Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Toward Scientific Reasoning in LLMs: Training from Expert Discussions via Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.19501 v2 pith:SDAS6GF2 submitted 2025-05-26 cs.AI

Toward Scientific Reasoning in LLMs: Training from Expert Discussions via Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.AI
keywords scientificdiscussionsllmsreasoninglearningpipelinereinforcementbeyond
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We investigate how to teach large language models (LLMs) to perform scientific reasoning by leveraging expert discussions as a learning signal. Focusing on the genomics domain, we develop an automated pipeline to extract trainable data and introduce Genome-Bench, a new benchmark constructed from over a decade of scientific forum discussions on genome engineering. Our pipeline transforms raw interactions into a reinforcement learning-friendly multiple-choice questions format, supported by 3000+ high-quality question-answer pairs spanning foundational biology, experimental troubleshooting, tool usage, and beyond. We fine-tune an LLM using RL with a rule-based reward signal derived from the synthetic MCQ dataset to enhance domain-specific reasoning. Our results show that reinforcement learning from scientific discussions improves model performance by over 15% compared to the base model on Genome-Bench, narrowing the gap between open-source LLMs and expert-level reasoning. To our knowledge, this is the first end-to-end pipeline for teaching LLMs to reason from scientific discussions, with promising potential for generalization across scientific domains beyond biology.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery

    cs.AI 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The SDE benchmark shows LLMs lag on scientific discovery tasks relative to general science tests, with diminishing scaling returns and shared weaknesses across models.

  2. How Post-Training Shapes Biological Reasoning Models

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Post-training stages reshape generalization in biological reasoning models distinctly: CPT aligns with biological language, SFT boosts ID performance but causes OOD to peak early and decline, while RL on strong SFT ch...

  3. Heterogeneous Scientific Foundation Model Collaboration

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Eywa enables language-based agentic AI systems to collaborate with specialized scientific foundation models for improved performance on structured data tasks.