pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.11376 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-15 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

GeV-scale thermal dark matter from dark photons: tightly constrained, yet allowed

D. Alonso-Gonz\'alez , D. Cerde\~no , P. Foldenauer , J. M. No This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords dark matterdark photonthermal productiondirect detectionindirect detectionkinetic mixingresonant annihilationGeV scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

GeV-scale thermal dark matter survives detection only in narrow resonant windows near half the mediator mass with tiny dark couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies Dirac fermion dark matter χ coupled to a dark photon Z_D in an extended Abelian Higgs model, with kinetic mixing to the Standard Model. It consistently includes how detection signals dilute when χ makes up only part of the total dark matter density. Most of the parameter space is excluded by direct detection and indirect searches, but narrow bands around m_χ ≲ m_ZD/2 survive because resonant annihilation in the early universe can produce the full observed density when the dark coupling α_D is small enough. Collider searches for invisibly decaying Z_D add bounds at large mixing. Future direct detection runs are projected to shrink the remaining windows further.

Core claim

The only way to avoid both indirect and direct detection limits is in narrow windows of parameter space close to m_χ ≲ m_{Z_D}/2, when χ is produced resonantly in the early universe, and it can constitute all of the DM. For this to happen, a small dark sector coupling is required: α_D ≲ 10^{-3} for DM masses below 6 GeV, or α_D ≲ 10^{-5} for DM masses larger than 10 GeV.

What carries the argument

Resonant s-channel annihilation of χ through the dark photon Z_D during thermal freeze-out, which sets the correct relic density at small α_D while signal dilution is applied for subdominant cases.

If this is right

  • Indirect detection loses sensitivity at large kinetic mixing because signals dilute when χ is subdominant.
  • Direct detection experiments supply the dominant constraints over most of the (m_χ, kinetic-mixing) plane.
  • Collider searches for an invisibly decaying Z_D provide complementary limits at large kinetic mixing.
  • Future direct detection runs will shrink the viable area around the resonant bands.
  • The resonant windows require α_D below 10^{-3} (below 6 GeV) or 10^{-5} (above 10 GeV) to yield the full relic density.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A confirmed signal in one of these windows would imply a tight mass relation m_χ ≈ m_ZD/2 as a direct consequence of thermal production.
  • Similar resonant mechanisms could be explored in models with additional dark-sector mediators or different DM spins.
  • Non-standard early-universe expansion histories would shift the location and width of the resonant bands.
  • Precision measurements of the kinetic mixing parameter at future colliders could independently test the model without relying on direct detection.

Load-bearing premise

The relic density of χ follows from standard thermal production in a radiation-dominated universe and the dilution of all detection signals scales exactly with the fraction of total dark matter that χ supplies.

What would settle it

A direct detection experiment that sets limits below the predicted spin-independent scattering rate for the resonant windows at masses between 1 and 10 GeV would close the last allowed regions.

read the original abstract

GeV-scale thermal dark matter (DM) is highly constrained by the null results of both direct and indirect detection experiments, especially in the context of simplified models. In this work, we study the interplay of collider, direct and indirect detection constraints on an extension of the dark Abelian Higgs model that includes a Dirac fermionic DM candidate, $\chi$. We take into account in a consistent fashion the dilution of the indirect and direct detection signals when the relic abundance of $\chi$ is smaller than the total observed DM density (assuming that it is a subdominant component in those cases). As a consequence, we show that indirect detection constraints cannot probe regions with large kinetic mixing, and direct detection experiments provide the leading constraints in most of the parameter space. Collider searches for the (invisibly decaying) vector mediator provide complementary bounds in areas with large kinetic mixing. We find that the only way to avoid both indirect and direct detection limits is in narrow windows of parameter space close to $m_\chi\lesssim m_{Z_D}/2$, when $\chi$ is produced resonantly in the early universe, and it can constitute all of the DM. For this to happen, a small dark sector coupling is required: $\alpha_D~\lesssim10^{-3}$ for DM masses below $6$ GeV, or $\alpha_D~\lesssim10^{-5}$ for DM masses larger than $10$ GeV. The remaining areas of the parameter space can be probed in a complementary way by future direct detection experiments (which will narrow down the allowed area around the resonant region) and collider searches (which will set limits for smaller values of the kinetic mixing).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies GeV-scale thermal dark matter in an extension of the dark Abelian Higgs model featuring a Dirac fermion DM candidate χ. It consistently incorporates dilution of direct and indirect detection signals when χ is subdominant to the total DM density. The analysis combines collider, direct, and indirect constraints and concludes that the only surviving regions where χ can comprise all of the observed DM are narrow resonant windows near m_χ ≲ m_{Z_D}/2, requiring small dark-sector couplings α_D ≲ 10^{-3} (for m_χ < 6 GeV) or α_D ≲ 10^{-5} (for m_χ > 10 GeV). Collider searches for the invisibly decaying vector mediator provide complementary bounds at large kinetic mixing.

Significance. If the assumptions hold, the work shows that GeV-scale thermal DM in this class of models remains viable but is confined to specific resonant regions that future direct-detection and collider experiments can probe. A clear strength is the consistent treatment of signal dilution for subdominant components together with the integration of multiple experimental limits. The result provides a concrete, falsifiable map of allowed parameter space and underscores the role of resonant production in evading bounds.

major comments (1)
  1. [relic-density calculation and resonant-production discussion] The central claim that only the quoted narrow resonant windows survive rests on χ being produced via standard thermal freeze-out with chemical equilibrium maintained down to T ~ m_χ for the small values α_D ≲ 10^{-5}. At such couplings the dark-sector interaction rate may fall below the Hubble rate before freeze-out, shifting production toward freeze-in and altering both the relic abundance and the dilution factors applied to indirect (∝ (Ω_χ/Ω_DM)^2) and direct (∝ Ω_χ/Ω_DM) signals. An explicit verification that Γ_int > H until freeze-out near the resonance (or a quantitative condition on α_D and kinetic mixing) is required to support the allowed windows. This issue is load-bearing for the exclusion of the rest of parameter space.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the kinetic mixing parameter and the dark photon mass m_{Z_D} should be defined at first use in the main text for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for raising this important point about the validity of the thermal freeze-out assumption. We address the concern directly below and will incorporate the requested verification in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that only the quoted narrow resonant windows survive rests on χ being produced via standard thermal freeze-out with chemical equilibrium maintained down to T ~ m_χ for the small values α_D ≲ 10^{-5}. At such couplings the dark-sector interaction rate may fall below the Hubble rate before freeze-out, shifting production toward freeze-in and altering both the relic abundance and the dilution factors applied to indirect (∝ (Ω_χ/Ω_DM)^2) and direct (∝ Ω_χ/Ω_DM) signals. An explicit verification that Γ_int > H until freeze-out near the resonance (or a quantitative condition on α_D and kinetic mixing) is required to support the allowed windows. This issue is load-bearing for the exclusion of the rest of parameter space.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of chemical equilibrium is necessary to support the narrow resonant windows at small α_D. In our calculation the resonant s-channel annihilation through the dark photon provides a strong enhancement to the interaction rate precisely when m_χ ≲ m_{Z_D}/2. This boost keeps Γ_int > H down to T ∼ m_χ for the quoted values α_D ≲ 10^{-3} (m_χ < 6 GeV) and α_D ≲ 10^{-5} (m_χ > 10 GeV). Outside these narrow windows the relic density is sub-dominant, so the dilution factors we apply remain valid irrespective of whether production is freeze-out or freeze-in. To make this fully transparent we will add a short appendix (or subsection) that plots Γ_int/H versus temperature for representative points inside the allowed resonant bands, confirming that equilibrium is maintained until freeze-out. We will also state the quantitative condition on α_D and kinetic mixing under which the assumption holds. This revision directly addresses the load-bearing concern without altering the overall conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard relic-density calculation and external constraints; dilution applied consistently but without internal fitting

full rationale

The paper computes Ω_χ via standard thermal freeze-out in the dark Abelian Higgs model and scales indirect/direct signals by (Ω_χ/Ω_DM)^2 or Ω_χ/Ω_DM when χ is subdominant. All limits are taken from external experimental results and standard cosmology; no central quantity (relic density, dilution factor, or allowed window) is defined in terms of a parameter fitted inside the paper's equations. The resonant-window claim follows directly from applying these external inputs to the model parameter space rather than from any self-definitional loop or self-citation load-bearing step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard thermal freeze-out, dilution for subdominant components, and the dark Abelian Higgs extension; no new particles beyond the stated Dirac fermion and dark photon are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • kinetic mixing parameter
    The mixing strength between the dark photon and the SM photon is scanned as a free parameter controlling collider and detection rates.
  • dark sector coupling α_D
    The dark fine-structure constant is required to be small in the surviving resonant windows and is treated as a free parameter.
  • DM and mediator masses
    m_χ and m_{Z_D} are scanned with focus on the resonant relation m_χ ≈ m_{Z_D}/2.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard thermal freeze-out production of DM in the early universe under standard cosmology
    Relic abundance and resonant production calculations assume conventional thermal history and Boltzmann equations.
  • domain assumption Consistent dilution of direct and indirect signals when χ is subdominant
    Signal strengths are scaled by the fractional abundance of χ relative to total DM density.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5852 in / 1560 out tokens · 50789 ms · 2026-05-19T04:27:26.335627+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. New benchmarks for direct detection of freeze-in dark matter in vector portal models

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Freeze-in at low reheating temperatures allows MeV-scale dark matter in vector portal models to be probed by future direct detection experiments in nuclear recoils for 50-500 MeV masses and via enhanced solar neutrino...

  2. Testing Viability of Benchmark Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Excess

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Updated constraints on two simplified dark matter models for the Galactic Center Excess leave unconstrained parameter space after applying recent multi-experiment data.

  3. WIMP Dark Matter within the dark photon portal

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Derives lower limits on dark photon parameters from thermal relic density for Dirac fermion and complex scalar WIMPs and compares resulting spin-independent cross sections to direct detection upper bounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 144 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 72 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Secluded WIMP Dark Matter

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M. B. Voloshin,Secluded WIMP Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B662 (2008) 53–61, [0711.4866]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    Bosonic super-WIMPs as keV-scale dark matter

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M. B. Voloshin,Bosonic super-WIMPs as keV-scale dark matter, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 115012, [0807.3279]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    A Theory of Dark Matter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer and N. Weiner,A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 015014, [0810.0713]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter

    R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. Volansky,Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 076007, [1108.5383]. – 27 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg,Direct detection of dark matter in models with a light Z’, JHEP 09 (2011) 128, [1107.2118]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints

    S. Knapen, T. Lin and K. M. Zurek,Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115021, [1709.07882]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    J. L. Feng and J. Smolinsky,Impact of a resonance on thermal targets for invisible dark photon searches, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 095022, [1707.03835]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    MeV Dark Matter Complementarity and the Dark Photon Portal

    M. Dutra, M. Lindner, S. Profumo, F. S. Queiroz, W. Rodejohann and C. Siqueira,MeV Dark Matter Complementarity and the Dark Photon Portal, JCAP 03 (2018) 037, [1801.05447]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Jung, S.-H

    D.-W. Jung, S.-H. Nam, C. Yu, Y. G. Kim and K. Y. Lee,Singlet fermionic dark matter with dark Z, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 513, [2002.10075]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    P. J. Fitzpatrick, H. Liu, T. R. Slatyer and Y.-D. Tsai,New pathways to the relic abundance of vector-portal dark matter, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 083517, [2011.01240]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    T. G. Rizzo,Dark initial state radiation and the kinetic mixing portal, JHEP 01 (2021) 079, [2006.08502]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Gori et al.,Dark Sector Physics at High-Intensity Experiments, 2209.04671

    S. Gori et al.,Dark Sector Physics at High-Intensity Experiments, 2209.04671

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Antelet al., Eur

    C. Antel et al.,Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 1122, [2305.01715]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    T. G. Rizzo,Toward UV models of kinetic mixing and portal matter. VI. A more complex dark matter sector?, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 075037, [2408.01296]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Balan et al.,Resonant or asymmetric: the status of sub-GeV dark matter, JCAP 01 (2025) 053, [2405.17548]

    S. Balan et al.,Resonant or asymmetric: the status of sub-GeV dark matter, JCAP 01 (2025) 053, [2405.17548]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Alenezi, C

    A. Alenezi, C. Cesarotti, S. Gori and J. Shelton,Discovery Prospects for a Minimal Dark Matter Model at Cosmic and Intensity Frontier Experiments, 2504.00077

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Krnjaic,Testing Thermal-Relic Dark Matter with a Dark Photon Mediator, 2505.04626

    G. Krnjaic,Testing Thermal-Relic Dark Matter with a Dark Photon Mediator, 2505.04626

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    The Stueckelberg $Z'$ Extension with Kinetic Mixing and Milli-Charged Dark Matter From the Hidden Sector

    D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath,The Stueckelberg Z-prime Extension with Kinetic Mixing and Milli-Charged Dark Matter From the Hidden Sector, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 115001, [hep-ph/0702123]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Electroweak and Dark Matter Constraints on a Z' in Models with a Hidden Valley

    S. Cassel, D. M. Ghilencea and G. G. Ross,Electroweak and Dark Matter Constraints on a Z-prime in Models with a Hidden Valley, Nucl. Phys. B 827 (2010) 256–280, [0903.1118]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    (In)visible Z' and dark matter

    E. Dudas, Y. Mambrini, S. Pokorski and A. Romagnoni,(In)visible Z-prime and dark matter, JHEP 08 (2009) 014, [0904.1745]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    E. J. Chun, J.-C. Park and S. Scopel,Dark matter and a new gauge boson through kinetic mixing, JHEP 02 (2011) 100, [1011.3300]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Invisible Z' and dark matter: LHC vs LUX constraints

    G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini, M. H. G. Tytgat and B. Zaldivar,Invisible Z ′ and dark matter: LHC vs LUX constraints, JHEP 03 (2014) 134, [1401.0221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    P. Ko, Y. Omura and C. Yu,Dark matter and dark force in the type-I inert 2HDM with local U(1)H gauge symmetry, JHEP 11 (2014) 054, [1405.2138]. – 28 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Aprile et al.,Search for Coherent Elastic Scattering of Solar8B Neutrinos in the XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment, Phys

    XENON collaboration, E. Aprile et al.,Search for Coherent Elastic Scattering of Solar8B Neutrinos in the XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 091301, [2012.02846]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Agnes et al

    DarkSide-50 collaboration, P. Agnes et al.,Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 063001, [2207.11966]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Meng et al

    PandaX-4Tcollaboration, Y. Meng et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 261802, [2107.13438]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Ma et al.,Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Coherent Scattering, Phys

    PandaXcollaboration, W. Ma et al.,Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Coherent Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 021802, [2207.04883]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,

    PandaXcollaboration, Z. Bo et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 011805, [2408.00664]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment

    LZ collaboration, J. Aalbers et al.,First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 041002, [2207.03764]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment

    LZ collaboration, J. Aalbers et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025) 011802, [2410.17036]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    SuperCDMS collaboration, M. F. Albakry et al.,Investigating the sources of low-energy events in a SuperCDMS-HVeV detector, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 112006, [2204.08038]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Alkhatib et al

    SuperCDMS collaboration, I. Alkhatib et al.,Light Dark Matter Search with a High-Resolution Athermal Phonon Detector Operated Above Ground, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 061801, [2007.14289]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Aguilar-Arevalo et al.,Results on low-mass weakly interacting massive particles from a 11 kg-day target exposure of DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys

    DAMIC collaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al.,Results on low-mass weakly interacting massive particles from a 11 kg-day target exposure of DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 241803, [2007.15622]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Angloher et al

    CRESST collaboration, G. Angloher et al.,First observation of single photons in a CRESST detector and new dark matter exclusion limits, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 083038, [2405.06527]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Ajaj et al.,Search for dark matter with a 231-day exposure of liquid argon using DEAP-3600 at SNOLAB, Phys

    DEAP collaboration, R. Ajaj et al.,Search for dark matter with a 231-day exposure of liquid argon using DEAP-3600 at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 022004, [1902.04048]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    First results from the NEWS-G direct dark matter search experiment at the LSM

    NEWS-G collaboration, Q. Arnaud et al.,First results from the NEWS-G direct dark matter search experiment at the LSM, Astropart. Phys.97 (2018) 54–62, [1706.04934]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Updated CMB constraints on Dark Matter annihilation cross-sections

    S. Galli, F. Iocco, G. Bertone and A. Melchiorri,Updated CMB constraints on Dark Matter annihilation cross-sections, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 027302, [1106.1528]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    J. M. Gaskins,A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter, Contemp. Phys. 57 (2016) 496–525, [1604.00014]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    R. K. Leane, T. R. Slatyer, J. F. Beacom and K. C. Y. Ng,GeV-scale thermal WIMPs: Not even slightly ruled out, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 023016, [1805.10305]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Abdalla et al.,Combined dark matter searches towards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS, PoS ICRC2021 (2021) 528, [2108.13646]

    Hess, HA WC, VERITAS, MAGIC, H.E.S.S., Fermi-LAT collaboration, H. Abdalla et al.,Combined dark matter searches towards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS, PoS ICRC2021 (2021) 528, [2108.13646]. – 29 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Revisiting CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation,

    M. Kawasaki, H. Nakatsuka, K. Nakayama and T. Sekiguchi,Revisiting CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation, JCAP 12 (2021) 015, [2105.08334]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Gajović et al.,Weakly interacting massive particle cross section limits from LOFAR observations of dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Astron

    L. Gajović et al.,Weakly interacting massive particle cross section limits from LOFAR observations of dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Astron. Astrophys.673 (2023) A108, [2303.12155]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    K. E. O’Donnell and T. R. Slatyer,Constraints on dark matter with future MeV gamma-ray telescopes, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 083037, [2411.00087]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Wang, X.-C

    Y.-N. Wang, X.-C. Duan, T.-P. Tang, Z. Wang and Y.-L. S. Tsai,Exploring sub-GeV dark matter via s-wave, p-wave, and resonance annihilation with CMB data, 2502.18263

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for dark photons in Higgs boson production via vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2021) 011, [2009.14009]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for dark matter produced in association with a Standard Model Higgs boson decaying into b-quarks using the full Run 2 dataset from the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2021) 209, [2108.13391]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for new phenomena with top-quark pairs and large missing transverse momentum using 140 fb−1 of pp collision data at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 03 (2024) 139, [2401.13430]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for new particles in events with a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and large missing transverse momentum at√s = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2024) 126, [2406.01272]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for new particles in final states with a boosted top quark and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 05 (2024) 263, [2402.16561]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Chekhovsky et al.,Search for dark matter production in association with a single top quark in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, 2503.20033

    CMS collaboration, V. Chekhovsky et al.,Search for dark matter production in association with a single top quark in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, 2503.20033

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Chekhovsky et al.,Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to aτ lepton pair in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, 2506.04431

    CMS collaboration, V. Chekhovsky et al.,Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to aτ lepton pair in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, 2506.04431

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*,

    J. Billard et al.,Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 (2022) 056201, [2104.07634]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Cooley et al.,Report of the Topical Group on Particle Dark Matter for Snowmass 2021, 2209.07426

    J. Cooley et al.,Report of the Topical Group on Particle Dark Matter for Snowmass 2021, 2209.07426

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Bauer and P

    M. Bauer and P. Foldenauer,Consistent Theory of Kinetic Mixing and the Higgs Low-Energy Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 171801, [2207.00023]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    R. M. Schabinger and J. D. Wells,A Minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 093007, [hep-ph/0509209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    Higgs boson decays to four fermions through an abelian hidden sector

    S. Gopalakrishna, S. Jung and J. D. Wells,Higgs boson decays to four fermions through an abelian hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 055002, [0801.3456]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    J. D. Wells,How to Find a Hidden World at the Large Hadron Collider, 0803.1243. – 30 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Illuminating Dark Photons with High-Energy Colliders

    D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori and J. Shelton,Illuminating Dark Photons with High-Energy Colliders, JHEP 02 (2015) 157, [1412.0018]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    ATLAScollaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment,

    work page

  60. [60]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton–proton collisions at√s = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 421, [1809.10733]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Biekötter and M

    T. Biekötter and M. Pierre,Higgs-boson visible and invisible constraints on hidden sectors, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 1026, [2208.05505]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Fernández-Martínez, J

    E. Fernández-Martínez, J. López-Pavón, J. M. No, T. Ota and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz,ν Electroweak baryogenesis: the scalar singlet strikes back, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 715, [2210.16279]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    ATLAScollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for pair production of Higgs bosons in the b¯bb¯b final state using proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 01 (2019) 030, [1804.06174]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    ATLAScollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Combination of searches for heavy resonances decaying into bosonic and leptonic final states using 36 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 052008, [1808.02380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for heavy resonances decaying into two Higgs bosons or into a Higgs boson and a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, JHEP 01 (2019) 051, [1808.01365]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    J. M. No and M. Ramsey-Musolf,Probing the Higgs Portal at the LHC Through Resonant di-Higgs Production, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 095031, [1310.6035]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Singlet-like Higgs bosons at present and future colliders

    D. Buttazzo, F. Sala and A. Tesi,Singlet-like Higgs bosons at present and future colliders, JHEP 11 (2015) 158, [1505.05488]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Resonant Di-Higgs Production in the $b{\bar b}WW$ Channel: Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition at the LHC

    T. Huang, J. M. No, L. Pernié, M. Ramsey-Musolf, A. Safonov, M. Spannowsky et al., Resonant di-Higgs boson production in theb¯bW W channel: Probing the electroweak phase transition at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 035007, [1701.04442]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at LEP

    LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL collaboration, R. Barate et al.,Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565 (2003) 61–75, [hep-ex/0306033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  70. [70]

    Cepeda, S

    M. Cepeda, S. Gori, V. M. Outschoorn and J. Shelton,Exotic Higgs Decays, 2111.12751

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Final results of the searches for neutral Higgs bosons in e+e- collisions at sqrt(s) up to 209GeV

    ALEPH collaboration, A. Heister et al.,Final results of the searches for neutral Higgs bosons in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) up to 209-GeV, Phys. Lett. B526 (2002) 191–205, [hep-ex/0201014]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  72. [72]

    Searches for invisibly decaying Higgs bosons with the DELPHI detector at LEP

    DELPHI collaboration, J. Abdallah et al.,Searches for invisibly decaying Higgs bosons with the DELPHI detector at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C32 (2004) 475–492, [hep-ex/0401022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [73]

    Search for an Invisibly-Decaying Higgs Boson at LEP

    L3 collaboration, P. Achard et al.,Search for an invisibly-decaying Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 35–48, [hep-ex/0501033]. – 31 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  74. [74]

    Search for invisibly decaying Higgs bosons in e+e- -> Zoho production at sqrt(s) = 183 - 209 GeV

    OPALcollaboration, G. Abbiendi et al.,Search for invisibly decaying Higgs bosons in e+ e- —> Z0 h0 production at s**(1/2) = 183-GeV - 209-GeV, Phys. Lett. B682 (2010) 381–390, [0707.0373]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  75. [75]

    A second Higgs from the Higgs portal

    A. Falkowski, C. Gross and O. Lebedev,A second Higgs from the Higgs portal, JHEP 05 (2015) 057, [1502.01361]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1

    T. Robens and T. Stefaniak,Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 104, [1501.02234]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    The Higgs Portal and Cosmology

    K. Assamagan et al.,The Higgs Portal and Cosmology, 4, 2016. 1604.05324

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Arcadi, A

    G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi and M. Raidal,Dark Matter through the Higgs portal, Phys. Rept. 842 (2020) 1–180, [1903.03616]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    Bauer, P

    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, P. Reimitz and T. Plehn,Light Dark Matter Annihilation and Scattering in LHC Detectors, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 030, [2005.13551]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    P. N. Bhattiprolu and J. D. Wells,Depleted Higgs boson: Searches for universal coupling suppression, invisible decays, and mixed-in scalars, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 055022, [2204.03435]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.