pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.12860 · v2 · pith:WPG276O3new · submitted 2025-07-17 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-ex· physics.atom-ph· quant-ph

Detecting dark matter using optically trapped Rydberg atom tweezer arrays

So Chigusa , Taiyo Kasamaki , Toshi Kusano , Takeo Moroi , Kazunori Nakayama , Naoya Ozawa , Yoshiro Takahashi , Atsuhiro Umemoto
show 1 more author
Amar Vutha
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-exphysics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords dark matter detectionRydberg atomsoptical tweezersdark photonswave-like dark matteratomic sensorsnew physics searches
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rydberg atoms in optical tweezer arrays detect dark-photon dark matter via induced excitations and magnetic scanning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes preparing a large ensemble of Rydberg atoms in optical tweezer arrays to detect wave-like dark matter. Dark matter produces an effective electric field that excites transitions between Rydberg states, and an applied magnetic field creates Zeeman and diamagnetic shifts that allow the energy levels to be tuned across a range of possible dark matter masses. For the specific case of dark-photon dark matter, the authors calculate that the setup reaches sensitivities in previously unexplored regions of coupling strength and mass. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns a tabletop atomic physics apparatus into a probe for a leading dark matter candidate, offering a controlled laboratory alternative to large-scale detectors.

Core claim

The central claim is that Rydberg atoms trapped in optical tweezer arrays can observe excitations driven by the effective electric field of wave-like dark matter. An external magnetic field supplies the Zeeman and diamagnetic shifts needed to scan over dark matter mass. Taking dark-photon dark matter as an example, the proposed experiment achieves high enough sensitivity to probe previously unexplored regions of the parameter space of coupling strengths and masses.

What carries the argument

The dark matter-induced effective electric field that drives transitions between Rydberg states, combined with magnetic-field tuning of the Zeeman and diamagnetic shifts to scan dark matter mass.

If this is right

  • The experiment can reach dark-photon masses and couplings outside the reach of existing searches.
  • Magnetic field adjustment provides a continuous scan over a range of dark matter masses without changing the physical setup.
  • Large ensembles of optically trapped Rydberg atoms make detection of rare excitations feasible with current technology.
  • The same platform can be adapted to search for other wave-like dark matter candidates beyond dark photons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Rydberg tweezer arrays already used in quantum information experiments could be repurposed for dark matter searches with modest additions.
  • Success would demonstrate that precision atomic sensing competes with conventional dark matter detectors for light bosonic candidates.
  • The approach opens a route to test whether background noise or atom loss limits sensitivity in real devices.
  • Similar techniques might apply to axion-like particles or other ultralight dark matter models with appropriate level tuning.

Load-bearing premise

Recent advances in trapping and manipulating Rydberg atoms make it possible to prepare a large ensemble and observe the dark matter-induced excitations in practice.

What would settle it

Building the Rydberg tweezer array, applying the calculated magnetic field scan, and measuring whether the observed excitation rate matches the predicted dark matter signal or remains at background levels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12860 by Amar Vutha, Atsuhiro Umemoto, Kazunori Nakayama, Naoya Ozawa, So Chigusa, Taiyo Kasamaki, Takeo Moroi, Toshi Kusano, Yoshiro Takahashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic overview of the experiment. (a) Rydberg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Resonance frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A new scheme for detecting wave-like dark matter (DM) using Rydberg atoms is proposed. Recent advances in trapping and manipulating Rydberg atoms make it possible to use Rydberg atoms trapped in optical tweezer arrays for DM detection. We propose to prepare a large ensemble of Rydberg atoms and to observe the excitations between Rydberg states by the DM-induced effective electric field. A scan over DM mass is enabled with the use of the Zeeman and diamagnetic shifts of energy levels under an applied external magnetic field. Taking dark-photon DM as an example, we demonstrate that our proposed experiment can have high enough sensitivity to probe previously unexplored regions of the parameter space of dark-photon coupling strengths and masses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a scheme for detecting wave-like dark matter using Rydberg atoms in optical tweezer arrays. A large ensemble of Rydberg atoms is prepared to detect excitations driven by the DM-induced effective electric field, with DM mass scanned via Zeeman and diamagnetic shifts under an applied magnetic field. Dark-photon DM is used as an example to claim that the setup can reach sufficient sensitivity to probe previously unexplored regions of the coupling-mass parameter space.

Significance. If the projected reach holds, the proposal would introduce a new atomic-physics-based method for direct detection of ultralight DM that could access new territory for dark-photon models. The approach builds on recent experimental progress in Rydberg trapping and manipulation, offering a potentially scalable platform with tunable resonance via external fields.

major comments (2)
  1. [sensitivity analysis / abstract] The central sensitivity projection (abstract and sensitivity section) is load-bearing for the claim of entering unexplored parameter space, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or numerical estimate of the DM-induced transition rate relative to background and noise after integration over the DM coherence time. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the stated reach is achieved.
  2. [experimental configuration] The feasibility discussion assumes that Rydberg coherence times remain long enough under the applied B-field for the required integration, and that tweezer-induced decoherence plus field inhomogeneity do not dominate; however, no quantitative estimates, scaling arguments, or references to measured values under comparable conditions are supplied. This directly affects whether the excess signal exceeds noise.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction] Clarify the precise definition and magnitude of the 'DM-induced effective electric field' when first introduced, including its relation to the dark-photon coupling and local DM density.
  2. [abstract] The abstract states a sensitivity demonstration but does not indicate the key assumptions (coherence time, ensemble size, readout fidelity) that underpin the result; adding one sentence would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript proposing Rydberg atom tweezer arrays for wave-like dark matter detection. We have revised the paper to incorporate explicit derivations for the sensitivity projections and quantitative estimates for experimental feasibility, as detailed in our point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [sensitivity analysis / abstract] The central sensitivity projection (abstract and sensitivity section) is load-bearing for the claim of entering unexplored parameter space, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or numerical estimate of the DM-induced transition rate relative to background and noise after integration over the DM coherence time. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the stated reach is achieved.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation strengthens the central claim. The original manuscript applied standard formulas for dark-photon-induced transitions but did not expand them fully. In the revised manuscript we have added a self-contained derivation in the sensitivity section: the transition rate is Γ_DM = (ε² g_{γ'}² ρ_DM / (4 m_DM²)) |⟨f|d·E_eff|i⟩|², where E_eff is the effective electric field from the DM wave. After coherent integration over τ_coh ≈ 2π/m_DM and comparison to background Poisson fluctuations for N ≈ 10⁴ atoms and integration times of order 1 s, the projected signal-to-noise ratio reaches several sigma for couplings ε ≲ 10^{-12} in the 10^{-6}–10^{-3} eV mass window, confirming access to unexplored parameter space. These steps and numerical values are now explicitly shown. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [experimental configuration] The feasibility discussion assumes that Rydberg coherence times remain long enough under the applied B-field for the required integration, and that tweezer-induced decoherence plus field inhomogeneity do not dominate; however, no quantitative estimates, scaling arguments, or references to measured values under comparable conditions are supplied. This directly affects whether the excess signal exceeds noise.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting the lack of quantitative support. The revised manuscript now supplies order-of-magnitude estimates and references. Rydberg coherence times in B-fields of a few gauss are typically 10–100 ms in recent tweezer-array experiments (e.g., works on Rydberg blockade and quantum simulation platforms). Tweezer-induced decoherence rates are estimated below 1 kHz at magic wavelengths, while magnetic-field inhomogeneity across the array produces <10 % detuning variation, which remains subdominant to the natural linewidth and is further mitigated by the Zeeman/diamagnetic scanning protocol. These estimates ensure that decoherence does not limit integration over the DM coherence time, preserving the projected signal excess over noise. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Proposed Rydberg tweezer DM detector sensitivity is self-contained and not circular

full rationale

The paper is an experimental proposal that derives projected sensitivity to dark-photon DM from standard transition-rate formulas applied to a new configuration of optically trapped Rydberg atoms. The scan over DM mass uses external Zeeman and diamagnetic shifts under an applied B-field; the reach into unexplored parameter space follows from assumed ensemble size, coherence time, and readout fidelity drawn from cited recent advances in Rydberg trapping. No equation reduces the claimed sensitivity to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain; the central result is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The derivation therefore remains independent of the paper's own assumptions and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the feasibility of the proposed Rydberg atom setup and the existence of a DM-induced effective electric field interaction, with limited independent evidence provided in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Recent advances in trapping and manipulating Rydberg atoms enable the proposed large ensemble preparation and excitation observation.
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the basis for the experimental scheme.
invented entities (1)
  • DM-induced effective electric field no independent evidence
    purpose: To induce observable excitations between Rydberg states for detection
    Postulated as the interaction mechanism for wave-like dark matter; no independent falsifiable handle outside the proposal is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1330 out tokens · 45616 ms · 2026-05-19T04:58:53.169499+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Super-Heisenberg protocol for dark matter and high-frequency gravitational wave search

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A protocol using squeezed states in 2D ion crystals in a Penning trap achieves super-Heisenberg sensitivity for axion-like particles, dark photons, and high-frequency gravitational waves while accounting for decoherence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1415 (1983), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    work page 1983

  2. [2]

    Bradley, J

    R. Bradley, J. Clarke, D. Kinion, L. J. Rosenberg, K. van Bibber, S. Matsuki, M. Muck, and P. Sikivie, Microwave cavity searches for dark-matter axions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 777 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    A. V. Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Searching for Dark Matter with a Superconducting Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141302 (2021), arXiv:2008.12231 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Detecting Hidden Photon Dark Matter Using the Direct Excitation of Transmon Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 211001 (2023), arXiv:2212.03884 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Agrawal, A

    A. Agrawal, A. V. Dixit, T. Roy, S. Chakram, K. He, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Stimulated Emission of Signal Photons from Dark Matter Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 140801 (2024), arXiv:2305.03700 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Search for QCD axion dark matter with transmon qubits and quantum circuit, Phys. Rev. D110, 115021 (2024), arXiv:2407.19755 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Chigusa, M

    S. Chigusa, M. Hazumi, E. D. Herbschleb, N. Mizuochi, and K. Nakayama, Light dark matter search with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamonds, JHEP 03, 083, arXiv:2302.12756 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Chigusa, M

    S. Chigusa, M. Hazumi, E. D. Herbschleb, Y. Matsuzaki, N. Mizuochi, and K. Nakayama, Nuclear spin metrol- ogy with nitrogen vacancy center in diamond for axion dark matter detection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075028 (2025), arXiv:2407.07141 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    A. Ito, R. Kitano, W. Nakano, and R. Takai, Quan- tum entanglement of ions for light dark matter detection, JHEP 02, 124, arXiv:2311.11632 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Matsuki and K

    S. Matsuki and K. Yamamoto, Direct detection of galac- tic axions with Rydberg atoms in an inhibited cavity regime, Phys. Lett. B 263, 523 (1991)

    work page 1991

  11. [11]

    Ogawa, S

    I. Ogawa, S. Matsuki, and K. Yamamoto, Interactions of cosmic axions with Rydberg atoms in resonant cavi- ties via the Primakoff process, Phys. Rev. D 53, R1740 (1996). 6

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    Gu´ e, A

    J. Gu´ e, A. Hees, J. Lodewyck, R. L. Targat, and P. Wolf, Search for vector dark matter in microwave cavities with Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035042 (2023), arXiv:2305.11671 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Graham et al., Rydberg-atom-based single-photon de- tection for haloscope axion searches, Phys

    E. Graham et al., Rydberg-atom-based single-photon de- tection for haloscope axion searches, Phys. Rev. D 109, 032009 (2024), arXiv:2310.15352 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Engelhardt, A

    G. Engelhardt, A. Bhoonah, and W. V. Liu, Detecting axion dark matter with Rydberg atoms via induced elec- tric dipole transitions, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023017 (2024), arXiv:2304.05863 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579–584 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, et al., Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional rydberg array, Nature 616, 691 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature 622, 279 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin, A. W. Young, S. Jandura, L. Yan, K. Kim, G. Pupillo, J. Ye, N. Dark- wah Oppong, et al. , Multi-qubit gates and schr¨ odinger cat states in an optical clock, Nature 634, 315 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Finkelstein, R

    R. Finkelstein, R. B.-S. Tsai, X. Sun, P. Scholl, S. Di- rekci, T. Gefen, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, and M. Endres, Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks, Nature 634, 321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, S. J. Evered, J. Ataides, G. Baranes, A. Gu, T. Manovitz, M. Xu, M. Kalinowski, et al. , Architectural mechanisms of a universal fault-tolerant quantum computer, (2025), arXiv:2506.20661 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Schymik, S

    K.-N. Schymik, S. Pancaldi, F. Nogrette, D. Barredo, J. Paris, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Single atoms with 6000-second trapping lifetimes in optical-tweezer arrays at cryogenic temperatures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 034013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Pichard, D

    G. Pichard, D. Lim, ´E. Bloch, J. Vaneecloo, L. Boura- chot, G.-J. Both, G. M´ eriaux, S. Dutartre, R. Hostein, J. Paris, et al. , Rearrangement of individual atoms in a 2000-site optical-tweezer array at cryogenic tempera- tures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 024073 (2024)

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Zhang, T.-W

    Z. Zhang, T.-W. Hsu, T. Y. Tan, D. H. Slichter, A. M. Kaufman, M. Marinelli, and C. A. Regal, High optical access cryogenic system for rydberg atom arrays with a 3000-second trap lifetime, PRX Quantum 6, 020337 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Nogrette, H

    F. Nogrette, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, D. Barredo, L. B´ eguin, A. Vernier, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Single-atom trapping in holographic 2d arrays of micro- traps with arbitrary geometries, Phy. Rev. X 4, 021034 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Wilson, S

    J. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. Burg- ers, and J. Thompson, Trapping alkaline earth rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 033201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Boulier, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Three- dimensional trapping of individual rydberg atoms in pon- deromotive bottle beam traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 023201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103520 (2016), arXiv:1504.02102 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Y. Ema, K. Nakayama, and Y. Tang, Production of purely gravitational dark matter: the case of fermion and vector boson, JHEP 07, 060, arXiv:1903.10973 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1903

  30. [30]

    A. J. Long and L.-T. Wang, Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings, Phys. Rev. D 99, 063529 (2019), arXiv:1901.03312 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Kitajima and K

    N. Kitajima and K. Nakayama, Dark photon dark matter from cosmic strings and gravitational wave background, JHEP 08, 068, arXiv:2212.13573 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Kitajima and K

    N. Kitajima and K. Nakayama, Viable vector coherent oscillation dark matter, JCAP 07, 014, arXiv:2303.04287 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Neukammer, H

    J. Neukammer, H. Rinneberg, and U. Majewski, Diamag- netic shift and singlet-triplet mixing of 6snp yb rydberg states with large radial extent, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1142 (1984)

    work page 1984

  34. [34]

    Thompson, M

    J. Thompson, M. Peper, and S. Cohen, https://github. com/ThompsonLabPrinceton/rydcalc

    work page

  35. [35]

    Peper et al

    M. Peper et al. , Spectroscopy and Modeling of Yb171 Rydberg States for High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011009 (2025), arXiv:2406.01482 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    S. D. McDermott and S. J. Witte, Cosmological evolution of light dark photon dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063030 (2020), arXiv:1911.05086 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    New axion and hidden photon constraints from a solar data global fit

    N. Vinyoles, A. Serenelli, F. L. Villante, S. Basu, J. Re- dondo, and J. Isern, New axion and hidden photon con- straints from a solar data global fit, JCAP 10, 015, arXiv:1501.01639 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, New limits on dark photons from solar emission and keV scale dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115022 (2020), arXiv:2006.13929 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    First results from a hidden photon dark matter search in the meV sector using a plane-parabolic mirror system

    S. Knirck, T. Yamazaki, Y. Okesaku, S. Asai, T. Idehara, and T. Inada, First results from a hidden photon dark matter search in the meV sector using a plane-parabolic mirror system, JCAP 11, 031, arXiv:1806.05120 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Search for hidden-photon cold dark matter using a K-band cryogenic receiver,

    N. Tomita, S. Oguri, Y. Inoue, M. Minowa, T. Nagasaki, J. Suzuki, and O. Tajima, Search for hidden-photon cold dark matter using a K-band cryogenic receiver, JCAP 09, 012, arXiv:2006.02828 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    P. Brun, L. Chevalier, and C. Flouzat, Direct Searches for Hidden-Photon Dark Matter with the SHUKET Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201801 (2019), arXiv:1905.05579 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Levine, B

    J. Levine, B. Godfrey, J. A. Tyson, S. M. Tripathi, D. Polin, A. Aminaei, B. H. Kolner, and P. Stucky, New limit on dark photon kinetic mixing in the 0.2–1.2 µeV mass range from the Dark E-field Radio experiment, Phys. Rev. D 110, 032010 (2024), arXiv:2405.20444 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    L. H. Nguyen, A. Lobanov, and D. Horns, First results from the WISPDMX radio frequency cavity searches for hidden photon dark matter, JCAP 10, 014, arXiv:1907.12449 [hep-ex]. 7

    work page arXiv 1907

  44. [44]

    Search for 70µeV Dark Photon Dark Matter with a Dielectrically Loaded Multiwavelength Microwave Cavity,

    R. Cervantes et al., Search for 70 µeV Dark Photon Dark Matter with a Dielectrically Loaded Multiwavelength Mi- crowave Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 201301 (2022), arXiv:2204.03818 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Adachi, R

    S. Adachi, R. Fujinaka, S. Honda, Y. Muto, H. Nakata, Y. Sueno, T. Sumida, J. Suzuki, O. Tajima, and H. Takeuchi (DOSUE-RR), Search for dark photon dark matter in the mass range 41 −74 µeV using millimeter- wave receiver and radioshielding box, Phys. Rev. D 109, 012008 (2024), arXiv:2308.14656 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    H. An, S. Ge, W.-Q. Guo, X. Huang, J. Liu, and Z. Lu, Direct Detection of Dark Photon Dark Matter Using Radio Telescopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 181001 (2023), arXiv:2207.05767 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Deepest sensitivity to wavelike dark photon dark matter with superconducting radio frequency cavities,

    R. Cervantes et al. , Deepest sensitivity to wavelike dark photon dark matter with superconducting radio frequency cavities, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043022 (2024), arXiv:2208.03183 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Wideband Direct Detection Constraints on Hidden Photon Dark Matter with the QUALIPHIDE Experiment,

    K. Ramanathan, N. Klimovich, R. Basu Thakur, B. H. Eom, H. G. LeDuc, S. Shu, A. D. Beyer, and P. K. Day, Wideband Direct Detection Constraints on Hidden Pho- ton Dark Matter with the QUALIPHIDE Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 231001 (2023), arXiv:2209.03419 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    First results from BRASS-p broadband searches for hidden photon dark matter,

    F. Bajjali et al. , First results from BRASS-p broadband searches for hidden photon dark matter, JCAP 08, 077, arXiv:2306.05934 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    SRF Cavity Searches for Dark Photon Dark Matter: First Scan Results,

    Z. Tang et al. (SHANHE), First Scan Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter with a Tunable Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021005 (2024), arXiv:2305.09711 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Knirck et al

    S. Knirck et al. (BREAD), First Results from a Broad- band Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter in the 44 to 52 µeV Range with a Coaxial Dish Antenna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131004 (2024), arXiv:2310.13891 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Egge et al

    J. Egge et al. (MADMAX), First Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter with a madmax Prototype, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 151004 (2025), arXiv:2408.02368 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Carosi et al

    G. Carosi et al. (ADMX), Search for Axion Dark Matter from 1.1 to 1.3 GHz with ADMX, arXiv:2504.07279 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Bai et al

    X. Bai et al. (HAYSTAC), Dark Matter Axion Search with HAYSTAC Phase II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 151006 (2025), arXiv:2409.08998 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Ahn et al

    S. Ahn et al. (CAPP), Extensive Search for Axion Dark Matter over 1 GHz with CAPP’S Main Axion Experi- ment, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031023 (2024), arXiv:2402.12892 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    C. M. Adair et al. , Search for Dark Matter Axions with CAST-CAPP, Nature Commun. 13, 6180 (2022), arXiv:2211.02902 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Chang et al

    H. Chang et al. (TASEH), First Results from the Taiwan Axion Search Experiment with a Haloscope at 19.6 µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111802 (2022), arXiv:2205.05574 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    R. Kang, M. Jiao, Y. Tong, Y. Liu, Y. Zhong, Y.-F. Cai, J. Zhou, X. Rong, and J. Du, Near-quantum-limited haloscope search for dark-photon dark matter enhanced by a high-Q superconducting cavity, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095037 (2024), arXiv:2404.12731 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    B. T. McAllister, A. Quiskamp, C. A. J. O’Hare, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, Limits on Dark Photons, Scalars, and Axion- Electromagnetodynamics with the ORGAN Experiment, Annalen Phys. 536, 2200622 (2024), arXiv:2212.01971 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Rettaroli et al

    A. Rettaroli et al. (QUAX), Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable haloscope, Phys. Rev. D 110, 022008 (2024), arXiv:2402.19063 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    First results of the SUPAX Experiment: Probing Dark Photons,

    T. Schneemann, K. Schmieden, and M. Schott, First re- sults of the SUPAX Experiment: Probing Dark Photons, arXiv:2308.08337 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    He et al

    D. He et al. (APEX), Dark photon constraints from a 7.139 GHz cavity haloscope experiment, Phys. Rev. D 110, L021101 (2024), arXiv:2404.00908 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    X. Fan, G. Gabrielse, P. W. Graham, R. Harnik, T. G. Myers, H. Ramani, B. A. D. Sukra, S. S. Y. Wong, and Y. Xiao, One-Electron Quantum Cyclotron as a Milli- eV Dark-Photon Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261801 (2022), arXiv:2208.06519 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Dark photon limits: A handbook,

    A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, Dark photon limits: A handbook, Phys. Rev. D 104, 095029 (2021), arXiv:2105.04565 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits (2024) arXiv:2403.12021 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Kanno, J

    S. Kanno, J. Soda, and A. Taniguchi, Search for high- frequency gravitational waves with Rydberg atoms, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 31 (2025), arXiv:2311.03890 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Quantum Enhancement in Dark Matter Detection with Quantum Computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021801 (2024), arXiv:2311.10413 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firstenberg, H. P. B¨ uchler, and S. Hofferberth, Tutorial: Calculation of Rydberg interaction potentials, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50, 133001 (2017). 8 End Matter In End Matter, we explain our procedure to calculate the transition rates of the Rydberg atom. The calcula- tion is based on the Hamiltonian gi...

    work page 2017