Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

One Video to Steal Them All: 3D-Printing IP Theft through Optical Side-Channels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.21897 v1 pith:FPRO7X6W submitted 2025-06-27 cs.CR

One Video to Steal Them All: 3D-Printing IP Theft through Optical Side-Channels

classification cs.CR
keywords instructionsprintprintingreversevideocheckerequivalencemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The 3D printing industry is rapidly growing and increasingly adopted across various sectors including manufacturing, healthcare, and defense. However, the operational setup often involves hazardous environments, necessitating remote monitoring through cameras and other sensors, which opens the door to cyber-based attacks. In this paper, we show that an adversary with access to video recordings of the 3D printing process can reverse engineer the underlying 3D print instructions. Our model tracks the printer nozzle movements during the printing process and maps the corresponding trajectory into G-code instructions. Further, it identifies the correct parameters such as feed rate and extrusion rate, enabling successful intellectual property theft. To validate this, we design an equivalence checker that quantitatively compares two sets of 3D print instructions, evaluating their similarity in producing objects alike in shape, external appearance, and internal structure. Unlike simple distance-based metrics such as normalized mean square error, our equivalence checker is both rotationally and translationally invariant, accounting for shifts in the base position of the reverse engineered instructions caused by different camera positions. Our model achieves an average accuracy of 90.87 percent and generates 30.20 percent fewer instructions compared to existing methods, which often produce faulty or inaccurate prints. Finally, we demonstrate a fully functional counterfeit object generated by reverse engineering 3D print instructions from video.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Firewall3D: A Hardware Firewall for Defending 3D Printers Against Firmware Attacks

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A dedicated hardware monitor detects firmware attacks on 3D printers by comparing real-time physical signals (stepper currents, temperatures, fans, endstops) against intended G-code execution.