Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Privacy Risks and Protection in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.01976 v1 pith:FJZMYPDF submitted 2025-05-04 cs.CR

A Survey on Privacy Risks and Protection in Large Language Models

classification cs.CR
keywords privacyllmsmodelschallengesleakageriskssurveydata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly integral to diverse applications, their capabilities raise significant privacy concerns. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of privacy risks associated with LLMs and examines current solutions to mitigate these challenges. First, we analyze privacy leakage and attacks in LLMs, focusing on how these models unintentionally expose sensitive information through techniques such as model inversion, training data extraction, and membership inference. We investigate the mechanisms of privacy leakage, including the unauthorized extraction of training data and the potential exploitation of these vulnerabilities by malicious actors. Next, we review existing privacy protection against such risks, such as inference detection, federated learning, backdoor mitigation, and confidential computing, and assess their effectiveness in preventing privacy leakage. Furthermore, we highlight key practical challenges and propose future research directions to develop secure and privacy-preserving LLMs, emphasizing privacy risk assessment, secure knowledge transfer between models, and interdisciplinary frameworks for privacy governance. Ultimately, this survey aims to establish a roadmap for addressing escalating privacy challenges in the LLMs domain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Implicit Reasoning Steering via Concept Chaining

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reinforcement-learning-optimized concept-chain paragraphs covertly steer language-model multiple-choice preferences after continued pretraining, with far lower detectability than direct paraphrases.

  2. PRISM: Generation-Time Detection and Mitigation of Secret Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PRISM detects and stops credential leakage during LLM generation in multi-agent pipelines using per-token risk scores from lexical, structural, and behavioral signals, achieving zero observed leaks and F1 of 0.832 on ...

  3. Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation: A Survey with Focus on Repository-Level Approaches

    cs.SE 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper organizes repository-level retrieval-augmented code generation into a unified framework covering retrieval substrate, control regime, and evaluation setting while summarizing strategies, datasets, and challenges.

  4. SLM Finetuning for Natural Language to Domain Specific Code Generation in Production

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Fine-tuned small language models outperform larger models in natural language to domain-specific code generation with improved performance, latency, and the ability to adapt to customer-specific scenarios without losi...