Trust Region Preference Approximation: A simple and stable reinforcement learning algorithm for LLM reasoning
read the original abstract
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly evolved, approaching Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) while benefiting from large-scale reinforcement learning to enhance Human Alignment (HA) and Reasoning. Recent reward-based optimization algorithms, such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) have achieved significant performance on reasoning tasks, whereas preference-based optimization algorithms such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) significantly improve the performance of LLMs on human alignment. However, despite the strong performance of reward-based optimization methods in alignment tasks , they remain vulnerable to reward hacking. Furthermore, preference-based algorithms (such as Online DPO) haven't yet matched the performance of reward-based optimization algorithms (like PPO) on reasoning tasks, making their exploration in this specific area still a worthwhile pursuit. Motivated by these challenges, we propose the Trust Region Preference Approximation (TRPA) algorithm, which integrates rule-based optimization with preference-based optimization for reasoning tasks. As a preference-based algorithm, TRPA naturally eliminates the reward hacking issue. TRPA constructs preference levels using predefined rules, forms corresponding preference pairs, and leverages a novel optimization algorithm for RL training with a theoretical monotonic improvement guarantee. Experimental results demonstrate that TRPA not only achieves competitive performance on reasoning tasks but also exhibits robust stability. The code of this paper are released and updating on https://github.com/XueruiSu/Trust-Region-Preference-Approximation.git.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective
ConSPO improves RLVR training by aligning rollout scores with generation likelihoods via length-normalized log-probabilities and applying a group-wise InfoNCE contrastive loss with a scheduled margin, outperforming GR...
-
Curriculum Reinforcement Learning Can Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model
Boundary-aware Curriculum RL raises average pass@256 by 9.8 points over base models and 10.3 points over vanilla RLVR on Qwen, Llama, and DeepSeek families.
-
Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective
ConSPO introduces a contrastive sequence-level policy optimization that aligns rollout scores with generation likelihoods via length-normalized log-probabilities and an InfoNCE-style group contrast with curriculum mar...
-
Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective
ConSPO is a new contrastive sequence-level policy optimization method that addresses GRPO limitations via length-normalized log-probability scores and InfoNCE-style objectives, outperforming baselines on reasoning benchmarks.
-
Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance
LUFFY mixes off-policy reasoning traces into RLVR training via Mixed-Policy GRPO and regularized importance sampling, delivering over 6-point gains on math benchmarks and enabling training of weak models where on-poli...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.