Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Symmetry breaking in Prussian Blue Analogues via growth--guided local ordering of hexacyanometallate vacancies

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Growth-guided vacancy ordering reduces the local symmetry of cubic Prussian Blue analogue crystals to tetragonal.

desk verdict The diffuse-scattering evidence for local tetragonal vacancy order in a cubic-average Prussian blue is solid and new; the growth-guided mechanism is plausible but the axis-to-growth mapping is under-documented. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05936 v1 pith:FJOEAGPK submitted 2025-02-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yevheniia Kholina , Thomas Weber , Joohee Bang , Arthur Baroni , Marianne Liebi , Semen Gorfman , Ido Biran , Mark Warren
show 2 more authors
Dmitriy Chernyshov Arkadiy Simonov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci MSC 82D25 PACS 61.66.Fn78.20.Fm
keywords PrussianBlueAnaloguesgrowth-guidedlocalorderingsymmetrybreakingvacancydiffusescattering3D-DeltaPDFbirefringenceMonteCarlosimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in disordered crystals, symmetry can be broken not by a phase transition but by the growth process itself: point defects, here Co(CN)_6 vacancies, develop correlations preferentially along the growth direction, and this anisotropy becomes locked into the crystal. In Mn[Co] Prussian Blue analogues, the average structure stays cubic Fm-3m, but diffuse scattering and birefringence show that the local scale is tetragonal 4/mmm. The authors propose 'Growth-Guided Local Ordering' as a general mechanism for tuning symmetry by choosing the growth direction, which would turn a hard materials-design problem into a crystallization-control problem.

What carries the argument

The central object is the anisotropic pair-correlation model of vacancy ordering. Quantitatively, it is the three-dimensional difference pair distribution function (3D-DeltaPDF) refined from single-crystal diffuse scattering, which yields pair probabilities of Co(CN)_6 occupancy at each lattice vector; the key result is the contrast between correlation length of about 18 unit cells along [001] and about 8 along [100] and [010]. The mechanism is carried by a Monte Carlo Hamiltonian with a nearest-neighbour repulsion J1 enforcing electroneutrality and a split second-neighbour interaction J2,x = J2,y = -0.0135 versus J2,z = -0.11, whose anisotropy produces the observed tetragonal diffuse scattering.

What would settle it

Measure diffuse scattering from a Mn[Co]-PBA crystal whose growth direction is known independently, for example by in-situ growth observation or by facet indexing: if the long-correlation axis does not coincide with the growth direction, or if a crystal grown along [111] shows no trigonal diffuse pattern, the mechanism fails. Alternatively, anneal a freshly grown crystal and check whether the diffuse-scattering anisotropy disappears; if the correlations become cubic, the ordering was not locked in during growth.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that in Mn[Co]-Prussian Blue Analogues the Co(CN)_6 vacancies are non-randomly arranged: they avoid each other at first neighbours and correlate positively along [001], with a correlation length of about 18 unit cells along the growth direction versus only about 8 unit cells perpendicular to it. This anisotropy gives the local structure tetragonal 4/mmm Laue symmetry while Bragg diffraction shows the average structure is cubic m-3m, and it manifests optically as birefringence. The authors identify the long-correlation axis with the growth direction and show in Monte Carlo simulations that a single anisotropic second-neighbour interaction (J2,z about six times J2,xy) reproduces the observed diffuse scattering. Growing crystals with {111} faces produces additional domains with trigonal (bar-3m) local symmetry. The general claim is that any disordered crystal grown irreversibly locks in growth-direction-specific defect correlations, providing a route to symmetry engineering by controlling growth direction.

Load-bearing premise

The long-correlation axis of the vacancies is identified with the crystal growth direction from the cube morphology, and the authors assume that once deposited, vacancies cannot rearrange; if that axis identification or that locking-in is wrong, the 'growth-guided' conclusion does not follow even though the tetragonal local order itself is real.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If growth direction is controlled, the local symmetry, and thus the optical, transport, and mechanical properties, of disordered crystals can be engineered without changing their composition.
  • Cube-shaped Mn[Co]-PBA crystals are six pyramidal tetragonal twins sharing a single cubic average structure, with defect-rich twin boundaries at the cube edges that explain the previously observed preferential etching.
  • Pore connectivity in these Prussian Blue analogues becomes anisotropic, with vacancy channels connecting better within planes perpendicular to the growth direction than along it.
  • Growing along a <111> direction should produce trigonal (bar-3m) local domains, which the optical data already indicate and which future diffuse-scattering tomography could confirm.
  • The mechanism should generalize to other out-of-equilibrium disordered crystals, such as electrochemically grown or flux-grown materials, provided post-growth rearrangement is suppressed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism may underlie unexplained birefringence or anisotropy in other nominally cubic framework materials where disorder is high but diffuse scattering has not been measured.
  • A direct test of the growth-guided claim would be to grow the same material along two different directions and compare the symmetry of the diffuse scattering; if the local symmetry tracks the growth direction, the mechanism is confirmed.
  • If the locking-in hypothesis is correct, the correlation length along the growth direction could serve as a readout of growth kinetics, distinguishing layer-by-layer from island growth modes.
  • The principle may extend well beyond insoluble salts to molecular and colloidal crystals whenever rearrangement is slow compared with the growth timescale, potentially making growth-direction control a general symmetry-engineering tool.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined single-crystal diffuse scattering, 3D-ΔPDF, and Mueller polarimetry study of Mn[Co]-Prussian Blue Analogues. It shows that although the average structure refines as cubic Fm\bar{3}m, the diffuse scattering from an optically selected pyramidal domain is tetragonal, with vacancy correlations decaying much more slowly along one cubic axis (~18 unit cells) than along the perpendicular axes (~8 unit cells). A Monte Carlo model with anisotropic second-neighbor interactions reproduces the pattern. The authors interpret this as 'Growth-Guided Local Ordering': the slow-correlation axis is the growth direction, the vacancy order is locked in during layer-by-layer growth, and the local Laue symmetry is reduced to 4/mmm while the average structure remains cubic. Growth along <111> is claimed to yield trigonal domains. The central experimental finding is the anisotropic local vacancy order; the causal growth mechanism is an interpretation that goes beyond the final-state data.

Significance. If the growth-direction attribution can be established, this is a significant result: it would provide a mechanism for symmetry control in disordered crystals and a concrete experimental demonstration in an important materials family. The paper has real strengths: the anisotropic diffuse scattering is observed directly and is not an artifact of the Monte Carlo model; the 3D-ΔPDF refinement separates substitutional and displacive correlations; the average-structure analysis is careful; Mueller polarimetry provides independent optical evidence; and the data and scripts are made available. The Monte Carlo model is transparent and explicitly labeled as approximate. The main weakness is that the causal 'growth-guided' and 'locked-in' claims are not uniquely supported by the static final-state measurements, because the relation between the diffuse-scattering axis and the external crystal morphology is not experimentally documented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Real-Space Model / Methods] The assignment of the long-correlation direction to the crystal growth direction is not experimentally documented. The Methods describe cutting a pyramidal domain under a polarizing microscope and gluing it to a loop, followed by indexing with XDS/Dials, but no step records how the optical or morphological orientation of the cut domain was transferred to the diffractometer coordinate frame. Because the average structure is cubic, indexing does not fix the physical orientation of the unique diffuse-scattering axis relative to the crystal habit: any cubic crystal can be reindexed so that the slow axis is [001]. Therefore the sentence 'The [001] direction, characterized by longer vacancy correlations, corresponds to the crystal growth direction' is an assumption, not a measured relation. This assumption is load-bearing for the 'Growth-Guided' mechanism claimed in the title and abstract. A co-registration experiment (for example, mounting a crystal with a known face on the diffractometer, or comparing several crystals whose growth axes are known from morphology) is needed; without it, the causal wording should be softened to a hypothesis.
  2. [Discussion and outlook] The claim that 'the insoluble nature of the material ensures that once the building blocks attach during growth, they do not rearrange, thus preserving the growth-induced anisotropy' is asserted without any kinetic test. No annealing, aging, dissolution/regrowth, or growth-rate variation experiment is reported. The static diffuse scattering data are equally consistent with anisotropic short-range order established during growth and with an equilibrium or post-growth reorganization that also produces a tetragonal local axis. To support the locking-in step of the mechanism, the paper needs an experimental control (for example, measuring diffuse scattering after thermal treatment, or comparing crystals grown under conditions that change the growth rate or post-growth time). Without such a test, the abstract's claim that the reduced symmetry 'persists in the final structure' through a growth process is not uniquely established.
  3. [Abstract / Symmetry Control Through Growth Direction] The statement that growth along [111] 'produces domains with trigonal symmetry' overstates what is shown. The Symmetry Control section acknowledges that the small size and overlapping domains 'currently prevent us from performing detailed diffuse scattering analysis'; the evidence for the {111} domains is Mueller polarimetry only, and the trigonal symmetry is inferred from a subgroup analysis ('likely produces domains'). The abstract should be phrased in terms of consistency with trigonal local symmetry, or the corresponding diffuse scattering measurement should be provided.
minor comments (4)
  1. [3D-ΔPDF Analysis / Figure 2c] The quoted correlation lengths of approximately 18 and 8 unit cells are presented without uncertainties or a discussion of how resolution and background subtraction affect the decay profiles; since the ratio is used as a quantitative measure of anisotropy, please add error estimates or explicitly state that these are approximate values.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'margnianlly' should be 'marginally' (Average Structure section), 'untwined' should be 'untwinned' (Methods), 'withing' should be 'within' (Real-Space Model), 'the the scaling' should be 'the scaling' (Methods), 'Data avalibility' should be 'Data availability' (heading), and 'Views and options' should probably be 'Views and opinions' (Acknowledgements).
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The parenthetical expression '(h+1, k+1, 0, with h,k = odd)' is awkward and should be rewritten for clarity.
  4. [Methods / Monte Carlo modelling] The mean-field derivation of the Monte Carlo interaction parameters and the displacive correlation analysis are attributed to reference 23, a 'Manuscript in preparation (2025)'; because these items are needed to reproduce the model, please provide a preprint, a deposition, or an expanded description in the Methods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the tetragonal local ordering is read directly from measured single-crystal diffuse scattering and 3D-ΔPDF refinement, not generated by the Monte Carlo model; the only self-referential element is a non-load-bearing deferral of mean-field parameter details to an unpublished companion manuscript.

full rationale

The paper's central result, that Mn[Co]-PBA retains cubic m-3m average symmetry while the vacancy distribution has tetragonal 4/mmm local symmetry, is established from direct experimental observations: single-crystal diffuse scattering shows tetragonal intensity distributions (Figure 2a), and the 3D-ΔPDF refinement yields anisotropic vacancy-vacancy correlations with longer range along the unique axis (Table S6 and Figure 2b-c). These data are not produced by the Monte Carlo model; rather, the model is fitted to them, as the text states that "to reproduce the observed diffuse scattering pattern, we found that the strength of J2,z must be set approximately six times of J2,xy", and the Methods explicitly disclaim any pretense of an optimal model ("the aim is not to represent an optimal model"). The causal attribution to growth rests on the empirical identification of the long-correlation axis with the growth direction and on a qualitative layer-by-layer argument, which is an interpretation rather than a derivation from the model. The only self-citation of note is reference 23, an in-preparation manuscript by overlapping authors, for the mean-field derivation of the Monte Carlo interaction parameters and for the displacive-correlation analysis; this citation is not load-bearing because neither the tetragonal symmetry conclusion nor the observed correlation anisotropy depends on those parameters. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted input, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior same-author work. The main substantive weakness is evidentiary, not circular: the mapping of the diffuse-scattering long axis to the morphological growth direction is asserted rather than documented, and the locking-in mechanism is not tested by annealing or time-resolved experiments.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several domain assumptions and fitted simulation parameters. The direct observation of anisotropic diffuse scattering is independent of the Monte Carlo model, which reduces the circularity burden, but the growth-direction mapping, the substitutional/displacive separation, and the locked-in growth assumption are load-bearing.

free parameters (4)
  • J1 = 0.605
    Nearest-neighbor vacancy interaction in the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian, fitted to reproduce the experimental diffuse scattering; no uncertainty given.
  • J2,x = J2,y = -0.0135
    Second-neighbor interaction within the (001) plane, fitted to the diffuse pattern.
  • J2,z = -0.11
    Second-neighbor interaction along [001], fitted; the paper says it is "about six times" J2,xy but the values imply about 8 times.
  • Monte Carlo temperature T = 1.3
    Simulation temperature chosen to yield reasonable swap acceptance; it affects the resulting correlation lengths.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Bragg diffraction measures only the cubic average structure; diffuse scattering is needed to see local ordering.
    The entire logical structure relies on the standard separation in crystallography between average and local structure. Invoked throughout 'Average Structure' and 'Local Structure'.
  • domain assumption The diffuse signal can be cleanly separated into substitutional and displacive correlations, and the substitutional part is unbiased by the punch-and-fill removal of Bragg peaks.
    The 3D-ΔPDF refinement in the SI fits both correlation types simultaneously and argues artifacts affect only the displacive parameters, which are not used. This is asserted but not independently demonstrated.
  • domain assumption The measured tetragonal c-axis corresponds to the crystal growth direction identified from morphology.
    The statement 'The [001] direction, characterized by longer vacancy correlations, corresponds to the crystal growth direction' underpins the 'growth-guided' interpretation. If this identification is wrong, the mechanism would not be established even though the anisotropy is real.
  • domain assumption Post-growth rearrangement is negligible because the material is insoluble.
    The Discussion states this directly ('the insoluble nature of the material ensures that once the building blocks attach during growth, they do not rearrange'). It is plausible but not experimentally demonstrated.
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation for the interaction parameters, with details in an unpublished manuscript.
    Methods state the pair interaction parameters were calculated using mean-field theory as detailed in ref [23], a 'Manuscript in preparation' by the same group. The derivation is not available in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry breaking in Prussian Blue Analogues via growth--guided local ordering of hexacyanometallate vacancies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FJOEAGPK

@misc{pith2026250205936,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry breaking in Prussian Blue Analogues via growth--guided local ordering of hexacyanometallate vacancies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FJOEAGPK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05936}
}
abstract

We report Growth--Guided Local Ordering, a novel mechanism of symmetry reduction in disordered crystals. This mechanism operates through the directional ordering of point defects during crystal growth, where defect correlations develop preferentially along the growth direction, resulting in reduced symmetry that persists in the final structure through the spatial distribution of defects. We demonstrate this phenomenon in Mn[Co]-Prussian Blue Analogues, disordered cyanide crystals containing numerous Co(CN)$_6$ vacancies. Single crystal diffuse scattering reveals pronounced anisotropy in vacancy distribution: strong correlations along [001] growth direction contrast with weak correlations perpendicular to it. This local ordering reduces the Laue symmetry to tetragonal $4/mmm$, evident in properties such as birefringence, while the average structure retains cubic $m\bar 3m$ symmetry. When growth proceeds along [111] direction, the same mechanism produces domains with trigonal symmetry. Because this mechanism relies on fundamental aspects of crystal growth rather than specific material properties, it offers a general strategy for symmetry control in disordered crystals. Crucially, it transforms the complex task of altering crystal symmetry into the more manageable challenge of controlling growth direction, achievable through various established techniques such as the use of surfactants during crystallization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05936 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mn[Co]-PBA crystals grow in the shape of cubes (a). When placed between crossed linear polarizers, these crystals show weak optical birefringence and two-color contrast when in addition to crossed polarizers a quarter-wave plate (QWP) is inserted (b). Such optical contrast suggests that each crystal cube consists of six square-pyramidal domains (c,d). Using Bragg and diffuse scattering analysis we show that all six … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Single crystal diffuse scattering from Mn[Co]-PBA. a) Three crosssections, hk0, h0l, and 0kl of the reconstructed three-dimensional diffuse scattering dataset. This dataset contains Bragg peaks at even h,k,l, and diffuse scattering located in between. The characteristic diffuse scattering on a border of the Brillouin zone can be explained by non-random Co(CN)6 distribution. The intensity distribution of this diffuse… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The Mn[Co]-PBA structure consists of Mn and Co ions linked by cyanides. (b) Due to electroneutrality condition, one-third of hexacyanocobaltate clusters are absent and replaced with large vacancies which we represent as beige spheres. (c) Monte Carlo simulations of a supercell of Mn[Co]-PBA show highly anisotropic distribution of the vacancies. For clarity we remove all atoms and only show the vacancies, moreove… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mueller polarimetry of Mn[Co]-PBA crystals reveals the relationship between crystal morphology and domain structure. The color wheel (top right) indicates the direction of the fast optical axis, while color saturation represents retardance. Cubic crystals (left) exhibi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nye, J. F. Physical properties of crystals: their representation by tensors and matrices (Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Nonlinear optics on ferroic materials (John Wiley & Sons, 2023)

    Fiebig, M. Nonlinear optics on ferroic materials (John Wiley & Sons, 2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    P., Paltiel, Y ., Naaman, R

    Bloom, B. P., Paltiel, Y ., Naaman, R. & Waldeck, D. H. Chemical Reviews 124, 1950–1991 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    V ojta, M.Advances in Physics 58, 699–820 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    & Yamanaka, M

    Mikami, K. & Yamanaka, M. Chemical Reviews 103, 3369–3400 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    & Jona-Lasinio, G.Physical Review 122, 345 (1961)

    Nambu, Y . & Jona-Lasinio, G.Physical Review 122, 345 (1961)

    work page 1961

  7. [7]

    Higgs, P. W. Physical Review Letters 13, 508 (1964)

    work page 1964

  8. [8]

    Nature 490, 472–473 (2012)

    Livio, M. Nature 490, 472–473 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Annual Review of Materials Science 28, 1–27 (1998)

    Goodenough, J. Annual Review of Materials Science 28, 1–27 (1998). 8/19

    1998

  2. [10]

    Benedek, N. A. & Hayward, M. A. Annual Review of Materials Research 52, 331–355 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Bostr"om, H. L. CrystEngComm 22, 961–968 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    L., Senn, M

    Bostr"om, H. L., Senn, M. S. & Goodwin, A. L. Nature Communications 9, 2380 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    W., Southon, P

    Chapman, K. W., Southon, P. D., Weeks, C. L. & Kepert, C. J. Chemical Communications 3322–3324 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    K., Thallapally, P

    Motkuri, R. K., Thallapally, P. K., McGrail, B. P. & Gho- rishi, S. B. CrystEngComm 12, 4003–4006 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    Y ., Rodríguez-García, B

    Goberna-Ferrón, S., Hernández, W. Y ., Rodríguez-García, B. & Galán-Mascarós, J. R. ACS Catal. 4, 1637–1641 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Guo, S. et al. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 59, 13831–13840 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    & Goodwin, A

    Cattermull, J., Pasta, M. & Goodwin, A. L. Materials Horizons 8, 3178–3186 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    J., Pasta, M

    Cattermull, J., Roth, N., Cassidy, S. J., Pasta, M. & Good- win, A. L. Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, 24249–24259 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    & Hashimoto, K

    Sato, O., Iyoda, T., Fujishima, A. & Hashimoto, K. Science 272, 704–705 (1996)

    1996

  12. [20]

    S., Mathonière, C

    Aguilà, D., Prado, Y ., Koumousi, E. S., Mathonière, C. & Clérac, R. Chemical Society Reviews 45, 203–224 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    & Ohkoshi, S.-i

    Stefánczyk, O. & Ohkoshi, S.-i. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 15963– 15977 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Simonov, A. et al. Nature 578, 256–260 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    & Arkadiy, S

    Kholina, Y ., Chernyshov, D., Warren, M. & Arkadiy, S. Manuscript in preparation (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    & Zeng, Y

    Hu, M., Jiang, J.-S. & Zeng, Y . Chemical Communications 46, 1133–1135 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Welberry, T. R. Diffuse X-ray Scattering and Models of Disorder (Oxford University Press, 2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Welberry, T., Miller, G. H. & Pickard, D. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 367, 175–192 (1979)

    1979

  19. [27]

    W., Quintel, A

    Hulliger, J., Roth, S. W., Quintel, A. & Bebie, H. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 152, 49–56 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    & Fl"orsheimer, M

    Rechsteiner, P., Hulliger, J. & Fl"orsheimer, M. Chemistry of Materials 12, 3296–3300 (2000)

    2000

  21. [29]

    Hulliger, J. et al. The crystallization of polar, channel- type inclusion compounds: Property-directed supramolec- ular synthesis (1997)

    1997

  22. [30]

    Roth, S. W. et al. Advanced Materials 10, 1543–1546 (1998)

    1998

  23. [31]

    & Chernyshov, D

    Dyadkin, V ., Pattison, P., Dmitriev, V . & Chernyshov, D. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 23, 825–829 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    MiTeGen, LTD, info@mitegen.com. P.O. Box 3867, Ithaca, NY 14852

  25. [33]

    Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography 66, 125–132 (2010)

    Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography 66, 125–132 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    Winter, G. et al. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology 74, 85–97 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Meerkat: program for reciprocal space reconstruction

    Simonov, A. Meerkat: program for reciprocal space reconstruction. https://github.com/aglie/meerkat (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography 64, 112–122 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    V ., Bourhis, L

    Dolomanov, O. V ., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. & Puschmann, H. Journal of Applied Crystallography 42, 339–341 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    Gorfman, S. et al. Journal of Applied Crystallography 54, 914–923 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    & Zhang, N

    Gorfman, S., Spirito, D., Zhang, G., Detlefs, C. & Zhang, N. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances 78, 158–171 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    & Gorfman, S

    Biran, I., Bosak, A., Ye, Z.-G., Levin, I. & Gorfman, S. Applied Physics Letters 124 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    & Steurer, W.Journal of Applied Crystallography 47, 1146–1152 (2014)

    Simonov, A., Weber, T. & Steurer, W.Journal of Applied Crystallography 47, 1146–1152 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    & Simonov, A.Zeit

    Weber, T. & Simonov, A.Zeit. Krist. (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    & Dušek, M

    Petˇríˇcek, V ., Palatinus, L., Plášil, J. & Dušek, M. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials 238, 271–282 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Chipman, R., Lam, W. S. T. & Young, G.Polarized Light and Optical Systems. CRC Press (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    thermal diffuse scattering-like

    Lu, S.-Y . & Chipman, R. A. JOSA A 13, 1106–1113 (1996). Data avalibility The raw data along with the scripts used to produce the figures in this paper are shared on the follow- ing doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000719385, https://www.research- collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/7193...

    1996 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.