Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 91 references

Ultrafast Non-Hermitian Skin Effect

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the abrupt jump in instantaneous frequency of a laser's nonlinear extendon state acts as a topological interface that binds non-Hermitian skin modes of the field fluctuations, measured as a 583 ± 16 fs intensity…

desk verdict A real experimental observation of a sub-ps spike locked to the extendon's frequency jump, but the topological-interface interpretation is built on approximations that need quantitative checking, and the sub-Fourier-limit claim does not survive the error bar. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03658 v1 pith:ZJVLILPY submitted 2025-05-06 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Barbara Schneider , Alexander Dikopoltsev , Markus Bestler , Philipp Täschler , Mattias Beck , David Burghoff , Oded Zilberberg , Jérome Faist This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords non-HermitiantopologyskineffectspatiotemporalquantumcascadelasersextendonBogoliubovfluctuationsasynchronousupconversionsamplingultrafastmode-locking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Nonlinear mode-locking in a fast-gain semiconductor laser produces an extendon: a constant-intensity field whose phase sweeps linearly in time and then resets, so the instantaneous frequency jumps once per round trip. This paper claims that the phase jump is a topological interface for small fluctuations riding on the extendon. Because the phase slope is opposite on the two sides of the jump, linearized fluctuations live in non-Hermitian bulk phases with opposite spectral winding numbers, and the fluctuation dynamics maps exactly onto a momentum-shifted parametric model whose skin modes localize at the sign change. The authors verify this in a quantum cascade laser by asynchronous sampling of the output: they see a 583 ± 16 fs intensity spike locked to the frequency jump, find that noise is funneled toward that same point, and show the pulse's width and arrival time can be steered with RF modulation. If the identification is right, it gives a spatial-lattice-free route to topologically bound, sub-transform-limited pulses of light in time.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the extendon's phase kink combined with the Bogoliubov coupling generated by the saturated-gain term. The paper treats the phase as exactly linear on each side, $\phi(\eta) = \mp q_0\eta$, so the exponential coupling $e^{2i\phi(\eta)}$ becomes a momentum shift $2q_0$ in the conjugate-pairing term. The machinery then is the spectral winding number $W(E) = \int dq'/(2\pi i)\,\partial_{q'}\log\det(D_{q'} - E)$ of the $2\times 2$ dynamical matrix $D_{q'}$; it returns $+1$ on one side and $-1$ on the other, and the sign reversal at the reset point is what forces a skin mode to localize there. Experimentally, the machinery is completed by asynchronous upconversion sampling, which resolves a sub-picosecond feature without being washed out by phase noise.

What would settle it

Use filter-resolved asynchronous sampling to reconstruct $\phi(\eta)$ over a full half-cycle and compute the phase residual $\phi(\eta) - q_0\eta$ in the bulk. If away from the jump this residual deviates by order a radian or more (equivalently, $d\phi/d\eta$ varies by order $|q_0|$ over the half-cycle), the two sides are not topological bulks with winding $\pm 1$, and the predicted skin mode should either disappear or detach from the jump; observing the spike under such conditions would falsify the mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the extendon steady state $F_0 = \sqrt{P_0}e^{i\phi(\eta)}$ carries a phase profile $\phi(\eta)$ that is linear on each side of a reset point with $d\phi/d\eta = \pm |q_0|$. Linearizing the mean-field laser equation for the fluctuation $\delta F$ gives $i\partial_T \delta F = -D\partial_\eta^2 \delta F - i\Gamma\delta F - i\Gamma e^{2i\phi(\eta)}\delta F^*$; substituting constant-slope phases and Fourier transforming reproduces, term by term, the continuum model $H = \int dq\,[(q^2/2m - i\Gamma)a_q^\dagger a_q - i\Gamma a_q^\dagger a_{-q-2q_0}^\dagger + \mathrm{h.c.}]$. That model has spectral winding numbers $W(E) = \pm 1$ on the two sides, so a sign flip of $q_0$ is a domain wall, and the paper predicts and measures skin modes bound there: an intensity spike of width $583 \pm 16$ fs sitting exactly at the jump in instantaneous frequency. The same funneling is seen in the noise statistics, where fluctuations accumulate at the interface.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the extendon phase is exactly linear in the co-rotating coordinate over the whole region on each side of the jump, $d\phi/d\eta = \pm |q_0|$, and that the slow nonlinear potential $V(F_0)$ changes too gently to matter; if the chirp is curved instead of constant, both the winding-number assignment and the skin-mode confinement lose their exact footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The measured skin mode is shorter than the transform-limited pulse from the same optical spectrum (583 ± 16 fs versus 588 fs and 619 fs), so the topological mechanism can generate pulses below the bandwidth limit of the underlying field.
  • Enlarging the frequency jump, here by increasing RF modulation power, sharpens and strengthens the spike, giving a direct control parameter for pulse duration.
  • Detuning the modulation frequency across the locking range moves the interface within the optical cycle in a quasi-linear way, so the arrival time of the topological pulse is predictable and adjustable; at high modulation depth the position shifts by about $\pi/2$.
  • Local fluctuations launched at any intracycle time propagate toward the interface, and white-noise simulations plus intensity statistics show the excess noise accumulates at the jump, meaning the laser self-funnels energy into the topological state rather than spreading it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: if the linear-slope idealization holds, the effect should be generic to any source that forms a phase kink with opposite linear slopes, not only quantum cascade lasers, so strongly chirped mode-locked lasers and microcombs are natural places to look for the same sub-picosecond skin mode.
  • Because the paper's own model ties the mode width to the size of the frequency jump, engineering larger dispersion or stronger phase modulation could push the confinement well below the 583 fs measured here, possibly approaching the ~100 fs probe limit.
  • A chain of several phase jumps per round trip would create multiple interfaces with alternating winding, offering a synthetic time-lattice of skin modes whose spacings could be tuned independently, something the paper does not simulate.
  • If the confinement is truly topological, a controlled experiment that linearizes the chirp only on one side of the jump should leave the mode on the other side nearly unchanged; absence of that asymmetry would indicate the localization is ordinary spectral filtering rather than skin-effect topology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the experimental observation and theoretical interpretation of an ultrafast non-Hermitian skin mode localized at the abrupt jump in instantaneous frequency of an 'extendon' state in a fast-gain quantum cascade laser. The authors derive a Bogoliubov fluctuation equation, map it to a non-Hermitian topological model under a linear-phase assumption, and identify the frequency jump as a topological interface between two bulks with opposite spectral winding numbers. Using asynchronous upconversion sampling (ASUPS), they measure an intensity spike with FWHM 583 ± 16 fs at the frequency jump, demonstrate tunability with RF modulation, and show noise funneling to the interface in both experiment and simulation. The central claim is that this is the first realization of an ultrafast topological non-Hermitian skin effect in the time domain.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is significant: it connects nonlinear laser physics to non-Hermitian topological phenomena in the time domain, provides a direct time-domain measurement of a skin mode at a sub-picosecond scale, and introduces the extendon frequency jump as a new platform for topological states of light. The paper is strengthened by the direct ASUPS measurement, the independent experimental identification of the skin mode location (not fitted), the supporting noise-funneling statistics, and the predictive numerical simulations based on a mean-field theory. The derivation in Appendices B and C is straightforward and the mapping to Eq. (1) is plausible under the stated assumptions. However, the theoretical identification depends on two assumptions—exact linearity of the phase on each side of the jump and neglect of the phase-dependent potential V(F0)—that are not quantitatively justified in the present manuscript, leaving the topological interpretation not fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1 and Appendix C] The mapping from the fluctuation equation (3) to the topological model (1) assumes exactly linear phase, dφ/dη = ±|q0| on each side of the frequency jump, as stated in §2.1 and used in Eq. (C8). However, the extendon is described as a monotonic chirp (Figs. 2d and 3d), meaning the phase is quadratic over the bulk and the slope is only locally constant. The manuscript does not quantify the residual phase curvature over the ~583 fs decay length of the skin mode, nor does it show that the spectral winding number W(E) of Eq. (A3) remains ±1 when q is position-dependent. I request either a quantitative estimate of the error introduced by the linear-phase approximation or a direct numerical solution of Eq. (3) with the actual extendon phase to confirm that the localized mode at the interface is the non-Hermitian skin mode.
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (B6)] The derivation of the fluctuation equation neglects the potential V(F0) on the assumption that it is 'much slower than the abrupt jump'. This assumption is questionable because, as stated in §2.1, V(F) ∝ φ|F|^2; the phase kink in the steady state F0 therefore produces a kink in V(F0) at exactly the interface. A kinked scalar potential can itself support bound fluctuations for non-topological reasons, and it can also locally shift the dispersion enough to alter the winding-number reversal that is central to the topological argument. The paper should estimate the magnitude of V(F0) relative to Γ and D and demonstrate, for example by solving Eq. (B6) with and without V(F0), that the observed and simulated mode is indeed the topological skin mode rather than a potential-bound state.
  3. [§2.2 and Fig. 3] The measured intensity spike at the frequency jump is the key experimental evidence, but the current analysis does not exclude non-topological explanations such as an intensity anomaly generated directly by the chirp discontinuity or by the phase-kinked potential discussed above. The noise-funneling data in Fig. 5 and the tunability in Fig. 4 are supportive but qualitative. I ask for a control test—for example, modifying the sign pattern of the chirp or introducing a phase kink without reversing the winding—to show that the localization is tied specifically to the winding-number reversal rather than to the interface's local potential or singular chirp.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Discussion] In the fourth paragraph, 'novel meteorological and communication applications' should be 'metrological and communication applications'.
  2. [Fig. 4a] The measured FWHM of 583 ± 16 fs overlaps with the transform-limited value of 588 fs within the uncertainty; the claim that the measured mode is 'narrower than the bandwidth limit' would benefit from a statement of the statistical significance or a clearer comparison that accounts for the 100 fs probe convolution.
  3. [§2.2] The description of the optical filter measurement (Fig. 3d) is brief; it would be helpful to explain explicitly how a spectral filter combined with ASUPS yields the instantaneous-frequency map and how the frequency jump is extracted from those data.
  4. [Appendix A] The definition of the spectral winding number in Eq. (A3) is terse; specifying the integration contour, the base point E, and the assumptions on the analyticity of det(D_q'(q')−E) would make the computation self-contained and easier to verify.
  5. [Appendix D] In Eq. (D11) and the paragraph after it, the average ⟨K⟩ is used before it is defined; reorder the definitions or add a pointer so that the notation is unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the skin-mode prediction is an independent consequence of an explicit approximation, and the measurements are not fitted.

full rationale

The load-bearing derivation is the mapping from the extendon fluctuation equation (3) to the model (1). Appendix C performs this mapping only under the explicitly stated assumption dφ/dη = ±|q0| on each side of the jump; this is an approximation to the physical chirp, not a definition of the conclusion. The measured FWHM, the mode position at the frequency jump, the tunability with RF modulation, and the noise funneling are all compared with independent ASUPS data and with numerical simulation of the mean-field model (2), rather than being recovered by construction from fitted parameters. The model Hamiltonian (1), spectral winding formula (A3), and the interface skin-mode calculation follow a companion preprint by coauthors [36]; that citation is load-bearing for the topological interpretation, but the cited result is an independently checkable model calculation (and is reproduced in the paper's Fig. 1d), so per the review rules it is independent support, not circularity. The paper's own caveats—the linear-phase assumption in Section 2.1 and the neglect of V(F0) in Appendix B—are validity and approximation concerns, not equivalent-input reductions; no equation is shown to equal its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two imported pieces: the parametric continuum NHSE model from the authors' companion paper, and the existence and phase profile of the extendon from prior laser theory. The free parameters are set by device physics rather than fitted to the skin-mode shape, which lowers the circularity burden somewhat. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • q0 (chirp slope) = not explicitly given; set by the ~1 THz sweep over the repetition period
    The phase of the extendon is approximated as φ(η)=±q0η on each side of the frequency jump; q0 sets the bulk winding number and the skin-mode width. It is not fitted to the skin-mode data but derived from the measured frequency sweep.
  • Γ (gain-loss imbalance) = not explicitly given in a number; relates to g and α
    The non-Hermitian coupling in Eq. (3) is Γ = g - α; it determines the spectral loops and the existence of the skin modes. It is taken from device parameters, not fitted.
  • D (dispersion coefficient) = k'' c^2/2 with k'' ≈ -1500 fs²/mm (Table D1)
    Dispersion in the fluctuation equation; enters through Dq² in the Bogoliubov dispersion. The value comes from the cavity group velocity dispersion.
  • Modulation depth M (in simulations) = from ΔJ = 50 A/cm², α = 0.5 (Table D1)
    The RF bias modulation enters as phase modulation with depth M; M governs the frequency jump size and skin-mode shape in the simulations.
  • Linewidth enhancement factor α (not the loss α) = 0.5 (Table D1)
    Couples current modulation to phase modulation; needed to simulate the modulation tuning of the skin mode.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The parametric Hamiltonian model of Eq. (1) with spectral winding number W(E), taken from Ref. [36], describes the fluctuation dynamics of the extendon under linear chirp.
    The paper imports the model and its topological classification from a companion preprint by co-authors; it is not derived within this paper.
  • domain assumption The extendon steady state is an exact solution of the mean-field NLSE (Eq. 2) with V(F) ∝ φ|F|², as established in prior work [76-79].
    The existence and form of the extendon underpin the whole analysis; the paper relies on previous theoretical work for this.
  • domain assumption On each side of the frequency jump, dφ/dη = ±|q0| (linear phase approximation).
    Explicitly stated in Section 2.1 and used in Appendix C to map Eq. (3) to the model. The approximation must hold over a region large compared with the skin-mode width.
  • domain assumption V(F0) in the fluctuation equation is slowly varying and can be neglected (Appendix B).
    Used to drop the potential term in the fluctuation equation; if V(F0) varies on the same scale as the jump, the correspondence to the simple model breaks down.
  • domain assumption The fluctuations are bosonic Bogoliubov modes well described by the linearized equation (3).
    Neglects O(δF²) nonlinearities; could be violated when noise accumulates at the interface.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast Non-Hermitian Skin Effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJVLILPY

@misc{pith2026250503658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast Non-Hermitian Skin Effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJVLILPY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03658}
}
abstract

Topological phases of matter commonly feature protected states at their boundaries. Transferring this protection to time-metamaterials is extremely challenging, as it requires the generation of an abrupt interface between two topologically distinct bulks. Here, we realize and measure an ultrafast topological non-Hermitian skin mode bound to an interface circulating within the cavity of a fast-gain semiconductor laser. The nonlinear stationary state generated in such devices features a jump in the instantaneous frequency. We show that this discontinuity gives rise to a topological interface for the field fluctuations in the system. Using direct intensity sampling, we experimentally measure the skin modes and their positioning at the frequency jump of the stationary state. Analysis of these isolated modes reveals an ultrashort full-width at half-maximum of 583 $\pm$ 16 fs. Furthermore, we show that we can tune the shape and relative timing shift of the skin modes via external bias modulation. Finally, both numerical and experimental analysis of the noise in the system reveal that field fluctuations are funneled into the topological interface. Our findings reveal a new way to generate topologically protected states of light in time, which paves the way for novel time-varying physics as well as metrological applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2505.02776 18

    Bestler, M., Dikopoltsev, A., Zilberberg, O.: Non-Hermitian topology and skin modes in the continuum via parametric processes (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2505.02776 18

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

    Nakahara, M.: Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315275826 . https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781420056945

    arXiv 2018

  3. [2]

    Bernevig, B.A.: Topological Insulators and Topologi- cal Superconductors, p. 247. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2013). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400846733 . https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400846733/html

    doi:10.1515/9781400846733 2013

  4. [3]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 82(4), 3045–3067 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    Hasan, M.Z., Kane, C.L.: Colloquium : Topological insulators. Reviews of Modern Physics 82(4), 3045–3067 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 2010

  5. [4]

    Reviews of modern physics 83(4), 1057–1110 (2011)

    Qi, X.-L., Zhang, S.-C.: Topological insulators and superconductors. Reviews of modern physics 83(4), 1057–1110 (2011)

    2011

  6. [5]

    Springer, New York (2012)

    Prange, R.E., Cage, M.E., Thouless, D.J., Pruisken, A.M.M., Chang, A.M., Laughlin, R.B., Duncan, F., Haldane, M., Girvin, S.M.: The Quantum Hall Effect, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3350-3 . https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4612-3350-3 15

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3350-3 2012

  7. [6]

    Haldane, F.D.M.: Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015–2018 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2015 1988

  8. [7]

    Nature 452, 970–974 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06843

    Hsieh, D., Qian, D., Wray, L., Xia, Y., Hor, Y.S., .Cava, R.J., Hasan, M.Z.: A topological dirac insulator in a quantum spin hall phase. Nature 452, 970–974 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06843

    doi:10.1038/nature06843 2008

Show all 91 references
  1. [8]

    Fu, L., Kane, C.L.: Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.096407

    2008 doi

  2. [9]

    Science 347(6219), 294–298 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1126/science

    Xu, S.-Y., Liu, C., Kushwaha, S.K., Sankar, R., Krizan, J.W., Belopol- ski, I., Neupane, M., Bian, G., Alidoust, N., Chang, T.-R., Jeng, H.-T., Huang, C.-Y., Tsai, W.-F., Lin, H., Shibayev, P.P., Chou, F.-C., Cava, R.J., Hasan, M.Z.: Observation of fermi arc surface states in ...

    2015 doi

  3. [10]

    Wang, Z., Chong, Y.D., Joannopoulos, J.D., Soljaˇ ci´ c, M.: Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013905 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013905

    2008 doi

  4. [11]

    Nature Materials 12(3), 233– 239 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3520

    Khanikaev, A.B., Hossein Mousavi, S., Tse, W.-K., Kargarian, M., MacDonald, A.H., Shvets, G.: Photonic topological insulators. Nature Materials 12(3), 233– 239 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3520

    2013 doi

  5. [12]

    Nature 496(7444), 196–200 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12066

    Rechtsman, M.C., Zeuner, J.M., Plotnik, Y., Lumer, Y., Podolsky, D., Dreisow, F., Nolte, S., Segev, M., Szameit, A.: Photonic floquet topological insulators. Nature 496(7444), 196–200 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12066

    2013 doi

  6. [13]

    Nature Photonics 7(12), 1001–1005 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.274

    Hafezi, M., Mittal, S., Fan, J., Migdall, A., Taylor, J.M.: Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics. Nature Photonics 7(12), 1001–1005 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.274

    2013 doi

  7. [14]

    Science 349(6243), 47–50 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0239 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aab0239

    S¨ usstrunk, R., Huber, S.D.: Observation of phononic heli- cal edge states in a mechanical topological insulator. Science 349(6243), 47–50 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0239 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aab0239

    2015 doi

  8. [15]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 91(1), 015006 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.91.015006

    Ozawa, T., Price, H.M., Amo, A., Goldman, N., Hafezi, M., Lu, L., Rechtsman, M.C., Schuster, D., Simon, J., Zilberberg, O., Carusotto, I.: Topological photon- ics. Reviews of Modern Physics 91(1), 015006 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.91.015006

    2019

  9. [16]

    Journal of Physics: Photonics 4(3), 032501 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 2515-7647/ac4ee4

    Price, H., Chong, Y., Khanikaev, A., Schomerus, H., Maczewsky, L.J., Kremer, M., Heinrich, M., Szameit, A., Zilberberg, O., Yang, Y., Zhang, B., Al` u, A., 16 Thomale, R., Carusotto, I., St-Jean, P., Amo, A., Dutt, A., Yuan, L., Fan, S., Yin, X., Peng, C., Ozawa, T., Blanco-Re...

    2022

  10. [17]

    Nature Photonics 8(11), 821–829 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.248

    Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J.D., Soljaˇ ci´ c, M.: Topological photonics. Nature Photonics 8(11), 821–829 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.248

    2014 doi

  11. [18]

    Kraus, Y.E., Lahini, Y., Ringel, Z., Verbin, M., Zilberberg, O.: Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106402 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.106402

    2012 doi

  12. [19]

    Nature 553(7686), 59–62 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature25011

    Zilberberg, O., Huang, S., Guglielmon, J., Wang, M., Chen, K.P., Kraus, Y.E., Rechtsman, M.C.: Photonic topological boundary pumping as a probe of 4d quantum hall physics. Nature 553(7686), 59–62 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature25011

    2018

  13. [20]

    Nature Communications 11(1), 907 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14692-4

    Kremer, M., Petrides, I., Meyer, E., Heinrich, M., Zilberberg, O., Szameit, A.: A square-root topological insulator with non-quantized indices realized with pho- tonic aharonov-bohm cages. Nature Communications 11(1), 907 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14692-4

    2020 doi

  14. [21]

    Nature Photonics 12(7), 408–415 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41566-018-0179-3

    Noh, J., Benalcazar, W.A., Huang, S., Collins, M.J., Chen, K.P., Hughes, T.L., Rechtsman, M.C.: Topological protection of photonic mid-gap defect modes. Nature Photonics 12(7), 408–415 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41566-018-0179-3

    2018

  15. [22]

    Science advances 4(9), 3187 (2018)

    Tambasco, J.-L., Corrielli, G., Chapman, R.J., Crespi, A., Zilberberg, O., Osel- lame, R., Peruzzo, A.: Quantum interference of topological states of light. Science advances 4(9), 3187 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    Nanophotonics 12(13), 2247–2271 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0775

    Yan, Q., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., Ma, R., Lyu, Q., Chu, S., Hu, X., Gong, Q.: Advances and applications on non-hermitian topological photonics. Nanophotonics 12(13), 2247–2271 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0775

    2023 doi

  17. [24]

    Physical Review B 97(4), 045106 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97

    Lieu, S.: Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. Physical Review B 97(4), 045106 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97. 045106

    2018 doi

  18. [25]

    Physical Review Letters 115(4), 040402 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.040402

    Zeuner, J.M., Rechtsman, M.C., Plotnik, Y., Lumer, Y., Nolte, S., Rudner, M.S., Segev, M., Szameit, A.: Observation of a Topological Transition in the Bulk of a Non-Hermitian System. Physical Review Letters 115(4), 040402 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.040402

    2015 doi

  19. [26]

    Physical Review B 84(15), 153101 (2011) https://doi

    Hu, Y.C., Hughes, T.L.: Absence of topological insulator phases in non-Hermitian ¡math display=”inline”¿ ¡mrow¿ ¡mi¿P¡/mi¿ ¡mi¿T¡/mi¿ ¡/mrow¿ ¡/math¿ - symmetric Hamiltonians. Physical Review B 84(15), 153101 (2011) https://doi. 17 org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.153101

    2011 doi

  20. [27]

    Nature Materials 16(4), 433–438 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4811

    Weimann, S., Kremer, M., Plotnik, Y., Lumer, Y., Nolte, S., Makris, K.G., Segev, M., Rechtsman, M.C., Szameit, A.: Topologically protected bound states in pho- tonic parity–time-symmetric crystals. Nature Materials 16(4), 433–438 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4811

    2017 doi

  21. [28]

    Yao, S., Wang, Z.: Edge states and topological invariants of non-hermitian sys- tems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 121.086803

    2018 doi

  22. [29]

    Science Advances 7(45), 8905 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj8905

    Su, R., Estrecho, E., Biega´ nska, D., Huang, Y., Wurdack, M., Pieczarka, M., Truscott, A.G., Liew, T.C.H., Ostrovskaya, E.A., Xiong, Q.: Direct measurement of a non-Hermitian topological invariant in a hybrid light-matter system. Science Advances 7(45), 8905 (2021) https://do...

    2021 doi

  23. [30]

    Nature Communications 2024 15:1 15(1), 1–7 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55236-4

    Zheng, X., Jalali Mehrabad, M., Vannucci, J., Li, K., Dutt, A., Hafezi, M., Mittal, S., Waks, E.: Dynamic control of 2D non-Hermitian photonic corner skin modes in synthetic dimensions. Nature Communications 2024 15:1 15(1), 1–7 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55236-4

    2024 doi

  24. [31]

    Nature Communications 2024 15:1 15(1), 1–9 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50776-1

    Li, Z., Wang, L.W., Wang, X., Lin, Z.K., Ma, G., Jiang, J.H.: Observation of dynamic non-Hermitian skin effects. Nature Communications 2024 15:1 15(1), 1–9 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50776-1

    2024 doi

  25. [32]

    Nature Materials 23(3), 377–382 (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Fritzsche, A., Biesenthal, T., Maczewsky, L.J., Becker, K., Ehrhardt, M., Heinrich, M., Thomale, R., Joglekar, Y.N., Szameit, A.: Parity–time-symmetric photonic topological insulator. Nature Materials 23(3), 377–382 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41563-023-01773-0

    2024

  26. [33]

    Nature 2025 637:8046 637(8046), 565–573 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-08347-3

    Zhao, E., Wang, Z., He, C., Poon, T.F.J., Pak, K.K., Liu, Y.-J., Ren, P., Liu, X.- J., Jo, G.-B.: Two-dimensional non-Hermitian skin effect in an ultracold Fermi gas. Nature 2025 637:8046 637(8046), 565–573 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-08347-3

    2025

  27. [34]

    Okuma, N., Kawabata, K., Shiozaki, K., Sato, M.: Topological origin of non- hermitian skin effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.124.086801

    2020

  28. [35]

    Physical Review Letters 77(3), 570–573 (1996) https://doi.org/10

    Hatano, N., Nelson, D.R.: Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review Letters 77(3), 570–573 (1996) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.77.570

    1996

  29. [37]

    Nature Communications 11(1), 3149 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16863-9

    Wanjura, C.C., Brunelli, M., Nunnenkamp, A.: Topological framework for direc- tional amplification in driven-dissipative cavity arrays. Nature Communications 11(1), 3149 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16863-9

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Communications Physics4(1), 230 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00731-z

    Cao, P.-C., Li, Y., Peng, Y.-G., Qi, M., Huang, W.-X., Li, P.-Q., Zhu, X.-F.: Diffusive skin effect and topological heat funneling. Communications Physics4(1), 230 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00731-z

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Physical Review Letters 132(6), 063804 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.063804

    Sun, Y., Hou, X., Wan, T., Wang, F., Zhu, S., Ruan, Z., Yang, Z.: Photonic Floquet Skin-Topological Effect. Physical Review Letters 132(6), 063804 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.063804

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Physical Review Letters 124(8), 086801 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.086801

    Okuma, N., Kawabata, K., Shiozaki, K., Sato, M.: Topological Origin of Non- Hermitian Skin Effects. Physical Review Letters 124(8), 086801 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.086801

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Science 368(6488), 311–314 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8727

    Weidemann, S., Kremer, M., Helbig, T., Hofmann, T., Stegmaier, A., Greiter, M., Thomale, R., Szameit, A.: Topological funneling of light. Science 368(6488), 311–314 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8727

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Nature Physics 20(5), 852–858 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02420-4

    Leefmans, C.R., Parto, M., Williams, J., Li, G.H.Y., Dutt, A., Nori, F., Marandi, A.: Topological temporally mode-locked laser. Nature Physics 20(5), 852–858 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02420-4

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    Science Advances 9(27) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv

    Wang, A., Meng, Z., Chen, C.Q.: Non-Hermitian topology in static mechanical metamaterials. Science Advances 9(27) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv. adf7299

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Laughlin, R.B.: Anomalous quantum hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395–1398 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395

    1983 doi

  37. [45]

    Springer, New York (2009)

    Jain, J.K.: Composite Fermions. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511607561 . https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/composite- fermions/AB22E09A3F9C4E98F91E1BB447AF5778

    2009 doi

  38. [46]

    Nature 582(7810), 41–45 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-2318-5

    Clark, L.W., Schine, N., Baum, C., Jia, N., Simon, J.: Observation of laughlin states made of light. Nature 582(7810), 41–45 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-2318-5

    2020

  39. [47]

    Stormer, H.L., Tsui, D.C., Gossard, A.C.: The fractional quantum hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 298–305 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S298

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    Vicentini, F., Minganti, F., Rota, R., Orso, G., Ciuti, C.: Critical slowing down in driven-dissipative bose-hubbard lattices. Phys. Rev. A 97, 013853 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.013853 19

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    Carusotto, I., Ciuti, C.: Quantum fluids of light. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299–366 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.299

    2013 doi

  42. [50]

    Nature Physics 20(6), 905–912 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02454-8

    Szameit, A., Rechtsman, M.C.: Discrete nonlinear topological photonics. Nature Physics 20(6), 905–912 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02454-8

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    Nature Physics 2021 17:6 17(6), 704–709 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-021-01185-4

    Liu, Y.G.N., Jung, P.S., Parto, M., Christodoulides, D.N., Khajavikhan, M.: Gain-induced topological response via tailored long-range interactions. Nature Physics 2021 17:6 17(6), 704–709 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-021-01185-4

    2021

  44. [52]

    Nature Photonics 11(10), 651–656 (2017) https://doi.org/10

    St-Jean, P., Goblot, V., Galopin, E., Lemaˆ ıtre, A., Ozawa, T., Le Gratiet, L., Sagnes, I., Bloch, J., Amo, A.: Lasing in topological edge states of a one- dimensional lattice. Nature Photonics 11(10), 651–656 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41566-017-0006-2

    2017

  45. [53]

    Science 358(6363), 636–640 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4551

    Bahari, B., Ndao, A., Vallini, F., El Amili, A., Fainman, Y., Kant´ e, B.: Nonre- ciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries. Science 358(6363), 636–640 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4551

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Science 359(6381) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4003

    Harari, G., Bandres, M.A., Lumer, Y., Rechtsman, M.C., Chong, Y.D., Kha- javikhan, M., Christodoulides, D.N., Segev, M.: Topological insulator laser: Theory. Science 359(6381) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4003

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Science 359(6381) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4005

    Bandres, M.A., Wittek, S., Harari, G., Parto, M., Ren, J., Segev, M., Christodoulides, D.N., Khajavikhan, M.: Topological insulator laser: Experi- ments. Science 359(6381) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4005

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    Physical Review X 10(4), 041060 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041060

    Amelio, I., Carusotto, I.: Theory of the Coherence of Topological Lasers. Physical Review X 10(4), 041060 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041060

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    Nature 2020 578:7794 578(7794), 246– 250 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1981-x

    Zeng, Y., Chattopadhyay, U., Zhu, B., Qiang, B., Li, J., Jin, Y., Li, L., Davies, A.G., Linfield, E.H., Zhang, B., Chong, Y., Wang, Q.J.: Electrically pumped topological laser with valley edge modes. Nature 2020 578:7794 578(7794), 246– 250 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s4158...

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    Science 373(6562), 1514–1517 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj2232

    Dikopoltsev, A., Harder, T.H., Lustig, E., Egorov, O.A., Beierlein, J., Wolf, A., Lumer, Y., Emmerling, M., Schneider, C., H¨ ofling, S., Segev, M., Klembt, S.: Topological insulator vertical-cavity laser array. Science 373(6562), 1514–1517 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/scien...

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    Optica 5(11), 1390 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001390

    Lustig, E., Sharabi, Y., Segev, M.: Topological aspects of photonic time crystals. Optica 5(11), 1390 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001390

    2018 doi

  52. [60]

    Nature Physics 17(10), 1169–1176 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01302-3 20

    Mittal, S., Moille, G., Srinivasan, K., Chembo, Y.K., Hafezi, M.: Topological frequency combs and nested temporal solitons. Nature Physics 17(10), 1169–1176 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01302-3 20

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Science 384(6702), 1356–1361 (2024) https://doi

    Flower, C.J., Jalali Mehrabad, M., Xu, L., Moille, G., Suarez-Forero, D.G., ¨Orsel, O., Bahl, G., Chembo, Y., Srinivasan, K., Mittal, S., Hafezi, M.: Observation of topological frequency combs. Science 384(6702), 1356–1361 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.ado0053

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    Nature Physics 19(6), 863–868 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-023-01975-y

    Moussa, H., Xu, G., Yin, S., Galiffi, E., Ra’di, Y., Al` u, A.: Observa- tion of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces. Nature Physics 19(6), 863–868 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-023-01975-y

    2023

  55. [63]

    Physica Scripta 65(2), 160–163 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1238/ Physica.Regular.065a00160

    Mendon¸ ca, J.T., Shukla, P.K.: Time Refraction and Time Reflection: Two Basic Concepts. Physica Scripta 65(2), 160–163 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1238/ Physica.Regular.065a00160

    2002

  56. [65]

    Feis, J., Weidemann, S., Sheppard, T., Price, H.M., Szameit, A.: Spacetime- topological events (2024)

    2024

  57. [66]

    Nature Communications 2025 16:1 16(1), 1–7 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56021-7

    Ren, Y., Ye, K., Chen, Q., Chen, F., Zhang, L., Pan, Y., Li, W., Li, X., Zhang, L., Chen, H., Yang, Y.: Observation of momentum-gap topology of light at temporal interfaces in a time-synthetic lattice. Nature Communications 2025 16:1 16(1), 1–7 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s...

    2025 doi

  58. [67]

    APL Photonics 10(1), 016104 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234030 https://pubs.aip.org/aip/app/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0234030/20341185/016104 1 5.0234030.pdf

    Shandilya, P., Ou, S.-C., Stone, J., Menyuk, C., Erkintalo, M., Srini- vasan, K., Moille, G.: All-optical azimuthal trapping of dissipative kerr multi-solitons for relative noise suppression. APL Photonics 10(1), 016104 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234030 https://pubs.aip...

    2025 doi

  59. [68]

    Wang, S., Carruthers, T.F., Menyuk, C.R.: Efficiently modeling the noise perfor- mance of short-pulse lasers with a computational implementation of dynamical methods. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 35(10), 2521–2531 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/ JOSAB.35.002521

    2018

  60. [69]

    Lado, J.L., Zilberberg, O.: Topological spin excitations in harper-heisenberg spin chains. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033009 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.1.033009

    2019

  61. [70]

    Nanophotonics 12(12), 2221–2230 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0126

    Lustig, E., Segal, O., Saha, S., Bordo, E., Chowdhury, S.N., Sharabi, Y., Fleischer, A., Boltasseva, A., Cohen, O., Shalaev, V.M., Segev, M.: Time-refraction optics with single cycle modulation. Nanophotonics 12(12), 2221–2230 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0126

    2023 doi

  62. [71]

    Nature 458(7235), 178–181 (2009) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature07838

    G¨ unter, G., Anappara, A.A., Hees, J., Sell, A., Biasiol, G., Sorba, L., De Liberato, 21 S., Ciuti, C., Tredicucci, A., Leitenstorfer, A., Huber, R.: Sub-cycle switch-on of ultrastrong light–matter interaction. Nature 458(7235), 178–181 (2009) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature07838

    2009 doi

  63. [72]

    Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics 4(3–4), 261 (1997) https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.1997.4

    Jackiw, R.: A nonrelativistic chiral soliton in one dimension. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics 4(3–4), 261 (1997) https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.1997.4. 3-4.2

    1997 doi

  64. [73]

    The European Physical Journal Plus 134(11), 571 (2019) https://doi

    Dutta Roy, P., Das, J., Kar, S.: Quasi-normal modes in a symmetric triangular barrier. The European Physical Journal Plus 134(11), 571 (2019) https://doi. org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12928-y

    2019 doi

  65. [74]

    Applied Physics Letters 104(8), 081118 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866868

    Khurgin, J.B., Dikmelik, Y., Hugi, A., Faist, J.: Coherent frequency combs pro- duced by self frequency modulation in quantum cascade lasers. Applied Physics Letters 104(8), 081118 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866868

    2014 doi

  66. [75]

    Physical Review Letters 123(24), 243902 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.243902

    Opaˇ cak, N., Schwarz, B.: Theory of Frequency-Modulated Combs in Lasers with Spatial Hole Burning, Dispersion, and Kerr Nonlinearity. Physical Review Letters 123(24), 243902 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.243902

    2019 doi

  67. [76]

    Optica 7(12), 1781 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/ optica.408917

    Burghoff, D.: Unraveling the origin of frequency modulated combs using active cavity mean-field theory. Optica 7(12), 1781 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/ optica.408917

    2020

  68. [77]

    Science 282(6669), 434–438 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ADJ3858

    Heckelmann, I., Bertrand, M., Dikopoltsev, A., Beck, M., Scalari, G., Faist, J.: Quantum walk comb in a fast gain laser. Science 282(6669), 434–438 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ADJ3858

    2023 doi

  69. [78]

    Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews 17(4), 2200590 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202200590

    T¨ aschler, P., Forrer, A., Bertrand, M., Kapsalidis, F., Beck, M., Faist, J.: Asyn- chronous Upconversion Sampling of Frequency Modulated Combs. Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews 17(4), 2200590 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202200590

    2023 doi

  70. [79]

    Nanophotonics (2025) https://doi.org/10.1515/ nanoph-2024-0768

    Dikopoltsev, A., Heckelmann, I., Schneider, B., Bertrand, M., Faist, J.: The theory of the quantum walk comb laser. Nanophotonics (2025) https://doi.org/10.1515/ nanoph-2024-0768

    2025

  71. [80]

    Nature Physics 2025, 1–7 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-025-02880-2

    Dikopoltsev, A., Heckelmann, I., Bertrand, M., Beck, M., Scalari, G., Zilber- berg, O., Faist, J.: Collective quench dynamics of active photonic lattices in synthetic dimensions. Nature Physics 2025, 1–7 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-025-02880-2

    2025

  72. [81]

    Optics Express 30(4), 5376 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.445570

    Humbard, L., Burghoff, D.: Analytical theory of frequency-modulated combs: gen- eralized mean-field theory, complex cavities, and harmonic states. Optics Express 30(4), 5376 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.445570

    2022 doi

  73. [82]

    Europhysics Letters 102(6), 67007 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1209/ 22 0295-5075/102/67007

    Chiocchetta, A., Carusotto, I.: Non-equilibrium quasi-condensates in reduced dimensions. Europhysics Letters 102(6), 67007 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1209/ 22 0295-5075/102/67007

    2013

  74. [83]

    Science 264(5158), 553–556 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.264.5158.553

    Faist, J., Capasso, F., Sivco, D.L., Sirtori, C., Hutchinson, A.L., Cho, A.Y.: Quan- tum Cascade Laser. Science 264(5158), 553–556 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.264.5158.553

    1994

  75. [84]

    Optics Express 28(5), 6002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.382243

    Han, Z., Ren, D., Burghoff, D.: Sensitivity of SWIFT spectroscopy. Optics Express 28(5), 6002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.382243

    2020 doi

  76. [85]

    Laser & Photonics Reviews 15(12), 2100242 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202100242

    Schneider, B., Kapsalidis, F., Bertrand, M., Singleton, M., Hillbrand, J., Beck, M., Faist, J.: Controlling Quantum Cascade Laser Optical Frequency Combs through Microwave Injection. Laser & Photonics Reviews 15(12), 2100242 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202100242

    2021 doi

  77. [86]

    Optica 5(8), 948 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/optica

    Singleton, M., Jouy, P., Beck, M., Faist, J.: Evidence of linear chirp in mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers. Optica 5(8), 948 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/optica. 5.000948

    2018 doi

  78. [87]

    Nature Photonics 13(2), 101–104 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0320-3

    Hillbrand, J., Andrews, A.M., Detz, H., Strasser, G., Schwarz, B.: Coherent injec- tion locking of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Nature Photonics 13(2), 101–104 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0320-3

    2019 doi

  79. [88]

    Applied Physics Letters 42(4), 328–330 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.93921

    Harder, C., Vahala, K., Yariv, A.: Measurement of the linewidth enhancement factor α of semiconductor lasers. Applied Physics Letters 42(4), 328–330 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.93921

    1983 doi

  80. [89]

    Applied Physics Letters 89(9), 091121 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2345035

    Aellen, T., Maulini, R., Terazzi, R., Hoyler, N., Giovannini, M., Faist, J., Blaser, S., Hvozdara, L.: Direct measurement of the linewidth enhancement factor by optical heterodyning of an amplitude-modulated quantum cascade laser. Applied Physics Letters 89(9), 091121 (2006) h...

    2006 doi

  81. [90]

    Optica, Vol

    Opaˇ cak, N., Opaˇ cak, N., Pilat, F., Kazakov, D., Kazakov, D., Cin, S.D., Ramer, G., Lendl, B., Capasso, F., Schwarz, B., Schwarz, B.: Spectrally resolved linewidth enhancement factor of a semiconductor frequency comb. Optica, Vol. 8, Issue 9, pp. 1227-1230 8(9), 1227–1230 (...

    2021 doi

  82. [91]

    Applied Physics Letters 118(7), 071101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0040882

    Kapsalidis, F., Schneider, B., Singleton, M., Bertrand, M., Gini, E., Beck, M., Faist, J.: Mid-infrared quantum cascade laser frequency combs with a microstrip- like line waveguide geometry. Applied Physics Letters 118(7), 071101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0040882

    2021 doi

  83. [92]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0787 23

    Xiao, M.-w.: Theory of transformation for the diagonalization of quadratic Hamiltonians (2009). https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0787 23

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.