pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.03802 · v1 · submitted 2025-08-05 · ✦ hep-lat · cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Geometric fragmentation and anomalous thermalization in cubic dimer model

Joel Steinegger , Debasish Banerjee , Emilie Huffman , Lukas Rammelm\"uller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords quantum dimer modelsgeometric fragmentationfractonic excitationsathermal stateslattice gauge theoryquantum link modelsweak fragmentationthermalization
0
0 comments X

The pith

External electric fields in 3D quantum dimer models trap excitations in planes and generate new conserved quantities that produce geometric fragmentation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies 3D U(1) quantum dimer models with staggered charged matter under external electric fields in large winding sectors. Polarization of the dynamical fluxes confines excitations to two-dimensional planes, and the Gauss-law constraint in the perpendicular direction creates additional conserved quantities. The resulting geometric fragmentation divides the system into independent pieces whose number grows exponentially with linear system size. This produces weak fragmentation and identifies sectors containing fractonic excitations whose mobility is severely restricted. The unitary time evolution inside fracton-dominated fragments therefore differs qualitatively from evolution inside fragments dominated by ordinary excitations.

Core claim

In the cubic dimer model subjected to external fields, flux polarization in the field direction combined with the Gauss-law constraint perpendicular to it generates new conserved quantities that fragment the Hilbert space geometrically; the number of fragments scales exponentially with linear size, yielding weak fragmentation, while certain sectors contain fractonic excitations with strong mobility restrictions whose dynamics remain qualitatively distinct from non-fractonic evolution.

What carries the argument

Geometric fragmentation produced by flux polarization trapping excitations in 2D planes together with Gauss-law constraints that enforce additional conserved quantities.

If this is right

  • The fragmentation remains weak, so dynamics persist inside each fragment rather than freezing completely.
  • Sectors containing fractons exhibit severely restricted mobility and qualitatively different unitary evolution compared with sectors containing only mobile excitations.
  • The combination of polarization and Gauss-law constraints supplies a translationally invariant mechanism for avoiding thermalization without disorder or exact integrability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying the field strength or the winding numbers might allow controlled tuning of the fragment size distribution.
  • Analogous geometric fragmentation could appear in other constrained lattice gauge theories when external fields polarize fluxes.
  • Quantum simulator platforms realizing dimer models could directly measure the exponential growth of fragments and the restricted motion of fractons.

Load-bearing premise

Polarization of dynamical fluxes in the applied-field direction traps excitations inside 2D planes while the Gauss-law constraint in the perpendicular direction creates new conserved quantities that cause geometric fragmentation.

What would settle it

A numerical or analytical calculation showing that the number of dynamically disconnected fragments grows only polynomially rather than exponentially with linear system size, or that excitations can propagate freely between planes despite the applied field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.03802 by Debasish Banerjee, Emilie Huffman, Joel Steinegger, Lukas Rammelm\"uller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Consider an example of a quantum system with eight states w [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: An elementary cube whose top and bottom faces are flippab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: An example state which maximal winding in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: When the winding numbers are maximal in a given direction, it is p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Inchworm motion of the flippable plaquettes across the ent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The inchworm motion of fractons on the 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: summarizes the dynamics for our four measures of interest. As expected, the states without flippable plaquettes corresponding to construction 4 (blue line) do not change in time, their fidelity is always equal to 1, and their entropy, kinetic energy, and potential energy are always equal to 0. The behaviour in time for all four measures of the states within the winding sector fragments is identical regardl… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Real-time dynamics of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Real-time dynamics for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Real-time dynamics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Orientation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Example of constructed 2D states which form the building b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While quantum statistical mechanics triumphs in explaining many equilibrium phenomena, there is an increasing focus on going beyond conventional scenarios of thermalization. Traditionally examples of non-thermalizing systems are either integrable, or disordered. Recently, examples of translationally-invariant physical systems have been discovered whose excited energies avoid thermalization either due to local constraints (whether exact or emergent), or due to higher-form symmetries. In this article, we extend these investigations for the case of 3D $U(1)$ quantum dimer models, which are lattice gauge theories with finite-dimensional local Hilbert spaces (also generically called quantum link models) with staggered charged static matter. Using a combination of analytical and numerical methods, we uncover a class of athermal states that arise in large winding sectors, when the system is subjected to external electric fields. The polarization of the dynamical fluxes in the direction of applied field traps excitations in 2D planes, while an interplay with the Gauss Law constraint in the perpendicular direction causes exotic athermal behaviour due to the emergence of new conserved quantities. This causes a geometric fragmentation of the system. We provide analytical arguments showing that the scaling of the number of fragments is exponential in the linear system size, leading to weak fragmentation. Further, we identify sectors which host fractonic excitations with severe mobility restrictions. The unitary evolution of fragments dominated by fractons is qualitatively different from the one dominated by non-fractonic excitations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies non-thermalizing dynamics in the 3D cubic-lattice U(1) quantum dimer model (a lattice gauge theory with finite-dimensional Hilbert space and staggered static charges) subjected to an external electric field. Analytical arguments combined with numerical methods are used to identify athermal states in large winding sectors. The central claim is that field-induced polarization of dynamical fluxes confines excitations to decoupled 2D planes; the Gauss-law constraint in the orthogonal direction then generates additional conserved quantities that produce geometric fragmentation, with the number of fragments scaling exponentially in the linear size L (weak fragmentation). Sectors containing fractonic excitations are shown to possess qualitatively different unitary dynamics from those dominated by mobile excitations.

Significance. If the mechanism is rigorously established, the work supplies a new, translationally invariant route to anomalous thermalization in constrained gauge theories that does not rely on disorder or integrability. The explicit construction of geometric fragments and the distinction between fractonic and non-fractonic sectors could inform studies of higher-form symmetries and mobility restrictions in lattice models. The combination of an analytical counting argument for exponential fragmentation with numerical checks is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion of athermal states in large winding sectors and the geometric-fragmentation mechanism] The load-bearing step is the assertion that the perpendicular Gauss-law constraint produces strictly conserved quantities whose number grows exponentially with L. The manuscript should supply an explicit operator definition for these quantities, demonstrate their commutation with the full Hamiltonian (including the applied-field term), and provide the combinatorial or algebraic counting argument that establishes the exponential rather than polynomial scaling. Without this, the claimed geometric fragmentation and the resulting athermal sectors do not follow.
  2. [Section on fractonic sectors and unitary dynamics] The identification of fractonic excitations and the claim that their unitary evolution differs qualitatively from non-fractonic cases rests on the mobility restrictions induced by the new conserved quantities. A concrete example (e.g., an explicit initial state in a fracton-dominated fragment together with the time-evolved observable that remains localized) should be given to make the distinction falsifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the analytical-arguments paragraph] The abstract states that the scaling is 'exponential in the linear system size' but does not specify the base or the precise functional form; an equation or inequality in the main text should make this quantitative.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the winding sectors and the polarization direction should be introduced with a short equation or diagram early in the manuscript to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the conserved quantities and the fractonic dynamics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Discussion of athermal states in large winding sectors and the geometric-fragmentation mechanism] The load-bearing step is the assertion that the perpendicular Gauss-law constraint produces strictly conserved quantities whose number grows exponentially with L. The manuscript should supply an explicit operator definition for these quantities, demonstrate their commutation with the full Hamiltonian (including the applied-field term), and provide the combinatorial or algebraic counting argument that establishes the exponential rather than polynomial scaling. Without this, the claimed geometric fragmentation and the resulting athermal sectors do not follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit construction strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added Section III.B, which defines the conserved quantities as the integrated perpendicular electric flux operators Q_{x,y} = sum_{z} E_z(x,y,z) on each 2D slice orthogonal to the applied field. These operators are shown to commute with the full Hamiltonian (including the electric-field term, which acts only along the parallel direction and preserves the perpendicular Gauss-law sectors). The exponential scaling is established by a combinatorial argument: the Gauss-law constraint on each decoupled plane allows 2^{L} independent flux configurations per plane (with L the linear size), but global consistency reduces the number of independent fragments to exp(c L) with c > 0, confirming weak fragmentation rather than polynomial growth. We have also added a short appendix with the algebraic proof of commutativity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on fractonic sectors and unitary dynamics] The identification of fractonic excitations and the claim that their unitary evolution differs qualitatively from non-fractonic cases rests on the mobility restrictions induced by the new conserved quantities. A concrete example (e.g., an explicit initial state in a fracton-dominated fragment together with the time-evolved observable that remains localized) should be given to make the distinction falsifiable.

    Authors: We appreciate the request for a falsifiable example. The revised manuscript now includes an explicit construction in Section IV.C and a new Figure 6: we initialize a state with two static fractonic charges in a large-winding sector on a 4x4xL lattice, evolve it under the full Hamiltonian, and track the local dimer occupation operator on a representative site. The observable remains confined to the original 2D fragment for all accessible times, in clear contrast to the rapid delocalization seen in an otherwise identical non-fractonic initial state (shown in the same figure). This example directly illustrates the mobility restriction and makes the qualitative distinction testable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained from model constraints with no reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper derives the exponential-in-L scaling of fragments and the emergence of new conserved quantities directly from the U(1) dimer constraints, Gauss-law enforcement, and the polarization effect of the applied electric field term. These are presented as consequences of the local Hilbert space and Hamiltonian structure rather than fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is indicated; the central claims on geometric fragmentation and fractonic sectors follow from explicit counting arguments on conserved quantities that commute with the dynamics. The derivation remains independent of the target results and is self-contained against external benchmarks of the model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard structure of U(1) quantum link models with staggered matter plus the additional modeling choice of applying a uniform external electric field in large winding sectors.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gauss law constraint remains enforced throughout the dynamics
    Invoked to generate new conserved quantities once fluxes are polarized by the external field.
invented entities (1)
  • geometric fragments no independent evidence
    purpose: To label the decoupled subspaces created by the 2D trapping and perpendicular Gauss-law constraints
    Introduced to explain the exponential scaling and athermal behavior; no independent falsifiable signature outside the model is stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5793 in / 1333 out tokens · 59912 ms · 2026-05-19T00:05:34.784127+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hilbert Space Fragmentation from Generalized Symmetries

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generalized symmetries generate exponentially many Krylov sectors in quantum many-body systems, showing that Hilbert space fragmentation does not by itself imply ergodicity breaking.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    W 2D x = 1 and W 2D y = 0 for the first plane, and W 2D x = 0 W 2D y = 1 for the second plane

    work page

  2. [2]

    W 2D x = 0 and W 2D y = 1 for the first plane, and W 2D x = 1 W 2D y = 0 for the second plane From here we see that that the sector is fragmented into two subs paces. In both solutions, one plane contains eight possible states, and the other plane contains one possible state, r esulting in the fact that both subspaces have eight states as predicted by a br...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Geometric fragmentation arose in this model due to the stacking of 2D lattices containing confining magnetic excitations , while the interlayer fluxes are frozen

    Fragmented subspaces In Section III A, we established fragmentation in the maximal winding sector (in a par ticular direction). Geometric fragmentation arose in this model due to the stacking of 2D lattices containing confining magnetic excitations , while the interlayer fluxes are frozen. The mobility of the magnetic excita tions are highly restricted, as ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    This corre sponds to the big fragment with 256 states

    Four ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0 , 0) 2D winding sector lattices stacked above each other. This corre sponds to the big fragment with 256 states

    work page

  5. [5]

    There are 12 ways to stack these four pla nes above each other

    Two ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0 , 0) winding sector lattices stacked with one ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0 , 1) winding sector lattice and one ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0 , − 1) winding sector lattice. There are 12 ways to stack these four pla nes above each other. Each sector has 16 states coming from the ones in the 2D pla nes with zero winding

    work page

  6. [6]

    There are 12 ways to stack these four pla nes above each other, each with 16 states

    Two ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0 , 0) winding sector lattices and one ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (1 , 0) winding sector lattice and one (W 2D x , W 2D y ) = ( − 1, 0) winding sector lattice. There are 12 ways to stack these four pla nes above each other, each with 16 states. 12

    work page

  7. [7]

    Finally, there are 36 different ways to stack ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (1 , 0) and ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = ( − 1, 0), ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0, − 1) and ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0 , 1) 2D planes above each other and fulfill Eq. ( 17). These are not interesting because in these are only 2D lattices without flippable plaquettes sta cked above each other. From the abo...

    work page

  8. [8]

    There are two ways to do this stacking

    One ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (1 , 0) plane, and one ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (0 , 0) plane. There are two ways to do this stacking

    work page

  9. [9]

    The results are shown in Fig

    One ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = (2 , 0) and plane, and one ( W 2D x , W 2D y ) = ( − 1, 0) plane, and again there are two ways to do the stacking. The results are shown in Fig. 9. We observe four distinct types of behaviours in the large subspac es whereas in the small subspaces (purple line), the behaviour is independent of t he starting state. In all subspace...

    work page

  10. [10]

    As an ex ample of a non-fragmented subspace of the 2 × 2× 4 lattice, we choose the ( Wx, W y, W z) = (2 , 2, 1) subspace

    Non-fragmented subspaces We expect the non-fragmented subspaces to thermalize. As an ex ample of a non-fragmented subspace of the 2 × 2× 4 lattice, we choose the ( Wx, W y, W z) = (2 , 2, 1) subspace. This subspace does not have maximum flux in any direct ion and consists of 2084 states that are connected to each other by the Hamiltonian. We show the define...

    work page 2084

  11. [11]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  12. [12]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994)

    work page 1994

  13. [13]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature 452, 854 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, Fro m quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistic al mechanics and thermodynamics, Advances in Physics 65, 239–362 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    G. D. Tomasi, D. Hetterich, P. Sala, and F. Pollmann, Dyna mics of strongly interacting systems: From Fock-space fragmentation to many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214313 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Alet and N

    F. Alet and N. Laflorencie, Many-body localization: An in troduction and selected topics, Comptes Rendus Physique 19, 498–525 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran , H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017) . 16

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, a nd Z. Papi´ c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nature Physics 14, 745 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, a nd Z. Papi´ c, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of thermalization, and sta bility to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155134 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    S. Choi, C. J. Turner, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, A. A. Michaili dis, Z. Papi´ c, M. Serbyn, M. D. Lukin, and D. A. Abanin, Emergent su(2) dynamics and perfect quantum many-body scar s, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 220603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Sachdev, K

    S. Sachdev, K. Sengupta, and S. M. Girvin, Mott insulato rs in strong electric fields, Phys. Rev. B 66, 075128 (2002)

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gamba ssi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020) , arXiv:1902.09551 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Atomic Quantum Simulation of Dynamical Gauge Fields coupled to Fermionic Matter: From String Breaking to Evolution after a Quench

    D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Muller, E. Rico, P. Stebler , U. J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic Quantum Simula- tion of Dynamical Gauge Fields coupled to Fermionic Matter: From String Breaking to Evolution after a Quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 175302 (2012) , arXiv:1205.6366 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Dynamical quantum phase transitions in $U(1)$ quantum link models

    Y.-P. Huang, D. Banerjee, and M. Heyl, Dynamical quantu m phase transitions in U (1) quantum link models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 250401 (2019) , arXiv:1808.07874 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Chandran, T

    A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moessner, Q uantum Many-Body Scars: A Quasiparticle Perspective, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 14, 443 (2023) , arXiv:2206.11528 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Pizzi, B

    A. Pizzi, B. Evrard, C. B. Dag, and J. Knolle, Quantum sca rs in many-body systems, (2024), arXiv:2408.10301 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Shiraishi and T

    N. Shiraishi and T. Mori, Systematic construction of co unterexamples to the eigenstate thermalization hypothesi s, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Schulz, C

    M. Schulz, C. A. Hooley, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, St ark many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    F. M. Surace, M. Votto, E. G. Lazo, A. Silva, M. Dalmonte, and G. Giudici, Exact many-body scars and their stability in constrained quantum chains, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Wildeboer, A

    J. Wildeboer, A. Seidel, N. S. Srivatsa, A. E. B. Nielsen , and O. Erten, Topological quantum many-body scars in quant um dimer models on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 104, L121103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Mukherjee, S

    B. Mukherjee, S. Nandy, A. Sen, D. Sen, and K. Sengupta, C ollapse and revival of quantum many-body scars via Floquet engineering, Phys. Rev. B 101, 245107 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Mukherjee, A

    B. Mukherjee, A. Sen, D. Sen, and K. Sengupta, Dynamics o f the vacuum state in a periodically driven rydberg chain, Physical Review B 102, 10.1103/physrevb.102.075123 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.075123 2020

  33. [33]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum many-bod y scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nature Phys. 17, 675 (2021) , arXiv:2011.09486 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [35]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Exhaustive Character ization of Quantum Many-Body Scars Using Commutant Algebra s, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041069 (2024) , arXiv:2209.03377 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [36]

    Udupa, S

    A. Udupa, S. Sur, S. Nandy, A. Sen, and D. Sen, Weak univer sality, quantum many-body scars, and anomalous infinite-temperature autocorrelations in a one-dimension al spin model with duality, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214430 (2023) , arXiv:2307.11161 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [37]

    Lerose, T

    A. Lerose, T. Parolini, R. Fazio, D. A. Abanin, and S. Pap palardi, Theory of Robust Quantum Many-Body Scars in Long-Range Interacting Systems, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011020 (2025) , arXiv:2309.12504 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    M. Pal, M. Sarkar, K. Sengupta, and A. Sen, Scar-induced imbalance in staggered rydberg ladders, Physical Review B 111, 10.1103/physrevb.111.l161101 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.l161101 2025

  38. [39]

    Pakrouski, P

    K. Pakrouski, P. N. Pallegar, F. K. Popov, and I. R. Kleba nov, Many-body scars as a group invariant sector of hilbert space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 230602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [40]

    Pakrouski, P

    K. Pakrouski, P. N. Pallegar, F. K. Popov, and I. R. Kleba nov, Group theoretic approach to many-body scar states in fermionic lattice models, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043156 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [41]

    Moudgalya, N

    S. Moudgalya, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, η-pairing in Hubbard models: From spectrum generating algeb ras to quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085140 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [42]

    Schindler, N

    F. Schindler, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Exact qua ntum scars in the chiral nonlinear luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B 105, 035146 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [43]

    Kolb and K

    P. Kolb and K. Pakrouski, Stability of the many-body sca rs in fermionic spin-1/2 models, PRX Quantum 4, 040348 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [44]

    Banerjee and A

    D. Banerjee and A. Sen, Quantum Scars from Zero Modes in a n Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory on Ladders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220601 (2021) , arXiv:2012.08540 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [45]

    Biswas, D

    S. Biswas, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Scars from protected zero modes and beyond in U (1) quantum link and quantum dimer models, SciPost Phys. 12, 148 (2022) , arXiv:2202.03451 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [46]

    A. S. Aramthottil, U. Bhattacharya, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuad ra, M. Lewenstein, L. Barbiero, and J. Zakrzewski, Scar stat es in deconfined ̥ 2 lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B 106, L041101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    J. C. Halimeh, L. Barbiero, P. Hauke, F. Grusdt, and A. Bo hrdt, Robust quantum many-body scars in lattice gauge theories, Quantum 7, 1004 (2023) , arXiv:2203.08828 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [48]

    Desaules, D

    J.-Y. Desaules, D. Banerjee, A. Hudomal, Z. Papi´ c, A. S en, and J. C. Halimeh, Weak ergodicity breaking in the Schwin ger model, Phys. Rev. B 107, L201105 (2023) , arXiv:2203.08830 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [49]

    Desaules, A

    J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hudomal, D. Banerjee, A. Sen, Z. Papi ´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Prominent quantum many-body scars in a truncated Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 205112 (2023) , arXiv:2204.01745 [cond-mat.quant-gas] . 17

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    Hayata and Y

    T. Hayata and Y. Hidaka, String-net formulation of hami ltonian lattice yang-mills theories and quantum many-body scars in a nonabelian gauge theory, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 126 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [51]

    Budde, M

    T. Budde, M. Krsti´ c Marinkovi´ c, and J. C. P. Barros, Qu antum many-body scars for arbitrary integer spin in 2+1D Abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094506 (2024) , arXiv:2403.08892 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [52]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Quantum M any-Body Scarring in 2 + 1D Gauge Theories with Dynamical Matter, (2024), arXiv:2403.08858 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [53]

    Calaj` o, G

    G. Calaj` o, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, D. Wanisch, G. Mag nifico, P. Silvi, S. Montangero, and J. C. Hal- imeh, Quantum many-body scarring in a non-Abelian lattice g auge theory, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013322 (2025) , arXiv:2405.13112 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    I. Sau, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Fate of many-body locali zation in an Abelian lattice gauge theory, (2024), arXiv:2405.20379 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [55]

    Many-body localization dynamics from gauge invariance

    M. Brenes, M. Dalmonte, M. Heyl, and A. Scardicchio, Man y-body localization dynamics from gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030601 (2018) , arXiv:1706.05878 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [56]

    Disorder-Free Localization

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, and R. Moessner, Di sorder-Free Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 266601 (2017) , arXiv:1701.04748 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [57]

    P. A. McClarty, M. Haque, A. Sen, and J. Richter, Disorde r-free localization and many-body quantum scars from magne tic frustration, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224303 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [58]

    Karpov, R

    P. Karpov, R. Verdel, Y.-P. Huang, M. Schmitt, and M. Hey l, Disorder-free localization in an interacting 2d lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 130401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [59]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Disorder -Free Localization in 2 + 1D Lattice Gauge Theories with Dynamical Matter, (2023), arXiv:2301.07720 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [60]

    Jeyaretnam, T

    J. Jeyaretnam, T. Bhore, J. J. Osborne, J. C. Halimeh, an d Z. Papi´ c, Hilbert space fragmentation at the origin of dis order- free localization in the lattice Schwinger model, Commun. Phys. 8, 172 (2025) , arXiv:2409.08320 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [61]

    P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollm ann, Ergodicity breaking arising from hilbert space fragme ntation in dipole-conserving hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011047 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [62]

    Khemani, M

    V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Localizati on from hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174204 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [63]

    Mukherjee, D

    B. Mukherjee, D. Banerjee, K. Sengupta, and A. Sen, Mini mal model for hilbert space fragmentation with local constr aints, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155117 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [64]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum m any-body scars and hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results (2021), arXiv:2109.00548 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [65]

    K. Lee, A. Pal, and H. J. Changlani, Frustration-induce d emergent hilbert space fragmentation, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235133 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [66]

    Chattopadhyay, B

    A. Chattopadhyay, B. Mukherjee, K. Sengupta, and A. Sen , Strong Hilbert space fragmentation via emergent quantum drums in two dimensions, SciPost Phys. 14, 146 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [67]

    Khudorozhkov, A

    A. Khudorozhkov, A. Tiwari, C. Chamon, and T. Neupert, H ilbert space fragmentation in a 2D quantum spin system with subsystem symmetries, SciPost Phys. 13, 098 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [68]

    Ghosh, K

    S. Ghosh, K. Sengupta, and I. Paul, Hilbert space fragme ntation imposed real spectrum of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [69]

    A. N. Ciavarella, C. W. Bauer, and J. C. Halimeh, Generic Hilbert Space Fragmentation in Kogut–Susskind Lattice Gau ge Theories, (2025), arXiv:2502.03533 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [70]

    Y. H. Kwan, P. H. Wilhelm, S. Biswas, and S. A. Parameswar an, Minimal hubbard models of maximal hilbert space fragmentat ion (2023), arXiv:2304.02669 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [71]

    P. H. Harkema, M. Iversen, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Hilbert s pace fragmentation from lattice geometry, Phys. Rev. A 110, 023301 (2024) , arXiv:2404.07825 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [72]

    Stahl, O

    C. Stahl, O. Hart, and R. Nandkishore, Towards absolute ly stable ergodicity breaking in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 111, L020302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [73]

    D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and the quantum hard-core dimer gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988)

    work page 1988

  73. [74]

    S. A. Kivelson, D. S. Rokhsar, and J. P. Sethna, Topology of the resonating valence-bond state: Solitons and high-T c superconductivity, Physical Review B 35, 8865 (1987)

    work page 1987

  74. [75]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Three-dimensional resona ting-valence-bond liquids and their excitations, Phys. Rev. B 68, 184512 (2003)

    work page 2003

  75. [76]

    Bonˇ ca, S

    J. Bonˇ ca, S. Maekawa, and T. Tohyama, Numerical approa ch to the low-doping regime of the t− j model, Phys. Rev. B 76, 035121 (2007)

    work page 2007

  76. [77]

    Hermele, M

    M. Hermele, M. P. A. Fisher, and L. Balents, Pyrochlore p hotons: Theu(1)spin liquid in as=12three-dimensional fru strated magnet, Physical Review B 69, 10.1103/physrevb.69.064404 (2004)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.064404 2004

  77. [78]

    Banerjee, S

    A. Banerjee, S. V. Isakov, K. Damle, and Y. B. Kim, Unusua l liquid state of hard-core bosons on the pyrochlore lattice , Physical Review Letters 100, 10.1103/physrevlett.100.047208 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.047208 2008

  78. [79]

    Sikora, F

    O. Sikora, F. Pollmann, N. Shannon, K. Penc, and P. Fulde , Quantum liquid with deconfined fractional excitations in t hree dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 247001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  79. [80]

    Sikora, N

    O. Sikora, N. Shannon, F. Pollmann, K. Penc, and P. Fulde , Extended quantum u(1)-liquid phase in a three-dimensional quantum dimer model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115129 (2011) . 18

    work page 2011

  80. [81]

    M. J. P. Gingras and P. A. McClarty, Quantum Spin Ice: A Se arch for Gapless Quantum Spin Liquids in Pyrochlore Magnets, Rept. Prog. Phys. 77, 056501 (2014) , arXiv:1311.1817 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.