Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

OmniScience: A Domain-Specialized LLM for Scientific Reasoning and Discovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17604 v4 pith:LS7GBZ5O submitted 2025-03-22 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords omnisciencereasoningknowledgelargemodelsscientificadaptivebattery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in advancing scientific knowledge and addressing complex challenges. In this work, we introduce OmniScience, a specialized large reasoning model for general science, developed through three key components: (1) domain adaptive pretraining on a carefully curated corpus of scientific literature, (2) instruction tuning on a specialized dataset to guide the model in following domain-specific tasks, and (3) reasoning-based knowledge distillation through fine-tuning to significantly enhance its ability to generate contextually relevant and logically sound responses. We demonstrate the versatility of OmniScience by developing a battery agent that efficiently ranks molecules as potential electrolyte solvents or additives. Comprehensive evaluations reveal that OmniScience is competitive with state-of-the-art large reasoning models on the GPQA Diamond and domain-specific battery benchmarks, while outperforming all public reasoning and non-reasoning models with similar parameter counts. We further demonstrate via ablation experiments that domain adaptive pretraining and reasoning-based knowledge distillation are critical to attain our performance levels, across benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. History Rhymes: Accelerating LLM Reinforcement Learning with RhymeRL

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    RhymeRL accelerates LLM RL training by up to 2.6x by decoding speculatively from a prompt's previous-epoch responses and by alternating long and short rollouts across steps to remove GPU bubbles.

  2. Toward Scientific Reasoning in LLMs: Training from Expert Discussions via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reinforcement learning on questions extracted from CRISPR expert forums improves LLM accuracy on a new benchmark (Genome-Bench) by over 15 percentage points.

  3. Make Still Further Progress: Chain of Thoughts for Tabular Data Leaderboard

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM prompted with nearest-neighbor labels and external model predictions performs instance-level ensembling for tabular data, reaching the best average rank on TinyBench2.

Pith tools