pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.01896 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.data-an

Composition Design of Shape Memory Ceramics based on Gaussian Processes

Ashutosh Pandey , Justin Jetter , Hanlin Gu , Eckhard Quandt , Richard D. James This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 21:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.data-an
keywords shape memory ceramicsZrO2Gaussian processesthermal hysteresiscofactor conditionsmartensitic transformationmachine learninglattice parameters
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gaussian process model identifies a ZrO2 ceramic composition meeting metal-alloy design criteria, yet experiments measure 137°C thermal hysteresis.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper trains a Gaussian process machine learning model on data for ZrO2-based ceramics to predict transformation temperatures and lattice parameters. It uses this model to screen synthetic compositions against five design criteria borrowed from metal alloys: lambda2 equal to one, minimized max|q(f)|, high transformation temperature, low volume change, and solid solubility. A candidate composition 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er is selected as closely satisfying these criteria according to the predictions. Differential thermal analysis on the synthesized material instead reveals 137°C hysteresis, showing the criteria do not guarantee low hysteresis in these ceramics. The authors also test Er2O3 additions to reduce austenite tetragonality and increase variant flexibility but observe only weak effects from limited solubility.

Core claim

We present a Gaussian process machine learning model to predict the transformation temperature and lattice parameters of ZrO2-based ceramics. Our overall goal is to search for a shape memory ceramic with a reversible transformation and low hysteresis. The identification of a new low hysteresis composition is based on design criteria that have been successful in metal alloys. We generate many synthetic compositions, and identify a promising composition, 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er, which closely satisfies all the design criteria based on predictions from machine learning. However, differential thermal analysis reveals a relatively high thermal hysteresis of 137°C for this composition,

What carries the argument

Gaussian process regression model trained to predict transformation temperature and lattice parameters from composition in ZrO2-based ceramics

If this is right

  • The Gaussian process model enables efficient screening of many synthetic compositions against the five design criteria without exhaustive experiments.
  • A composition satisfying all five metal-derived criteria can still exhibit 137°C thermal hysteresis in ZrO2 ceramics.
  • Addition of Er2O3 produces only weak reduction in austenite tetragonality because of limited solubility.
  • A more effective dopant than Er2O3 is required to achieve significant tetragonality reduction and increase martensite variant flexibility.
  • Discovery of low-hysteresis shape memory ceramics requires additional factors beyond those governing phase transformations in metals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Interface energy or nucleation barriers specific to ceramics may dominate hysteresis even when geometric compatibility conditions are met.
  • Training similar models on larger datasets that include measured hysteresis values could identify ceramic-specific predictors.
  • Testing other rare-earth or transition-metal dopants at higher concentrations might reveal routes to cubic austenite and lower hysteresis.
  • The same Gaussian process approach could be repurposed to optimize mechanical properties or fatigue life once more data become available.

Load-bearing premise

Design criteria that produce low hysteresis in metal alloys, such as lambda2 equal to one and minimized max|q(f)|, will also produce low hysteresis when applied to ZrO2-based ceramics.

What would settle it

Fabrication and differential thermal analysis of the composition 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er, which measured 137°C hysteresis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.01896 by Ashutosh Pandey, Eckhard Quandt, Hanlin Gu, Justin Jetter, Richard D. James.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pearson correlation map for physical features: This graphical map shows Pearson [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Effect of number of input parameters on RMSE of testing data obtained by Gaussian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Performance of ML models on all test subsets: Comparison of Actual vs. Predicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effect of no. of input parameters on RMSE of testing data obtained by GP regression [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Predicted vs. actual values of monoclinic crystal’s lattice parameters: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Study of feature selection for the tetragonal lattice parameters: (a) Seven GP models, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Predicted vs. actual values of tetragonal crystal’s lattice parameter (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Measurements for alloys in Ti-Ni-X system (a) Hysteresis vs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: In the context of the crystallographic theory of martensite, the meaning of cofactor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The tetragonal crystal in (a) transforms to a monoclinic crystal so that the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Correlation between λ (1a) 2 , λ (1b) 2 , λ (2) 2 and max |q(f)| for lattice parameters of: (a) synthetic compositions predicted by the ML model (b) actual compositions measured by XRD-experiment. The highlighted data point in yellow color is selected based on predicted λ (2) 2 closest to 1 while satisfying the equidistant condition |λ (1a,1b) 2 − 1| = |λ (2) 2 − 1|. exclude data calculated from minority … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a Gaussian process machine learning model to predict the transformation temperature and lattice parameters of ZrO$_2$-based ceramics. Our overall goal is to search for a shape memory ceramic with a reversible transformation and low hysteresis. The identification of a new low hysteresis composition is based on design criteria that have been successful in metal alloys: (1) $\lambda_2 = 1$, where $\lambda_2$ is the middle eigenvalue of the transformation stretch tensor, (2) minimizing the max$|q(f)|$, which measures the deviation from satisfying the cofactor conditions, (3) high transformation temperature, (4) low transformational volume change, and (5) solid solubility. We generate many synthetic compositions, and identify a promising composition, 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er, which closely satisfies all the design criteria based on predictions from machine learning. However, differential thermal analysis reveals a relatively high thermal hysteresis of 137{\deg}C for this composition, indicating that the proposed design criteria are not universally applicable to all ZrO$_2$-based ceramics. We also explore reducing tetragonality of the austenite phase by addition of Er$_2$O$_3$. The idea is to tune the lattice parameters of austenite phase towards a cubic structure will increase the number of martensite variants, thus, allowing more flexibility for them to accommodate high strain during transformation. We find the effect of Er$_2$O$_3$ on tetragonality is weak due to limited solubility. We conclude that a more effective dopant is needed to achieve significant tetragonality reduction. Overall, Gaussian process machine learning models are shown to be highly useful for prediction of compositions and lattice parameters, but the discovery of low hysteresis ceramic materials apparently involves other factors not relevant to phase transformations in metals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops Gaussian process models to predict transformation temperatures and lattice parameters for ZrO2-based ceramics. These predictions are used to screen synthetic compositions against five design criteria transferred from metal alloys: λ2 = 1, minimized max|q(f)|, high transformation temperature, low volume change, and solid solubility. The composition 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er is identified as satisfying the criteria based on model outputs and is synthesized; differential thermal analysis shows a thermal hysteresis of 137°C. The authors conclude that the metal-alloy design criteria are not universally applicable to ZrO2-based ceramics. They additionally test Er2O3 additions to reduce austenite tetragonality but find limited solubility and weak effects.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would be significant for shape-memory materials research by demonstrating that cofactor conditions successful in metals do not guarantee low hysteresis in ceramics, highlighting the need for ceramic-specific design principles. The application of Gaussian processes to screen multi-component oxide compositions for lattice parameters and transformation temperatures is a constructive example of machine learning in materials discovery. The direct experimental test of the criteria, even as a negative outcome, provides a falsifiable data point.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The conclusion that the design criteria are not universally applicable is supported by the experimental hysteresis measurement only if the synthesized composition actually satisfies λ2 ≈ 1 and low max|q(f)|. These quantities are computed from GP-predicted lattice parameters for 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er; no experimental lattice parameters or X-ray diffraction data are reported for the synthesized sample to confirm that the real material meets the cofactor conditions. Without this verification, the high hysteresis does not falsify the criteria.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The reliability of the composition selection depends on the GP model's accuracy, yet no quantitative validation metrics (e.g., cross-validation error or test-set MAE for lattice constants or transformation temperature) are stated. This information is required to assess whether the selected composition is a valid test of the design criteria.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract phrasing 'The identification of a new low hysteresis composition is based on design criteria' is potentially misleading given the subsequent experimental result; rephrasing to clarify that the composition was predicted to be low-hysteresis would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which highlight important limitations in how our conclusions are supported. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity without misrepresenting the work performed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The conclusion that the design criteria are not universally applicable is supported by the experimental hysteresis measurement only if the synthesized composition actually satisfies λ2 ≈ 1 and low max|q(f)|. These quantities are computed from GP-predicted lattice parameters for 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er; no experimental lattice parameters or X-ray diffraction data are reported for the synthesized sample to confirm that the real material meets the cofactor conditions. Without this verification, the high hysteresis does not falsify the criteria.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of experimental lattice parameters for the synthesized sample limits the strength of the claim that the design criteria are falsified. The composition was selected and evaluated using GP predictions, and the observed high hysteresis (137°C) indicates that the criteria did not yield low hysteresis even when the model suggested they were satisfied. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract and add a dedicated limitations paragraph in the discussion to state explicitly that λ2 and max|q(f)| values are model-derived predictions, that no post-synthesis XRD data are reported to confirm the real material meets the cofactor conditions, and that direct experimental verification would be required for a definitive test. This change clarifies the evidential basis without altering the reported experimental result or the overall conclusion that metal-derived criteria may not be sufficient for ceramics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reliability of the composition selection depends on the GP model's accuracy, yet no quantitative validation metrics (e.g., cross-validation error or test-set MAE for lattice constants or transformation temperature) are stated. This information is required to assess whether the selected composition is a valid test of the design criteria.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the quantitative validation metrics were not stated with sufficient prominence in the main text. The GP models were trained and evaluated with cross-validation; we will revise the manuscript to include a concise summary (or table) of the relevant performance numbers—specifically the cross-validation error and any held-out test-set MAE for both lattice parameters and transformation temperature—placed in the methods or results section. This addition will allow readers to directly evaluate model accuracy and the reliability of the composition screening step. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: ML predictions guide selection while experiment provides independent benchmark

full rationale

The paper trains a Gaussian process on existing data to predict transformation temperature and lattice parameters for new synthetic compositions, then selects 31.75Zr-37.75Hf-14.5Y-14.5Ta-1.5Er because the model outputs indicate it meets the five design criteria. Differential thermal analysis is performed on the synthesized sample and directly measures 137 °C hysteresis. This experimental datum is not derived from or equivalent to the GP outputs by construction; it is an external observation. The conclusion that the cofactor conditions plus the other criteria are not universally applicable therefore rests on new measured data rather than on any self-definitional loop, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or self-citation chain. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce the central claim to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the predictive power of the GP model and the transferability of metal design criteria, both of which are challenged by the experimental outcome.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gaussian process models trained on existing data can accurately predict transformation temperatures and lattice parameters for new compositions in ZrO2-based systems.
    The paper uses the model to generate and select compositions without detailing validation.
  • domain assumption The design criteria (lambda2=1, min max|q(f)|, high trans temp, low vol change, solid solubility) from metal alloys are relevant for ceramics.
    Used to identify the promising composition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5888 in / 1499 out tokens · 40691 ms · 2026-05-22T21:39:15.859262+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    The identification of a new low hysteresis composition is based on design criteria... (1) λ₂=1... (2) minimizing the max|q(f)|... (5) solid solubility.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chu, Olugbenga O

    Jun Cui, Yong S. Chu, Olugbenga O. Famodu, Yasubumi Furuya, Jae Hattrick-Simpers, Richard D. James, Alfred Ludwig, Sigurd Thienhaus, Manfred Wuttig, Zhiyong Zhang, and Ichiro Takeuchi. Combinatorial search of thermoelastic shape-memory alloys with extremely small hysteresis width.Nature Materials, 5(4):286–290, April 2006. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    James, and Stefan Müller

    Zhiyong Zhang, Richard D. James, and Stefan Müller. Energy barriers and hysteresis in martensitic phase transformations.Acta Materialia, 57(15):4332–4352, September 2009

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Young, Alan Savan, Yasubumi Furuya, Sig- urd Thienhaus, Burkhard Maaß, Mustafa Rahim, Jan Frenzel, Hayo Brunken, Yong S

    Robert Zarnetta, Ryota Takahashi, Marcus L. Young, Alan Savan, Yasubumi Furuya, Sig- urd Thienhaus, Burkhard Maaß, Mustafa Rahim, Jan Frenzel, Hayo Brunken, Yong S. Chu, Vijay Srivastava, Richard D. James, Ichiro Takeuchi, Gunther Eggeler, and Alfred Ludwig. Identification of Quaternary Shape Memory Alloys with Near-Zero Thermal Hysteresis and Unprecedent...

    work page 1917

  4. [4]

    _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adfm.200902336

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.200902336

  5. [5]

    Unlikely

    R. D. James, Z. Zhang, R. D. James, and Z. Zhang. A Way to Search for Multiferroic Materials with “Unlikely” Combinations of Physical Properties. In Antoni Planes, Lluís Mañosa, and Avadh Saxena, editors,Magnetism and Structure in Functional Materials, pages 159–175. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Xian Chen, Vijay Srivastava, Vivekanand Dabade, and Richard D. James. Study of the cofactor conditions: Conditions of supercompatibility between phases.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 61(12):2566–2587, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Exploding and weeping ceramics.Nature, 599(7885):416–420, 2021

    Hanlin Gu, Jascha Rohmer, Justin Jetter, Andriy Lotnyk, Lorenz Kienle, Eckhard Quandt, and Richard D James. Exploding and weeping ceramics.Nature, 599(7885):416–420, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Oxford series on materials modelling ; 2

    Kaushik Bhattacharya.Microstructure of martensite : why it forms and how it gives rise to the shape-memory effect. Oxford series on materials modelling ; 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Li Jian and C. M. Wayman. Electron back scattering study of domain structure in monoclinic phase of a rare-earth orthoniobate LaNbO4.Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 43(10):3893–3901, October 1995

    work page 1995

  10. [10]

    Li Jian and Richard D. James. Prediction of microstructure in monoclinic LaNbO4 by energy minimization.Acta Materialia, 45(10):4271–4281, October 1997

    work page 1997

  11. [11]

    Pitteri and G

    M. Pitteri and G. Zanzotto. Generic and non-generic cubic-to-monoclinic transitions and their twins1.Acta Materialia, 46(1):225–237, December 1998

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    Kohn, and Felix Otto

    Hans Knüpfer, Robert V. Kohn, and Felix Otto. Nucleation Barriers for the Cubic-to- Tetragonal Phase Transformation.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 66(6):867–904, June 2013

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Shape memory alloys

    Christoph Chluba, Wenwei Ge, Rodrigo Lima de Miranda, Julian Strobel, Lorenz Kienle, Eckhard Quandt, and Manfred Wuttig. Shape memory alloys. Ultralow-fatigue shape memory alloy films.Science (New York, N.Y.), 348(6238):1004–1007, May 2015

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Greer, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Richard D

    Xiaoyue Ni, Julia R. Greer, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Richard D. James, and Xian Chen. Exceptional Resilience of Small-Scale Au30Cu25Zn45 under Cyclic Stress-Induced Phase 24 Transformation.Nano Letters, 16(12):7621–7625, December 2016. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Kohn and Stefan Müller

    Robert V. Kohn and Stefan Müller. Branching of twins near an austenite—twinned- martensite interface.Philosophical Magazine A, 66(5):697–715, November 1992. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619208201585

    work page doi:10.1080/01418619208201585 1992

  16. [16]

    J. M. Ball and R. D. James. Fine phase mixtures as minimizers of energy.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 100(1):13–52, March 1987

    work page 1987

  17. [17]

    James, and Dominique Schryvers

    Rémi Delville, Sakthivel Kasinathan, Zhiyong Zhang, Jan Van Humbeeck, Richard D. James, and Dominique Schryvers. Transmission electron microscopy study of phase compatibility in low hysteresis shape memory alloys.Philosophical Magazine, 90(1-4):177– 195, January 2010

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    K Mackenzie and J

    J. K Mackenzie and J. S Bowles. The crystallography of martensite transformations II. Acta Metallurgica, 2:138–147, January 1954

    work page 1954

  19. [19]

    S Bowles and J

    J. S Bowles and J. K Mackenzie. The crystallography of martensite transformations I. Acta Metallurgica, 2(1):129–137, January 1954

    work page 1954

  20. [20]

    Shield, and Richard D

    Yintao Song, Xian Chen, Vivekanand Dabade, Thomas W. Shield, and Richard D. James. Enhanced reversibility and unusual microstructure of a phase-transforming material. Nature, 502(7469):85–88, October 2013. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    X. L. Meng, H. Li, W. Cai, S. J. Hao, and L. S. Cui. Thermal cycling stability mechanism of Ti50.5Ni33.5Cu11.5Pd4.5 shape memory alloy with near-zero hysteresis.Scripta Materialia, 103:30–33, July 2015

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    James, and Eckhard Quandt

    Maike Wegner, Hanlin Gu, Richard D. James, and Eckhard Quandt. Correlation between phase compatibility and efficient energy conversion in Zr-doped Barium Titanate.Scientific Reports, 10(1):3496, February 2020. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Alan Lai, Zehui Du, Chee Lip Gan, and Christopher A. Schuh. Shape Memory and Superelastic Ceramics at Small Scales.Science, 341(6153):1505–1508, September 2013. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Suppression of abnormal grain growth in K0.5Na0.5NbO3: phase transitions and compatibility.Scientific Reports, 9(1):19775, December 2019

    Patricia Pop-Ghe, Norbert Stock, and Eckhard Quandt. Suppression of abnormal grain growth in K0.5Na0.5NbO3: phase transitions and compatibility.Scientific Reports, 9(1):19775, December 2019. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Y. G. Liang, S. Lee, H. S. Yu, H. R. Zhang, Y. J. Liang, P. Y. Zavalij, X. Chen, R. D. James, L. A. Bendersky, A. V. Davydov, X. H. Zhang, and I. Takeuchi. Tuning the hysteresis of a metal-insulator transition via lattice compatibility.Nature Communications, 11(1):3539, July 2020. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Pang, Gregory B

    Edward L. Pang, Gregory B. Olson, and Christopher A. Schuh. Low-hysteresis shape- memory ceramics designed by multimode modelling.Nature, 610:491–495, 10 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Influence ofEr2O3 content on microstructure and mechanical properties ofZTA−TiO 2 composites.Journal of Rare Earths, 37:299–304, 3 2019

    Yudong Sui, Li’na Han, Yehua Jiang, and Quan Shan. Influence ofEr2O3 content on microstructure and mechanical properties ofZTA−TiO 2 composites.Journal of Rare Earths, 37:299–304, 3 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    H. C. Tong and C. M. Wayman. Characteristic temperatures and other properties of thermoelastic martensites.Acta Metallurgica, 22(7):887–896, July 1974. 25

    work page 1974

  29. [29]

    Effect ofTa2O5, Nb2O5, andHfO2 alloying on the transformability of Y2O3-stabilized tetragonalHfO2.Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 73:115–120, 1990

    Dae-Joon -J Kim. Effect ofTa2O5, Nb2O5, andHfO2 alloying on the transformability of Y2O3-stabilized tetragonalHfO2.Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 73:115–120, 1990

    work page 1990

  30. [30]

    K. A. Khor and J. Yang. Lattice parameters, tetragonality (ca) and transformability of tetragonal zirconia phase in plasma-sprayed ZrO2-Er2O3 coatings.Materials Letters, 31(1):23–27, 1997

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    Mary Gurak, Quentin Flamant, Laetitia Laversenne, and David R. Clarke. On the yttrium tantalate – zirconia phase diagram.Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 38(9):3317–3324, 2018

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    P. DURAN. The system erbia-zirconia.Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 60(11- 12):510–513, 1977

    work page 1977

  33. [33]

    Martensitic transfor- mation temperatures of ceramics.Advanced Engineering Materials, 12 2022

    Mehrdad Zarinejad, Tim White, Yunxiang Tong, and Sajjad Rimaz. Martensitic transfor- mation temperatures of ceramics.Advanced Engineering Materials, 12 2022

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Frenzel, A

    J. Frenzel, A. Wieczorek, I. Opahle, B. Maaß, R. Drautz, and G. Eggeler. On the effect of alloy composition on martensite start temperatures and latent heats in Ni–Ti-based shape memory alloys.Acta Materialia, 90:213–231, May 2015

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Karl pearson and the correlation curve, 1994

    Stephen Blyth. Karl pearson and the correlation curve, 1994

    work page 1994

  36. [36]

    Clementi, D

    E. Clementi, D. L. Raimondi, and W. P. Reinhardt. Atomic screening constants from scf functions. ii. atoms with 37 to 86 electrons.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 47:1300–1307, 1967

    work page 1967

  37. [37]

    Pheno enologigal and igrosgopig theories of structural stability, 1985

    D G Pettifor. Pheno enologigal and igrosgopig theories of structural stability, 1985

    work page 1985

  38. [38]

    A. L. Allred. Electronegativity values from thermochemical data.Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, 17(3):215–221, June 1961

    work page 1961

  39. [39]

    J. C. Slater. Atomic radii in crystals.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 41:3199–3204, 1964

    work page 1964

  40. [40]

    R. D. Shannon. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides.Acta Crystallographica Section A, 32:751–767, 1976

    work page 1976

  41. [41]

    Hotop and W

    H. Hotop and W. C. Lineberger. Binding energies in atomic negative ions: Ii.Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 14:731–750, 1985

    work page 1985

  42. [42]

    Best Subset, Forward Stepwise or Lasso? Analysis and Recommendations Based on Extensive Comparisons.Statistical Science, 35(4):579 – 592, 2020

    Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Ryan Tibshirani. Best Subset, Forward Stepwise or Lasso? Analysis and Recommendations Based on Extensive Comparisons.Statistical Science, 35(4):579 – 592, 2020

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Random search for hyper-parameter optimization.J

    James Bergstra and Yoshua Bengio. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization.J. Mach. Learn. Res., 13(null):281–305, feb 2012

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Physics-informed machine learning for composition – process – property design: Shape memory alloy demonstration.Applied Materials Today, 22:100898, 2021

    Sen Liu, Branden B Kappes, Behnam Amin-ahmadi, Othmane Benafan, Xiaoli Zhang, and Aaron P Stebner. Physics-informed machine learning for composition – process – property design: Shape memory alloy demonstration.Applied Materials Today, 22:100898, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Kankanamge, Johannes Reiner, Xingjun Ma, Santiago Corujeira Gallo, and Wei Xu

    Udesh M.H.U. Kankanamge, Johannes Reiner, Xingjun Ma, Santiago Corujeira Gallo, and Wei Xu. Machine learning guided alloy design of high-temperatureNiTiHf shape memory alloys.Journal of Materials Science, 57:19447–19465, 2022. 26

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    The nature of martensite.trans

    Edgar C Bain and NY Dunkirk. The nature of martensite.trans. AIME, 70(1):25–47, 1924

    work page 1924

  47. [47]

    W.M. Lomer. Theβ→α transformation in uranium-1. 4 at. % chromium alloy. page 243, 1955

    work page 1955

  48. [48]

    Koumatos and A

    K. Koumatos and A. Muehlemann. Optimality of general lattice transformations with applications to the Bain strain in steel.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472(2188):20150865, April 2016. Publisher: Royal Society

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Bucsek, Grant A

    Ashley N. Bucsek, Grant A. Hudish, Glen S. Bigelow, Ronald D. Noebe, and Aaron P. Stebner. Composition, Compatibility, and the Functional Performances of Ternary NiTiX High-Temperature Shape Memory Alloys.Shape Memory and Superelasticity, 2(1):62–79, March 2016

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Morphology of Critical Nuclei in Solid-State Phase Transformations.Physical Review Letters, 98(26):265703, June 2007

    Lei Zhang, Long-Qing Chen, and Qiang Du. Morphology of Critical Nuclei in Solid-State Phase Transformations.Physical Review Letters, 98(26):265703, June 2007. Publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    J. C. Fisher, J. H. Hollomon, and D. Turnbull. Nucleation.Journal of Applied Physics, 19(8):775–784, August 1948

    work page 1948

  52. [52]

    M. S. Wechsler, D. S. Lieberman, and T. A. Read. On the theory of the formation of martensite.Trans AIME, 197:1503–1515, 1953

    work page 1953

  53. [53]

    Hanlin Gu, Lars Bumke, Christoph Chluba, Eckhard Quandt, and Richard D. James. Phase engineering and supercompatibility of shape memory alloys.Materials Today, 21(3):265–277, April 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Kelly and L.R

    Patrick M. Kelly and L.R. Francis Rose. The martensitic transformation in ceramics — its role in transformation toughening.Progress in Materials Science, 47(5):463–557, 2002

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    Hayakawa, N

    M. Hayakawa, N. Kuntani, and M. Oka. Structural study on the tetragonal to mono- clinic transformation in arc-melted zro2-2mol.%y2o3—i. experimental observations.Acta Metallurgica, 37(8):2223 – 2228, 1989

    work page 1989

  56. [56]

    Hayakawa and M

    M. Hayakawa and M. Oka. Structural study on the tetragonal to monoclinic transformation in arc-melted zro2-2mol.%y2o3—ii. quantitative analysis.Acta Metallurgica, 37(8):2229 – 2235, 1989

    work page 1989

  57. [57]

    Pang, Caitlin A

    Edward L. Pang, Caitlin A. McCandler, and Christopher A. Schuh. Reduced cracking in polycrystalline zro2-ceo2 shape-memory ceramics by meeting the cofactor conditions. Acta Materialia, 177:230 – 239, 2019. 27

    work page 2019