Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Towards Fully Exploiting LLM Internal States to Enhance Knowledge Boundary Perception

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11677 v2 pith:HRUYW62K submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL

Towards Fully Exploiting LLM Internal States to Enhance Knowledge Boundary Perception

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsperceptionconfidenceknowledgeinternalstatesacrossboundaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across diverse tasks but often struggle to accurately gauge their knowledge boundaries, leading to confident yet incorrect responses. This paper explores leveraging LLMs' internal states to enhance their perception of knowledge boundaries from efficiency and risk perspectives. We investigate whether LLMs can estimate their confidence using internal states before response generation, potentially saving computational resources. Our experiments on datasets like Natural Questions, HotpotQA, and MMLU reveal that LLMs demonstrate significant pre-generation perception, which is further refined post-generation, with perception gaps remaining stable across varying conditions. To mitigate risks in critical domains, we introduce Confidence Consistency-based Calibration ($C^3$), which assesses confidence consistency through question reformulation. $C^3$ significantly improves LLMs' ability to recognize their knowledge gaps, enhancing the unknown perception rate by 5.6% on NQ and 4.9% on HotpotQA. Our findings suggest that pre-generation confidence estimation can optimize efficiency, while $C^3$ effectively controls output risks, advancing the reliability of LLMs in practical applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can LLM Rerankers Predict Their Own Ranking Performance?

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLM rerankers can internally predict ranking quality via self-consistency of sampled outputs, matching SOTA external QPP while direct confidence is overconfident; supervised token-efficient methods improve calibration.

  2. Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DCPO decouples reasoning optimization from calibration in RLVR to fix overconfidence in LLMs without losing accuracy.

  3. Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DCPO decouples reasoning and calibration in RLVR, matching GRPO accuracy while reducing overconfidence via a claimed fundamental gradient conflict.