Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Steerable Chatbots: Exploring Personalization Control Interfaces via LLM Activation Steering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.04260 v3 pith:SDTXAZBQ submitted 2025-05-07 cs.HC cs.AI

Steerable Chatbots: Exploring Personalization Control Interfaces via LLM Activation Steering

classification cs.HC cs.AI
keywords activationcontrolsteeringchatbotspersonalizationsteerableusersarticulate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Personalizing LLM responses typically requires users to articulate their preferences through prompting, which can be burdensome at cold start and difficult to articulate in natural language. We introduce an alternative paradigm, steerable chatbots: rather than asking users to describe what they want, let them directly manipulate it via a linear factor. We implement this through activation steering, leveraging a linear scalar to control how strongly a preference is expressed in the LLM's output. We first assess the computational viability of activation steering as a method to control granular preference expression, then we explore how the factor can be exposed to users. We prototype three activation steering interface designs that vary on the axes of agency (user-led vs. system-driven) and fluidity (static vs. adaptive). A within-subjects user study (n=14) in cold-start personalization tasks shows the potential for steerable chatbots to align better with underlying user preferences than prompting alone, while revealing heterogeneous values around control, persistence, and transparency in LLM personalization.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Explaining and Breaking the Safety-Helpfulness Ceiling via Preference Dimensional Expansion

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MORA breaks the safety-helpfulness trade-off in LLM alignment by pre-sampling single-reward prompts and rewriting them to expand multi-dimensional reward diversity, yielding 5-12.4% single-preference gains in sequenti...

  2. Explaining and Breaking the Safety-Helpfulness Ceiling via Preference Dimensional Expansion

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MORA breaks the safety-helpfulness ceiling in LLMs by pre-sampling single-reward prompts and rewriting them to incorporate multi-dimensional intents, delivering 5-12.4% gains in sequential alignment and 4.6% overall i...

  3. Alignment has a Fantasia Problem

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AI alignment must move beyond assuming users have fully formed goals and instead provide active cognitive support to help form and refine intent over time.