REVIEW 2 cited by
FAVOR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Fine-Grained Video Motion Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in video content understanding but still struggle with fine-grained motion comprehension. To comprehensively assess the motion understanding ability of existing MLLMs, we introduce FAVOR-Bench, comprising 1,776 videos with structured manual annotations of various motions. Our benchmark includes both close-ended and open-ended tasks. For close-ended evaluation, we carefully design 8,184 multiple-choice question-answer pairs spanning six distinct sub-tasks. For open-ended evaluation, we develop both a novel cost-efficient LLM-free and a GPT-assisted caption assessment method, where the former can enhance benchmarking interpretability and reproducibility. Comprehensive experiments with 21 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal significant limitations in their ability to comprehend and describe detailed temporal dynamics in video motions. To alleviate this limitation, we further build FAVOR-Train, a dataset consisting of 17,152 videos with fine-grained motion annotations. The results of finetuning Qwen2.5-VL on FAVOR-Train yield consistent improvements on motion-related tasks of TVBench, MotionBench and our FAVOR-Bench. Comprehensive assessment results demonstrate that the proposed FAVOR-Bench and FAVOR-Train provide valuable tools to the community for developing more powerful video understanding models. Project page: \href{https://favor-bench.github.io/}{https://favor-bench.github.io/}.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond Description: Cognitively Benchmarking Fine-Grained Action for Embodied Agents
CFG-Bench uses 19,562 questions across four cognitive tiers to show that vision-language models are weak at fine-grained physical action understanding, and that SFT on its data improves scores on external embodied benchmarks.
-
Natural Language Camera Movement Understanding
A cinematographic taxonomy, atomic real+synthetic benchmark (ACaM), and targeted-augmentation SFT let an 8B VLM outperform Gemini-3.1-Pro by 10-11% on camera-movement recognition, yet a large human gap remains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.