pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.12776 · v6 · submitted 2025-07-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Cryogenic Magnetization Dynamics in Chemically Stabilized, Tensile-Strained Ultrathin Yttrium Iron Garnets with Tunable Magnetic Anisotropy

Jihyung Kim , Dongchang Kim , Seung-Gi Lee , Yung-Cheng Li , Jae-Chun Jeon , Jiho Yoon , Sachio Komori , Ryotaro Arakawa
show 3 more authors
Tomoyasu Taniyama Stuart S. P. Parkin Kun-Rok Jeon
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords ultrathin YIG filmscryogenic dampingtensile strainchemical stabilityinterdiffusion suppressionperpendicular anisotropyGSGG substratespintronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensile-strained ultrathin YIG films on GSGG substrates retain ultralow damping down to 2 K thanks to suppressed interdiffusion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that ultrathin yttrium iron garnet films grown under tensile strain on gadolinium scandium gallium garnet retain low magnetic damping at cryogenic temperatures as low as 2 K. This performance exceeds that of films grown on gadolinium gallium garnet substrates. The authors link the improvement to better chemical stability at the film-substrate interface, which reduces unwanted atomic mixing during growth and leads to tunable perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Readers interested in spintronic technologies would care because these films could enable efficient magnetic devices that function well in cold environments needed for quantum applications.

Core claim

Tensile-strained YIG films on GSGG exhibit ultralow damping constants and tunable magnetic anisotropy, retaining measurable damping even at nanometer thicknesses and cryogenic temperatures down to 2 K, outperforming relaxed films on Gd3Ga5O12, due to suppression of interdiffusion from enhanced chemical stability and favorable growth kinetics by Sc.

What carries the argument

Suppression of interdiffusion at the YIG/GSGG interface enabled by Sc-enhanced chemical stability and growth kinetics.

Load-bearing premise

The observed improvement in damping is due to reduced interdiffusion caused by the chemical stability from scandium in the substrate rather than other growth factors.

What would settle it

If damping measurements show no difference between YIG films on GSGG and on Gd3Ga5O12 at 2 K, or if interface analysis reveals comparable interdiffusion levels, the attribution would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12776 by Dongchang Kim, Jae-Chun Jeon, Jiho Yoon, Jihyung Kim, Kun-Rok Jeon, Ryotaro Arakawa, Sachio Komori, Seung-Gi Lee, Stuart S. P. Parkin, Tomoyasu Taniyama, Yung-Cheng Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) IP FMR spectra measured at a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report an interfacial chemical stability-driven reduction of low-temperature damping losses in tensile-strained, ultrathin Y3Fe5O12 (YIG) films grown by pulsed laser deposition, exhibiting ultralow damping constants and tunable magnetic anisotropy. Comparative broadband FMR measurements show that tensile-strained YIG films on Gd3Sc2Ga3O12 (GSGG) retain measurable damping even at nanometer thicknesses and cryogenic temperatures down to 2 K, outperforming relaxed films on Gd3Ga5O12. Based on static magnetometry measurements along with microstructural and compositional analyses, we attribute these enhanced dynamic properties to the suppression of interdiffusion across the YIG/GSGG interface, resulting from enhanced chemical stability and favorable growth kinetics by the presence of Sc. Our findings highlight the importance of chemical and kinetic factors in achieving few-nanometer-thick YIG film with negligible low-temperature damping dissipation and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy for cryogenic spintronic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the growth of tensile-strained ultrathin YIG films on GSGG substrates by PLD, showing via comparative broadband FMR that these films retain low damping down to 2 K even at few-nm thicknesses, outperforming relaxed YIG on GGG. The authors attribute the improvement to Sc-enhanced chemical stability that suppresses interdiffusion at the YIG/GSGG interface, supported by static magnetometry, microstructural imaging, and compositional analysis. The work also demonstrates tunable magnetic anisotropy and positions the films for cryogenic spintronic applications.

Significance. If the causal attribution to interface stability holds, the result is significant for cryogenic magnonics and spintronics because it offers a route to ultrathin YIG with negligible low-temperature damping losses and perpendicular anisotropy. The comparative substrate study usefully isolates chemical-kinetic factors beyond pure strain engineering. The inclusion of multiple characterization methods (FMR, magnetometry, microstructure) is a strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Damping attribution and interface analysis): The central claim that reduced low-T damping arises specifically from Sc-suppressed interdiffusion rests on indirect evidence from magnetometry, SEM/TEM imaging, and EDS compositional maps. No direct quantification of diffusion lengths, elemental gradients, or interface abruptness (e.g., via SIMS depth profiles or atomically resolved EELS) is presented, leaving strain relaxation, point-defect incorporation, or substrate-specific growth kinetics as viable alternative explanations for the observed FMR linewidth differences.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (FMR data presentation): Broadband FMR spectra and extracted damping constants at 2 K are described comparatively, but the manuscript does not report raw linewidth data, fitting uncertainties, or error bars on the damping values; this weakens verification that the GSGG films truly outperform GGG films by a statistically significant margin at the thinnest thicknesses.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption and axis labels should explicitly state the temperature range and substrate comparison to improve readability of the damping vs. thickness plots.
  2. [Discussion] A brief discussion of possible Sc incorporation into the YIG lattice (even at low levels) and its potential effect on magnetocrystalline anisotropy would clarify the tunable anisotropy claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation and strengthen the supporting arguments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Damping attribution and interface analysis): The central claim that reduced low-T damping arises specifically from Sc-suppressed interdiffusion rests on indirect evidence from magnetometry, SEM/TEM imaging, and EDS compositional maps. No direct quantification of diffusion lengths, elemental gradients, or interface abruptness (e.g., via SIMS depth profiles or atomically resolved EELS) is presented, leaving strain relaxation, point-defect incorporation, or substrate-specific growth kinetics as viable alternative explanations for the observed FMR linewidth differences.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the attribution relies on comparative and indirect evidence rather than direct diffusion profiling. The key supporting observations are the systematic damping difference between otherwise similar tensile-strained films on GSGG versus GGG, the absence of detectable interdiffusion signatures in the EDS maps and TEM images for the GSGG case, and the correlation with Sc incorporation. Strain relaxation is unlikely to dominate because both substrates produce comparable in-plane tensile strain at the thicknesses studied, and the damping advantage appears only when Sc is present. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised discussion that explicitly compares the alternative mechanisms and shows why they are less consistent with the full data set. While we agree that SIMS or atomically resolved EELS would constitute stronger direct evidence, such measurements were not performed in the present study; we therefore qualify the claim accordingly and note the planned follow-up experiments. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (FMR data presentation): Broadband FMR spectra and extracted damping constants at 2 K are described comparatively, but the manuscript does not report raw linewidth data, fitting uncertainties, or error bars on the damping values; this weakens verification that the GSGG films truly outperform GGG films by a statistically significant margin at the thinnest thicknesses.

    Authors: We agree that the original presentation lacked sufficient detail for independent verification. In the revised manuscript we now include (i) representative raw broadband FMR spectra at 2 K, (ii) frequency-dependent linewidth plots with linear fits for each thickness and substrate, and (iii) error bars on the extracted Gilbert damping values that reflect the standard errors of the linear fits. These additions allow direct assessment of the statistical significance of the damping differences, particularly at the few-nanometer thicknesses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental comparison with indirect attribution; no derivation reduces to fitted input or self-citation by construction

full rationale

The paper reports comparative FMR, magnetometry, and microstructural data on YIG films grown on two substrates. The central attribution of lower damping to Sc-suppressed interdiffusion is an inference from those measurements rather than a mathematical derivation or prediction that reduces to a fitted parameter. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that collapse the result to its own inputs. A score of 2 reflects possible minor self-citations that are not load-bearing for the experimental claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental attribution rather than derivation; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5764 in / 1066 out tokens · 23473 ms · 2026-05-19T05:02:47.881212+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. V asyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon Spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11, 453 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    L. J. Cornelissen, J. Liu, R. A. Duine, J. Ben Youssef, and B. J. van Wees, Long -Distance Transport of Magnon Spin Information in a Magnetic Insulator at Room Temperature. Nat. Phys. 11, 1022 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Kajiwara, K

    Y. Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, M. Mizuguchi, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, K. Ando, K. Takanashi, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Transmission of Electrical Signals by Spin-Wave Interconversion in a Magnetic Insulator. Nature, 464, 262 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Yang and R

    F. Yang and R. C. Hammel, FMR-Driven Spin Pumping in Y 3Fe5O12-Based Structures. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 253001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y . Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Coherent coupling between ferromagnetic magnon and superconducting qubit . Science 349, 405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y . Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura Quantum magnonics: The magnon meets the superconducting qubit. C. R. Phys. 17, 729 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Lachance -Quirion, S

    D. Lachance -Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Entanglement-based single-shot detection of a single magnon with a superco nducting qubit Science 367, 425 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Y. Li, C. Zhao, W. Zhang, Z. Hoffmann, and V. Novosad, APL Mater. 9, 060902 (2021). 14

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Collet, X

    M. Collet, X. de Milly, O. d ’Allivy Kelly, V . V . Naletov, R. Bernard, P. Bortolotti, J. Ben Youssef, V . E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, J. L. Prieto, M. Muñoz, V . Cros, A. Anane, G. de Loubens & O. Klein, Generation of coherent spin -wave modes in yttrium iron garnet microdiscs by spin–orbit torque. Nat. Commun. 7, 10377 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    T. Goto, T. Y oshimoto, B. Iwam oto, K. Shimada, C. A. Ross, K. Sekiguchi, A. B. Granovsky, Y . Nakamura, H. Uchida, and M. Inoue, Three port logic gate using forward volume spin wave interference in a thin yttrium iron garnet film, Sci. Rep. 9, 16472 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Tabuchi, Y. et al. Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    -L., Jiang, L

    Zhang, X., Zou, C. -L., Jiang, L. & Tang, H. X. Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Barman et al., The 2021 Magnonics Roadmap, J

    A. Barman et al., The 2021 Magnonics Roadmap, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 413001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Görnert, R

    P. Görnert, R. Hergt, E. Sinn, M. Wendt, B. Keszei, and J. Vandlik, Growth kinetics and some properties of thick LPE YIG layers. J. Cryst. Growth 87, 331 (1988)

    work page 1988

  15. [15]

    Wei and W

    H. Wei and W. Wang. The growth of LPE YIG films with narrow FMR linewidth . IEEE T. Magn. 20, 1222 (1984)

    work page 1984

  16. [16]

    C. L. Jermain , S. V . Aradhya, N. D. Reynolds , R. A. Buhrman, J. T. Brangham , M. R. Page, P. C. Hammel , F. Y. Yang and D. C. Ralph , Increased low -temperature damping in yttrium iron garnet thin films. Phys. Rev. B 95, 174411 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    d’Allivy Kelly, A

    O. d’Allivy Kelly, A. Anane, R. Bernard, J. Ben Youssef, C. Hahn, A. H. Molpeceres, C. Carrétéro, E. Jacquet, C. Deranlot, P. Bortolotti, R. Lebourgeois, J.-C. Mage, G. de Loubens, O. Klein, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Inverse spin Hall effect in nanometer-thick yttrium iron garnet/Pt system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 082408 (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Arias and D

    R. Arias and D. L. Mills, Extrinsic contributions to the ferromagnetic resonance response 15 of ultrathin films. Phys. Rev. B 60, 7395 (1999)

    work page 1999

  19. [19]

    Mitra, O

    A. Mitra, O. Cespedes, Q. Ramasse, M. Ali, S. Marmion, M. Ward, R. M. D. Byrdson, C. J. Kinane, J. F. K. Cooper, S. Langridge, and B. J. Hickey, Interfacial Origin of the Magnetisation Suppression of Thin Film Yttrium Iron Garnet. Sci. Rep. 7, 11774 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    J. F. K. Cooper, C. J. Kinane, S. Langridge,M. Ali, B. J. Hickey, T. Niizeki, K. Uchida, E. Saitoh, H. Ambaye, and A. Glavic, Unexpected structural and magnetic depth dependence of YIG thin films. Phys. Rev. B. 96, 104404 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Heinrich, C

    B. Heinrich, C. Burrowes, E. Montoya, B. Kardasz, E. Girt, Y. -Y. Song, Y. Sun, and M. Wu, Spin Pumping at the Magnetic Insulator (YIG)/Normal Metal (Au) Interfaces . Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 066604 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    M. C. Onbasli , A. Kehlberger , D. H. Kim , G. Jakob , M. Kläui, A. V. Chumak , B. Hillebrands, and C. A. Ross, Pulsed laser deposition of epitaxial yttrium iron garnet films with low Gilbert damping and bulk-like magnetization. APL Mater. 2, 106102 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    J. Fu, M. Hua, X. Wen, M. X ue, S. Ding, M. Wang, P. Yu, S. Liu, J. Han, C. Wang, H. Du, Y. Yang, and J. Yang, Epitaxial growth of Y3Fe5O12 thin films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 202403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    G. Li, H. Bai, J. Su, Z. Z. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and J. W. Cai, Tunable perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in epitaxial Y3Fe5O12 films. APL Mater. 7, 041104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    C. Y. Guo, C. H. Wan, M. K. Zhao, H. Wu, C. Fang, Z. R. Yan, J. F. Feng, H. F. Liu, and X. F. Han, Spin-orbit torque switching in perpendicular Y3Fe5O12/Pt bilayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 192409 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    J. Ding, C. Liu, Y. Zhang, U. Erugu, Z. Quan, R. Yu, E. McCollum, S. Mo, S. Yang, H. Ding, X. Xu, J. Tang, X. Yang, and M. Wu, Nanometer-thick yttrium iron garnet films with perpendicular anisotropy and low damping. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 014017 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    K.-R. Jeon, C. Ciccarelli, A. J. Ferguson, H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, X. Montiel, M. 16 Eschrig, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Enhanced Spin Pumping into Superconductors Provides Evidence for Superconducting Pure Spin Currents. Nat. Mater. 17, 499 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    K.-R. Jeon, X. Montiel, S. Komori, C. Ciccarelli, J. Haigh, H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, A. K. Chan, K. D. Stenni ng, C.-M. Lee, M. Eschrig, M. G. Blamire, and J. W. A. Robinson, Tunable pure spin supercurrents and the demonstration of their ga teability in a spin -wave device. Phys. Rev. X 10, 031020 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Holzmann, A

    C. Holzmann, A. Ullrich, O.-T. Ciubotariu, and M. Albrecht, Stress-Induced Magnetic Properties of Gadolinium Iron Garnet Nanoscale -Thin Films: Implications for Spintronic Devices. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5, 1023 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Hansen, in Physics of Magnetic Garnets, edited by A

    P. Hansen, in Physics of Magnetic Garnets, edited by A. Paoletti (North -Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), Vol. 1, pp. 56–133

    work page 1978

  31. [31]

    S. M. Zanjani and M. C. Onbaşlı, Predicting new iron garnet thin films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 499, 166108 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    W. H. Von Aulock, Handbook of Microwave Ferrite Materials (Academic, London, 1965)

    work page 1965

  33. [33]

    Arakawa, S

    R. Arakawa, S. Komori, and T. Taniyama, Strain-induced magnetic damping anomaly in La1-xSrxMnO3 (x = 0.3-0.5) thin films. arXiv:2505.19005

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    M.Suturin, A

    S. M.Suturin, A. M. Korovin, V. E. Bursian, L. V. Lutsev, V. Bourobina, N. L. Yakovlev, M. Montecchi, L. Pasquali, V. Ukleev, A. Vorobiev, A. Devishvili, and N. S. Sokolov, Role of gallium diffusion in the formation of a magnetically dead layer at Y₃Fe₅O₁₂/Gd₃Ga₅O₁₂ epitaxial interface. Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 104404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    D. J. Cherniak, Rare earth element and gallium diffusion in yttrium aluminum garnet. Phys Chem Minerals 26, 156 (1998)

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    B. Li, J. Ge, and B. Zhang, Diffusion in garnet: a review. Acta Geochimica 37, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Heinrich, Ultrathin Magnetic Structures (Springer, Berlin, 2005), Vol

    B. Heinrich, Ultrathin Magnetic Structures (Springer, Berlin, 2005), Vol. III

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Smit and H

    J. Smit and H. G. Beljers, Philips Res. Rep. 10, 113 (1955). 17

    work page 1955

  39. [39]

    Suhl, Phys

    H. Suhl, Phys. Rev. 97, 555 (1955)

    work page 1955

  40. [40]

    K.-R. Jeon, C. Ciccarelli, H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, S. Komori, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Abrikosov vortex nucleation and its detrimental effect on superconducting spin pumping in Pt/Nb/Ni80Fe20/Nb/Pt proximity structures. Phys. Rev. B 99, 144503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Zakeri, J

    Kh. Zakeri, J. Lindner, I. Barsukov, R. Meckenstock, M. Farle, U. von Hörsten, H. Wende, W. Keune, J. Rocker, S. S. Kalarickal, K. Lenz, W. Kuch, K. Baberschke, and Z. Frait, Spin dynamics in ferromagnets: Gilbert dampi ng and two -magnon scattering, Phys. Rev. B 76, 104416 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    K. Lenz, H. Wende, W. Kuch, K. Baberschke, K. Nagy, and A. Jánossy, Two -magnon scattering and viscous Gilbert damping in ultrathin ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 73, 144424 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    Sparks, Ferromagnetic-Relaxation Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964), p

    M. Sparks, Ferromagnetic-Relaxation Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964), p. 226

    work page 1964

  44. [44]

    P. C. Dorsey, S. E. Bushnell, R. G. Seed, and C. Vittoria, Structure and magnetic properties of yttrium–iron–garnet thin films prepared by laser deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 74, 1242 (1993)

    work page 1993

  45. [45]

    Mankovsky, D

    S. Mankovsky, D. Kodderitzsch, G. Woltersdorf, and H. Ebert, First-principles calculation of the Gilbert damping parameter via the linear response formalism with application to magnetic transition metals and alloys. Phys. Rev. B 87, 014430 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Y. Zhao, Q. Song, S. -H. Yang, T. Su, W. Yuan, S. S. P. Parkin, J. Shi & W. Han. Experimental Investigation of Temperature -Dependent Gilbert Damping in Permalloy Thin Films. Sci. Rep. 6, 22890 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Yu, X.-H

    T. Yu, X.-H. Zhou, G. E. W. Bauer, and I. Bobkova, Electromagnetic Proximity Effect: Superconducting Magnonics and Beyond. arXiv:2506.18502. FIGURE CAPTIONS FIG. 1. (a) θ–2θ X-ray diffraction (XRD) scans and (b) X -ray reflectivity (XRR) profiles for 18 ultrathin YIG films with thicknesses tYIG = 3, 5, and 10 nm, grown on GGG(111) substrates. (c) and (d) ...

    work page arXiv