Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Out-of-Sample Embedding with Proximity Data: Projection versus Restricted Reconstruction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.06756 v1 pith:ARCHJKR6 submitted 2025-05-10 stat.ML cs.LGstat.CO

Out-of-Sample Embedding with Proximity Data: Projection versus Restricted Reconstruction

classification stat.ML cs.LGstat.CO
keywords projectionreconstructionrestrictedmethodsproblemaddinganalysisdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of using proximity (similarity or dissimilarity) data for the purpose of "adding a point to a vector diagram" was first studied by J.C. Gower in 1968. Since then, a number of methods -- mostly kernel methods -- have been proposed for solving what has come to be called the problem of *out-of-sample embedding*. We survey the various kernel methods that we have encountered and show that each can be derived from one or the other of two competing strategies: *projection* or *restricted reconstruction*. Projection can be analogized to a well-known formula for adding a point to a principal component analysis. Restricted reconstruction poses a different challenge: how to best approximate redoing the entire multivariate analysis while holding fixed the vector diagram that was previously obtained. This strategy results in a nonlinear optimization problem that can be simplified to a unidimensional search. Various circumstances may warrant either projection or restricted reconstruction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.