pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.21443 · v1 · pith:3S7G5E56new · submitted 2025-06-26 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Domain Knowledge-Enhanced LLMs for Fraud and Concept Drift Detection

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords driftdomainconceptconversationsdetectionfakefraudknowledge
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Detecting deceptive conversations on dynamic platforms is increasingly difficult due to evolving language patterns and Concept Drift (CD)-i.e., semantic or topical shifts that alter the context or intent of interactions over time. These shifts can obscure malicious intent or mimic normal dialogue, making accurate classification challenging. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong performance in natural language tasks, they often struggle with contextual ambiguity and hallucinations in risk-sensitive scenarios. To address these challenges, we present a Domain Knowledge (DK)-Enhanced LLM framework that integrates pretrained LLMs with structured, task-specific insights to perform fraud and concept drift detection. The proposed architecture consists of three main components: (1) a DK-LLM module to detect fake or deceptive conversations; (2) a drift detection unit (OCDD) to determine whether a semantic shift has occurred; and (3) a second DK-LLM module to classify the drift as either benign or fraudulent. We first validate the value of domain knowledge using a fake review dataset and then apply our full framework to SEConvo, a multiturn dialogue dataset that includes various types of fraud and spam attacks. Results show that our system detects fake conversations with high accuracy and effectively classifies the nature of drift. Guided by structured prompts, the LLaMA-based implementation achieves 98% classification accuracy. Comparative studies against zero-shot baselines demonstrate that incorporating domain knowledge and drift awareness significantly improves performance, interpretability, and robustness in high-stakes NLP applications.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. JARVIS: An Evidence-Grounded Retrieval System for Interpretable Deceptive Reviews Adjudication

    cs.IR 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    JARVIS combines hybrid retrieval and evidence graphs with LLMs to raise deceptive-review detection precision from 0.953 to 0.988 and recall from 0.830 to 0.901 on a custom dataset while cutting manual inspection time ...