Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 4 cited by

An apologia for islands

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that entanglement islands and Page curves are generic in massless gravity, and that island operators can be reconstructed from Hawking radiation.

desk verdict Argues islands need neither massive gravitons nor external baths, and mostly earns it; the operator reconstruction 'guarantee' is weaker than the abstract claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04311 v1 pith:CX66XC62 submitted 2025-06-04 hep-th gr-qc

Stefano Antonini , Chang-Han Chen , Henry Maxfield , Geoff Penington This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.60.-m04.70.Dy
keywords entanglementislandsPagecurveblackholeinformationparadoxmasslessgravitonsgravitationaldressingwedgereconstructioncompactlysupportedoperatorsdiffeomorphisminvariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper defends entanglement islands against the claim that they require 'massive gravitons' produced by coupling gravity to a nongravitational bath. It argues that islands, and the Page curves they produce, appear in ordinary massless gravity: for boundary subregions in AdS/CFT, for radiation at null infinity in asymptotically flat spacetime, and even for radiation inside a gravitating spacetime. The load-bearing step is a dressing theorem: in any background that breaks all diffeomorphisms in a compact region, a matter operator can be made gauge-invariant and compactly supported to all orders in perturbation theory. Combined with entanglement wedge reconstruction, this guarantees that semiclassical operators in an island can be approximated by nonperturbative operators acting on the Hawking radiation. The reader should care because this removes the main technical objection to unitarity of black hole evaporation in realistic, massless gravity.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the surjectivity of the linearised gravitational constraint operator $D\Phi^g_0$ on a background that breaks all diffeomorphisms in the region of interest: if no gauge transformation leaves the background invariant, any matter energy-momentum source can be cancelled order by order by compactly supported metric perturbations, letting operators be dressed without reaching the asymptotic boundary. On AdS/CFT this is supplemented by a refined version of the BBPSV construction: starting from an operator dressed to the boundary, average it over time with a state projector and a correction factor $f(H)$ (or the inverse square root of the averaged identity) so that it commutes with the Hamiltonian at all orders while still acting like the original local operator at leading order. The same state-dependent averaging, generalised to all asymptotic symmetry generators, yields operators that commute with boundary charges and with boundary-dressed operators outside the island.

What would settle it

Evaluate the gravitational replica path integral for the radiation algebra $A_{rad,u_0}$ of a concrete asymptotically flat evaporating black hole after the Page time: the claim stands only if a replica wormhole saddle beats the disconnected saddle and produces a nontrivial island. A more direct check is to solve the linearised constraints around a compact nonsymmetric matter source in a black-hole interior and search for a source in the cokernel of $D\Phi^g_0$ that is not generated by any isometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the island mechanism does not depend on graviton mass or on an external reservoir. In full detail, it asserts that in a theory with massless gravitons, Hawking radiation defined through a proper subalgebra of observables (matter fields at null infinity before a retarded time, with or without graviton news operators, but not including the ADM mass) has an entropy that follows a Page curve, because a quantum extremal island forms just inside the horizon after the Page time. It further claims that any matter operator $O^{(0)}$ in a region $I$ with no background isometries can be dressed to a gauge-invariant operator $O$ supported in $I$ to all orders in perturbation theory, so entanglement wedge reconstruction is not obstructed by a dearth of local operators in the island. Applied to evaporating black holes, these claims together guarantee that semiclassical interior operators can be approximated, to all orders, by nonperturbative operators acting only on the radiation.

Load-bearing premise

The construction requires the background spacetime in the island to break every diffeomorphism symmetry, but an evaporating black hole only breaks time translation by a tiny amount, and the paper itself notes in Section 4.6 that operators at Page-time scales and eternal-black-hole states are not covered.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Page curve can be measured by a bulk observer who collects radiation into a fault-tolerant quantum computer; an $O(1)$ collection error rate only shifts the Page time, not the shape of the curve.
  • In asymptotically flat spacetime the algebra $A_{rad,u_0}$ of radiation, excluding the ADM mass, is the one whose entropy follows a Page curve; the enlarged algebra containing $H_{ADM}$ is not supposed to follow one.
  • Entanglement wedge reconstruction implies that island operators are not vacuous: nonperturbative operators on the Hawking radiation approximate them to all orders in perturbation theory.
  • The massless-gravity island examples mean black hole evaporation can be unitary without a nongravitational bath and without any anomalous graviton scaling dimension.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If dressing to the quantum state is made precise for eternal black holes, the same logic would imply reconstruction in exactly symmetric backgrounds by using the entanglement pattern between island and radiation as a relational clock, extending the paper beyond its stated scope.
  • The dressing theorem suggests a general criterion: what matters for reconstruction is spontaneous breaking of the background's gauge symmetries, not graviton mass; this could be tested in simpler gauge-theory analogues of the linearised constraint problem.
  • The swap-operator Rényi entropy construction offers a concrete numerical route: a tensor-network or matrix-model simulation of a small evaporating AdS black hole should show the replica wormhole saddle appearing in the second Rényi entropy once more than half the radiation is swapped.
  • The robustness argument implies that modest experimental inefficiencies need not prevent an in-principle observation of the Page curve; the real bottleneck is the exponential number of repeated experiments needed for tomography.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper argues that entanglement islands and the Page curve are generic features of quantum gravity with massless gravitons, contrary to the suggestion that a graviton mass is necessary for islands to exist. It presents three classes of examples: boundary subregions in AdS/CFT with a bulb-neck geometry, radiation at null infinity in asymptotically flat spacetimes, and bulk radiation inside a gravitating spacetime. It then develops a general perturbative construction of compactly supported, gauge-invariant operators around symmetry-breaking backgrounds, based on surjectivity of the linearized constraint operator, and refines the BBPSV state-dressing construction so that the refined operators act correctly at leading order on the code subspace and commute with the Hamiltonian to all orders. The paper concludes that, given such operators, entanglement wedge reconstruction applies to island operators.

Significance. If the main claims hold, the paper substantially strengthens the case that islands are not an artifact of special boundary conditions or massive gravitons. The linearization-stability argument in Section 4 is a valuable general result: compactly supported dressings exist to all orders in G precisely when the background breaks all diffeomorphisms in the region. The paper is also unusually candid in identifying where its construction fails, especially for late-time evaporating black holes, where only operators with O(G) energy changes or thermal-scale smearing are covered. The refinement of BBPSV operators to preserve higher-point correlators is a concrete technical step forward. However, the advertised 'guarantee' in the abstract is stronger than the proven statements, and the bulb-neck example is explicitly unsolved; these gaps should be addressed before publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §4.4 and §4.6] The abstract states that the results 'guarantee that semiclassical operators in the island can be approximated by nonperturbative operators on the Hawking radiation', and §4.4 states that 'any matter operator O^(0) in the region I can be dressed to become a gauge-invariant operator O supported in I to all orders in perturbation theory'. These statements are not supported for generic late-time island operators in an evaporating black hole. As the authors themselves concede in §4.6, the background breaks time-translation symmetry only at order G while the island size grows as G^{-1}; solving (4.13) for an operator with O(1) energy change then requires a gravitational correction of order G^{-1}, so the perturbative expansion is not suppressed. Dressing to the collapsing star produces fluctuations of size G t^{3/2} ~ G^{-1/2} at Page time, which can push the dressed operator's support outside I. The construction is therefore proven only for operators with O(G) energy changes or thermal-scale smearing, as stated in §4.6, and dressing to the quantum state for eternal black holes is left to future work. The abstract and the theorem statement in §4.4 must be qualified to match the technically established domain of validity.
  2. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.2)-(3.4)] The bulb-neck example is advertised as an explicit setup where islands appear in massless gravity, but the authors write that they 'have not attempted to solve the Einstein equations subject to these boundary conditions explicitly'. The existence of the neck geometry, and hence of the island in this example, relies on an unproven existence assumption for the boundary value problem and on the assumption that a holographic CFT can live on the bulb-neck boundary geometry. This does not undermine the general island-existence argument of §2.1, but it does weaken the paper's claim to provide 'a number of examples' if this example is presented as one of them. The authors should either provide a numerical or analytic solution, or explicitly label this part as conjectural.
  3. [§5.2, Eq. (5.19)] The refined BBPSV operator \bar{\phi} = \hat{I}^{-1/2} \hat{\phi} \hat{I}^{-1/2} is shown to commute with the Hamiltonian and to act like \phi at leading order, but its bulk support is not established. The construction uses the global Hamiltonian and time evolution over a window [-t_*, t_*], and the authors note that the generalized inverse \hat{I}^{-1/2} is hard to obtain explicitly in generic cases. The claim that \bar{\phi} is 'entirely localised in the island' is argued only via commutativity with boundary-dressed operators outside the island (last paragraph of §5.2); this is a necessary condition for locality but not obviously sufficient, and no explicit support argument is given. As the paper aims to provide a 'microscopic construction of compactly supported operators', this gap should be addressed or explicitly flagged as an assumption.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.4] The informal term 'diffs' is used for diffeomorphisms without definition; consider spelling it out at first use for a broader readership.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.1)] The metric expression appears to have a misplaced parenthesis in 'r^2_{neck}+x^2)d\Omega^2'; please check the typesetting.
  3. [§4.3, after Eq. (4.9)] The sentence referring to 'the component of \delta\Pi^{ij} corresponding to gauge transformations of the spatial metric g' is confusing, since \delta\Pi^{ij} is symplectically conjugate to \delta g_{ij}; consider rewording for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's island examples and dressing constructions are applications of the standard island rule and external linearization-stability theorems, not re-statements of its conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivations are not circular. The island examples in Section 3 are applications of the island rule (1.1) and the general quantum-normal argument reviewed in Section 2.1, which is attributed to the independent result [35] and is not equivalent to the paper's own conclusion that islands exist in massless gravity. The compactly supported operator construction in Section 4 uses the classical linearization-stability criterion that DPhi^g_0 is surjective iff the background has no isometries, citing the external mathematical work [88] (Moncrief 1975); the stated condition is then solved order-by-order in G, so the result follows from an explicit equation (4.13), not from assuming the conclusion. Section 5's refined BBPSV operators are an explicit construction: the definition (5.15) with f(H) in (5.17) is designed to cancel the Gaussian suppression in (5.14), and the paper explicitly identifies the failure of the original construction before refining it. This is a construction with a verification, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The abstract's 'guarantee' is conditional on entanglement wedge reconstruction, which is an external input, and Section 4.6 explicitly limits the dressing construction to operators with O(G) energy changes or thermal-scale smearing, and leaves eternal black hole dressing to future work. These are honest scope limitations relevant to correctness, but they do not make the argument circular. Self-citations to the authors' earlier island papers [6,7,8] provide background on the standard island rule, but the rule is independently established and is not being used to justify the paper's novel claims in a question-begging way. No load-bearing self-citation chain or definitional equivalence was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard semiclassical gravity and AdS/CFT framework, on the large-N suppression of return amplitudes, and on the unproven existence of a specific new gravity solution for one example. No free parameters are fitted.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The island rule and QES prescription follow from the gravitational replica trick and give the entropy of radiation.
    Used throughout Section 2.1 and in all examples as the basis for computing S(R) and locating islands; this is a widely accepted but not proven framework.
  • domain assumption Quantum focusing conjecture holds, so maximin arguments imply existence of quantum extremal surfaces.
    Invoked in Section 2.1 to prove that an island exists whenever an information problem arises.
  • domain assumption Large-N return amplitude decays exponentially as in eq (5.3): <psi0|e^{iHT}|psi0> = e^{-N^2 f(T)+iT E0}.
    Assumed in Section 5.1 for code-subspace states; used to show BBPSV and refined operators act like local operators.
  • standard math DPhi^g_0 is surjective iff the background has no isometries in the region of interest (Moncrief's linearization stability).
    Core of the Section 4 construction, cited from Moncrief [88]; accepted mathematical theorem.
  • ad hoc to paper A holographic CFT can live on the bulb-neck boundary geometry, and the Einstein equations admit the described neck solution.
    Section 3.1 assumes the boundary geometry (3.1) and bulk ansatz (3.2) have a solution; the authors admit they have not solved it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An apologia for islands." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CX66XC62

@misc{pith2026250604311,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An apologia for islands},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CX66XC62}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04311}
}
read the original abstract

Entanglement islands have played a key role in the recent derivation of the Page curve and other progress on the black hole information problem. Arising from the inclusion of connected wormhole saddles in a gravitational replica trick, islands signal that degrees of freedom in the black hole interior are not microscopically independent of the exterior Hawking radiation. Islands were originally discovered in the context of AdS/CFT coupled to an external, nongravitating reservoir, where the coupling gives graviton excitations an anomalous boundary scaling dimension (or "mass"). It has been claimed in the literature that this mass is crucial for the existence of islands and even the Page curve itself. In this paper, however, we explain how entanglement islands can also appear in setups with massless gravitons and no external reservoir, giving a number of examples including the entanglement wedges of boundary CFT regions, of radiation at null infinity in asymptotically flat spacetimes, and of radiation inside a semiclassical but gravitating spacetime. In each case, the Page curve is physically observable and can be determined with sufficiently careful experiments on many copies of the black hole. We give general arguments for the existence of gauge-invariant operators in gravity which are compactly supported to all orders in perturbation theory (whenever no isometries of the background spacetime exist) and refine a recently-proposed explicit construction of such operators. When applied to islands, these results -- together with entanglement wedge reconstruction -- guarantee that semiclassical operators in the island can be approximated by nonperturbative operators on the Hawking radiation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04311 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. When computing the entanglement entropy of a subregion B with the replica trick, one considers n copies of the system cyclically glued along subregion B as indicated by the different colors of each side of the cut along B. Here we represent an n = 3 replica geometry. The path integral on the resulting Riemanniann manifold computes Tr(ρ n B), which is related to the entanglement entropy by equation (2.2). The prescri… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Replica trick to compute the entanglement entropy of a subset R of non-gravitational degrees of freedom coupled to a holographic system. a) The different replicas (here we take n = 3) are cyclically glued along region R, depicted by a black wiggled line. The holographic system is depicted by a red circle. b) We can use the gravitational path integral to fill in these boundary conditions. Keeping only Zn replica-symm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time slice of pure AdS. A local operator ϕ acting at x ∈ W(B) can be dressed via a gravitational Wilson line either to region B (blue line) or to its complement B¯ (red line). In the former case, the dressed operator is reconstructible from B at all orders in perturbation theory; in the latter case it can be reconstructed from B only at leading order, but access to B¯ is needed for reconstruction beyond leading orde… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The shaded region I is an island for the reservoir R in an asymptotically AdS setting. A local operator acting in the island and dressed to the asymptotic boundary through a Wilson line cannot be reconstructed from R beyond leading order, because the Wilson line passes…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A small black hole in AdS (rH ≪ LAdS), is evaporating. A mirror (depicted in grey) is built on one side of the black hole, deflecting Hawking radiation (depicted in light blue) to the other side. Consider a boundary subregion B smaller than half of the CFT and its naiv…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: a time slice of the boundary geometry on which the holographic CFT lives consists of a bulb connected to a non-compact, asymptotically flat region by a small neck. Right: bulk dual geometry with a large AdS black hole in the bulb region connected to Poincar´e-AdS…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: we are interested in computing the entanglement entropy of the boundary subregion B including the boundary manifold up to the narrowest part of the neck x = 0 (depicted in light blue). Right: when the black hole evaporates and Hawking radiation escapes into the P…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Unitary operator U(x) acting in the left wedge and dressed to the left asymptotic boundary. The operator can be reconstructed from the left CFT by a unitary UL. (b) After the isometry (A.2) from the left CFT to an external reservoir r is implemented, the unitary op…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The mini-Page Curve in Cosmology

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    In 2D centaur geometries the entropy difference of a modular-conjugate Hawking-pair probe traces an inverse mini-Page curve that bottoms at τ≈β/8, marking when information begins to leave the cosmological horizon.

  2. Cosmological correlators in gravitationally-constrained de Sitter states

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cosmological correlators in gravitationally constrained de Sitter states are conformally invariant and differ from QFT vacuum correlators, but relational observables with a heavy background state can reproduce QFT results.

  3. A revision to the QES prescription

    hep-th 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a weighted-sum revision of the quantum extremal surface formula, but the weight is assumed rather than derived.

  4. JT gravity and deformed CFTs

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deformed CFTs on a strip with a stretched-horizon conformal boundary are proposed as UV completions of pure and matter-coupled JT gravity, reproducing its entropy and a Page-curve-like saturation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  2. [2]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini,The entropy of Hawking radiation,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021), no. 3 035002, [arXiv:2006.06872]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett. Nuovo Cim.4(1972) 737–740

    1972

  4. [4]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346. – 49 –

    1973

  5. [5]

    S. W. Hawking,Black hole explosions,Nature248(1974) 30–31

    1974

  6. [6]

    Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002, [arXiv:1905.08255]

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002, [arXiv:1905.08255]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019) 063, [arXiv:1905.08762]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, JHEP03(2022) 205, [arXiv:1911.11977]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013, [arXiv:1911.12333]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf. Proc. C930308(1993) 284–296, [gr-qc/9310026]

    1993 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Susskind,The World as a hologram,J

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, [hep-th/9409089]

    1995 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183–386, [hep-th/9905111]

    2000 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Harlow and P

    D. Harlow and P. Hayden,Quantum Computation vs. Firewalls,JHEP06(2013) 085, [arXiv:1301.4504]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, G. Penington, and L. Susskind,The Python ’s Lunch: geometric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiation,JHEP08(2020) 121, [arXiv:1912.00228]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Hayden and G

    P. Hayden and G. Penington,Learning the Alpha-bits of Black Holes,JHEP12(2019) 007, [arXiv:1807.06041]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Akers, S

    C. Akers, S. Leichenauer, and A. Levine,Large Breakdowns of Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 12 126006, [arXiv:1908.03975]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Akers and G

    C. Akers and G. Penington,Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction,SciPost Phys. 12(2022), no. 5 157, [arXiv:2109.14618]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Engelhardt, G

    N. Engelhardt, G. Penington, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,A world without pythons would be so simple,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021), no. 23 234001, [arXiv:2102.07774]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Akers, N

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington, and S. Vardhan,The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity,JHEP06(2024) 155, [arXiv:2207.06536]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi,Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 5 103, [arXiv:2012.04671]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Geng and A

    H. Geng and A. Karch,Massive islands,JHEP09(2020) 121, [arXiv:2006.02438]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi,Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,JHEP01(2022) 182, [arXiv:2107.03390]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Raju,Lessons from the information paradox,Phys

    S. Raju,Lessons from the information paradox,Phys. Rept.943(2022) 1–80, [arXiv:2012.05770]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Geng,Graviton Mass and Entanglement Islands in Low Spacetime Dimensions, arXiv:2312.13336

    H. Geng,Graviton Mass and Entanglement Islands in Low Spacetime Dimensions, arXiv:2312.13336. – 50 –

  19. [27]

    Geng,The Mechanism behind the Information Encoding for Islands,arXiv:2502.08703

    H. Geng,The Mechanism behind the Information Encoding for Islands,arXiv:2502.08703

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Laddha, S

    A. Laddha, S. Prabhu, S. Raju, and P. Shrivastava,The holographic nature of null infinity,SciPost Physics10(Feb., 2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Donnelly and S

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra, Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 2 024030, [arXiv:1507.07921]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 029903 (2016)]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Donnelly and S

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings,Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems,Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 10 104038, [arXiv:1607.01025]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    S. B. Giddings, D. Marolf, and J. B. Hartle,Observables in effective gravity,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 064018, [hep-th/0512200]

    2006 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bahiru, A

    E. Bahiru, A. Belin, K. Papadodimas, G. Sarosi, and N. Vardian,State-dressed local operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 8 086035, [arXiv:2209.06845]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bahiru, A

    E. Bahiru, A. Belin, K. Papadodimas, G. Sarosi, and N. Vardian,Holography and Localization of Information in Quantum Gravity,arXiv:2301.08753

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kourkoulou and J

    I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena,Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-AdS 2 gravity, arXiv:1707.02325

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bousso and A

    R. Bousso and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,Island Finder and Entropy Bound,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021), no. 10 106005, [arXiv:2101.11648]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045, [hep-th/0605073]

    2006 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti–de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence,Physical review letters96(2006), no. 18 181602

    2006

  30. [38]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani, and T. Takayanagi,A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,JHEP07(2007) 062, [arXiv:0705.0016]

    2007 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Engelhardt and A

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall,Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,JHEP01(2015) 073, [arXiv:1408.3203]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Colin-Ellerin, G

    S. Colin-Ellerin, G. Lin, and G. Penington,Generalized entropy of gravitational fluctuations, arXiv:2501.08308

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Generalized gravitational entropy,JHEP08(2013) 090, [arXiv:1304.4926]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Faulkner, A

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz, and J. Maldacena,Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP11(2013) 074, [arXiv:1307.2892]

    2013 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A. C. Wall,Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014), no. 22 225007, [arXiv:1211.3494]

    2014 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Akers, N

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, G. Penington, and M. Usatyuk,Quantum Maximin Surfaces,JHEP08 (2020) 140, [arXiv:1912.02799]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bousso, Z

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer, and A. C. Wall,Quantum focusing conjecture,Phys. Rev. D93 (2016), no. 6 064044, [arXiv:1506.02669]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Hayden and J

    P. Hayden and J. Preskill,Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP09(2007) 120, [arXiv:0708.4025]

    2007 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Czech, J

    B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira, and M. Van Raamsdonk,The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 155009, [arXiv:1204.1330]. – 51 –

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Headrick, V

    M. Headrick, V. E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence, and M. Rangamani,Causality & holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP12(2014) 162, [arXiv:1408.6300]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena, and S. J. Suh,Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy,JHEP06(2016) 004, [arXiv:1512.06431]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Almheiri, X

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow,Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP04(2015) 163, [arXiv:1411.7041]

    2015 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Cotler, P

    J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle, and M. Walter,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels,Phys. Rev. X9(2019), no. 3 031011, [arXiv:1704.05839]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall,Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 2 021601, [arXiv:1601.05416]

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Faulkner and A

    T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz,Bulk locality from modular flow,JHEP07(2017) 151, [arXiv:1704.05464]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    C.-F. Chen, G. Penington, and G. Salton,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction using the Petz Map, JHEP01(2020) 168, [arXiv:1902.02844]

    2020 arXiv

  47. [55]

    de Rham,Massive Gravity,Living Rev

    C. de Rham,Massive Gravity,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 7, [arXiv:1401.4173]

    2014 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Harlow and H

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri,Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, 2019

    2019

  49. [57]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall,Locally localized gravity,JHEP05(2001) 008, [hep-th/0011156]

    2001 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, and A. Karch,Defect conformal field theory and locally localized gravity,JHEP07(2003) 030, [hep-th/0303249]

    2003 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. B. Clark, and A. Karch,The CFT/AdS correspondence, massive gravitons and a connectivity index conjecture,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 086006, [hep-th/0608089]

    2006 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Cooper, M

    S. Cooper, M. Rozali, B. Swingle, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell, and D. Wakeham,Black hole microstate cosmology,JHEP07(2019) 065, [arXiv:1810.10601]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Antonini and B

    S. Antonini and B. Swingle,Cosmology at the end of the world,Nature Phys.16(2020), no. 8 881–886, [arXiv:1907.06667]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149, [arXiv:1908.10996]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Antonini and L

    S. Antonini and L. G. C. Bariuan,Magnetic braneworlds: cosmology and wormholes,JHEP09(2024) 070, [arXiv:2405.18465]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Porrati,Mass and gauge invariance 4

    M. Porrati,Mass and gauge invariance 4. Holography for the Karch-Randall model,Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 044015, [hep-th/0109017]

    2002 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Porrati and A

    M. Porrati and A. Starinets,On the graviton selfenergy in AdS(4),Phys. Lett. B532(2002) 48–54, [hep-th/0201261]

    2002 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Porrati,Higgs phenomenon for the graviton in ADS space,Mod

    M. Porrati,Higgs phenomenon for the graviton in ADS space,Mod. Phys. Lett. A18(2003) 1793–1802, [hep-th/0306253]

    2003 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Rattazzi and M

    R. Rattazzi and M. Redi,Gauge Boson Mass Generation in AdS4,JHEP12(2009) 025, [arXiv:0908.4150]

    2009 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Karch, M

    A. Karch, M. Wang, and M. Youssef,AdS Higgs mechanism from double trace deformed CFT,JHEP 02(2024) 044, [arXiv:2311.10135]. – 52 –

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Bousso and M

    R. Bousso and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c,Unitarity From a Smooth Horizon?,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 10 106019, [arXiv:1911.06305]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Headrick and T

    M. Headrick and T. Takayanagi,A Holographic proof of the strong subadditivity of entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 106013, [arXiv:0704.3719]

    2007 arXiv

  63. [71]

    V. E. Hubeny, H. Maxfield, M. Rangamani, and E. Tonni,Holographic entanglement plateaux,JHEP 08(2013) 092, [arXiv:1306.4004]

    2013 arXiv

  64. [72]

    D. N. Page,Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole,Phys. Rev. D13(Jan, 1976) 198–206

    1976

  65. [73]

    Prabhu, G

    K. Prabhu, G. Satishchandran, and R. M. Wald,Infrared finite scattering theory in quantum field theory and quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 6 066005, [arXiv:2203.14334]

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Raju,Failure of the split property in gravity and the information paradox,Class

    S. Raju,Failure of the split property in gravity and the information paradox,Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022), no. 6 064002, [arXiv:2110.05470]

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Raju,How does information emerge from a black hole?,arXiv:2404.00374

    S. Raju,How does information emerge from a black hole?,arXiv:2404.00374

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Hamilton, D

    A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe,Holographic representation of local bulk operators,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 066009, [hep-th/0606141]

    2006 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Bousso and G

    R. Bousso and G. Penington,Islands far outside the horizon,JHEP11(2024) 164, [arXiv:2312.03078]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Kitaev,Almost-idempotent quantum channels and approximateC ∗-algebras,arXiv:2405.02434

    A. Kitaev,Almost-idempotent quantum channels and approximateC ∗-algebras,arXiv:2405.02434

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Shor,Fault-tolerant quantum computation, inProceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, pp

    P. Shor,Fault-tolerant quantum computation, inProceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 56–65, 1996.quant-ph/9605011

    1996 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Aharonov and M

    D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or,Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate,SIAM J. Comput.38(2008), no. 4 1207–1282, [quant-ph/9906129]

    2008 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W. H. Zurek,Resilient quantum computation: Error models and threshold, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A454(1998) 365–384, [quant-ph/9702058]

    1998 arXiv

  74. [82]

    A. Y. Kitaev,Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons,Annals Phys.303(2003) 2–30, [quant-ph/9707021]

    2003 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Chowdhury, V

    C. Chowdhury, V. Godet, O. Papadoulaki, and S. Raju,Holography from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation,JHEP03(2022) 019, [arXiv:2107.14802]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [84]

    C. J. Isham,Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time,NATO Sci. Ser. C409(1993) 157–287, [gr-qc/9210011]

    1993 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Marolf,Quantum observables and recollapsing dynamics,Class

    D. Marolf,Quantum observables and recollapsing dynamics,Class. Quant. Grav.12(1995) 1199–1220, [gr-qc/9404053]

    1995 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Geng,Quantum Rods and Clock in a Gravitational Universe,arXiv:2412.03636

    H. Geng,Quantum Rods and Clock in a Gravitational Universe,arXiv:2412.03636

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    A. E. Fischer and J. E. Marsden,Linearization stability of the einstein equations,

  80. [88]

    Moncrief,Spacetime symmetries and linearization stability of the einstein equations

    V. Moncrief,Spacetime symmetries and linearization stability of the einstein equations. i,Journal of Mathematical Physics16(1975), no. 3 493–498

    1975

  81. [89]

    Folkestad,Subregion Independence in Gravity,arXiv:2311.09403

    r. Folkestad,Subregion Independence in Gravity,arXiv:2311.09403

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    B. S. DeWitt,The Quantization of geometry,

  83. [91]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. Maldacena,Islands outside the horizon,arXiv:1910.11077. – 53 –

    1910 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju,Remarks on the necessity and implications of state-dependence in the black hole interior,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 8 084049, [arXiv:1503.08825]

    2016 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju,Local Operators in the Eternal Black Hole,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015), no. 21 211601, [arXiv:1502.06692]

    2015 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Jensen, S

    K. Jensen, S. Raju, and A. J. Speranza,Holographic observers for time-band algebras, arXiv:2412.21185

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,arXiv:1903.11115

    1903 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Stanford and Z

    D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Firewalls from wormholes,arXiv:2208.01625

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, H. W. Lin, H. Maxfield, and M. Mezei,On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,arXiv:2403.08696. – 54 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.