Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Super-Universal Behavior of Outliers Diffusing in a Space-Time Random Environment

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that the extremes of N diffusing particles in a space-time random environment are governed by the KPZ equation, with the variance scaling set by the lowest random moment of the environment.

desk verdict A solid extension of the m=1 KPZ extreme-diffusion results to higher moments, with explicit prefactors and honest numerics, but the 'infinite super-universal hierarchy' framing overstates both the FPT results (which fail for m>3 by the paper's own admission) and the asymptotic nature of the higher-m regimes. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01533 v1 pith:5BW6DB5K submitted 2025-05-02 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MP

Jacob Hass This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP PACS 05.40.-a05.40.Fb
keywords randomwalksinenvironmentsextremevaluestatisticsKPZuniversalityclassstochasticheatequationfirstpassagetimespace-timeenvironmentsuper-universalityoutlierdiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the most extreme particle in a cloud of N independent diffusing walkers when the medium itself is random in space and time. It argues that the extreme location and the extreme first-passage time are governed by the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) equation, and that the variance of these extremes splits into a universal sampling part and an environmental part. The environmental part is controlled by the lowest moment of the local jump distribution that still fluctuates: a random first moment acts as a random velocity field, a fixed first moment with a random second moment acts as a random diffusion coefficient, and fixing each further moment promotes the next one to set the scaling. Because each such regime is its own universality class, the family of models is called a super-universality class. The point matters because outlier statistics can expose microscopic fluctuations of the environment that ordinary diffusion theory ignores.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the annealed tail probability $P_\xi(R(t)\ge x)$ and its convergence, after centering and rescaling, to the multiplicative stochastic heat equation (SHE), whose logarithm is the KPZ height. The paper identifies the noise strength of the SHE as $D_0=\lambda_{\mathrm{ext}}/((m!)^2(2D)^{(4m-1)/2})$, where $m-1$ is the number of deterministic moments of the single-site jump distribution and $\lambda_{\mathrm{ext}}=\mathrm{Var}_\nu(E_\xi[Y^m])/(2E_\nu[\mathrm{Var}_\xi(Y)])$ is the normalized variance of the lowest random moment. The argument hinges on expanding the collision term $g(\lambda)$ of the tilted two-point motion; its leading term is $\lambda^{2m}\mathrm{Var}_\nu(E_\xi[Y^m])/(m!)^2$, which selects the lowest random moment and produces the anomalous scaling exponents in $t$ and $L$.

What would settle it

Simulate an $m=2$ environment (zero drift, random per-site variance) and measure, over many environments, the covariance between $\mathrm{Env}^N_t$ and $\mathrm{Sam}^N_t$; if it is not zero, the variance addition in Eq. (12) is incomplete. Independently, check whether $\mathrm{Var}_\nu(\mathrm{Env}^N_t)$ decays as $t^{-1/2}$ with the prefactor $(\sqrt{2\pi}/4)\lambda_{\mathrm{ext}}\ln N$; a different exponent would falsify the identification of the noise strength of the effective KPZ equation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the annealed tail probability of a single walker converges to the multiplicative stochastic heat equation, so the extremes of N walkers inherit KPZ fluctuations. The mean extreme values remain classical, $E[\mathrm{Max}^N_t] \approx \sqrt{4Dt\ln N}$ and $E[\mathrm{Min}^N_L] \approx L^2/(4D\ln N)$. The variances are sums of a Gumbel sampling term, independent of the environment model, and an environmental term controlled by the lowest random moment $m$: $\mathrm{Var}_\nu(\mathrm{Env}^N_t) \approx \frac{\sqrt{2\pi}}{(m!)^2}\lambda_{\mathrm{ext}}(\ln N)^{m-1}(Dt)^{(3-2m)/2}$ and $\mathrm{Var}_\nu(\mathrm{Env}^N_L) \approx \frac{\lambda_{\mathrm{ext}}\sqrt{\pi}\,2^{4m-9/2}}{(m!)^2D^2(\ln N)^{(4m-9)/2}}L^{5-2m}$. Each $m$ defines a distinct scaling regime and hence a distinct universality class within the KPZ super-universality class; the numerical section reports collapse onto these formulas for a wide class of environments.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the environment-dependent median Env and the within-environment sampling fluctuation Sam are independent, so their variances simply add in Eqs. (12)-(13); the paper says this independence is not proved and relies on numerical support, and if it fails the central variance formulas are incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The mean extreme location and mean extreme first-passage time match classical diffusion, so the environment changes the spread of outliers rather than their typical position.
  • For $m=1$ the environmental variance grows with time or distance; for $m=2$ it decays for the location but still contributes a distinct $L^1$ term for the first-passage time; for $m>2$ it eventually vanishes, so the largest outliers become classically Gumbel-distributed at large scales.
  • The prefactor of every environmental variance term is set by $\lambda_{\mathrm{ext}}$, the normalized variance of the lowest random moment, so a single measured constant carries microscopic information about the environment.
  • Each integer $m$ defines a separate KPZ universality class; fixing one more moment moves the model one rung up the hierarchy, so the collection of all such environments is a single super-universality class.
  • If the assumed independence of environmental and sampling fluctuations holds, experimenters can separate the two contributions by comparing repeated runs in one environment with runs across many environments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims, the hierarchy suggests a spectroscopic use of extreme statistics: by measuring the outlier-variance exponent in $t$ or $L$, an experiment could infer which environmental moment is random without directly imaging the environment.
  • The paper itself reports that the first-passage formula breaks down for $m>3$ in the bulk regime because non-KPZ Gaussian fluctuations appear; completing the super-universality picture will require combining the present KPZ scaling with that bulk fluctuation theory.
  • A natural next test is to add temporal correlations to the environment; the SHE/KPZ limit would then carry a colored noise whose spectrum should appear as a frequency-dependent correction to the outlier variance.
  • Because the sampling variance is $m$-independent, subtracting the Gumbel term computed from two different $N$ values isolates the environmental term and gives a direct estimator of $\lambda_{\mathrm{ext}}$ without measuring the environment directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the extreme statistics of N independent random walks in a space-time random environment. It claims that the extreme location (maximum position) and the extreme first passage time (minimum time to reach a distant point) are governed by the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) equation, with means matching classical diffusion but variances receiving an environmental contribution that depends on the lowest random moment of the environment. The environmental variance is claimed to scale as in Eqs. (6) and (7), controlled by a parameter λ_ext, leading to an infinite hierarchy of universality classes indexed by m, where m−1 is the number of deterministic moments of the jump distribution. The paper derives these results through a replica-moment calculation of the tail probability, and supports them with numerical simulations for several distributions and for m=1,2,3,4.

Significance. If the results hold, they represent a significant extension of KPZ universality to higher moments of space-time disorder, and they give a concrete, measurable way to probe microscopic environment fluctuations through extreme-value statistics. The paper's strengths include the explicit identification of the generalized extreme diffusion coefficient D_ext^(m), the clean separation of sampling and environmental fluctuations, and a numerical comparison that uses independently measured environment statistics rather than fitted parameters. The numerical collapse in Fig. 2 for a wide class of distributions is encouraging. However, the claims as stated exceed what the paper's own analysis supports, particularly for the extreme first passage time and for the unqualified notion of an infinite hierarchy of universality classes.

major comments (4)
  1. [Numerical Results; Eq. (7); Abstract; Conclusion] The Numerical Results section explicitly states: 'For the extreme first passage time and m>3, my theoretical predictions break down.' Yet Eq. (7) is presented without any m≤3 restriction, the abstract claims the scalings of both the extreme location and the extreme first passage time depend on the moments, and the conclusion asserts an infinite hierarchy of universality classes. This is a load-bearing overstatement: the paper's own results establish the FPT hierarchy only for m=1,2,3, and the m>3 FPT claim is contradicted by the text. Moreover, for m>2 the environmental variance in Eq. (6) decays to zero as t→∞, so the higher 'universality classes' are transient scaling regimes rather than asymptotic ones. The revision should explicitly restrict Eq. (7) to m≤3, qualify Eq. (6) and the hierarchy language as transient for m>2, and adjust the abstract and conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Supplemental Material, Section VII] The derivation of the extreme first passage time relies on the non-backtracking approximation Pξ(τL≤t)≈Pξ(R(t)≥L), used without any quantitative justification. Since the paper itself reports that the FPT predictions break down in the bulk regime for m>3, and the same approximation underlies the m=1,2,3 FPT results, the validity of this approximation must be checked explicitly for the cases where the FPT hierarchy is claimed. Please provide a numerical or analytical verification of the non-backtracking approximation for m=2 and m=3, or state as a caveat that the FPT results inherit its limitations.
  3. [Supplemental Material, Section III A, Eq. (S19)] The expansion of g(λ) is carried out explicitly only for m=1,2,3 and then the text states 'Thus, I extrapolate to higher m' to obtain Eq. (S19). The infinite-hierarchy claim therefore rests on an unproven pattern. This is acceptable as a conjecture, but the paper currently presents Eq. (S19) as a derivation. The revision should either prove the expansion for general m or explicitly mark Eqs. (6) and (7) as conjectural for m>3. The m=4 location numerics provide partial support, but they do not establish the general pattern.
  4. [Eqs. (12)–(13); Supplemental Material, Section VI] The independence of SamN_t and EnvN_t is assumed and used to add variances in Eqs. (12)–(13). In the Supplemental Material the text states: 'Although I do not justify this here, my numerics indicate this is a reasonable assumption.' This is a structural assumption for all the main results. The numerical collapse in Fig. 2 is suggestive but does not constitute a proof. The revision should either prove this independence in the large-N, large-t (or large-L) limit or clearly identify it as an unproven assumption and discuss the possible consequences if it fails.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'violates the first assumption, independence' is misleading: the random walks are independent given the environment; the environment induces correlations only in the sense that particles at the same site share the same jump distribution. Please rephrase for precision.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'The saturation of each curve is scaled by the diffusion coefficient, D' is unclear. Please specify the exact scaling used for the vertical axis in panels (b) and (e).
  3. [Main text after Eq. (8)] Equation (11) is stated as a condition for the simplified form of λ_ext, but the paper says it is only approximately satisfied for m>1 in the weak-noise limit. Please provide a quantitative bound or error estimate for this approximation, or state explicitly that the numerical agreement is used as justification.
  4. [Conclusion] The term 'super-universality class' is evocative but could be misunderstood; consider defining it as a hierarchy of universality classes indexed by the number of deterministic moments, with each class itself being a member of the KPZ universality class.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eqs. 6–7 are derived from environment statistics via SHE and tested against independent numerics; the m>3 FPT breakdown is a scope limitation, not circularity.

full rationale

The central predictions do not reduce by construction to their inputs. The load-bearing derivation (Supplemental Secs. II–IV) shows convergence of the tail probability to the SHE with noise strength D0 = λ_ext/((m!)^2(2D)^{(4m-1)/2}), where λ_ext is defined directly from environment statistics (Eqs. 8–10), not fitted to the extreme-value variances being predicted. Equations 6–7 then follow by evaluating the KPZ/SHE small-time variance, and the numerics in Fig. 2 independently sample environments, measure Varν(Env), and compare ratios to the theoretical curves; there is no fitted parameter disguised as a prediction. The use of same-author prior works [14,15] for the m=1 base case and the discrete-local-time relation is a citation of separate, parameter-free derivations; those works do not presuppose the m>1 hierarchy claimed here, so this is not a self-citation chain that forces the result. I flag two internal limitations that are not circularity: the paper states in Numerical Results that “For the extreme first passage time and m>3, my theoretical predictions break down,” and the Supplemental g(λ) expansion says “Thus, I extrapolate to higher m,” making the all-m hierarchy partly inductive. These are correctness/scope gaps, as is the assumed but numerically checked independence of Env^N_t and Sam^N_t. They do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central variance formulas depend on these assumptions. The first two are standard model assumptions; the last three are unproven steps that limit the rigor of the extrapolation to arbitrary m.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The environment ξx,t is i.i.d. across sites and times, sampled from a fixed distribution ν.
    This defines the model class and is needed for the annealed averages and moment calculations.
  • domain assumption The average environment has zero drift and variance 2D (Eq. 3).
    The paper restricts to net-drift-free environments; this is used in the tilting and Gaussian approximations.
  • domain assumption The non-backtracking approximation Pξ(τ_L ≤ t) ≈ Pξ(R(t) ≥ L) for first passage times.
    Used to convert first-passage statistics to tail probabilities; the error is not quantified.
  • ad hoc to paper SamN and EnvN are independent in the large-N, large-t/L limit.
    Assumed in the SM when deriving the Gumbel sampling distribution; the paper says numerics support it but offers no proof.
  • ad hoc to paper The expansion of g(λ) for general m follows the pattern computed for m=1,2,3.
    Extrapolated from three cases; no general proof is given.
  • ad hoc to paper For m>1, Eq. 11 is approximately satisfied in the weak noise limit, allowing the simplified λ_ext.
    The distributions used for m>1 do not satisfy Eq. 11 exactly; the approximation is justified only by agreement with numerics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Super-Universal Behavior of Outliers Diffusing in a Space-Time Random Environment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BW6DB5K

@misc{pith2026250501533,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Super-Universal Behavior of Outliers Diffusing in a Space-Time Random Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BW6DB5K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01533}
}
abstract

I characterize the extreme location and extreme first passage time of a system of $N$ particles independently diffusing in a space-time random environment. I show these extreme statistics are governed by the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) equation and derive their mean and variance. I find the scalings of the statistics depend on the moments of the environment. Each scaling regime forms a universality class which is controlled by the lowest order moment which exhibits random fluctuations. When the first moment is random, the environment plays the role of a random velocity field. When the first moment is fixed but the second moment is random, the environment manifests as fluctuations in the diffusion coefficient. As each higher moment is fixed, the next moment determines the scaling behavior. Since each scaling regime forms a universality class, this model for diffusion forms a super-universality class. I confirm my theoretical predictions using numerics for a wide class of underlying environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01533 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Several examples of random environments. Blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Plot of the different variances for the extreme location (a) and the extreme first passage time (d), for the symmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The critical KPZ scale for the Averaging Process

    math.PR 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The averaging process has KPZ critical scale λ=7/8 rather than the moment-criterion value 3/4, with tilted fields converging to the multiplicative SHE of noise 1/√2.

  2. Convergence of the KMP model to the KPZ equation

    math.PR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The KMP heat transport process converges, in a t^{3/4} scaling window, to the multiplicative-noise stochastic heat equation (the exponential of KPZ) with noise coefficient 1/(2√α).

  3. Random walks in Dirichlet random environment in dimension $d+1$

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For random walks in a Dirichlet random environment, rare-trajectory fluctuations match KPZ exponents in d=1,2, and in d=3 an exact second-moment calculation bounds the disorder transition at v_c ≥ 0.639.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Theoretische Bemerkungen ¨Uber Die Brownsche Bewegung. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Elektrochemie und angewandte physikalische Chemie , 13(6):41–42, February 1907

    work page 1907

  2. [2]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. ¨Uber Die von Der Molekularkinetischen Theorie Der W¨ arme Geforderte Bewegung von in Ruhen- den Fl¨ ussigkeiten Suspendierten Teilchen. Annalen der Physik, 322(8):549–560, 1905

    work page 1905

  3. [3]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Zur Theorie Der Brownschen Bewegung. Annalen der Physik , 324(2):371–381, January 1906

    work page 1906

  4. [4]

    The Viscosity of Gases and Molecu- lar Force

    William Sutherland. The Viscosity of Gases and Molecu- lar Force. Philosophical Magazine Series 5 , 36(223):507– 531, 1893

    work page

  5. [5]

    von Smoluchowski

    M. von Smoluchowski. Zur Kinetischen Theorie Der Brownschen Molekularbewegung Und Der Suspensionen. Annalen der Physik , 326(14):756–780, 1906

    work page 1906

  6. [6]

    Chechkin, Ralf Metzler, Joseph Klafter, and Vsevolod Yu

    Alexei V. Chechkin, Ralf Metzler, Joseph Klafter, and Vsevolod Yu. Gonchar. Introduction to the Theory of L´ evy Flights. InAnomalous Transport, chapter 5, pages 129–162. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    I. M. Sokolov and J. Klafter. From diffusion to anoma- lous diffusion: A century after Einstein’s Brownian mo- tion. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 15(2):026103, June 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: A fractional dynamics ap- proach

    Ralf Metzler and Joseph Klafter. The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: A fractional dynamics ap- proach. Physics Reports, 339(1):1–77, December 2000

    work page 2000

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Anoma- lous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mecha- nisms, models and physical applications

    Jean-Philippe Bouchaud and Antoine Georges. Anoma- lous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mecha- nisms, models and physical applications. Physics Re- ports, 195(4):127–293, November 1990

    1990

  2. [10]

    Dynamic Scaling of Growing Interfaces

    Mehran Kardar, Giorgio Parisi, and Yi-Cheng Zhang. Dynamic Scaling of Growing Interfaces. Physical Review Letters, 56(9):889–892, March 1986

    1986

  3. [11]

    The Kardar–Parisi–Zhang Equation and Universality Class

    Ivan Corwin. The Kardar–Parisi–Zhang Equation and Universality Class. Random Matrices: Theory and Ap- plications, 01(01):1130001, January 2012

    2012

  4. [12]

    Hass, Aileen N

    Jacob B. Hass, Aileen N. Carroll-Godfrey, Ivan Cor- win, and Eric I. Corwin. Anomalous fluctuations of ex- tremes in many-particle diffusion. Physical Review E , 107(2):L022101, February 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    b,e) show the numerically measured environ- mental variance asymptotes to my theoretical predictions for a wide range of distributions and m

    Figs. b,e) show the numerically measured environ- mental variance asymptotes to my theoretical predictions for a wide range of distributions and m. For m≥ 2, Eq. 11 is not satisfied for any of the show distributions. How- ever, I still use the simplified form of λext in Eq. 8 ...

  6. [14]

    Hass, Hindy Drillick, Ivan Corwin, and Eric I

    Jacob B. Hass, Hindy Drillick, Ivan Corwin, and Eric I. Corwin. Extreme Diffusion Measures Statistical Fluc- tuations of the Environment. Physical Review Letters , 133(26):267102, December 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Hass, Ivan Corwin, and Eric I

    Jacob B. Hass, Ivan Corwin, and Eric I. Corwin. First- passage time for many-particle diffusion in space-time random environments. Physical Review E, 109(5):054101, 6 May 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Diffusion in Time-Dependent Random Media and the Kardar-Parisi- Zhang Equation

    Pierre Le Doussal and Thimoth´ ee Thiery. Diffusion in Time-Dependent Random Media and the Kardar-Parisi- Zhang Equation. Physical Review E , 96(1):010102, July 2017

    2017

  9. [17]

    Universal KPZ Fluctuations for Moderate Devia- tions of Random Walks in Random Environments, March 2025

    Jacob Hass, Hindy Drillick, Ivan Corwin, and Eric Cor- win. Universal KPZ Fluctuations for Moderate Devia- tions of Random Walks in Random Environments, March 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    At the edge of a cloud of Brownian particles

    Dom Brockington and Jon Warren. At the edge of a cloud of Brownian particles. August 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Moderate Deviations for Diffusion in Time Dependent Random Me- dia

    Guillaume Barraquand and Pierre Le Doussal. Moderate Deviations for Diffusion in Time Dependent Random Me- dia. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 53(21):215002, May 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    The t7/8 regime was independently predicted by Pierre Le Doussal

  13. [21]

    See Supplemental Material

  14. [22]

    Sean D. Lawley. Distribution of Extreme First Passage Times of Diffusion. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 80(7):2301–2325, June 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Madrid and Sean D

    Jacob B. Madrid and Sean D. Lawley. Competition be- tween Slow and Fast Regimes for Extreme First Passage Times of Diffusion. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 53(33):335002, July 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Sean D. Lawley. Universal Formula for Extreme First Passage Statistics of Diffusion. Physical Review E , 101(1):012413, January 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Samantha Linn and Sean D. Lawley. Extreme Hitting Probabilities for Diffusion. Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical, 55(34):345002, August 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Schuss, K

    Z. Schuss, K. Basnayake, and D. Holcman. Redundancy Principle and the Role of Extreme Statistics in Molecular and Cellular Biology. Physics of Life Reviews , 28:52–79, March 2019

    2019

  19. [27]

    Basnayake, Z

    K. Basnayake, Z. Schuss, and D. Holcman. Asymp- totic Formulas for Extreme Statistics of Escape Times in 1, 2 and 3-Dimensions. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 29(2):461–499, April 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Conclusion

    predicts that there are Gaussian fluctuations with scaling behavior that is not captured by the short-time Gaussian statistics of the KPZ equation. Conclusion. I have shown the extreme value statistics of RWRE models for diffusion form a super-universality class which is gover...

  21. [29]

    Redundancy Principle and the Role of Extreme Statistics in Molecular and Cellular Biology

    S. Redner and B. Meerson. Redundancy, Extreme Statis- tics and Geometrical Optics of Brownian Motion: Com- ment on “Redundancy Principle and the Role of Extreme Statistics in Molecular and Cellular Biology” by Z. Schuss et Al. Physics of Life Reviews , 28:80–82, March 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Random walks in space-time random media in all spatial dimensions: The full subcritical fluctuation regime

    Hindy Drillick and Shalin Parekh. Random walks in space-time random media in all spatial dimensions: The full subcritical fluctuation regime. In preparation, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    Replica Bethe ansatz studies of two- dimensional interfaces with quenched random impurities

    Mehran Kardar. Replica Bethe ansatz studies of two- dimensional interfaces with quenched random impurities. Nuclear Physics B , 290:582–602, January 1987

    1987

  24. [32]

    The Stochas- tic Heat Equation: Feynman-Kac Formula and Intermit- tence

    Lorenzo Bertini and Nicoletta Cancrini. The Stochas- tic Heat Equation: Feynman-Kac Formula and Intermit- tence. Journal of Statistical Physics , 78(5):1377–1401, March 1995

    1995

  25. [33]

    Proba- bility Distribution of the Free Energy of the Continuum Directed Random Polymer in 1+1 Dimensions

    Gideon Amir, Ivan Corwin, and Jeremy Quastel. Proba- bility Distribution of the Free Energy of the Continuum Directed Random Polymer in 1+1 Dimensions. Commu- nications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 64(4):466– 537, April 2011

    2011

  26. [34]

    Calabrese, P

    P. Calabrese, P. Le Doussal, and A. Rosso. Free-Energy Distribution of the Directed Polymer at High Temper- ature. EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 90(2):20002, April 2010. 7 End Matter I. DISTRIBUTIONS FOR ν IN FIGURE 2 Here I list the various distributions for ν I used for the nu...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.