Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Non-equilibrium dynamics of disordered fractal spring network with active forces

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On critical percolation clusters used as disordered fractals, active force monopoles produce subdiffusive motion whose exponent is fixed by the network's spectral dimension, while active force dipoles drive slow collapse, sharp collapse…

desk verdict The central monopole-exponent claim is undercut by the paper's own fitted exponent (0.316 vs. 0.335), but the disordered-percolation phenomenology is genuinely new and worth sending to review. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16510 v1 pith:IPN3T6AQ submitted 2025-04-23 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Debjyoti Majumdar , Sadhana Singh , Rony Granek This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords activematterfractalnetworksspectraldimensionanomalousdiffusionmeansquaredisplacementpercolationforcedipolesrigidity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how disordered fractal spring networks—realized as the infinite cluster at bond percolation on square and triangular lattices—respond to stochastic active forces. It tries to establish that under force monopoles the intermediate-time mean-square displacement is governed entirely by the spectral dimension $d_s$ of the fractal, with $\mathrm{MSD}\sim t^{1-d_s/2}$, the same exponent that thermal noise produces. For force dipoles, it argues that the same fractal clusters never settle: they shrink continuously and the MSD shows a saturation plateau followed by either persistent or fluctuating local rotations. The work matters because such networks are minimal models for actomyosin gels, chromatin, and other active biopolymer systems, where molecular motors deliver localized forces rather than uniform thermal kicks.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the spectral dimension $d_s$, the exponent in the vibrational density of states $g(\omega)\sim\omega^{d_s-1}$ of the fractal; for the critical percolation cluster used here, $d_s=1.33$. The analytic MSD is a normal-mode sum over these vibrational states, and in the intermediate window $\tau\ll t\ll\tau_N$ the sum reduces to $\mathrm{MSD}\sim t^{1-d_s/2}$. For dipoles, the load-bearing counting device is Maxwell's isostatic criterion, modified so that a dipole in its ON state adds one mechanical constraint per active bond, shifting the rigidity threshold to $p'_{\mathrm{rigid}}=p_{\mathrm{rigid}}/(1+P\phi)$.

What would settle it

Simulate a bond-percolation cluster with force monopoles at fixed $d_s$ while varying $f$ and $\tau$ (for example $f=0.5$ versus $2$, $\tau=1$ versus $100$): if the fitted intermediate exponent moves away from $1-d_s/2$, or the prefactor does not scale as $f^2\tau$, the spectral-dimension-only claim fails. Independently, measure the collapse threshold of diluted triangular lattices with active dipoles at several $\phi$: if $f_c$ does not extrapolate to zero at $p'_{\mathrm{rigid}}=p_{\mathrm{rigid}}/(1+P\phi)$, the modified Maxwell criterion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that on a disordered fractal at the percolation threshold, the anomalous exponent of the time-averaged mean-square displacement under active monopolar noise is $\nu=1-d_s/2$, identical to the thermal exponent and independent of force amplitude and correlation time. Dipolar active forces behave differently: on critical percolation clusters they produce no true steady state, the network collapses slowly, and after a saturation regime the MSD rises ballistically then diffusively for a low fraction of dipoles, or diffusively for full dipole occupancy, depending on whether local node rotations are persistent or fluctuating. On mechanically stable triangular lattices above the isostatic point, contractile dipoles produce a sharp collapse transition above a critical force $f_c\sim \phi^{-0.54}$, and the paper derives a modified Maxwell criterion $p'_{\mathrm{rigid}}=p_{\mathrm{rigid}}/(1+P\phi)$ in which active dipole links act as extra constraints that shift rigidity percolation to lower bond dilution. A direct corollary is that active disordered solids should be poised above the isostatic point to remain stable against even weak, rare dipolar forces.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an active dipole in its ON state can be counted as an extra mechanical constraint, like a strut, in Maxwell rigidity counting; a prescribed motor force is not literally a geometric constraint, so the shifted threshold $p'_{\mathrm{rigid}}=p_{\mathrm{rigid}}/(1+P\phi)$ rests on that counting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For monopolar active forces, the subdiffusion exponent in the intermediate regime depends only on $d_s$ and not on the force amplitude, correlation time, or dipole fraction, so the same exponent should appear across very different activity levels.
  • Thermal and active monopole noise give the same anomalous exponent, so distinguishing active from passive fluctuations in gels or chromosomes requires amplitude or correlation-time measurements, not the exponent itself.
  • Contractile dipoles on sub-isostatic fractal clusters cause progressive collapse; the 'steady state' is only a pseudo-steady state on intermediate times, and the long-time state is collapsed.
  • In rigid triangular networks there is a threshold force for collapse that grows roughly as $\phi^{-0.54}$; below threshold the network size is stable, and active dipoles shift the rigidity point to $p'_{\mathrm{rigid}}=p_{\mathrm{rigid}}/(1+P\phi)$.
  • Persistent unidirectional rotation appears in fully connected networks with a low dipole fraction, while near the rigidity threshold rotation becomes direction-reversing and fluctuation-dominated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference beyond the paper: the exponent identity $\nu=1-d_s/2$ for monopoles offers a null test for chromatin data—if the subdiffusion exponent is unchanged after ATP depletion, the active noise may be effectively monopolar, whereas dipolar motor action should show saturation or collapse signatures instead of a shifted exponent.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the modified Maxwell criterion makes a quantitative prediction that motor density $P\phi$ lowers the rigidity threshold; this could be tested by measuring the elastic plateau or collapse onset of a reconstituted actin-myosin network as motor concentration is varied.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the slow collapse of sub-isostatic clusters under arbitrarily weak dipoles implies that biological networks maintained by weak motors must be above isostaticity or stabilized by bending rigidity, both of which are absent from the bead-spring model.
  • Inference beyond the paper: because the paper attributes rotation to residual anisotropy of a finite dipole realization, a testable extension is that the mean angular velocity decays with increasing system size while angular-velocity fluctuations persist, which could be checked in larger simulations or confined active gels.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports Langevin dynamics simulations of bead-spring networks built from critical bond-percolation clusters on square and triangular lattices, driven by thermal noise and by random-telegraph active forces. It claims that for force monopoles the intermediate-time MSD is subdiffusive with exponent ν = 1 − d_s/2, controlled solely by the spectral dimension d_s, and that the network reaches a dynamically swelled steady state. For force dipoles it reports a quasi-steady-state saturation regime followed by a second ballistic rise and then diffusion at low dipole fraction, persistent or fluctuating rotations, and a collapse transition in triangular lattices above a dilution-dependent threshold. The paper further proposes a modified Maxwell criterion, Eqs. (B7)–(B9), in which ON-state active dipoles contribute additional constraints and shift the rigidity percolation point to p'_rigid = p_rigid/(1 + P ϕ). The authors are candid about limitations: the dipole network does not reach a true steady state, excluded volume and hydrodynamic interactions are absent, and the monopole CM drift is only approximately removed by Eq. (6).

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper gives a clean, falsifiable prediction: for active monopolar noise on disordered fractals, the anomalous MSD exponent depends only on d_s, not on force amplitude, correlation time, or other fractal dimensions. The thermal control case matches the theory well (ν = 0.336 ± 0.004 against 1 − d_s/2 = 0.335), and d_s = 1.33 is measured independently from the connectivity matrix. The dipole phenomenology, including the shifted rigidity boundary and rotational motion, is a plausible extension of earlier work on the Sierpinski gasket to disordered percolation clusters. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs or a fully parameter-free derivation, since the analytic MSD formulas (Eqs. 10–11) are taken from the authors' prior paper; nonetheless, the numerical confrontation with those formulas is a useful contribution. The main value would be in extending active-network results from deterministic to disordered fractals and in motivating experiments on chromatin and actomyosin networks, provided the quantitative discrepancies noted below are resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [§VI B, Fig. 4(a), Eq. (14)] The headline prediction ν = 1 − d_s/2 = 0.335 (with d_s = 1.33 from Fig. 2) is not reproduced by the athermal monopole fit, which is reported as ν = 0.31633 ± 0.002541. This is a statistical offset of about 7.5σ from the predicted value, the paper does not acknowledge or explain it, and the claim that the exponent is 'solely controlled' by d_s is therefore not established by the presented numerics. Please report the exact fit window, the sensitivity of ν to the fit boundaries (especially the t ≈ τ crossover and the late-time ballistic/diffusive regimes), and the effect of the mean-displacement subtraction in Eq. (6). Without this analysis, the central scaling result rests on a fit that is, on its face, inconsistent with the theory at the level of the fitted uncertainty.
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B7)–(B9)] The modified Maxwell criterion treats each ON-state active dipole as an additional mechanical constraint, adding P ϕM to the number of constraints. A prescribed motor force is not a fixed-length geometric constraint; whether active stresses stabilize floppy modes must follow from the force balance and dynamics rather than from constraint counting. As written, Eq. (15) is an assumption, and consequently the predicted dilution boundary f_c = 0 at p'_rigid and the conclusion that active disordered solids must be poised above a shifted isostatic point are unsupported. Please provide a derivation of the stability condition, or a direct numerical test that is independent of f and P (e.g., measuring the rigidity onset for different force amplitudes and ON probabilities, or comparing the actual constraint count with the stability threshold) to distinguish constraint counting from stress-induced stabilization.
  3. [§VI C, Figs. 5–6] The dipole MSD is analyzed in a pseudo-steady state while R_g is continuously decreasing by 2–5% over the simulation. The control in Fig. 5(b) shows δR_g < sqrt(MSD) only for lag times shorter than about 10^6, but the reported saturation, second ballistic rise, and diffusive regime extend to longer times, and the rotation analysis in Fig. 8 covers even longer intervals. The paper should demonstrate that the time-averaged MSD is insensitive to the ongoing shrinkage over the full lag-time window, or restrict the fitting to lag times where the pseudo-steady-state condition is quantitatively verified. As it stands, the interpretation of the long-time dipole regimes as intrinsic network dynamics rather than as artifacts of a slowly collapsing reference configuration remains open.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§V, Eq. (14)] Eq. (14) states the regime as 't << τ', but the surrounding text and Eq. (11) describe the regime τ << t << τ_N; the inequality in Eq. (14) is a typo and should be corrected.
  2. [§IV C, Eqs. (5)–(7)] The expression 't_tot − t' lacks parentheses in both the prefactor and the summation upper limit, making the intended denominator (t_tot − t) unclear.
  3. [§VI A] The text writes 'ν = 0.33(5)' for the predicted value 1 − d_s/2 = 0.335; the notation is ambiguous and should be written as 0.335 or 0.33(5) with an explicit convention.
  4. [§VI B] The text says a 'second ballistic regime (not shown)' due to CM drift, then says this regime is replaced by linear scaling after applying Eq. (6). Please clarify which data points are excluded from the fit and how the CM subtraction affects the fitted window.
  5. [Fig. 7(a) inset] The power-law fit is labeled 'g(x) ∼ x^{−0.54}' while the horizontal axis of the inset appears to be the dipole fraction ϕ; please define x explicitly (presumably x = ϕ).
  6. [§VI C and §VII] The long-time ballistic-like rise for ϕ = 0.2 is attributed in §VI C to 'effectively free motion of dangling ends', while the abstract and conclusion attribute the two second-rise behaviors to persistent versus fluctuating local rotations; these explanations should be reconciled or distinguished in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central exponent is independently measured from the connectivity matrix and independently fitted from simulations; the cited prior theory has independent numerical confirmation.

full rationale

The core derivation is not circular. The prediction ν=1−d_s/2 is not an input: d_s=1.33 is measured from the cumulative density of eigenstates of the connectivity matrix (Fig. 2), and the MSD exponents are obtained by fitting independent Langevin-dynamics trajectories (thermal fit ν=0.336±0.004 in Fig. 3; monopole fits in Fig. 4). Eq. 14 is imported from the authors' prior Ref. [13], but that is a parameter-free analytic calculation, and the paper's own thermal simulation reproduces its numerical consequence, so the citation functions as independent evidence rather than a definitional shortcut. The athermal monopole fit 0.31633±0.002541 deviates from the predicted 0.335 by roughly seven standard deviations, and this discrepancy is not reconciled; that is a quantitative correctness issue, not a circular reduction. Likewise, the modified Maxwell criterion in Appendix B, p'_rigid=p_rigid/(1+Pφ), is an explicit counting ansatz and is used openly to set the fc=0 points in Fig. 7(c); it may be physically debatable, but the finite-p collapse forces are simulation outputs and the formula is not fitted to the quantity it predicts. No step of the derivation is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; 'crawling rotations' are an emergent behavior, not a new force or particle. The free parameters listed are model inputs chosen by hand, not fitted to the target observable. The most consequential assumption is the active-constraint counting in the modified Maxwell criterion.

free parameters (5)
  • active force amplitude f = 1 (monopole fractal), 0.1 (dipole fractal), 0.2-2 (triangular collapse)
    Chosen by hand from biological estimates; the collapse transition is studied as a function of f, so it is a control parameter rather than a hidden fit.
  • force decorrelation time tau = 1 and 100 (monopoles); 1 (dipoles)
    Chosen by hand; the existence of the intermediate subdiffusive regime depends on tau being between the short and long network relaxation times.
  • fraction of active dipoles phi = 0.2 and 1.0 (fractal); 0.2-0.4 (lattices)
    Chosen by hand; the paper's modified Maxwell criterion uses phi, and phi affects the collapse threshold and MSD dynamics.
  • ON probability P = 0.5
    Chosen for simplicity; the active autocorrelation and the modified rigidity point depend on P.
  • temperature T = 0 and 0.1
    Chosen to compare athermal and thermal cases; low temperature is used to show the active contribution survives at finite T.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Overdamped Langevin dynamics with no hydrodynamic interactions or excluded volume captures the network dynamics (Sec. III, IV A).
    The model sets gamma = 1 and neglects inertial, hydrodynamic, and steric effects; conclusions are for this minimal spring network.
  • domain assumption The percolation cluster at p = p_c + 10^-3 is a representative disordered fractal with well-defined d_s and d_f (Sec. III B).
    A single cluster realization is used; finite-size and realization fluctuations in d_s are not quantified.
  • domain assumption Active forces follow a random telegraph process with P = 1/2 and no spatial correlation (Sec. III, Appendix A2).
    This is the assumed noise model; results may depend on P and on spatial correlations, which are not explored.
  • standard math The vibrational density of states scales as g(omega) ~ omega^(d_s-1), giving cumulative P(omega) ~ omega^d_s (Sec. II, Sec. IV B).
    A standard fractal property used to extract d_s = 1.33 and to convert normal-mode sums into scaling laws.
  • ad hoc to paper Each active dipolar bond in the ON state acts as one additional constraint in Maxwell counting (Appendix B, Eq. B7).
    This is the paper's central analytic step for the shifted rigidity point; it identifies a force with a constraint without independent justification.
  • domain assumption Time-averaged MSD over 10-50 random nodes represents the network-averaged MSD even during slow collapse (pseudo-steady-state, Sec. VI C).
    For dipoles, Rg decreases by 2-5% during data accumulation; the authors argue delta Rg is small compared to sqrt(MSD) at short lags.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-equilibrium dynamics of disordered fractal spring network with active forces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IPN3T6AQ

@misc{pith2026250416510,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-equilibrium dynamics of disordered fractal spring network with active forces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IPN3T6AQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16510}
}
abstract

We investigate the non-equilibrium dynamics of active bead-spring critical percolation clusters under the action of monopolar and dipolar forces. Previously, Langevin dynamics simulations of Rouse-type dynamics were performed on a deterministic fractal -- the Sierpinski gasket -- and combined with analytical theory [Chaos {\bf 34}, 113107 (2024)]. To study disordered fractals, we use here the critical (bond) percolation infinite cluster of square and triangular lattices, where beads (occupying nodes) are connected by harmonic springs. Two types of active stochastic forces, modeled as random telegraph processes, are considered: force monopoles, acting on individual nodes in random directions, and force dipoles, where extensile or contractile forces act between pairs of nodes, forming dipole links. A dynamical steady state is reached where the network is dynamically swelled for force monopoles. The time-averaged mean square displacement (MSD) shows sub-diffusive behavior at intermediate times longer than the force correlation time, whose anomalous exponent is solely controlled by the spectral dimension $(d_s)$ of the fractal network yielding MSD $\sim t^{\nu}$, with $\nu=1-\frac{d_s}{2}$, similar to the thermal system and in accord with the general analytic theory. In contrast, dipolar forces require a diverging time to reach a steady state, depending on the fraction of dipoles, and lead to network shrinkage. Within a quasi-steady-state assumption, we find a saturation behavior at the same temporal regime. Thereafter, a second ballistic-like rise is observed for networks with a low fraction of dipole forces, followed by a linear, diffusive increase. The second ballistic rise is, however, absent in networks fully occupied with force dipoles. These two behaviors are argued to result from local rotations of nodes, which are either persistent or fluctuating.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16510 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The critical force depends on ϕ and diverges as ϕ → 0, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: ]. On further diluting the system down to p ≈ piso, e.g., p = 0.7, the system is almost collapsed, and display frequent changes in rotational direction, where the effec￾tive ⟨θac⟩ ≈ 0 over a large time. Angular velocity also depends on other factors like the force ampl…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    isostatic point

    found a sharp collapse transition at f ≃ 1 for the Sierpinski gasket. To understand this discrepancy, we further analyze the collapse transition in regular undi- luted and sparsely diluted lattices. Remarkably, even for complete (undiluted) square lat- tices, the slow network collapse persists (even though the collapse steady state is not observed). This ...

    work page

  2. [1]

    attachment

    The system evolves following the Hamiltonian H = 1 2mω2 0 X ⟨ij⟩ (⃗ ri−⃗ rj−bˆrij)2 (1) which⟨ij⟩ denotes pair of neighboring sites connected by springs of self-frequency ω0, m is the bead mass. In the limb→ 0, Eq. 1 reduces to the scalar elasticity Hamil- tonian [13]. For simulations we have used b = 1 unless 3 FIG. 1. Fractal lattice. A disordered fract...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Kirchhoff matrix

    and an integration time step of δt = 10−2. For choice of parameter values refer to Appendix A 3. B. Fractal lattice properties The infinite clusters of the disordered fractal are in- dexed, and the infinite cluster is isolated using the Hoshen-Kopelman algorithm [21] for square lattice and a depth-first search in the case of triangular lattice. The correl...

    work page

  4. [3]

    for once

    and τN∼ Γ(ωmin)−1∼τ0N2/ds. For the thermal system it has already been shown in Refs. [22–25] ⟨△⃗ r(t)2⟩th =Bthtνth, (12) where νth = 1− ds 2 , provided ds < 2, and the prefactor Bth∼dkBTγds/2−1. In active systems, for short times t << τ << τN, the theory finds super-diffusive ballistic scaling behavior ⟨△⃗ r(t)2⟩ac =Bacst2, t<<τ, (13) where the amplitude ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Force per- colation of contractile active gels

    Jose Alvarado, Michael Sheinman, Abhinav Sharma, Fred C MacKintosh, and Gijsje H Koenderink. Force per- colation of contractile active gels. Soft Matter, 13(5624), 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Criticality and isostaticity in fibre net- works

    C P Broedersz, Xiaoming Mao, T C Lubensky, and F C MacKintosh. Criticality and isostaticity in fibre net- works. Nature Physics, 7(983-988), 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [6]

    Nonequilibrium me- chanics and dynamics of motor-activated gels

    F C MacKintosh and A J Levine. Nonequilibrium me- chanics and dynamics of motor-activated gels. Physical Review Letters, 100(018104), 2008

    work page 2008

  8. [7]

    For the best possible fit in the intermediate region, 6 33 33.5 34 34.5 35 35.5 0 1 × 107 2 × 107 ϕ = 1.0 0.2 Rg t 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 10−2 100 102 104 106 108 √△r2,ϕ = 0.21.0δRg,ϕ = 0.21.0 δRg, √ △r2 t FIG. 5. Pseudo steady state in active force dipole net- works. (a) Variation inRg during which the data for MSD is gathered. (b) Comparison of cha...

    work page

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state

    Jose Alvarado, Michael Sheinman, Abhinav Sharma, Fred C MacKintosh, and Gijsje H Koenderink. Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state. Nature Physics, 9(11), 2013

    2013

  2. [9]

    Active gel physics

    J Prost, F Julicher, and J-F Joanny. Active gel physics. Nature Physics, 11:111–117, 2015

    2015

  3. [10]

    Dynamics of a poly- mer network modeled by a fractal cactus

    Aurel Jurjiu and Mircea Galiceanu. Dynamics of a poly- mer network modeled by a fractal cactus. Polymers, 10 (787), 2018

    2018

  4. [11]

    Range and strength of mechanical interactions of force dipoles in elastic fiber networks

    Abhinav Kumar, David A Quint, and Kinjal Dasbiswas. Range and strength of mechanical interactions of force dipoles in elastic fiber networks. Soft Matter , 19:5805– 5823, 2023

    2023

  5. [12]

    Fractal dimension of chromatin: potential molecular diagnostic applications for cancer prognosis

    K Metze. Fractal dimension of chromatin: potential molecular diagnostic applications for cancer prognosis. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics , 13(7):719–735, 2013

    2013

  6. [14]

    Nonequilibrium dynamics of isostatic spring networks

    Federico S Gnesotto, B M Remlein, and C P Broedersz. Nonequilibrium dynamics of isostatic spring networks. Phys. Rev. E , 100(013002), 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Koslowski, and A Blumen

    A Jurjiu, Th. Koslowski, and A Blumen. Dynamics of deterministic fractal polymer networks: Hydrodynamic interactions and the absence of scaling. J. Chem. Phys. , 118:2398–2404, 2003

    2003

  8. [16]

    Crumpled globule model of the three-dimensional structure of dna

    A Grosberg, Y Rabin, S Havlin, and A Neer. Crumpled globule model of the three-dimensional structure of dna. Europhysics Letters, 23(5):373–378, 1993

    1993

  9. [17]

    Anomalous diffusion in fractal globules

    M V Tamm, L I Nazarov, A A Gavrilov, and A V Cher- tovich. Anomalous diffusion in fractal globules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114(178102), 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    Active fractal net- works with stochastic force monopoles and force dipoles unravel subdiffusion of chromosomal loci

    Sadhana Singh and Rony Granek. Active fractal net- works with stochastic force monopoles and force dipoles unravel subdiffusion of chromosomal loci. Chaos, 34 (113107), 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    G Woodhouse and R

    F. G Woodhouse and R. E. Goldstein. Spontaneous cir- culation of confined active suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(168105), 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Spatial confinement of active microtubule networks induces large-scale ro- tational cytoplasmic flow

    Kazuya Suzuki, Makito Miyazaki, Jun Takagi, Takeshi Itabashi, and Shin’ichi Ishiwata. Spatial confinement of active microtubule networks induces large-scale ro- tational cytoplasmic flow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(11):2922–2927, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Actomyosin contractility rotates the cell nucleus

    Maitra Ananyo Kumar, Abhishek, Madhuresh Sumit, Sriram Ramaswamy, and G V Shivashankar. Actomyosin contractility rotates the cell nucleus. Scientific Reports, 4(3781), 2014

    2014

  14. [22]

    Introduction to percolation theory

    Dietrich Stauffer. Introduction to percolation theory. Tay- lor & Francis, London, 2nd edition, 1992

    1992

  15. [23]

    Density of states on fractals : fractons

    S Alexander and R Orbach. Density of states on fractals : fractons. J. Physique Lettres, 43:L–625 – L–631, 1982. 10

    1982

  16. [24]

    Vibrations of fractals and scattering of light from aerogels

    S Alexander. Vibrations of fractals and scattering of light from aerogels. Phys. Rev. B , 40(11), 1989

    1989

  17. [25]

    Handbook of Stochastic Processes, and Its Applications to Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sci- ences, Springer Series in Synergetics

    C Gardiner. Handbook of Stochastic Processes, and Its Applications to Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sci- ences, Springer Series in Synergetics . Springer, New York, 1991

    1991

  18. [26]

    Percolation and cluster dis- tribution

    J Hoshen and R Kopelman. Percolation and cluster dis- tribution. i. cluster multiple labeling technique and crit- ical concentration algorithm . Physical Review B, 14(8): 3438–3445, 1976

    1976

  19. [27]

    Fractons in proteins: Can they lead to anomalously decaying time autocorre- lations? Physical Review Letters, 95(098106), 2005

    Rony Granek and Joseph Klafter. Fractons in proteins: Can they lead to anomalously decaying time autocorre- lations? Physical Review Letters, 95(098106), 2005

    2005

  20. [28]

    Proteins as fractals: Role of the hydro- dynamic interaction

    Rony Granek. Proteins as fractals: Role of the hydro- dynamic interaction. Physical Review E, 83(020902(R)), 2011

    2011

  21. [29]

    Dy- namic structure factor of vibrating fractals: Proteins as a case study

    Shlomi Reuveni, Joseph Klafter, and Rony Granek. Dy- namic structure factor of vibrating fractals: Proteins as a case study. Physical Review E, 85(011906), 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    Dy- namic structure factor of vibrating fractals

    Shlomi Reuveni, Joseph Klafter, and Rony Granek. Dy- namic structure factor of vibrating fractals. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108(068101), 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    According to the Maxwell’s rule for mechanical stabil- ity in a d-dimensional network at the isostatic point the mean coordination number⟨z⟩ should be at least⟨z⟩ = 2d which is 4 for two-dimensional systems

  24. [32]

    Re- dundancy and cooperativity in the mechanics of com- positely crosslinked filamentous networks

    Moumita Das, David A Quint, and J M Schwarz. Re- dundancy and cooperativity in the mechanics of com- positely crosslinked filamentous networks. PLoS ONE , 7(5):e35939, 2012

    2012

  25. [33]

    Amorphous solids: Their struc- ture, lattice dynamics and elasticity

    Shlomo ALEXANDER. Amorphous solids: Their struc- ture, lattice dynamics and elasticity. Physics Reports, 296:65–236, 1998

    1998

  26. [34]

    Nonthermal atp-dependent fluctuations con- tribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci

    Stephanie C Weber, Andrew J Spakowitz, and Julie A Theriot. Nonthermal atp-dependent fluctuations con- tribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci. Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 109(19): 7338–7343, 2011

    2011

  27. [35]

    Chromatin hydrodynamics

    R Bruinsma, A Y Grosberg, Y Rabin, and A Zidovska. Chromatin hydrodynamics. Biophysical Journal , 106: 1871, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Extensile motor activity drives coherent motions in a model of in- terphase chromatin

    D Saintillan, M J Shelley, and A Zidovska. Extensile motor activity drives coherent motions in a model of in- terphase chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. , 115(11442- 11447), 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(127), 2000

    Y Cui and C Bustamante. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(127), 2000

    2000

  30. [38]

    Cell Systems , 11(424), 2020

    C P Johnstone, N B Wang, S A Sevier, and K E Galloway. Cell Systems , 11(424), 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Annual review of Biophysics , 48(321), 2019

    B Fierz and M G Poirier. Annual review of Biophysics , 48(321), 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    Annual review of Biophysics , 45(153), 2016

    C Y Zhou, S L Johnson, N I Gamarra, and G J Narlikar. Annual review of Biophysics , 45(153), 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    F MacKintosh, J Kas, and P Janmey. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 75:4425, 1995

    1995

  34. [42]

    C P Broedersz and F C MacKintosh. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 86:995, 2014

    2014

  35. [43]

    Biophysical Journal, 82: 2847, 2002

    G Wedemann and J Langowski. Biophysical Journal, 82: 2847, 2002

    2002

  36. [44]

    Biophysical Journal , 107:1065, 2014

    A Ghosh and N Gov. Biophysical Journal , 107:1065, 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    D Deviri, D. E. Discher, and S. A. Safran. Biophysical Journal, 113:1060, 2017. Appendix A: Simulation and Methods

    2017

  38. [46]

    This consists of the conventional Euler-Maruyama scheme (Eq

    Numerical integration To numerically integrate the ordinary differential equa- tions (ODEs) of motion we use the two-point finite dif- ference method, also known as the second order Heun al- gorithm or the midpoint scheme for ODEs. This consists of the conventional Euler-Maruy...

  39. [47]

    Telegraphic noise The source of active forces (or noise) switches between the 0 or f state following the transition rules as men- tioned below, R < (1−P ) +P× exp(−δt/τ ), 0→ 0 (A2) R < P + (1−P )× exp(−δt/τ ), f →f, (A3) whereR is a uniformly distributed random number R∈ [0, ...

  40. [48]

    Parameter choice To relate our findings to the biological systems, we use the parameter values in connection to the cytoplasmic active processes as described in Ref. [13]. We assume τ and f to be associated with the cytoplasmic motor pro- tein processivity times and forces. In...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.