, statistics
Lecture series on the physics, phenomenology, and statistics of large-scale cosmic structure evolution and non-Gaussian predictions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.