The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2503.16679 · v1 · pith:4467Y3CZ · submitted 2025-03-20 · cs.CY · cs.AI· cs.HC

Echoes of Power: Investigating Geopolitical Bias in US and China Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pithpith:4467Y3CZopen to challenge →

classification cs.CY cs.AIcs.HC
keywords modelsbiasesgeopoliticalllmsquestionshoweverlanguagelarge
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for generating human-like text, transforming human-machine interactions. However, their widespread adoption has raised concerns about their potential to influence public opinion and shape political narratives. In this work, we investigate the geopolitical biases in US and Chinese LLMs, focusing on how these models respond to questions related to geopolitics and international relations. We collected responses from ChatGPT and DeepSeek to a set of geopolitical questions and evaluated their outputs through both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Our findings show notable biases in both models, reflecting distinct ideological perspectives and cultural influences. However, despite these biases, for a set of questions, the models' responses are more aligned than expected, indicating that they can address sensitive topics without necessarily presenting directly opposing viewpoints. This study highlights the potential of LLMs to shape public discourse and underscores the importance of critically assessing AI-generated content, particularly in politically sensitive contexts.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Strategic Coercion Within Alliances: The Greenland Sovereignty Game as an AI Stress Test

    physics.soc-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Frontier LLMs in simulated Greenland sovereignty games escalate more under coercion framing, differ by origin when playing the US role, and achieve peaceful US acquisition in only 1.9% of clean games.