pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.16443 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · nlin.CD· physics.comp-ph· physics.flu-dyn

Turbulence-Induced Fluctuating Interfaces in Heterogeneously-Active Suspensions

Siddhartha Mukherjee , Kunal Kumar , Samriddhi Sankar Ray This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 02:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft nlin.CDphysics.comp-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords bacterial suspensionsheterogeneous activityhydrodynamic interfacesturbulencejammed statesactive mattermixingLagrangian tracers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heterogeneous activity in bacterial suspensions generates fluctuating hydrodynamic interfaces between turbulent and jammed regions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how spatially varying activity affects flows in a model of dense bacterial suspensions using fixed, simple patterns. It finds that the bacterial velocity field develops hydrodynamic interfaces that separate regions of localized turbulence from surrounding jammed, frictional areas. These interfaces display intermittent and multiscale fluctuations. Heterogeneity also changes how tracers mix by altering their residence times. The work indicates that natural heterogeneities can lead active flows to more complex states than uniform cases.

Core claim

In a hydrodynamical model of dense bacterial suspensions with quenched heterogeneous activity patterns, the evolution of the bacterial velocity field produces hydrodynamic interfaces that separate spatially localized turbulence from jammed frictional surroundings. These interfaces are characterized by intermittent and multiscale fluctuations, and the activity heterogeneity affects mixing as measured by the residence times of Lagrangian tracers.

What carries the argument

Hydrodynamic interfaces emerging from velocity field evolution under quenched activity patterning, which separate localized turbulence from jammed frictional surroundings.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen hydrodynamical model for dense bacterial suspensions with fixed-in-time activity patterns is sufficient to capture the relevant physics of real heterogeneous suspensions.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation with heterogeneous activity in bacterial suspensions that fails to produce fluctuating interfaces separating turbulent zones from jammed regions would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.16443 by Kunal Kumar, Samriddhi Sankar Ray, Siddhartha Mukherjee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Representative snapshots of the vorticity field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Time averaged kinetic energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) The contour [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) A snapshot of the vorticity field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effects of heterogeneous (spatially varying) activity in a hydrodynamical model for dense bacterial suspensions, confining ourselves to experimentally realizable, simple, quenched, activity patterns. We show that the evolution of the bacterial velocity field under such activity patterning leads to the emergence of hydrodynamic interfaces separating spatially localized turbulence from jammed frictional surroundings. We characterise the intermittent and multiscale fluctuations of this interface and also investigate how heterogeneity influences mixing via the residence times of Lagrangian tracers. This work reveals how naturally occurring heterogeneities could decisively steer active flows into more complex configurations than those typically studied, opening up parallels to droplet dynamics, front propagation and turbulent mixing layers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the effects of spatially heterogeneous but time-quenched activity patterns within a hydrodynamic model of dense bacterial suspensions. It reports that the evolution of the bacterial velocity field produces fluctuating hydrodynamic interfaces separating localized turbulent regions from jammed frictional surroundings. The work characterizes the intermittent, multiscale statistics of these interfaces and examines their consequences for mixing through the residence-time statistics of Lagrangian tracers. The central claim is that such experimentally realizable heterogeneities can steer active flows into configurations more complex than those in homogeneous systems, with suggested parallels to droplet dynamics and turbulent mixing layers.

Significance. If the reported interfaces and fluctuation statistics are robust, the result would be significant for understanding how natural spatial heterogeneities control the structure and transport properties of active turbulence. The restriction to simple, quenched patterns that are experimentally realizable is a constructive choice that keeps the study focused and potentially testable. The Lagrangian mixing analysis adds a practical dimension. However, the significance is tempered by the absence of direct validation against either experiments or self-consistent (time-evolving) activity fields.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Model and activity patterning): The emergence of the hydrodynamic interfaces is demonstrated exclusively for quenched (fixed-in-time) activity fields. No auxiliary simulations with slowly varying or self-consistent activity are presented to test whether the interface formation and its fluctuation spectrum survive when the activity pattern is allowed to evolve, which is required to establish that the reported interfaces are not an artifact of the quenching approximation.
  2. [§5] §5 (Lagrangian mixing): The residence-time distributions used to quantify mixing are shown for a single realization of the quenched pattern. Without ensemble averaging over multiple independent activity patterns or reported error bars on the residence-time statistics, it is not possible to assess the statistical significance of the claimed influence of heterogeneity on mixing.
  3. [§2] §2 (Hydrodynamic model): The continuum equations are stated without a direct comparison to experimental velocity statistics or interface widths in heterogeneous bacterial suspensions. Because the central claim rests on the model faithfully capturing steric, frictional, and polarity dynamics at the relevant scales, a quantitative benchmark against existing experimental data for even one heterogeneous pattern is needed to support the extrapolation to real suspensions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 1] Figure 1: the color bar for the activity field is not labeled with units or the precise functional form used to generate the pattern.
  2. [§4] Notation: the symbol for the interface position is introduced without an explicit definition in the text preceding the first use in §4.
  3. [Discussion] References: several recent experimental papers on heterogeneous active suspensions are cited only in passing; a short dedicated paragraph comparing the present quenched-pattern results to those experiments would improve context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. Our study is deliberately restricted to quenched activity patterns, as stated in the abstract and introduction, to examine experimentally realizable heterogeneities. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Model and activity patterning): The emergence of the hydrodynamic interfaces is demonstrated exclusively for quenched (fixed-in-time) activity fields. No auxiliary simulations with slowly varying or self-consistent activity are presented to test whether the interface formation and its fluctuation spectrum survive when the activity pattern is allowed to evolve, which is required to establish that the reported interfaces are not an artifact of the quenching approximation.

    Authors: The manuscript explicitly confines the analysis to quenched patterns because these are simple and experimentally realizable, allowing isolation of spatial heterogeneity effects on the velocity field. The interfaces emerge from the hydrodynamic evolution under fixed activity; we make no claim about persistence under dynamic activity. Adding self-consistent simulations would require a substantially different model and lies outside the stated scope of the work. revision: no

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Lagrangian mixing): The residence-time distributions used to quantify mixing are shown for a single realization of the quenched pattern. Without ensemble averaging over multiple independent activity patterns or reported error bars on the residence-time statistics, it is not possible to assess the statistical significance of the claimed influence of heterogeneity on mixing.

    Authors: The residence-time results illustrate the qualitative effect of heterogeneity for a representative quenched pattern. We agree that ensemble statistics over multiple patterns would strengthen the quantitative claims. We will attempt to add results from additional independent realizations together with error bars if the computational data can be generated within the revision timeframe. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§2] §2 (Hydrodynamic model): The continuum equations are stated without a direct comparison to experimental velocity statistics or interface widths in heterogeneous bacterial suspensions. Because the central claim rests on the model faithfully capturing steric, frictional, and polarity dynamics at the relevant scales, a quantitative benchmark against existing experimental data for even one heterogeneous pattern is needed to support the extrapolation to real suspensions.

    Authors: The continuum model is the standard hydrodynamic description used in prior literature on dense bacterial suspensions, with parameters chosen to lie within experimentally reported ranges. Direct quantitative benchmarks against heterogeneous experimental data are not included because such targeted data for quenched patterns remain limited. The work is positioned as a theoretical exploration of realizable heterogeneities rather than a direct experimental validation study. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results are direct outputs of numerical integration

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from direct numerical simulations of a standard hydrodynamical model (with quenched activity patterns) rather than any derivation that reduces the target quantities (interface fluctuations, residence times) to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. No equations are presented that equate a prediction to its own input by construction, and no self-citation chain is invoked as the sole justification for the central claim. The simulation itself constitutes an independent computation whose outputs are not forced by the reported statistics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the hydrodynamical model itself is treated as given from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5652 in / 992 out tokens · 25481 ms · 2026-05-23T02:31:00.278279+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Be’er and G

    A. Be’er and G. Ariel, Movement ecology 7, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    I. S. Aranson, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 076601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Physical review E 58, 4828 (1998)

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Toner, Y

    J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy, Annals of Physics 318, 170 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Kumar, H

    N. Kumar, H. Soni, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Sood, Nature communications 5, 4688 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Nishiguchi and M

    D. Nishiguchi and M. Sano, Physical Review E 92, 052309 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Ginot, I

    F. Ginot, I. Theurkauff, F. Detcheverry, C. Ybert, and C. Cottin-Bizonne, Nature communications 9, 696 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Sanchez, D

    T. Sanchez, D. T. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, Nature 491, 431 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    H. H. Wensink, J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, R. E. Goldstein, H. L¨ owen, and J. M. Yeomans, Pro- ceedings of the national academy of sciences 109, 14308 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Dunkel, S

    J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, H. H. Wensink, M. B¨ ar, and R. E. Goldstein, Physical review letters110, 228102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Doostmohammadi, M

    A. Doostmohammadi, M. F. Adamer, S. P. Thampi, and J. M. Yeomans, Nature communications 7, 10557 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Doostmohammadi, T

    A. Doostmohammadi, T. N. Shendruk, K. Thijssen, and J. M. Yeomans, Nature communications 8, 15326 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    C. Chen, S. Liu, X.-q. Shi, H. Chat´ e, and Y. Wu, Nature 542, 210 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Mart´ ınez-Prat, J

    B. Mart´ ınez-Prat, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. Casademunt, and F. Sagu´ es, Nature physics15, 362 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    S. Liu, S. Shankar, M. C. Marchetti, and Y. Wu, Nature 590, 80 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 143 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    James, W

    M. James, W. J. Bos, and M. Wilczek, Physical Review Fluids 3, 061101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    James and M

    M. James and M. Wilczek, The European Physical Jour- nal E 41, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    James, D

    M. James, D. A. Suchla, J. Dunkel, and M. Wilczek, Nature communications 12, 5630 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Mukherjee, R

    S. Mukherjee, R. K. Singh, M. James, and S. S. Ray, Nature Physics 19, 891 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Bratanov, F

    V. Bratanov, F. Jenko, and E. Frey, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 15048 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    CP and A

    S. CP and A. Joy, Physical Review Fluids 5, 024302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Rorai, F

    C. Rorai, F. Toschi, and I. Pagonabarraga, Physical Re- view Letters 129, 218001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    K. V. Kiran, K. Kumar, A. Gupta, R. Pandit, and S. S. Ray, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06950 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Ariel, A

    G. Ariel, A. Rabani, S. Benisty, J. D. Partridge, R. M. Harshey, and A. Be’Er, Nature communications 6, 8396 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Mukherjee, R

    S. Mukherjee, R. K. Singh, M. James, and S. S. Ray, Physical Review Letters 127, 118001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Gautam, H

    D. Gautam, H. Meena, S. Matheshwaran, and S. Chan- dran, Physical Review E 110, L012601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    R. K. Singh, S. Mukherjee, and S. S. Ray, Physical Re- view Fluids 7, 033101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Wioland, E

    H. Wioland, E. Lushi, and R. E. Goldstein, New Journal of Physics 18, 075002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    K.-T. Wu, J. B. Hishamunda, D. T. Chen, S. J. De- Camp, Y.-W. Chang, A. Fern´ andez-Nieves, S. Fraden, and Z. Dogic, Science 355, eaal1979 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Chandragiri, A

    S. Chandragiri, A. Doostmohammadi, J. M. Yeomans, and S. P. Thampi, Physical Review Letters 125, 148002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Nishiguchi, S

    D. Nishiguchi, S. Shiratani, K. A. Takeuchi, and I. S. Aranson, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05269 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    S. P. Thampi, R. Golestanian, and J. M. Yeomans, Phys- ical Review E 90, 062307 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    W. D. Hoff, M. A. van der Horst, C. B. Nudel, and K. J. Hellingwerf, Chemotaxis: Methods and Protocols pp. 25– 49 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Wilde and C

    A. Wilde and C. W. Mullineaux, FEMS microbiology reviews 41, 900 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    J. Yang, P. E. Arratia, A. E. Patteson, and A. Gopinath, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 16, 20180960 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Thar and M

    R. Thar and M. K¨ uhl, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 5748 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Colin, B

    R. Colin, B. Ni, L. Laganenka, and V. Sourjik, FEMS microbiology reviews 45, fuab038 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    A. P. Petroff, X.-L. Wu, and A. Libchaber, Physical re- 10 view letters 114, 158102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Natan, V

    G. Natan, V. M. Worlitzer, G. Ariel, and A. Be’er, Sci- entific Reports 12, 16500 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Engelhardt, D

    I. Engelhardt, D. Patko, Y. Liu, M. Mimault, G. de Las Heras Martinez, T. George, M. MacDonald, M. Ptash- nyk, T. Sukhodub, N. Stanley-Wall, et al., The ISME Journal 16, 2337 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Nishiguchi, I

    D. Nishiguchi, I. S. Aranson, A. Snezhko, and A. Sokolov, Nature communications 9, 4486 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Reinken, D

    H. Reinken, D. Nishiguchi, S. Heidenreich, A. Sokolov, M. B¨ ar, S. H. Klapp, and I. S. Aranson, Communications Physics 3, 76 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Reinken, S

    H. Reinken, S. Heidenreich, M. B¨ ar, and S. H. Klapp, Physical Review Letters 128, 048004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Shankar and M

    S. Shankar and M. C. Marchetti, Physical Review X 9, 041047 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Palacci, S

    J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Science 339, 936 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Schuppler, F

    M. Schuppler, F. C. Keber, M. Kr¨ oger, and A. R. Bausch, Nature communications 7, 13120 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    T. D. Ross, H. J. Lee, Z. Qu, R. A. Banks, R. Phillips, and M. Thomson, Nature 572, 224 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Zhang, S

    R. Zhang, S. A. Redford, P. V. Ruijgrok, N. Kumar, A. Mozaffari, S. Zemsky, A. R. Dinner, V. Vitelli, Z. Bryant, M. L. Gardel, et al., Nature materials 20, 875 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Zhang, A

    R. Zhang, A. Mozaffari, and J. J. de Pablo, Nature Re- views Materials 6, 437 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Shankar, A

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 380 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    J. Arlt, V. A. Martinez, A. Dawson, T. Pilizota, and W. C. Poon, Nature communications 9, 768 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Frangipane, D

    G. Frangipane, D. Dell’Arciprete, S. Petracchini, C. Maggi, F. Saglimbeni, S. Bianchi, G. Vizsnyiczai, M. L. Bernardini, and R. Di Leonardo, Elife 7, e36608 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    J. Arlt, V. A. Martinez, A. Dawson, T. Pilizota, and W. C. Poon, Nature communications 10, 2321 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Made with Processing [91–93]

    See animation showing the development of the vor- ticity field for an activity quench over a circu- lar geometry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJJg_ SMyfw8, along with a composite comparison of the emerging interface https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ a1vjBuiQSLM. Made with Processing [91–93]

    work page

  57. [57]

    See https://youtube.com/shorts/AIcsM2GP3d4 for an animation showing the formation of a large vortex, simi- lar to what is obtained for highly active turbulence under circular confinement

    work page

  58. [58]

    Puggioni, G

    L. Puggioni, G. Boffetta, and S. Musacchio, Physical Re- view E 106, 055103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    See https://www.youtube.com/shorts/l6AVRfRtIyo for an animation showing the evolution of the interface sep- arating the highly active flow from a region low activity

    work page

  60. [60]

    Pumir, Physics of Fluids 6, 2071 (1994)

    A. Pumir, Physics of Fluids 6, 2071 (1994)

    work page 2071

  61. [61]

    N. Cao, S. Chen, and G. D. Doolen, Physics of Fluids 11, 2235 (1999)

    work page 1999

  62. [62]

    Boffetta and R

    G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Annual review of fluid me- chanics 44, 427 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    Frisch, Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

    U. Frisch, Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. Sreenivasan, Physical review letters 59, 1424 (1987)

    work page 1987

  65. [65]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. Sreenivasan, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics 224, 429 (1991)

    work page 1991

  66. [66]

    Mukherjee, S

    S. Mukherjee, S. D. Murugan, R. Mukherjee, and S. S. Ray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 184002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Grassberger and I

    P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Physical review letters 50, 346 (1983)

    work page 1983

  68. [68]

    See https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AzAhfmAAwyc for an animation showing the evolution of the vorticity field for a striped activity pattern

    work page

  69. [69]

    N. Pal, P. Perlekar, A. Gupta, and R. Pandit, Physical Review E 93, 063115 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    N. B. Padhan and R. Pandit, Physical Review Research 5, L032013 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Perlekar, S

    P. Perlekar, S. S. Ray, D. Mitra, and R. Pandit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 054501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  72. [72]

    Bhatnagar, A

    A. Bhatnagar, A. Gupta, D. Mitra, R. Pandit, and P. Perlekar, Phys. Rev. E 94, 053119 (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    Manoharan, S

    A. Manoharan, S. CP, and A. Joy, Phys. Rev. E 108, L062602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Puggioni, G

    L. Puggioni, G. Boffetta, and S. Musacchio, Physical Re- view E 107, 055107 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Alexakis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 977, R1 (2023)

    A. Alexakis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 977, R1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Heus and H

    T. Heus and H. J. Jonker, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 1003 (2008)

    work page 2008

  77. [77]

    Westerweel, C

    J. Westerweel, C. Fukushima, J. M. Pedersen, and J. C. Hunt, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 631, 199 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    Chauhan, J

    K. Chauhan, J. Philip, C. M. De Silva, N. Hutchins, and I. Marusic, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 742, 119 (2014)

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Watanabe, Y

    T. Watanabe, Y. Sakai, K. Nagata, Y. Ito, and T. Hayase, Physics of Fluids 27 (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    Borrell and J

    G. Borrell and J. Jim´ enez, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 801, 554 (2016)

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.