AutoLayout: Closed-Loop Layout Synthesis via Slow-Fast Collaborative Reasoning
read the original abstract
The automated generation of layouts is vital for embodied intelligence and autonomous systems, supporting applications from virtual environment construction to home robot deployment. Current approaches, however, suffer from spatial hallucination and struggle with balancing semantic fidelity and physical plausibility, often producing layouts with deficits such as floating or overlapping objects and misaligned stacking relation. In this paper, we propose AutoLayout, a fully automated method that integrates a closed-loop self-validation process within a dual-system framework. Specifically, a slow system harnesses detailed reasoning with a Reasoning-Reflection-Generation (RRG) pipeline to extract object attributes and spatial constraints. Then, a fast system generates discrete coordinate sets and a topological relation set that are jointly validated. To mitigate the limitations of handcrafted rules, we further introduce an LLM-based Adaptive Relation Library (ARL) for generating and evaluating layouts. Through the implementation of Slow-Fast Collaborative Reasoning, the AutoLayout efficiently generates layouts after thorough deliberation, effectively mitigating spatial hallucination. Its self-validation mechanism establishes a closed-loop process that iteratively corrects potential errors, achieving a balance between physical stability and semantic consistency. The effectiveness of AutoLayout was validated across 8 distinct scenarios, where it demonstrated a significant 10.1% improvement over SOTA methods in terms of physical plausibility, semantic consistency, and functional completeness.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SceneCritic: A Symbolic Evaluator for 3D Indoor Scene Synthesis
SceneCritic is a symbolic, ontology-grounded evaluator for floor-plan layouts that identifies specific semantic, orientation, and geometric violations and aligns better with human judgments than VLM-based scorers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.