pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2508.08676 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-12 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-ex

WIMP Dark Matter within the dark photon portal

X. G. Wang , B. M. Loizos , A. W. Thomas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-ex
keywords dark photonWIMPrelic densitydirect detectionDirac fermioncomplex scalarkinetic mixingZ boson
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Dark photon portal imposes lower limits on thermal WIMP dark matter parameters up to 1 TeV

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a dark photon can serve as a portal linking the visible sector to dark matter, considering both Dirac fermion and complex scalar candidates with masses up to 1 TeV. It computes the thermal relic density from annihilation processes mediated by the dark photon together with the ordinary Z boson, then extracts the minimum values required for the dark-sector coupling and kinetic mixing to reproduce the observed abundance. These same parameters determine the spin-independent dark-matter-proton scattering cross section, which is compared against existing direct-detection upper limits to map out the surviving regions of parameter space.

Core claim

Including both the dark photon and the Z boson in the annihilation and scattering amplitudes, the authors obtain lower bounds on the dark parameters from the requirement that the thermal relic density matches observation, and they find that the corresponding direct-detection cross sections remain below current experimental limits over substantial portions of the parameter space for dark-matter masses below 1 TeV.

What carries the argument

The dark photon portal, through which both the dark photon and the Z boson mediate dark-matter annihilation into standard-model particles and scattering off nucleons, fixes the relic abundance and the direct-detection rates.

If this is right

  • Lower limits on the dark-photon mass and kinetic mixing arise directly from matching the observed relic density.
  • Spin-independent cross sections for both fermion and scalar candidates lie below current direct-detection bounds in the surviving parameter regions.
  • Viable windows remain open for dark-matter masses up to 1 TeV under the combined relic-density and direct-detection constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Tighter future direct-detection bounds could push the allowed windows to higher dark-matter masses or exclude the portal entirely.
  • Collider searches for light dark photons with the required couplings would provide an independent test of the same parameter space.
  • Extensions that include additional mediators would generally relax the lower bounds on the dark-photon parameters by enhancing annihilation efficiency.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that dark matter is thermally produced via freeze-out in standard cosmology and that annihilation and scattering are dominated by dark photon and Z boson exchange with no additional mediators or non-thermal effects altering the relic density.

What would settle it

A direct-detection measurement that sets an upper limit on the spin-independent dark-matter-proton cross section below the minimum value required by the thermal-relic-density calculation for any given mass below 1 TeV would exclude the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.08676 by A. W. Thomas, B. M. Loizos, X. G. Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Left panels): Lower limits on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We test the dark photon as a portal connecting to the dark sector in the case of Dirac fermion and complex scalar dark matter with masses up to 1 TeV. Both the dark photon and the $Z$ boson contribute to the dark matter annihilation and dark matter--nucleon scattering processes. We derive the lower limits on the dark parameters from thermal relic density. The corresponding spin-independent dark matter--proton cross sections are compared with the upper bounds set by direct detection. We explore the allowed regions of the dark parameter space that are consistent with these constraints.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper tests the dark photon as a portal to the dark sector for WIMP dark matter, considering both Dirac fermion and complex scalar candidates with masses up to 1 TeV. Annihilation and DM-nucleon scattering are mediated by the dark photon and Z boson. Lower limits on the dark parameters are derived from the observed thermal relic density via freeze-out, the corresponding spin-independent DM-proton cross sections are computed, and these are compared against direct-detection upper bounds to identify the allowed regions of parameter space.

Significance. If the calculations are accurate, the work provides a systematic mapping of viable parameter space in the dark-photon portal under standard thermal production assumptions, explicitly separating the Dirac-fermion and complex-scalar cases and including both dark-photon and Z contributions. This is a conventional but useful exercise that reproduces standard relic-density and cross-section results while directly confronting them with current experimental limits; the two-parameter scans and the separation of DM types are internally consistent strengths.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the numerical value adopted for the observed relic density (e.g., Ωh² = 0.12) and the precise direct-detection experiments/limits used for the comparison.
  2. [Model Lagrangian section] Notation for the dark-photon mixing parameter and the DM-portal coupling should be defined once in the model section and used consistently thereafter to avoid ambiguity in the scan results.
  3. [Results figures] Figure captions for the allowed-region plots should indicate the mass range scanned and whether the Z-boson contribution is included in every point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's description accurately reflects the scope of the paper, including the treatment of both Dirac fermion and complex scalar WIMP candidates, the inclusion of dark photon and Z contributions, and the comparison of relic-density-derived lower limits with direct-detection bounds. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central derivation computes the thermal relic density for Dirac fermion and complex scalar DM candidates via standard freeze-out in the dark photon portal model, incorporating s-channel exchanges of the dark photon and Z boson. Observed relic density is used as an external cosmological benchmark to extract lower limits on the portal parameters (mixing angle and dark photon mass). The resulting spin-independent DM-proton cross sections are then compared to independent upper limits from direct detection experiments. This chain relies on external data and established Boltzmann-equation methods rather than any self-referential fitting or redefinition of inputs as outputs. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatze smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems are invoked; the two-parameter scans and Dirac versus scalar cases remain internally consistent with the stated Lagrangian without reducing to tautology by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard WIMP thermal production paradigm, the introduction of a dark photon mediator, and the assumption that observed relic density and direct detection bounds are the only relevant constraints. Free parameters are the dark photon mass, kinetic mixing, and DM couplings, which are scanned rather than independently derived.

free parameters (2)
  • dark photon mass and coupling strength
    These are varied across ranges to derive lower limits that satisfy the observed relic density; they are not fixed by first principles.
  • DM-nucleon coupling via portal
    Determines the spin-independent cross section and is adjusted to remain below experimental bounds.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dark matter is thermally produced via freeze-out in standard Big Bang cosmology
    Invoked to derive lower limits on dark parameters from the observed relic density.
  • domain assumption Annihilation and scattering proceed only through dark photon and Z boson exchange
    Assumed when computing rates; no other mediators or non-perturbative effects are included.
invented entities (1)
  • dark photon no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediator providing portal between dark sector and Standard Model
    Postulated new particle whose mass and coupling are the main free parameters of the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5620 in / 1567 out tokens · 48349 ms · 2026-05-18T23:54:34.937977+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, (2024), arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rept. 405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Supersymmetric Dark Matter

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Phys. Rept. 267, 195 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9506380

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3059 (1985)

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report

    M. Battaglieri et al. , in U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter (2017) arXiv:1707.04591 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Strong Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Matter from SLAC Beam Dump E137

    B. Batell, R. Essig, and Z. Surujon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 171802 (2014), arXiv:1406.2698 [hep-ph]. 5 10 1 100 101 102 103 m (GeV) 10 12 10 10 10 8 10 6 10 4 y = 2 D(m /MAD )4 Dirac fermion, R = 3 EWPO, D = 0.5 EWPO, D = 0.05 EWPO, D = 0.005 10 1 100 101 102 103 m (GeV) 10 48 10 46 10 44 10 42 10 40 10 38 10 36 10 34 SI p(cm2) Dirac fermion, R = 3 CREST I...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115021 (2017), arXiv:1709.07882 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Banerjee et al

    D. Banerjee et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 121801 (2019), arXiv:1906.00176 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Akimov et al

    D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 051803 (2023), arXiv:2110.11453 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    S. Gori, S. Knapen, T. Lin, P. Munbodh, and B. Suter, (2025), arXiv:2506.11191 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Constraining the interaction strength between dark matter and visible matter: I. fermionic dark matter

    J.-M. Zheng, Z.-H. Yu, J.-W. Shao, X.-J. Bi, Z. Li, and H.-H. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B 854, 350 (2012), arXiv:1012.2022 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    Constraining the interaction strength between dark matter and visible matter: II. scalar, vector and spin-3/2 dark matter

    Z.-H. Yu, J.-M. Zheng, X.-J. Bi, Z. Li, D.-X. Yao, and H.-H. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B 860, 115 (2012), 6 10 1 100 101 102 103 m (GeV) 10 12 10 10 10 8 10 6 10 4 y = 2 D(m /MAD )4 Complex scalar, R = 3 EWPO, D = 0.5 EWPO, D = 0.05 EWPO, D = 0.005 10 1 100 101 102 103 m (GeV) 10 48 10 46 10 44 10 42 10 40 10 38 10 36 10 34 SI p(cm2) Complex scalar, R = 3 D = 0....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Balan et al.,Resonant or asymmetric: the status of sub-GeV dark matter, JCAP 01 (2025) 053, [2405.17548]

    S. Balan et al. , JCAP 01, 053 (2025), arXiv:2405.17548 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST), Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019), arXiv:1904.00498 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST), (2019), arXiv:1905.07335 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Agnes et al.,Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide-50, Phys

    P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide-50), Phys. Rev. D 107, 063001 (2023), arXiv:2207.11966 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Dark Matter Search Results from a One Tonne$\times$Year Exposure of XENON1T

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018), arXiv:1805.12562 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Aprile et al.,Search for Coherent Elastic Scattering of Solar8B Neutrinos in the XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment, Phys

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 091301 (2021), arXiv:2012.02846 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Meng et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys

    Y. Meng et al. (PandaX-4T), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 261802 (2021), arXiv:2107.13438 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Aalberset al.(LZ), Phys

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025), arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Spin-Dependent Weakly-Interacting-Massive-Particle--Nucleon Cross Section Limits from First Data of PandaX-II Experiment

    C. Fu et al. (PandaX-II), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 071301 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 049902 (2018)], arXiv:1611.06553 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1705.03380 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Constraining the Spin-Dependent WIMP-Nucleon Cross Sections with XENON1T

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141301 (2019), arXiv:1902.03234 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO-60 C$_3$F$_8$ Bubble Chamber

    C. Amole et al. (PICO), Phys. Rev. D 100, 022001 (2019), arXiv:1902.04031 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    X. G. Wang and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C 103, 034606 (2021), arXiv:2012.10144 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Abdel Khaleq, G

    R. Abdel Khaleq, G. Busoni, C. Simenel, and A. E. Stuchbery, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075036 (2024), arXiv:2311.15764 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2005

  30. [30]

    Filippi and M

    A. Filippi and M. De Napoli, Rev. Phys. 5, 100042 (2020), arXiv:2006.04640 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Graham, C

    M. Graham, C. Hearty, and M. Williams, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 37 (2021), arXiv:2104.10280 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2118 (1991)

    work page 1991

  33. [33]

    Scalar Dark Matter candidates

    C. Boehm and P. Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B683, 219 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0305261

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  34. [34]

    Hambye, M

    T. Hambye, M. H. G. Tytgat, J. Vandecasteele, and L. Vanderheyden, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095018 (2019), arXiv:1908.09864 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. Barbieri, and S. Jadach, Nucl. Phys. B 369, 3 (1992), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 376, 444 (1992)]

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    Precise calculation of MW, sin^2 theta_MSbar, and sin^2 theta_eff

    G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and A. Sirlin, Phys. Lett. B 394, 188 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9611363

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  37. [37]

    Dubovyk, A

    I. Dubovyk, A. Freitas, J. Gluza, T. Riemann, and J. Usovitsch, JHEP 08, 113 (2019), arXiv:1906.08815 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Electroweak Precision Observables, New Physics and the Nature of a 126 GeV Higgs Boson

    M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima, and L. Silvestrini, JHEP 08, 106 (2013), arXiv:1306.4644 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    Accelerating the Discovery of Light Dark Matter

    E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 251301 (2015), arXiv:1505.00011 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    J. L. Feng and J. Smolinsky, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095022 (2017), arXiv:1707.03835 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Krnjaic,Testing Thermal-Relic Dark Matter with a Dark Photon Mediator, 2505.04626

    G. Krnjaic, (2025), arXiv:2505.04626 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    A. Hook, E. Izaguirre, and J. G. Wacker, Adv. High En- ergy Phys. 2011, 859762 (2011), arXiv:1006.0973 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Illuminating Dark Photons with High-Energy Colliders

    D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori, and J. Shelton, JHEP 02, 157 (2015), arXiv:1412.0018 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    B. M. Loizos, X. G. Wang, A. W. Thomas, M. J. White, and A. G. Williams, J. Phys. G 51, 075002 (2024), arXiv:2306.13408 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Harigaya, E

    K. Harigaya, E. Petrosky, and A. Pierce, JHEP 07, 201 (2024), arXiv:2307.13045 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    M. P. Bento, H. E. Haber, and J. P. Silva, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138501 (2024), arXiv:2311.04976 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Davoudiasl, K

    H. Davoudiasl, K. Enomoto, H.-S. Lee, J. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115018 (2023), arXiv:2309.04060 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Zhang and W.-Z

    K.-Y. Zhang and W.-Z. Feng, Chin. Phys. C 47, 023107 (2023), arXiv:2204.08067 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Y.-P. Zeng, C. Cai, Y.-H. Su, and H.-H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 056004 (2023), arXiv:2204.09487 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Cheng, X.-G

    Y. Cheng, X.-G. He, F. Huang, J. Sun, and Z.-P. Xing, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055011 (2022), arXiv:2204.10156 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    A. W. Thomas and X. G. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056017 (2022), arXiv:2205.01911 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Aaltonen et al

    T. Aaltonen et al. , Science 376, 170 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    "Dark" Z implications for Parity Violation, Rare Meson Decays, and Higgs Physics

    H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 85, 115019 (2012), arXiv:1203.2947 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [54]

    Datta, A

    A. Datta, A. Hammad, D. Marfatia, L. Mukherjee, and A. Rashed, JHEP 03, 108 (2023), arXiv:2210.15662 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Wang and A

    X.-G. Wang and A. W. Thomas, J. Phys. G 50, 085001 (2023), arXiv:2301.08367 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    O. Seto, T. Shimomura, and S. Yoshida, (2025), arXiv:2504.15896 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    A. W. Thomas, X. G. Wang, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 011807 (2022), arXiv:2201.06760 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    A. M. Abdullahi, M. Hostert, D. Massaro, and S. Pascoli, Phys. Rev. D 108, 015032 (2023), arXiv:2302.05410 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    J. R. Felix, A. W. Thomas, and X. G. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2505.03241 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    GeV-scale thermal dark matter from dark photons: tightly constrained, yet allowed

    D. Alonso-Gonz´ alez, D. Cerde˜ no, P. Foldenauer, and J. M. No, (2025), arXiv:2507.11376 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Fayet, Phys

    P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. B 95, 285 (1980)

    work page 1980

  62. [62]

    Fayet, Nucl

    P. Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B187, 184 (1981)

    work page 1981

  63. [63]

    Holdom, Phys

    B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B 178, 65 (1986)

    work page 1986

  64. [64]

    L. B. Okun, Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 502 (1982)

    work page 1982

  65. [65]

    G. D. Kribs, D. McKeen, and N. Raj, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 011801 (2021), arXiv:2007.15655 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 145 (1991)

    work page 1991

  67. [67]

    Griest and D

    K. Griest and D. Seckel, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3191 (1991)

    work page 1991

  68. [68]

    N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 180, 1614 (2009), arXiv:0806.4194 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [69]

    FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2250 (2014), arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Alguero, G

    G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 299, 109133 (2024), arXiv:2312.14894 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    J. P. Lees et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 201801 (2014), arXiv:1406.2980 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Aaij et al.,Search for A′ → µ+µ− Decays, Phys

    R. Aaij et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041801 (2020), arXiv:1910.06926 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 131802 (2020), arXiv:1912.04776 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    N. T. Hunt-Smith, W. Melnitchouk, N. Sato, A. W. Thomas, X. G. Wang, and M. J. White, JHEP 09, 096 (2023), arXiv:2302.11126 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023