Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Non-Hermitian topology and skin modes in the continuum via parametric processes

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a purely Hermitian, nonlocal parametric pairing process can induce non-Hermitian topology and skin modes in a continuous bosonic medium, with only uniform local loss added for stability.

desk verdict A genuinely new mechanism for non-Hermitian skin modes in a continuum bosonic system, with solid non-Bloch evidence, but the claimed spectral winding number is not well defined as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02776 v1 pith:MMZHAQKF submitted 2025-05-05 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.opticsquant-ph

Markus Bestler , Alexander Dikopoltsev , Oded Zilberberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords non-Hermitiantopologyskineffectparametricdrivingbosonicsystemscontinuummodelexceptionalpointsnon-Blochbandtheoryspectralwindingnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a purely Hermitian, nonlocal parametric pairing term—bosons created and annihilated in pairs with opposite momenta plus a fixed momentum shift—can generate non-Hermitian topology and the non-Hermitian skin effect in a one-dimensional continuum, with only uniform local loss added for stability. The pairing produces level attraction between particle and hole branches, and beyond a threshold it creates a tilted diabolical line in the complex spectrum. The tilt supplies a net current that cannot be screened by the remaining bulk modes, a bulk anomaly that forces boundary modes when the system is opened. The authors compute a spectral winding number after compactifying the unbounded momentum axis and confirm the resulting skin modes and their localization lengths using non-Bloch theory. If the claim holds, parametric drives become a minimal, lattice-free route to non-Hermitian topological behavior in bosonic systems.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the momentum-shifted Nambu dynamical matrix $\tilde{D}_k=\sigma_z H_k-i\gamma\mathbb{1}$, with off-diagonal pairing $ig$ that couples $k-k_0$ particles to $-k-k_0$ holes. The imaginary pairing causes level attraction, and for $k_0\neq 0$ the resulting diabolical line—the one-dimensional set in the complex spectrum where the two bands touch in real part, bounded by exceptional points—is tilted, creating the unpaired current. The spectral winding number is made well defined by compactifying momentum via $\tilde{k}=\arctan(k)$, and non-Bloch theory with complex wave number $\bar{k}$ provides the generalized Brillouin zone and analytic localization lengths. Together these convert a local continuity anomaly into a quantized bulk index and edge modes.

What would settle it

Evaluate $W(E)=\oint d\tilde{k}\,\partial_{\tilde{k}}\log\det(\tilde{D}_{\tilde{k}}-E)/(2\pi i)$ on truncated domains $[-L,L]$ for fixed $E$ in the predicted $\pm1$ regions; if the winding changes with cutoff or depends on a regularization of the $k\to\pm\infty$ phase, the topological index is not well defined. Alternatively, realize the model in a driven bosonic gas with local loss and measure the steady-state density: absence of exponential accumulation at the predicted edge for $|k_0|<\sqrt{|g|}$ would falsify the bulk-boundary claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that the non-Hermitian skin effect in this model is not caused by engineered non-Hermitian couplings but by the Hermitian coupling between momentum-shifted particle and hole modes. In the shifted Nambu basis, the spectrum is $E=-2kk_0\pm\sqrt{(k^2+k_0^2)^2-g^2}$; for $|k_0|<\sqrt{|g|}$ the particle and hole bands coalesce into a tilted diabolical line terminated by exceptional points. Uniform loss $\gamma$ moves all lifetimes to the stable side, $\gamma\ge\sqrt{g^2-k_0^4}$, while the tilt of the diabolical line produces an unscreened bulk current. Opening the boundaries yields exponentially localized edge modes, classified by a spectral winding number $W(E)=\pm1$ computed after mapping $k\in(-\infty,\infty)$ to a circle with $\tilde{k}=\arctan(k)$; non-Bloch theory reproduces the open-boundary spectrum and localization lengths exactly.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that compactifying the unbounded momentum axis by $\tilde{k}=\arctan(k)$ makes the spectral winding integral well defined: the phase of $\det(\tilde{D}_k-E)$ must approach a controlled value as $k\to\pm\infty$, with no boundary contributions, even though that convergence is not proven in the paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $|k_0|<\sqrt{|g|}$ and damping $\gamma\ge\sqrt{g^2-k_0^4}$, the system is stable and every bulk mode has positive lifetime, so the skin effect can be observed without gain.
  • The spectral winding number predicts right- or left-edge localization from the sign of $k_0$, giving directional control by reversing the momentum shift.
  • Non-Bloch theory yields analytic localization lengths, so edge-mode decay rates are quantitatively predictable from bulk parameters.
  • Because the construction is continuum and lattice-free, parametric drives in ultracold atoms, polaritonic condensates, or acoustic metamaterials are candidate platforms.
  • The same logic extends the bulk-boundary correspondence for non-Hermitian systems from tight-binding lattices to continuum models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to read the pair creation as a squeezed-drive term: a Josephson or optical parametric oscillator with a finite-momentum pump should show the same edge accumulation, testable in existing tabletop setups.
  • Since the skin effect here comes from Hermitian pairing rather than loss engineering, it may appear in effectively Hermitian Bogoliubov descriptions of interacting condensates whenever a small local loss is added; that would move the effect from specially built lattices to ordinary superfluids.
  • One could test the anomaly directly by measuring the bulk current $J_\Sigma$ as a function of $k_0$: the predicted non-monotonic signal and its sign change should correlate with the onset of edge modes.
  • The paper does not address interactions; strong interactions could either stabilize or destroy the tilted diabolical line, so a generalized non-Bloch analysis with a Hartree term is a concrete next test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a one-dimensional continuum bosonic model with momentum-shifted parametric pairing, Eq. (1), and shows that the Hermitian pairing produces level attraction between shifted particle and hole branches. With uniform local damping added, the bulk spectrum contains a tilted diabolical line, and finite systems display non-Hermitian skin modes. The authors support this with exact numerical diagonalization of a discretized real-space model and with non-Bloch theory, obtaining analytical localization lengths that match numerics. They also attempt to classify the skin effect through a spectral winding number computed after compactifying the continuum momentum via k~=arctan(k), and claim W=±1 regions for energies inside the diabolical-line area.

Significance. The proposed mechanism—Hermitian parametric pairing generating non-Hermitian skin modes without complex bath engineering—is conceptually appealing and potentially impactful for bosonic platforms. The non-Bloch analysis is a genuine strength: no parameter is fitted, the localization lengths (|Im kbar|≈0.345 and 0.339 for g=γ=1, k0=0.3) are analytical predictions that agree with exact diagonalization, and the open-boundary spectrum from Eq. (5) matches numerics. However, the spectral-winding classification, one of the two advertised routes to the bulk-boundary correspondence, is not currently well defined. The significance of the paper depends on whether that index can be given a rigorous regularization; the non-Bloch route alone already establishes the main boundary physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (4) and the paragraph introducing k~=arctan(k)] The compactified spectral winding in Eq. (4) is not a well-defined integral for this model. With the damped dynamical matrix D~k = σz Hk − iγ1, one has det(D~k − E) = −(k^2−k0^2)^2 + 4(E+iγ)k0 k + (E+iγ)^2 + g^2, which behaves as −k^4 + O(k^2) as |k|→∞. Under the substitution k=tan(k~/2) used in the compactification, the integrand d/dk~ log det(D~k − E) has a fourth-order pole at the identified point k~=π/2. Consequently the integral in Eq. (4) is not defined as an ordinary winding integral, and the statement that this compactification 'guarantees a well quantized topological index' is unsupported. A symmetric cutoff k∈[−Λ,Λ] followed by Λ→∞ gives (1/2πi)[log det(D~Λ−E)−log det(D~−Λ−E)] → 0, i.e., the direct continuum limit is 0 rather than the claimed ±1, while nonsymmetric cutoffs give cutoff-dependent results. The W(E)=±1 regions in Fig. 3(a) therefore require an explicit regularization (for example, dividing det by (1+k^2)^2) that is not specified. Please supply such a prescription or remove the spectral-winding claim and rely on the non-Bloch argument, which is independent and appears sound.
  2. [Eq. (3) and the paragraph defining JΣ] The bulk-anomaly argument is presented as a consequence of Eq. (3), but the current Jk used to color the bands and to define JΣ is never defined, and the statement that diabolical-line modes 'cannot act as counter-propagating modes' is qualitative. In particular, the claim that the unscreened current JΣ≠0 'requires' a boundary effect is an inference, not a derived result. Since the boundary modes are already established by exact numerical diagonalization and non-Bloch theory, this section can be reframed as heuristic motivation; as written, it overstates the logical status of the anomaly. Please define Jk explicitly and either justify the screening statement or label it as a conjecture.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (5)] The expression 'det(D~kbar−1 E)=0' appears to contain a typesetting artifact; it should read det(D~kbar − E)=0 or det(D~kbar − 1·E)=0.
  2. [Paragraph after Eq. (2)] The figure references in the discussion of the three regimes (see Fig. 1(a), Fig. 1(c), Fig. 1(d)) should be to Fig. 2(a), Fig. 2(c), and Fig. 2(d), since the relevant spectra and diabolical lines are displayed there.
  3. [Numerical diagonalization, Fig. 3] The discretized real-space Hamiltonian used for the open-boundary numerical diagonalization is not described; please provide the lattice Hamiltonian, the boundary conditions, and the discretization scheme, or state that the code is available, so that the numerical results are reproducible.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The phrase 'We usek0 =0.3' is missing a space; it should read 'We use k0 =0.3'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: bulk spectra, non-Bloch localization, and numerics are independently derived from the same explicit continuum model.

full rationale

The paper's central results—the tilted diabolical line, the bulk current anomaly J_Sigma, the winding-number regions W(E)=+/-1, the analytical non-Bloch localization lengths, and the numerically computed skin modes—are all derived from the same explicit model in Eqs. (1)-(2). No parameter is fitted to the target observables: the localization values |Im k| approx 0.345 and 0.339 are obtained by solving polynomial equations (B6)-(B7) derived from the non-Bloch condition and are then compared with exact finite-system diagonalization, so the agreement is a genuine cross-check rather than an input. The self-citations (e.g., refs. [44], [45], [49], [50]) are background on parametric drives and dissipation-induced transitions; none supplies the non-Hermitian skin effect or the winding-number classification as an unexamined premise. The only flagged concern, namely whether the arctan compactification in Eq. (4) makes the winding integral well defined given the quartic growth of det(D_k-E), is a mathematical-rigor issue about the topological invariant, not a circular reduction: it does not make any result equivalent to its own input by construction, and the numerical and non-Bloch skin-mode calculations stand independently of W(E).

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new particles or forces. The free parameters are the Hamiltonian parameters with illustrative values. The key assumption is the compactification for the winding number and the validity of non-Bloch theory in this continuum setting.

free parameters (4)
  • coupling strength g = 1 (chosen for illustration)
    Sets the strength of the imaginary pairing. The paper uses g=1 in numerics, but the central claims hold for the regime p|g| > |k0|.
  • damping rate γ = 1 (chosen for illustration)
    Local damping required for stability; chosen so that γ ≥ sqrt(g^2 - k0^4). Not fitted to data.
  • momentum shift k0 = 0.3 (chosen for illustration)
    Tilts the diabolical line in the regime |k0| < sqrt(|g|). Not fitted to data.
  • mass m = 1/4 (set by hand)
    The dispersion is set to parabolic with m=1/4; this is a unit choice and does not affect the qualitative physics.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Local damping is accurately described by an effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian term -2iγ∫a†a, derived from a Lindblad master equation in the mean-field limit.
    The paper states this damping term can be derived from a Lindblad equation with single-particle jump operators (Appendix A), but the full master equation reduction is not shown.
  • ad hoc to paper Momentum compactification via k̃ = arctan(k) yields a well-defined spectral winding number without boundary contributions.
    The compactification is introduced to apply the winding formula of Eq. (4) to a continuum model. No proof of convergence or absence of boundary terms is given.
  • domain assumption Non-Bloch band theory applies to continuum non-Hermitian bosonic systems.
    The paper relies on Ref. [31] for non-Bloch theory in non-Hermitian continuum systems and Ref. [30] for bosonic BdG systems; the extension to this specific model is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-Hermitian topology and skin modes in the continuum via parametric processes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MMZHAQKF

@misc{pith2026250502776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-Hermitian topology and skin modes in the continuum via parametric processes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MMZHAQKF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02776}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that Hermitian, nonlocal parametric pairing processes can induce non-Hermitian topology and skin modes, offering a simple alternative to complex bath engineering. Our model, stabilized by local dissipation and operating in the continuum limit, reveals exceptional points that spawn a tilted diabolical line in the dispersion. Local dissipation prevents instabilities, while a bulk anomaly signals unscreened current response. Upon opening the boundaries, we observe a non-Hermitian skin effect with localized edge modes. Through bulk winding indices and non-Bloch theory, we establish a robust bulk-boundary correspondence, highlighting parametric drives as a scalable route to non-Hermitian topology in bosonic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02776 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a), bottom left. This approach guarantees a well quantized topological index, as the system approaches the thermodynamic limit, k→±∞. Calculating the wind￾ing number for every E ∈C reveals that the diabolical line engenders two regions with W(E)=±1 separated by a line at Im(E)=−γ, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (c) and (d) show the solutions of the non-Bloch equation [Eq. (5)] for the frequency of the weakest local￾ized finite frequency mode as a function its lifetime. In the case of |k0/ p |g||≲0.35, we see that the non-Bloch condition is fulfilled by a double-zero of the no…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ultrafast Non-Hermitian Skin Effect

    physics.optics 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The frequency jump in a mode-locked quantum cascade laser acts as a temporal interface supporting a non-Hermitian skin mode, observed as a sub-picosecond pulse.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  2. [2]

    Resta and D

    R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization: a modern approach, in Physics of ferroelectrics: a modern perspective (Springer, 2007) pp. 31–68

    2007

  3. [3]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of modern physics 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insulators, Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Reviews of modern physics 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    B. A. Bernevig, Topological insulators and topological su- perconductors (Princeton university press, 2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, et al., Topological photonics, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Gauge invariance and anomalies in con- densed matter physics, Journal of Mathematical Physics 64 (2023)

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, Gauge invariance and anomalies in con- densed matter physics, Journal of Mathematical Physics 64 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  2. [10]

    J. C. Teo and C. L. Kane, Topological defects and gap- less modes in insulators and superconductors, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Y. E. Kraus, Z. Ringel, and O. Zilberberg, Four- dimensional quantum hall effect in a two-dimensional quasicrystal, Physical review letters 111, 226401 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Petrides, H

    I. Petrides, H. M. Price, and O. Zilberberg, Six- dimensional quantum hall effect and three-dimensional topological pumps, Physical Review B 98, 125431 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Petrides and O

    I. Petrides and O. Zilberberg, Higher-order topological insulators, topological pumps and the quantum hall effect 6 in high dimensions, Physical Review Research 2, 022049 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zil- berberg, Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals, Physical review letters 109, 106402 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Verbin, O

    M. Verbin, O. Zilberberg, Y. Lahini, Y. E. Kraus, and Y. Silberberg, Topological pumping over a photonic fi- bonacci quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. B 91, 064201 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Zilberberg, Topology in quasicrystals, Optical Mate- rials Express 11, 1143 (2021)

    O. Zilberberg, Topology in quasicrystals, Optical Mate- rials Express 11, 1143 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. U. and, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991

    2020

  11. [19]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Roccati, G

    F. Roccati, G. M. Palma, F. Ciccarello, and F. Bagarello, Non-hermitian physics and master equations, Open Sys- tems & Information Dynamics 29, 2250004 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1142/S1230161222500044

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological in- variants of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 201103 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and topology in non-hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-bloch band theory of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-bloch band theory in bosonic bogoliubov–de gennes systems, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165123 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Hu, Y.-Q

    Y.-M. Hu, Y.-Q. Huang, W.-T. Xue, and Z. Wang, Non- bloch band theory for non-hermitian continuum systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205429 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    V. A. Yurovsky, A. Ben-Reuven, P. S. Julienne, and C. J. Williams, Atom loss from bose-einstein condensates due to feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. A 60, R765 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    L. Li, C. H. Lee, and J. Gong, Topological switch for non-hermitian skin effect in cold-atom systems with loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 250402 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Harari, M

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y. Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Segev, Topological insu- lator laser: Theory, Science 359, eaar4003 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aar4003

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    Y. Ota, K. Takata, T. Ozawa, A. Amo, Z. Jia, B. Kante, M. Notomi, Y. Arakawa, and S. Iwamoto, Active topo- logical photonics, Nanophotonics 9, 547 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    M. A. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological insulator laser: Experiments, Science 359, eaar4005 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aar4005

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    Bahari, A

    B. Bahari, A. Ndao, F. Vallini, A. E. Amili, Y. Fainman, and B. Kant´ e, Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries, Science 358, 636 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aao4551

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    Longhi, D

    S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Robust light trans- port in non-hermitian photonic lattices, Scientific Re- ports 5, 13376 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Topo- logical framework for directional amplification in driven- dissipative cavity arrays, Nature Communications 11, 3149 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Weidemann, M

    S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science 368, 311 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaz8727

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Halder, R

    D. Halder, R. Thomale, and S. Basu, Circuit realization of a two-orbital non-hermitian tight-binding chain, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115407 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Ghatak, M

    A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-hermitian topol- ogy and its bulk–edge correspondence in an ac- tive mechanical metamaterial, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 29561 (2020), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/...

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Eichler and O

    A. Eichler and O. Zilberberg, Classical and Quantum Parametric Phenomena (Oxford University Press, 2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Soriente, T

    M. Soriente, T. L. Heugel, K. Omiya, R. Chitra, and O. Zilberberg, Distinctive class of dissipation-induced phase transitions and their universal characteristics, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023100 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Macklin, K

    C. Macklin, K. O’Brien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Sid- diqi, A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling- wave parametric amplifier, Science 350, 307 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaa8525

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Evans, S

    M. Evans, S. Gras, P. Fritschel, J. Miller, L. Barsotti, D. Martynov, A. Brooks, D. Coyne, R. Abbott, R. X. Adhikari, K. Arai, R. Bork, B. Kells, J. Rollins, N. Smith- Lefebvre, G. Vajente, H. Yamamoto, C. Adams, S. Aston, J. Betzweiser, V. Frolov, A. Mullavey, A. Pele, J. Rom...

    2015

  40. [48]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2019). 7

    2019

  41. [49]

    T. L. Heugel, O. Zilberberg, C. Marty, R. Chitra, and A. Eichler, Ising machines with strong bilinear coupling, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013149 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Ameye, A

    O. Ameye, A. Eichler, and O. Zilberberg, The parametric instability landscape of coupled kerr parametric oscilla- tors (2025), arXiv:2501.08793 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    M. I. Dykman, C. Bruder, N. L¨ orch, and Y. Zhang, Interaction-induced time-symmetry breaking in driven quantum oscillators, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195444 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Fulde and R

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964)

    1964

  45. [53]

    wen Xiao, Theory of transformation for the diagonalization of quadratic hamiltonians (2009), arXiv:0908.0787 [math-ph]

    M. wen Xiao, Theory of transformation for the diagonalization of quadratic hamiltonians (2009), arXiv:0908.0787 [math-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gardin, G

    A. Gardin, G. Bourcin, C. Person, C. Fumeaux, R. Le- brun, I. Boventer, G. C. Tettamanzi, and V. Castel, Level attraction from interference in a two-tone-driven cavity magnonics system, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 014048 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    M. G. Silveirinha, Chern invariants for continuous media, Phys. Rev. B 92, 125153 (2015). 8 Appendix A: Derivation of the non-Hermitian continuity equation The effective von Neumann equation corresponding to Eq. (1) in the main text is ˙ρ=−i[ R dka† kHkak,ρ ]−2iγρ. Here, the f...

    2015

  48. [56]

    We therefore solve the non-Bloch equation det(D¯k−Im(E))=0

    Zero-frequency modes and Finite-frequency modes with strongest localization We first focus on the zero frequency modes [Re(E)=0]. We therefore solve the non-Bloch equation det(D¯k−Im(E))=0 . (B1) 9 FIG. 4: Non-Bloch theory forg=γ=1 andk0=0.3 (aFrequency Re(E) and localization ...

  49. [57]

    4(c) and (d) show the solutions of the non-Bloch equation [Eq

    Finite-frequency modes with weakest localization Fig. 4(c) and (d) show the solutions of the non-Bloch equation [Eq. (5)] for the frequency of the weakest local- ized finite frequency mode as a function its lifetime. In the case of |k0/ p |g|| ≲0.35, we see that the non-Bloch ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.