Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bridging the Theoretical Gap in Randomized Smoothing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.02412 v2 pith:C76DQWV7 submitted 2025-04-03 cs.LG stat.ML

Bridging the Theoretical Gap in Randomized Smoothing

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords robustnessrandomizedsmoothingcertifiedlipschitztheoreticalaccuracyapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Randomized smoothing has become a leading approach for certifying adversarial robustness in machine learning models. However, a persistent gap remains between theoretical certified robustness and empirical robustness accuracy. This paper introduces a new framework that bridges this gap by leveraging Lipschitz continuity for certification and proposing a novel, less conservative method for computing confidence intervals in randomized smoothing. Our approach tightens the bounds of certified robustness, offering a more accurate reflection of model robustness in practice. Through rigorous experimentation we show that our method improves the robust accuracy, compressing the gap between empirical findings and previous theoretical results. We argue that investigating local Lipschitz constants and designing ad-hoc confidence intervals can further enhance the performance of randomized smoothing. These results pave the way for a deeper understanding of the relationship between Lipschitz continuity and certified robustness.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.