Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Red Teaming Roadmap Towards System-Level Safety

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.05376 v2 pith:Q6C3I4FI submitted 2025-05-30 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords teamingsafetyresearchmitigationmodelsnecessaryprioritizeshould
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Model (LLM) safeguards, which implement request refusals, have become a widely adopted mitigation strategy against misuse. At the intersection of adversarial machine learning and AI safety, safeguard red teaming has effectively identified critical vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art refusal-trained LLMs. However, in our view the many conference submissions on LLM red teaming do not, in aggregate, prioritize the right research problems. First, testing against clear product safety specifications should take a higher priority than abstract social biases or ethical principles. Second, red teaming should prioritize realistic threat models that represent the expanding risk landscape and what real attackers might do. Finally, we contend that system-level safety is a necessary step to move red teaming research forward, as AI models present new threats as well as affordances for threat mitigation (e.g., detection and banning of malicious users) once placed in a deployment context. Adopting these priorities will be necessary in order for red teaming research to adequately address the slate of new threats that rapid AI advances present today and will present in the very near future.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mass-Scale Analysis of In-the-Wild Conversations Reveals Complexity Bounds on LLM Jailbreaking

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 2M+ in-the-wild LLM conversations, jailbreak attempts show no higher complexity than normal chats, and assistant toxicity has declined over time, suggesting bounded attack sophistication.

Pith tools