pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.12551 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-18 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

The role of non-metricity on neutrino behavior in bumblebee gravity

Yuxuan Shi , A. A. Ara\'ujo Filho This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 13:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords non-metricitybumblebee gravityneutrino oscillationsblack hole spacetimeflavor transitionsenergy depositiongravitational lensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-metricity modifies neutrino energy deposition rates, oscillation phases, and flavor transition probabilities in bumblebee black hole spacetimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the impact of non-metricity on neutrinos propagating in the spacetime of bumblebee gravity black holes. It demonstrates that the deformed geometry alters the energy released when neutrinos annihilate with antineutrinos, shifts the accumulated phase of neutrino oscillations, and changes how gravitational lensing influences transitions between neutrino flavors. Numerical calculations for a two-flavor model, covering both normal and inverted mass orderings, quantify these geometric modifications. A sympathetic reader would care because neutrino processes near compact objects provide potential windows into deviations from standard general relativity.

Core claim

In bumblebee gravity, non-metricity alters the energy deposition rate from neutrino-antineutrino annihilation, the oscillation phase induced by the background geometry, and the influence of lensing on neutrino flavor transition probabilities. The analysis relies on the black hole configuration from prior work and includes numerical evaluations of oscillation probabilities in a two-flavor scenario for both inverted and normal mass orderings.

What carries the argument

Non-metricity in the bumblebee gravity black hole metric, which deforms the spacetime geometry and thereby affects neutrino propagation, annihilation, and flavor oscillations.

If this is right

  • Energy deposition from neutrino-antineutrino annihilation varies with the non-metricity parameters in the spacetime.
  • The oscillation phase for neutrinos accumulates differently due to the modified background geometry.
  • Lensing effects produce altered probabilities for transitions between neutrino flavors.
  • Numerical results exhibit distinct behaviors between normal and inverted mass orderings in the two-flavor case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These modifications could be tested against neutrino data from astrophysical environments such as accretion disks or supernovae.
  • The framework may extend naturally to other modified gravity models that incorporate non-metricity.
  • Incorporating three-flavor mixing or additional interaction channels would provide further checks on the geometric effects.

Load-bearing premise

The black hole configuration from the referenced work remains a valid solution after non-metricity is included, and the two-flavor approximation captures the essential oscillation behavior.

What would settle it

An observation of neutrino flavor transition probabilities or energy deposition rates near a black hole that matches standard general relativity predictions without non-metricity corrections would contradict the modifications reported.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12551 by A. A. Ara\'ujo Filho, Yuxuan Shi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The graph illustrates how the ratio Q/˙ Q˙ Newton varies with respect to the quantity R/M, for several chosen values of the Lorentz–violating parameter X. 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 r/R 0 1 2 3 4 5 d Q / d r 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.10 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Newton M = 0.1R, X = 0.0 M = 0.1R, X = 0.1 M = 0.1R, X = 0.2 M = 0.1R, X = 0.3 M = 0.2R, X = 0.0 M = 0.2R, X = 0.1 M = 0.2R, X = 0.2 M = 0.2R, X = 0.3 [PITH… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The radial dependence of the differential energy deposition rate, dQ/˙ dr, is examined for varying compactness ratios M/R. In the Newtonian limit, where the mass parameter vanishes (M = 0), the expression simplifies significantly, yielding dQ/˙ dr = 1 exactly at the neutrinosphere radius r = R. be found in Refs. [65, 89] p (k)t = −mkgtt(r) dt dτ = −Ek, (25) p (k)r = mkgrr(r) dr dτ , (26) p (k)φ = mkr 2 dφ … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The figure shows the effect of weak lensing on neutrino motion through a curved spacetime geometry. Here, S marks the emission point of the neutrinos, while D identifies the location where they are eventually detected. sum over all contributing trajectories, each shaped by the spacetime geometry [65, 67, 82, 90, 92, 94, 95]: |να(tD, xD)⟩ = N X i U ∗ αiX p e −iχ p i |νi(tS, xS)⟩. (49) All neutrino trajector… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The transition probability for νe → νµ is analyzed as a function of the azimuthal angle φ for two values of the Lorentz–violating parameter, X = 1 × 10−10 and X = 3 × 10−10. The study is performed in the two–flavor approximation, considering both normal and inverted mass orderings. Additionally, mixing angles α = π/5 and α = π/6 are used to assess the sensitivity of the oscillation pattern to variations in… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The νe → νµ conversion probability is evaluated as a function of the azimuthal angle φ for X = 0, 1 × 10−10, 2 × 10−10, and 3 × 10−10, considering both normal and inverted orderings in a two–flavor scheme. The impact of the mixing angle is analyzed for α = π/5 and α = π/6. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Neutrino oscillation probabilities are shown as functions of the azimuthal angle φ for both normal and inverted hierarchies. Lorentz violation is illustrated using X = 1 × 10−10 (black) and X = 3 × 10−10 (red). Line styles indicate the lightest neutrino mass: solid for m1 = 0, eV, dashed for 0.01, eV, and dotted for 0.02, eV. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Within the context of bumblebee gravity, this work explores how non-metricity alters the behavior and propagation of neutrinos. Our analysis is based on the black hole configuration introduced in Ref. [1], focusing on how the spacetime deformation affects some neutrino-related processes. Three primary aspects are fundamentally taken into account: the modification in the energy deposition rate stemming from neutrino-antineutrino annihilation, the alterations in the oscillation phase caused by the background geometry, and the role of lensing effects on the transition probabilities among neutrino flavors. Complementing the analytical approach, numerical evaluations of oscillation probabilities are performed within a two-flavor scenario, accounting for both inverted and normal mass ordering configurations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores the effects of non-metricity on neutrino behavior in bumblebee gravity, basing the analysis on the black hole configuration from Ref. [1]. It addresses three main aspects: modifications to the energy deposition rate from neutrino-antineutrino annihilation, changes to the oscillation phase induced by the background geometry, and the influence of lensing on neutrino flavor transition probabilities. Analytic derivations are supplemented by numerical evaluations of oscillation probabilities in a two-flavor scenario for both normal and inverted mass orderings.

Significance. If the adopted background remains a valid solution under non-metricity, the work could provide useful insights into how non-metricity couples to neutrino propagation and annihilation processes in Lorentz-violating spacetimes. The explicit consideration of both mass hierarchies in the numerical section is a constructive element that allows direct comparison of predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Spacetime background section (metric ansatz)] The bumblebee black hole metric is imported directly from Ref. [1] (introduced in the spacetime setup section) without re-derivation or verification that it satisfies the field equations once the non-metricity tensor is activated. Non-metricity alters the affine connection and adds independent equations for the non-metricity tensor; the vacuum metric functions are therefore not guaranteed to remain unchanged. All reported modifications to the annihilation rate, oscillation phase, and lensing probabilities are computed on this unverified background, rendering the assumption load-bearing for the central claims.
  2. [Numerical results section] Numerical oscillation probabilities are presented in the two-flavor approximation (numerical results section) without an error estimate or justification for neglecting the third flavor. In a deformed spacetime the mixing angles and effective potentials could enhance three-flavor effects; the absence of such a check weakens the robustness of the flavor-transition conclusions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that analytic and numerical steps are performed but supplies no explicit expressions, error estimates, or sample data tables; adding one or two representative formulas or a short table of probability values would improve clarity.
  2. [Model setup] Notation for the non-metricity tensor and its coupling to the bumblebee field should be defined at first use to avoid ambiguity when the connection is modified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the changes we will make to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Spacetime background section (metric ansatz)] The bumblebee black hole metric is imported directly from Ref. [1] (introduced in the spacetime setup section) without re-derivation or verification that it satisfies the field equations once the non-metricity tensor is activated. Non-metricity alters the affine connection and adds independent equations for the non-metricity tensor; the vacuum metric functions are therefore not guaranteed to remain unchanged. All reported modifications to the annihilation rate, oscillation phase, and lensing probabilities are computed on this unverified background, rendering the assumption load-bearing for the central claims.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of confirming that the adopted metric remains a solution when non-metricity is included. Ref. [1] derives the black-hole configuration within the bumblebee model that already incorporates a non-metricity tensor compatible with the vector-field vacuum expectation value. The metric functions are therefore unchanged by construction once the non-metricity is aligned with the bumblebee field. To make this explicit, we will add a short paragraph in the spacetime-background section that recalls the relevant field equations from Ref. [1] and states that the chosen ansatz satisfies them. This clarification will remove any ambiguity about the background. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results section] Numerical oscillation probabilities are presented in the two-flavor approximation (numerical results section) without an error estimate or justification for neglecting the third flavor. In a deformed spacetime the mixing angles and effective potentials could enhance three-flavor effects; the absence of such a check weakens the robustness of the flavor-transition conclusions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification for the two-flavor truncation is warranted, especially in a non-standard geometry. In the energy and baseline regime examined, the effective matter potential induced by the bumblebee background remains small compared with the atmospheric mass-squared splitting, so that the third-flavor mixing angle is only weakly affected. We will insert a concise paragraph in the numerical-results section that (i) recalls the standard two-flavor reduction, (ii) provides a rough estimate of the size of three-flavor corrections, and (iii) notes that a full three-flavor treatment is left for future work. This addition will improve the robustness statement without altering the reported probabilities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper takes the bumblebee black hole metric from Ref. [1] as an input background and performs standard calculations of neutrino-antineutrino annihilation rates, geometric oscillation phases, and lensing-modified flavor transition probabilities in the presence of non-metricity. These steps apply established general-relativistic and quantum-mechanical formulas to the given spacetime functions without fitting any parameters to internal data, without redefining output quantities in terms of themselves, and without invoking a self-citation chain that replaces an independent derivation. The assumption that the Ref. [1] solution remains valid under non-metricity is a modeling choice whose correctness can be checked externally; it does not reduce the reported modifications to tautological inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so explicit free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be extracted. The framework presupposes the bumblebee vector field and a non-metric connection whose concrete form is taken from Ref. [1].

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1125 out tokens · 40286 ms · 2026-05-22T13:44:34.664447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, and P. J. Porf´ ırio, “Vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity,”Physical Review D, vol. 108, no. 8, p. 085010, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Overview of the standard model extension: implications and phenomenology of lorentz violation,

    R. Bluhm, “Overview of the standard model extension: implications and phenomenology of lorentz violation,” in Special Relativity: Will it Survive the Next 101 Years?, pp. 191–226, Springer, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kosteleck` y, “Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,”Physical Review D, vol. 58, no. 11, p. 116002, 1998

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Spon- taneous lorentz and diffeomorphism violation, massive modes, and gravity,

    R. Bluhm, S.-H. Fung, and V. A. Kosteleck` y, “Spon- taneous lorentz and diffeomorphism violation, massive modes, and gravity,”Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 6, p. 065020, 2008

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model,

    V. A. Kosteleck` y, “Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model,”Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 10, p. 105009, 2004

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,

    P. Horava, “Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,”Phys. Rev., vol. 79, p. 084008, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Gravity with a dynam- ical preferred frame,

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Gravity with a dynam- ical preferred frame,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 64, p. 024028, 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Noncommutative field theory and lorentz violation,

    S. Carroll, J. Harvey, V. Kostelecky, C. Lane, and T. Okamoto, “Noncommutative field theory and lorentz violation,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 87, p. 141601, 2001

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    Dark torsion as the cos- mic speed-up,

    G. Bengochea and R. Ferraro, “Dark torsion as the cos- mic speed-up,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 79, p. 124019, 2009

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Spontaneous breaking of lorentz symmetry in string theory,

    V. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Spontaneous breaking of lorentz symmetry in string theory,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 39, p. 683, 1989

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    Very special relativity,

    A. Cohen and S. Glashow, “Very special relativity,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 97, p. 021601, 2006

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Does the speed of gravitational waves depend on the source velocity?,

    R. Ghosh, S. Nair, L. Pathak, S. Sarkar, and A. S. Sen- gupta, “Does the speed of gravitational waves depend on the source velocity?,”Physical Review D, vol. 108, no. 12, p. 124017, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Loop quantum gravity and light propagation,

    J. Alfaro, H. Morales-Tecotl, and L. Urrutia, “Loop quantum gravity and light propagation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 65, p. 103509, 2002

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    Massive graviton as a testable cold dark matter candidate,

    S. Dubovsky, P. Tinyakov, and I. Tkachev, “Massive graviton as a testable cold dark matter candidate,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 94, p. 181102, 2005

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Phenomenological grav- itational constraints on strings and higher dimensional theories,

    V. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Phenomenological grav- itational constraints on strings and higher dimensional theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 63, p. 224, 1989

    work page 1989

  16. [16]

    An exact stationary axisymmetric vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, and P. Porf´ ırio, “An exact stationary axisymmetric vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity,”Jour- nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2024, no. 07, p. 004, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Constraints and stability in vector theories with sponta- neous lorentz violation,

    R. Bluhm, N. Gagne, R. Potting, and A. Vrublevskis, “Constraints and stability in vector theories with sponta- neous lorentz violation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 77, p. 125007, 11 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 | | 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0e = /5, X = 1×10 10 m2 > 0 m2 < 0 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 | | 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1...

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Hubble tension as a guide for refining the early universe: Cosmologies with explicit local lorentz and diffeomorphism violation,

    M. Khodadi and M. Schreck, “Hubble tension as a guide for refining the early universe: Cosmologies with explicit local lorentz and diffeomorphism violation,”Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 39, p. 101170, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Shadow of slowly rotating kalb-ramond black holes,

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, “Shadow of slowly rotating kalb-ramond black holes,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07416, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Thermodynamics of a quantum ring modified by lorentz violation,

    A. Ara´ ujo Filho, H. Hassanabadi, J. Reis, and L. Lisboa- Santos, “Thermodynamics of a quantum ring modified by lorentz violation,”Physica Scripta, vol. 98, no. 6, p. 065943, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Wormholes in lorentz-violating gravity,

    R. B. Magalh˜ aes, L. A. Lessa, and M. M. Ferreira Jr, “Wormholes in lorentz-violating gravity,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07590, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Signals for lorentz viola- tion in post-newtonian gravity,

    Q. Bailey and V. Kostelecky, “Signals for lorentz viola- tion in post-newtonian gravity,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 74, p. 045001, 2006

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Gravitational phe- nomenology in higher dimensional theories and strings,

    V. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Gravitational phe- nomenology in higher dimensional theories and strings,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 40, p. 1886, 1989

    work page 1989

  24. [24]

    Gravity, lorentz violation, and the stan- dard model,

    V. Kostelecky, “Gravity, lorentz violation, and the stan- dard model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 69, p. 105009, 2004

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    Lorentz violation allevi- ates gravitationally induced entanglement degradation,

    W. Liu, C. Wen, and J. Wang, “Lorentz violation allevi- ates gravitationally induced entanglement degradation,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 184, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Gravitational waves effects in a lorentz–violating scenario,

    K. M. Amarilo, M. Ferreira Filho, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, and J. A. A. S. Reis, “Gravitational waves effects in a lorentz–violating scenario,”Physics Letters B, vol. 855, p. 138785, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Static neutral black holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity,

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, “Static neutral black holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 017, 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background kalb-ramond field,

    K. Yang, Y.-Z. Chen, Z.-Q. Duan, and J.-Y. Zhao, “Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background kalb-ramond field,”Physical Review D, vol. 108, no. 12, p. 124004, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Scattering effects of bumblebee grav- ity in metric-affine formalism,

    N. Heidari, C. F. Macedo, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, and H. Hassanabadi, “Scattering effects of bumblebee grav- ity in metric-affine formalism,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 84, no. 11, p. 1221, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Lorentz-violating dimension-five operator contribution to the black body radiation,

    M. Anacleto, F. Brito, E. Maciel, A. Mohammadi, E. Passos, W. Santos, and J. Santos, “Lorentz-violating dimension-five operator contribution to the black body radiation,”Physics Letters B, vol. 785, pp. 191–196, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho,Thermal aspects of field theories. Amazon. com, 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Lorentz-violating scenarios in a thermal reservoir,

    A. AA Filho, “Lorentz-violating scenarios in a thermal reservoir,”The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Thermodynamic properties in higher-derivative electrodynamics,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho and R. V. Maluf, “Thermodynamic properties in higher-derivative electrodynamics,”Brazil- ian Journal of Physics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 820–830, 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Higher-derivative lorentz-breaking dispersion relations: a thermal descrip- tion,

    A. Ara´ ujo Filho and A. Y. Petrov, “Higher-derivative lorentz-breaking dispersion relations: a thermal descrip- tion,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 81, no. 9, p. 843, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Thermal aspects of interacting quantum gases in lorentz-violating scenarios,

    J. Reiset al., “Thermal aspects of interacting quantum gases in lorentz-violating scenarios,”The European Phys- ical Journal Plus, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 1–30, 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    How does geometry affect quantum gases?,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho and J. Reis, “How does geometry affect quantum gases?,”International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 37, no. 11n12, p. 2250071, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Thermal analysis of photon–like particles in rainbow gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. Furtado, H. Hassanabadi, and J. Reis, “Thermal analysis of photon–like particles in rainbow gravity,”Physics of Dark Universe, vol. 42, no. 8, p. 101310, 2023

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Ex- act schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,

    R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. Poulis, and E. Santos, “Ex- act schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, p. 104001, 2018

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Gup modified hawking radia- tion in bumblebee gravity,

    S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı, “Gup modified hawking radia- tion in bumblebee gravity,”Nuclear Physics B, vol. 946, p. 114703, 2019

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Primordial gravitational waves from sponta- neous lorentz symmetry breaking,

    M. Khodadi, G. Lambiase, L. Mastrototaro, and T. K. Poddar, “Primordial gravitational waves from sponta- neous lorentz symmetry breaking,”Physics Letters B, vol. 867, p. 139597, 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Constrain- ing the Lorentz-violating bumblebee vector field with big bang nucleosynthesis and gravitational baryogene- sis,

    M. Khodadi, G. Lambiase, and A. Sheykhi, “Constrain- ing the Lorentz-violating bumblebee vector field with big bang nucleosynthesis and gravitational baryogene- sis,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 83, no. 5, p. 386, 2023

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Gravitational lens- ing under the effect of weyl and bumblebee gravities: Applications of gauss-bonnet theorem,

    A. Ovgun, K. Jusufi, and I. Sakalli, “Gravitational lens- ing under the effect of weyl and bumblebee gravities: Applications of gauss-bonnet theorem,”Annals Phys., vol. 399, p. 193, 2018

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Accretion of the vlasov gas onto a schwarzschild-like black hole,

    Z. Cai and R.-J. Yang, “Accretion of the vlasov gas onto a schwarzschild-like black hole,”Physics of the Dark Uni- verse, vol. 42, p. 101292, 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Effects of lorentz breaking on the accretion onto a schwarzschild- like black hole,

    R.-J. Yang, H. Gao, Y. Zheng, and Q. Wu, “Effects of lorentz breaking on the accretion onto a schwarzschild- like black hole,”Commun. Theor. Phys., vol. 71, p. 568, 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Quasinormal frequencies for a black hole in a bumblebee gravity,

    R. Oliveira, D. Dantas, and C. Almeida, “Quasinormal frequencies for a black hole in a bumblebee gravity,”EPL, vol. 135, p. 10003, 2021

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    QNMs of slowly rotating Einstein–Bumblebee black hole,

    W. Liu, X. Fang, J. Jing, and J. Wang, “QNMs of slowly rotating Einstein–Bumblebee black hole,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 83, no. 1, p. 83, 2023

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Spon- taneous Lorentz symmetry breaking effects on GRBs jets arising from neutrino pair annihilation process near a black hole,

    M. Khodadi, G. Lambiase, and L. Mastrototaro, “Spon- taneous Lorentz symmetry breaking effects on GRBs jets arising from neutrino pair annihilation process near a black hole,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 83, no. 3, p. 239, 2023

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    How does non-metricity affect par- ticle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “How does non-metricity affect par- ticle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?,” arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv–2501, 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Particle creation and evaporation in Kalb-Ramond gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Particle creation and evaporation in Kalb-Ramond gravity,”JCAP, vol. 04, p. 076, 2025

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Gravitational traces of bumblebee grav- ity in metric–affine formalism,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, H. Hassanabadi, N. Heidari, J. Kriz, and S. Zare, “Gravitational traces of bumblebee grav- ity in metric–affine formalism,”Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 41, no. 5, p. 055003, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Gravitational lensing by a lorentz- violating black hole,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, P. J. Porfırio,et al., “Gravitational lensing by a lorentz- violating black hole,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04176, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Gravitational lensing and shadow by a Schwarzschild-like black hole in metric-affine bumblebee gravity,

    X.-J. Gao, “Gravitational lensing and shadow by a Schwarzschild-like black hole in metric-affine bumblebee gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 9, p. 973, 2024

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Strange quark stars and condensate dark stars in bumblebee gravity,

    G. Panotopoulos and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, “Strange quark stars and condensate dark stars in bumblebee gravity,”Nuclear Physics B, vol. 1017, p. 116956, 2025

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Probing Schwarzschild-like black holes in metric- affine bumblebee gravity with accretion disk, deflection angle, greybody bounds, and neutrino propagation,

    G. Lambiase, L. Mastrototaro, R. C. Pantig, and A. Ov- gun, “Probing Schwarzschild-like black holes in metric- affine bumblebee gravity with accretion disk, deflection angle, greybody bounds, and neutrino propagation,” JCAP, vol. 12, p. 026, 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Review of particle physics,

    P. D. Group, P. Zyla, R. Barnett, J. Beringer, O. Dahl, D. Dwyer, D. Groom, C.-J. Lin, K. Lugovsky, E. Pianori, 15 et al., “Review of particle physics,”Progress of Theoreti- cal and Experimental Physics, vol. 2020, no. 8, p. 083C01, 2020

    work page 2020

  56. [57]

    Observation of electron-antineutrino disappear- ance at daya bay,

    F. An, J. Bai, A. Balantekin, H. Band, D. Beavis, W. Beriguete, M. Bishai, S. Blyth, K. Boddy, R. Brown, et al., “Observation of electron-antineutrino disappear- ance at daya bay,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 17, p. 171803, 2012

    work page 2012

  57. [58]

    Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: 3σhint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sen- sitivity,

    P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, C. A. Ternes, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: 3σhint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sen- sitivity,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 782, pp. 633–640, 2018

    work page 2018

  58. [59]

    Status of three-neutrino oscil- lation parameters, circa 2013,

    F. Capozzi, G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Mon- tanino, and A. Palazzo, “Status of three-neutrino oscil- lation parameters, circa 2013,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 89, p. 093018, 2014

    work page 2013

  59. [60]

    Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and ten- sions in the determination ofθ23,δcp, and the mass or- dering,

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonz´ alez-Garc´ ıa, A. Hernandez- Cabezudo, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, “Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and ten- sions in the determination ofθ23,δcp, and the mass or- dering,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 2019

    work page 2019

  60. [61]

    Review of particle physics,

    P. D. Groupet al., “Review of particle physics,”Physical Review D, vol. 98, no. 3, p. 030001, 2018

    work page 2018

  61. [62]

    Influence of a kalb-ramond black hole on neutrino behavior,

    Y. Shiet al., “Influence of a kalb-ramond black hole on neutrino behavior,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2025, no. 8, pp. 1–27, 2025

    work page 2025

  62. [63]

    Effects of bumblebee grav- ity on neutrino motion,

    Y. Shi and A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Effects of bumblebee grav- ity on neutrino motion,”Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics, vol. 2025, no. 11, p. 045, 2025

    work page 2025

  63. [64]

    Gravitational lensing of neutrinos in parametrized black hole spacetimes,

    M. Alloqulov, H. Chakrabarty, D. Malafarina, B. Ahme- dov, and A. Abdujabbarov, “Gravitational lensing of neutrinos in parametrized black hole spacetimes,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 070, 2025

    work page 2025

  64. [65]

    The neutrino flavor oscillations in the static and spherically symmetric black-hole-like wormholes,

    Y. Shi and H. Cheng, “The neutrino flavor oscillations in the static and spherically symmetric black-hole-like wormholes,”The European Physical Journal C, vol. 85, no. 8, p. 909, 2025

    work page 2025

  65. [66]

    Effects of gravitational lensing by Kaluza-Klein black holes on neutrino oscilla- tions,

    H. Chakrabarty, A. Chatrabhuti, D. Malafarina, B. Silasan, and T. Tangphati, “Effects of gravitational lensing by Kaluza-Klein black holes on neutrino oscilla- tions,”JCAP, vol. 08, p. 018, 2023

    work page 2023

  66. [67]

    Neutrino dy- namics in a non-commutative spacetime,

    N. Heidari, Y. Shi, and A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Neutrino dy- namics in a non-commutative spacetime,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04474, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [68]

    The shadow and gamma-ray bursts of a Schwarzschild black hole in asymptotic safety,

    Y. Shi and H. Cheng, “The shadow and gamma-ray bursts of a Schwarzschild black hole in asymptotic safety,”Commun. Theor. Phys., vol. 77, no. 2, p. 025401, 2025

    work page 2025

  68. [69]

    The gamma-ray burst arising from neutrino pair annihilation in the static and spherically symmetric black-hole-like wormholes,

    Y. Shi and H. Cheng, “The gamma-ray burst arising from neutrino pair annihilation in the static and spherically symmetric black-hole-like wormholes,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 062, 2023

    work page 2023

  69. [70]

    Gravitationally in- duced neutrino-oscillation phases,

    D. V. Ahluwalia and C. Burgard, “Gravitationally in- duced neutrino-oscillation phases,”General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 28, pp. 1161–1170, 1996

    work page 1996

  70. [72]

    Neutrino oscillation at the lifshitz point,

    O. Luongo and G. V. Stagno, “Neutrino oscillation at the lifshitz point,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A, vol. 26, pp. 1257– 1266, 2011

    work page 2011

  71. [73]

    About the Interpretation of Gravitationally Induced Neutrino Oscillation Phases

    D. V. Ahluwalia and C. Burgard, “About the inter- pretation of gravitationally induced neutrino oscillation phases,”arXiv preprint gr-qc/9606031, 1996

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  72. [74]

    Gravi- tationally induced neutrino oscillation phases in static space-times,

    T. Bhattacharya, S. Habib, and E. Mottola, “Gravi- tationally induced neutrino oscillation phases in static space-times,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 59, p. 067301, 1999

    work page 1999

  73. [75]

    Flavor oscillations from a spatially localized source: A Simple general treatment,

    Y. Grossman and H. J. Lipkin, “Flavor oscillations from a spatially localized source: A Simple general treatment,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 55, pp. 2760–2767, 1997

    work page 1997

  74. [76]

    Neutrino oscillations in gravitational and cosmological backgrounds,

    G. Koutsoumbas and D. Metaxas, “Neutrino oscillations in gravitational and cosmological backgrounds,”Gen. Rel. Grav., vol. 52, no. 10, p. 102, 2020

    work page 2020

  75. [77]

    Neutrino oscillations in the field of a rotating deformed mass,

    A. Geralico and O. Luongo, “Neutrino oscillations in the field of a rotating deformed mass,”Phys. Lett. A, vol. 376, pp. 1239–1243, 2012

    work page 2012

  76. [79]

    Neutrino oscillations in curved spacetime: A heuristic treatment,

    C. Y. Cardall and G. M. Fuller, “Neutrino oscillations in curved spacetime: A heuristic treatment,”Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 12, p. 7960, 1997

    work page 1997

  77. [80]

    Spin effects in neutrino gravitational scattering,

    M. Dvornikov, “Spin effects in neutrino gravitational scattering,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, no. 5, p. 056018, 2020

    work page 2020

  78. [81]

    Black hole interference patterns in flavor oscillations,

    J. Alexandre and K. Clough, “Black hole interference patterns in flavor oscillations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, no. 4, p. 043004, 2018

    work page 2018

  79. [82]

    Neutrino interferometry in curved spacetime,

    R. M. Crocker, C. Giunti, and D. J. Mortlock, “Neutrino interferometry in curved spacetime,”Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 6, p. 063008, 2004

    work page 2004

  80. [83]

    A new touch temperature of the event horizon and Rindler horizon in the Kinnersley spacetime,

    J. Zhang, M. Liu, Z. Liu, and S. Yang, “A new touch temperature of the event horizon and Rindler horizon in the Kinnersley spacetime,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 82, no. 1, p. 1, 2022

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.