Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Retrieval-Augmented Process Reward Model for Generalizable Mathematical Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14361 v1 pith:NW2EV7TL submitted 2025-02-20 cs.AI cs.IR

Retrieval-Augmented Process Reward Model for Generalizable Mathematical Reasoning

classification cs.AI cs.IR
keywords reasoningmodelretrievalprmacrossissuesmodelsprocessreward
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced mathematical reasoning, Process Reward Models (PRMs) have been developed to evaluate the logical validity of reasoning steps. However, PRMs still struggle with out-of-distribution (OOD) challenges. This paper identifies key OOD issues, including step OOD, caused by differences in reasoning patterns across model types and sizes, and question OOD, which arises from dataset shifts between training data and real-world problems. To address these issues, we introduce Retrieval-Augmented Process Reward Model (RetrievalPRM), a novel framework designed to tackle these OOD issues. By utilizing a two-stage retrieval-enhanced mechanism, RetrievalPRM retrieves semantically similar questions and steps as a warmup, enhancing PRM's ability to evaluate target steps and improving generalization and reasoning consistency across different models and problem types. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that RetrievalPRM outperforms existing baselines across multiple real-world datasets. Our open-source contributions include a retrieval-enhanced dataset, a tuning framework for PRM training, and the RetrievalPRM model, establishing a new standard for PRM performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CoLD: Counterfactually-Guided Length Debiasing for Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CoLD mitigates length bias in process reward models for mathematical reasoning via counterfactual guidance, length penalties, bias estimation, and joint training, improving step selection accuracy and conciseness on M...