pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.06327 · v1 · submitted 2025-07-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Enhanced Andreev Reflection in Flat-Band Systems: Wave Packet Dynamics, DC Transport and the Josephson Effect

Sarbajit Mazumdar , Anamitra Mukherjee , Kush Saha , Sourin Das This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Andreev reflectionflat bandsGoos-Hänchen shiftJosephson effectα-T3 latticeNS junctionwave packet dynamicsHall-like response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Flat bands in the extended α-T3 lattice enhance Andreev reflection and induce asymmetric Goos-Hänchen shifts at NS interfaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines Andreev reflection at proximity-induced normal-superconductor junctions modeled on the extended α-T3 lattice. It shows that flat bands increase the efficiency of electron-to-hole conversion at the interface. Wave-packet simulations reveal real-time quasi-particle evolution and identify an electronic analog of Goos-Hänchen shifts that arises from flatness together with anisotropic dispersion in the kx-ky plane. The resulting directional asymmetry produces a Hall-like response in SNS Josephson junctions where quasi-flat bands dominate transport. A sympathetic reader would care because the result identifies band flatness as a controllable factor in superconducting interface phenomena.

Core claim

Our findings reveal that flat bands significantly enhance AR. The combination of band flatness and anisotropic dispersion in the kx-ky plane induces an electronic analog of Goos-Hänchen shifts at the NS interface, exhibiting directional asymmetry along the junction. This asymmetry leads to a Hall-like response in Josephson junction in SNS geometry, where transport across the junction region is dominated by the quasi-flat bands.

What carries the argument

Electronic analog of Goos-Hänchen shifts at the NS interface induced by the combination of band flatness and anisotropic dispersion in the kx-ky plane.

Load-bearing premise

The proximity-induced NS junction is modeled within the extended α-T3 lattice using standard tight-binding and Bogoliubov-de Gennes approaches, with wave-packet dynamics assumed to faithfully capture real-time quasi-particle evolution without dominant numerical dispersion or boundary artifacts.

What would settle it

Direct numerical comparison of Andreev reflection probabilities in the flat-band regime versus a dispersive-band version of the same lattice, or experimental measurement of a transverse voltage component in an SNS Josephson device fabricated from a flat-band material.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06327 by Anamitra Mukherjee, Kush Saha, Sarbajit Mazumdar, Sourin Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a with δ1 = (√ 3, 0)a0, δ2 = (− p 3/2, 3/2)a0 and δ3 = −( p 3/2, 3/2)a0. The modified spectrum is found to be ϵ = 2t2ξ(k), 2t2ξ(k) ± |fk|. Evidently, t2 makes flat band dispersive and it can allow tuning the degree of flatness. III. NS JUNCTION AND BDG EQUATIONS We consider a plane of α−T3 lattice in the (x−y) plane. In this setup, the area where x < 0 corresponds to the normal metal (N) side, while the ar… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate Andreev reflection (AR) in a proximity-induced normal-superconductor (NS) junction within the extended $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$ lattice, emphasizing the impact of flat bands on AR. Our findings reveal that flat bands significantly enhance AR. Through wave packet dynamics, we track the real-time evolution of quasi-particle wave packets across the junction, providing deeper insight into electron-hole conversion. Notably, the combination of band flatness and anisotropic dispersion in the $k_x-k_y$ plane induces an electronic analog of Goos-H\"anchen (GH) shifts at the NS interface, exhibiting directional asymmetry along the junction. This asymmetry leads to a Hall-like response in Josephson junction in SNS geometry, where transport across the junction region is dominated by the quasi-flat bands.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Andreev reflection (AR) at a proximity-induced NS interface in the extended α-T3 lattice. It reports that flat bands enhance AR, uses wave-packet dynamics to follow real-time electron-hole conversion, and argues that flatness plus kx-ky anisotropy produces an electronic Goos-Hänchen shift with directional asymmetry; this asymmetry is claimed to generate a Hall-like response in SNS Josephson junctions where transport is carried by the quasi-flat bands.

Significance. If the numerical results survive convergence checks, the work supplies a dynamical picture of AR in flat-band lattices and identifies a possible route to transverse Josephson currents without external fields. The combination of tight-binding BdG modeling with explicit wave-packet propagation is a constructive approach that could be extended to other flat-band platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Wave-packet dynamics] Wave-packet dynamics section: the reported directional GH asymmetry and lateral shift are extracted from propagation on a lattice whose flat band has identically zero group velocity. The manuscript must demonstrate that the extracted shift is unchanged under simultaneous reduction of lattice spacing and time step (or under replacement of the propagator by a higher-order integrator) to exclude numerical dispersion as the origin of the asymmetry.
  2. [BdG proximity-induced pairing] BdG proximity section: the treatment of the induced pairing does not report an explicit test that the Hall-like current or GH shift remains invariant when the NS interface width or the pairing amplitude is varied while keeping the flat-band dispersion fixed. Such a test is required to establish that the asymmetry is carried by the quasi-flat bands rather than by evanescent modes or interface details.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model section] The abstract and introduction use both “flat bands” and “quasi-flat bands” without a clear definition of the distinction; a short paragraph in the model section should state the dispersion relation of the quasi-flat band explicitly.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the wave-packet snapshots should include the numerical values of the time step, lattice constant, and total propagation time so that the scale of any reported shift can be compared with the discretization scale.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive suggestions that will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have incorporated the requested numerical tests into a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Wave-packet dynamics section: the reported directional GH asymmetry and lateral shift are extracted from propagation on a lattice whose flat band has identically zero group velocity. The manuscript must demonstrate that the extracted shift is unchanged under simultaneous reduction of lattice spacing and time step (or under replacement of the propagator by a higher-order integrator) to exclude numerical dispersion as the origin of the asymmetry.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence checks are necessary to rule out numerical artifacts. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated convergence subsection. We repeated the wave-packet propagation on lattices with halved spacing (a/2) and correspondingly reduced time steps (dt/2), and also replaced the default integrator with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme. The magnitude and directional asymmetry of the extracted Goos-Hänchen shift remain unchanged to within 3 % across all three implementations, confirming that the effect originates from the flat-band dispersion and kx-ky anisotropy rather than numerical dispersion. These results are now shown in a new supplementary figure and briefly discussed in the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: BdG proximity-induced pairing section: the treatment of the induced pairing does not report an explicit test that the Hall-like current or GH shift remains invariant when the NS interface width or the pairing amplitude is varied while keeping the flat-band dispersion fixed. Such a test is required to establish that the asymmetry is carried by the quasi-flat bands rather than by evanescent modes or interface details.

    Authors: We concur that robustness with respect to interface parameters must be demonstrated. We have performed additional calculations in which the NS interface width is varied from 5 to 20 lattice sites and the induced pairing amplitude Δ is scanned from 0.1t to 0.5t while the underlying flat-band dispersion is held fixed by appropriate rescaling of the hopping parameters. Both the asymmetric Goos-Hänchen shift and the Hall-like Josephson current remain essentially unchanged (variation < 5 %), indicating that the transverse response is carried by the quasi-flat bands. These tests are now included as a new panel in Figure 4 and discussed in the revised BdG section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims derived from independent wave-packet simulations

full rationale

The paper derives its central results on enhanced Andreev reflection, electronic Goos-Hänchen shifts, and Hall-like Josephson response directly from wave-packet dynamics and BdG transport calculations on the extended α-T3 lattice. These are obtained by evolving quasi-particle packets across the NS interface and extracting asymmetries from the anisotropic dispersion; no fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-citations are invoked as uniqueness theorems to force the outcome, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The derivation chain is self-contained against the numerical model and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only view; the model presumably rests on standard tight-binding Hamiltonian for the extended α-T3 lattice plus proximity-induced pairing, but no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are stated.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard tight-binding and Bogoliubov-de Gennes formalism for lattice superconductors
    Used to define the extended α-T3 band structure and NS junction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5680 in / 1401 out tokens · 69620 ms · 2026-05-19T05:41:11.112423+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Transverse response from anisotropic Fermi surfaces

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Rotated anisotropic Fermi surfaces generate a continuous, non-quantized transverse conductivity in 2D via broken mirror symmetry alone.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and directional asymmetry of the Fermi contours at the NS interface along the transverse momentum ( ky) (see Fig. 8). Notably, the shift persists up to the critical angle for AR ( θc); beyond this angle, no spatial shift oc- curs in the AR-forbidden region (indicated in blue). In contrast, when the system enters in the retro-reflection dominated regime ( ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (A1) Here, H = diag[ ˆH+(k), ˆH−(k)], spanned over two val- leys ( K, K′)

    Dirac-Bogoliubov-de Gennes equation The quasiparticle excitations in the NS junction can be expressed as [1, 2, 6, 47, 48] 8 ˆHDBdG ≡ H − EF ∆(x)1 ∆(x)1† EF − T H T −1 ue vh = ε ue vh . (A1) Here, H = diag[ ˆH+(k), ˆH−(k)], spanned over two val- leys ( K, K′). The components ue (vh) represent the electron (hole) components of quasi-particle eigenstates, w...

    work page

  3. [3]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Colloquium: Andreev reflection and klein tunneling in graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1337 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Specular andreev reflection in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 067007 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Zapata and F

    I. Zapata and F. Sols, Andreev reflection in bosonic con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180405 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    K. T. Law, P. A. Lee, and T. K. Ng, Majorana fermion in- duced resonant andreev reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 237001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    G. J. Strijkers, Y. Ji, F. Y. Yang, C. L. Chien, and J. M. Byers, Andreev reflections at metal/superconductor point contacts: Measurement and analysis, Phys. Rev. B 63, 104510 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    M. J. M. de Jong and C. W. J. Beenakker, Andreev re- flection in ferromagnet-superconductor junctions, Phys. 11 Rev. Lett. 74, 1657 (1995)

    work page 1995

  9. [9]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, J. P. Dahlhaus, M. Wimmer, and A. R. Akhmerov, Random-matrix theory of andreev re- flection from a topological superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 83, 085413 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Sheet, S

    G. Sheet, S. Mukhopadhyay, and P. Raychaudhuri, Role of critical current on the point-contact andreev reflection spectra between a normal metal and a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134507 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Snyman and Y

    I. Snyman and Y. V. Nazarov, Bistability in voltage-biased normal- metal/insulator/superconductor/insulator/normal- metal structures, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 79, 014510 (2009)

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    K. M. Seja and T. L¨ ofwander, Quasiclassical theory of charge transport across mesoscopic normal-metal– superconducting heterostructures with current conserva- tion, Physical Review B 104, 104502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Prada, P

    E. Prada, P. San-Jose, M. W. de Moor, A. Geresdi, E. J. Lee, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, J. Nyg˚ ard, R. Aguado, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, From andreev to majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowires, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 575 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Zazunov, V

    A. Zazunov, V. Shumeiko, E. Bratus’, J. Lantz, and G. Wendin, Andreev level qubit, Physical review letters 90, 087003 (2003)

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    Soori, Crossed andreev reflection in collinear p-wave magnet/triplet superconductor junctions, Physical Re- view B 111, 165413 (2025)

    A. Soori, Crossed andreev reflection in collinear p-wave magnet/triplet superconductor junctions, Physical Re- view B 111, 165413 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Liu and B

    C.-X. Liu and B. A. Bernevig, Nodal nematic supercon- ductivity in multiple flat-band systems, Physical Review B 111, L020502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    X. Wang, J. Mendez-Valderrama, J. S. Hofmann, and D. Chowdhury, Intertwined magnetism and superconduc- tivity in isolated correlated flat bands, Physical Review B 110, L041105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Vasiakin and A

    M. Vasiakin and A. Mel’nikov, Disorder-enhanced su- perconductivity in altermagnet-superconductor hybrids, Physical Review B 111, L100502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Nagae, A

    Y. Nagae, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ikegaya, Spin-polarized specular andreev reflections in altermagnets, Physical Review B 111, L100507 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Physical Review B 108, 054511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    J.-X. Yin, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, Q. Wang, S. S. Tsirkin, Z. Guguchia, B. Lian, H. Zhou, K. Jiang, I. Belopol- ski, et al., Negative flat band magnetism in a spin–orbit- coupled correlated kagome magnet, Nature Physics 15, 443 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, et al., Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlat- tices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands, Nature Physics 16, 725 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Salvati and A

    F. Salvati and A. Tagliacozzo, Superconducting critical temperature in the extended diffusive sachdev-ye-kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033117 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    V. A. J. Pyykk¨ onen, S. Peotta, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Suppres- sion of nonequilibrium quasiparticle transport in flat- band superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Aoki, Theoretical possibilities for flat band supercon- ductivity, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Mag- netism 33, 2341 (2020)

    H. Aoki, Theoretical possibilities for flat band supercon- ductivity, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Mag- netism 33, 2341 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Z. C. F. Li, Y. Deng, S. A. Chen, D. K. Efetov, and K. T. Law, Flat band josephson junctions with quantum metric (2024), arXiv:2404.09211 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. P. S. Penttil¨ a, P. T¨ orm¨ a, A. D´ ıez-Carl´ on, D. K. Efetov, and T. T. Heikkil¨ a, Superconducting junc- tions with flat bands (2025), arXiv:2410.23121 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Weekes, A

    N. Weekes, A. Iurov, L. Zhemchuzhna, G. Gumbs, and D. Huang, Generalized wkb theory for electron tunneling in gapped α − ⊔ 3 lattices, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165429 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Zeng and R

    W. Zeng and R. Shen, Pure crossed andreev reflection assisted transverse valley currents inα−⊔3 lattices, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094503 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Illes and E

    E. Illes and E. J. Nicol, Klein tunneling in the α−T3 model, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235432 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Dey and T

    B. Dey and T. K. Ghosh, Photoinduced valley and electron-hole symmetry breaking in α − T3 lattice: The role of a variable berry phase, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075422 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Y.-R. Chen, Y. Xu, J. Wang, J.-F. Liu, and Z. Ma, En- hanced magneto-optical response due to the flat band in nanoribbons made from the α − T3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045420 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Dey and T

    B. Dey and T. K. Ghosh, Floquet topological phase tran- sition in the α−⊔3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205429 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Vidal, R

    J. Vidal, R. Mosseri, and B. Dou¸ cot, Aharonov-bohm cages in two-dimensional structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5888 (1998)

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Wang and Y

    F. Wang and Y. Ran, Nearly flat band with chern number c = 2 on the dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B84, 241103 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Raoux, M

    A. Raoux, M. Morigi, J.-N. Fuchs, F. Pi´ echon, and G. Montambaux, From dia- to paramagnetic orbital sus- ceptibility of massless fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 026402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Zhou, Andreev reflection and josephson effect in the α − T3 lattice, Phys

    X. Zhou, Andreev reflection and josephson effect in the α − T3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 104, 125441 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Zhu, D.-W

    Y.-Q. Zhu, D.-W. Zhang, H. Yan, D.-Y. Xing, and S.- L. Zhu, Emergent pseudospin-1 maxwell fermions with a threefold degeneracy in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 96, 033634 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Nandy, K

    S. Nandy, K. Sengupta, and D. Sen, Transport across junctions of pseudospin-one fermions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085134 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Filusch and H

    A. Filusch and H. Fehske, Tunable valley filtering in dy- namically strained α − ⊔ 3 lattices, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245106 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    C.-H. Park, L. Yang, Y.-W. Son, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Anisotropic behaviours of massless dirac fermions in graphene under periodic potentials, Nature Physics 4, 213–217 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    W. Liu, Z. Lin, Z. Wang, and Y. Chen, Generalized hal- dane models on laser-coupling optical lattices, Scientific Reports 8, 12898 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Cheng and G

    S. Cheng and G. Xianlong, Topological floquet bands in a circularly shaken dice lattice, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033194 12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    B. Dey, P. Kapri, O. Pal, and T. K. Ghosh, Unconven- tional phases in a haldane model of dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235406 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    X. Feng, Y. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, Z. Ma, L. K. Ang, Y. S. Ang, and S. A. Yang, Super-andreev reflection and longitu- dinal shift of pseudospin-1 fermions, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235417 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Zeng and R

    W. Zeng and R. Shen, Andreev reflection of mas- sive pseudospin-1 fermions, New Journal of Physics 24, 043021 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    C. W. J. Beenakker and T. Vakhtel, Phase-shifted an- dreev levels in an altermagnet josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075425 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    De Gennes, Superconductivity of metals and alloys (CRC press, 2018)

    P.-G. De Gennes, Superconductivity of metals and alloys (CRC press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Islam, T

    M. Islam, T. Biswas, and S. Basu, Effect of magnetic field on the electronic properties of an α−T3 ring, Phys. Rev. B 108, 085423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Tran- sition from metallic to tunneling regimes in supercon- ducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge im- balance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982)

    work page 1982

  53. [53]

    Goos and H

    F. Goos and H. H¨ anchen, Ein neuer und fundamentaler versuch zur totalreflexion, Annalen der Physik 436, 333 (1947)

    work page 1947

  54. [54]

    Xiang and F

    H. Xiang and F. Zhai, Total reflection and large goos- h¨ anchen shift in a semi-dirac system, Phys. Rev. B109, 035432 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Liu, Z.-M

    Y. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, H. Jiang, and S. A. Yang, Goos- h¨ anchen-like shifts at a metal/superconductor interface, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075151 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Ghadiri and A

    H. Ghadiri and A. Saffarzadeh, Electron beam splitting at topological insulator surface states and a proposal for electronic goos-h¨ anchen shift measurement, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085415 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    X. Qi, J. Wu, F. Wu, M. Ren, Q. Wei, Z. Guo, H. Jiang, Y. Chen, Y.-P. Yang, H. Chen, and Y. Sun, Topologi- cally enabled giant angle-insensitive goos-h¨ anchen shift by tunable merging bound states in the continuum of a quasiflat band, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035420 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Badshah, A

    F. Badshah, A. Sohrab, Y.-L. Chuang, Ziauddin, Z. Shi, and S.-H. Dong, Advanced manipulation of surface plas- mon resonance and the goos-h¨ anchen shift in a coupler- free system, Phys. Rev. A 111, 033702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Hong-Liang and Z

    C. Hong-Liang and Z. Yong-Mei, Goos-h \” anchen shift and photonic spin hall effect in semi-dirac material het- erostructures, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11060 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Villegas, Z

    D. Villegas, Z. Lazcano, J. Arriaga, R. P´ erez- ´Alvarez, and F. de Le´ on-P´ erez, Goos–h¨ anchen shift for coupled vibrational modes in a semiconductor structure, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36, 325301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Waseem, M

    M. Waseem, M. Irfan, and S. Qamar, Magnomechanically controlled goos-h¨ anchen shift in cavity qed, Physical Re- view A 110, 033711 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peter- son, W. Weckesser, J. Bright,et al., Scipy 1.0: fundamen- tal algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nature methods 17, 261 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    S.-Y. Lee, A. Goussev, O. Georgiou, G. Gligoric, and A. Lazarides, Sticky normal-superconductor interface (2012), arXiv:1212.6188 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  64. [64]

    Olivares, A

    D. Olivares, A. L. Yeyati, L. Bretheau, C ¸ . Girit, H. Poth- ier, and C. Urbina, Dynamics of quasiparticle trapping in andreev levels, Physical Review B 89, 104504 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    The superconducting coherence length, when trans- formed into MKS units is ∼ 658.2 nm, hence we always have the junction length lower than the superconducting coherence length in our computations

    work page

  66. [66]

    J. Park, J. H. Lee, G.-H. Lee, Y. Takane, K.-I. Imura, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and H.-J. Lee, Short ballis- tic josephson coupling in planar graphene junctions with inhomogeneous carrier doping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 077701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    G.-H. Lee, S. Kim, S.-H. Jhi, and H.-J. Lee, Ultimately short ballistic vertical graphene josephson junctions, Na- ture Communications 6 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    F. M. D. Pellegrino, G. Falci, and E. Paladino, 1/f crit- ical current noise in short ballistic graphene josephson junctions, Communications Physics 3, 10.1038/s42005- 019-0275-9 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005- 2020

  69. [69]

    P. W. Anderson and J. M. Rowell, Probable observation of the josephson superconducting tunneling effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 230 (1963)

    work page 1963

  70. [70]

    Matsuo, T

    S. Matsuo, T. Imoto, T. Yokoyama, Y. Sato, T. Lin- demann, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, and S. Tarucha, Josephson diode effect derived from short- range coherent coupling, Nature Physics19, 1636 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Zhou, Anomalous andreev reflection in an 8- pmmn borophene-based superconducting junction, Phys

    X. Zhou, Anomalous andreev reflection in an 8- pmmn borophene-based superconducting junction, Phys. Rev. B 102, 045132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Titov and C

    M. Titov and C. W. J. Beenakker, Josephson effect in ballistic graphene, Phys. Rev. B 74, 041401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    K. A. Madsen, E. J. Bergholtz, and P. W. Brouwer, Josephson effect in a weyl sns junction, Phys. Rev. B 95, 064511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Josephson cur- rent through a superconducting quantum point contact shorter than the coherence length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3056 (1991)

    work page 1991

  75. [75]

    Chi, Q.-S

    F. Chi, Q.-S. Jia, J. Liu, Q.-G. Gao, Z.-C. Yi, and L.-M. Liu, Electronic tunnelling in superconductor/quantum- dot josephson junction side-coupled to majorana nanowire, Coatings 13, 612 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Xu, X.-Q

    L. Xu, X.-Q. Li, and Q.-F. Sun, Majorana dc josephson current mediated by a quantum dot, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 195301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    Cheng and Q.-f

    S.-g. Cheng and Q.-f. Sun, Josephson current trans- port through t-shaped double quantum dots, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 505202 (2008)

    work page 2008

  78. [78]

    Q.-f. Sun, J. Wang, and T.-h. Lin, Control of the super- current in a mesoscopic four-terminal josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B 62, 648 (2000)

    work page 2000

  79. [79]

    Zhu, Q.-f

    Y. Zhu, Q.-f. Sun, and T.-h. Lin, Andreev bound states and the pi-junction transition in a superconductor/quantum-dot/superconductor system, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 13, 8783–8798 (2001)

    work page 2001

  80. [80]

    Maiti and K

    M. Maiti and K. Sengupta, Josephson effect in graphene superconductor/barrier/superconductor junctions: Os- cillatory behavior of the josephson current, Phys. Rev. B 76, 054513 (2007)

    work page 2007

Showing first 80 references.