Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hateful Person or Hateful Model? Investigating the Role of Personas in Hate Speech Detection by Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.08593 v1 pith:45CGL456 submitted 2025-06-10 cs.CL

Hateful Person or Hateful Model? Investigating the Role of Personas in Hate Speech Detection by Large Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords hatespeechannotationmodelstraitsdetectionhatefulhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Hate speech detection is a socially sensitive and inherently subjective task, with judgments often varying based on personal traits. While prior work has examined how socio-demographic factors influence annotation, the impact of personality traits on Large Language Models (LLMs) remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive study on the role of persona prompts in hate speech classification, focusing on MBTI-based traits. A human annotation survey confirms that MBTI dimensions significantly affect labeling behavior. Extending this to LLMs, we prompt four open-source models with MBTI personas and evaluate their outputs across three hate speech datasets. Our analysis uncovers substantial persona-driven variation, including inconsistencies with ground truth, inter-persona disagreement, and logit-level biases. These findings highlight the need to carefully define persona prompts in LLM-based annotation workflows, with implications for fairness and alignment with human values.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Confident, Calibrated, or Complicit: Safety Alignment and Ideological Bias in LLM Hate Speech Detection

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Censored LLMs achieve 69.0% strict accuracy in hate speech detection versus 64.1% for uncensored models and resist persona-based ideological influence better, but all exhibit overconfidence, irony failures, and group ...