Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Instant Folded Strings, Dark Energy and a Cyclic Bouncing Universe

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a complete cyclic universe from string-theoretic ingredients, where a gas of instant folded strings violates the null energy condition to mediate both the bounce and a transient dark-energy phase.

desk verdict A serious, coherent cyclic-cosmology construction with a real load-bearing gap—the IFS fluid description is imported from prior work—but worth a careful referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09745 v1 pith:MVHSACKM submitted 2025-08-13 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Nissan Itzhaki , Uri Peleg , Paul J. Steinhardt This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th MSC 83F0583E3081T30 PACS 98.80.-k98.80.Cq11.25.-w
keywords instantfoldedstringscycliccosmologybouncinguniversenullenergyconditiondilatondarkenhancedsymmetrypointslowcontraction
topics Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a complete, self-consistent cyclic bouncing cosmology can be built from ingredients native to string theory, without ever leaving perturbative control: string coupling $g_s \ll 1$ and temperature well below the string scale at all times. The central actor is the instant folded string (IFS), a classically produced fundamental string that is much lighter and longer than ordinary strings and violates the null energy condition. In this construction IFSs do double duty: their negative pressure turns a contracting universe around in a smooth bounce, and later their friction on the dilaton creates a transient dark-energy phase that naturally hands over to slow contraction. If correct, the model eliminates the initial singularity and inflation's multiverse problem, and makes two stated falsifiable predictions: no primordial tensor modes (hence no B-mode polarization in the CMB) and dark energy that changes with time and brings accelerated expansion to an end.

What carries the argument

Instant folded strings (IFSs): closed folded fundamental strings nucleated classically only when $\dot\phi > 0$, much lighter than the string mass yet much longer than the string length. Their stress tensor has positive bulk tension cancelled exactly by negative null energy at the folds, so a gas obeys $\rho_{\mathrm{IFS}}=0$, $p_{\mathrm{IFS}}=-\gamma\dot\phi^2/(3g_s^2)$; production rate $\Gamma_{\mathrm{IFS}}=(\partial_\mu\phi)^2/(32\pi^6)\Theta(\dot\phi)$. This negative pressure violates the null energy condition and feeds the IFS-friction term that carries both the bounce and the late-time dark-energy phase. The other load-bearing ingredient is the enhanced symmetry point: a $\chi$ field

What would settle it

Compute the next-order string-loop or $\alpha'$ correction to the single-IFS energy-momentum tensor in a time-dependent dilaton background: if $\rho_{\mathrm{IFS}} = 0$ fails at the order relevant to the bounce, the central mechanism is unsupported. Observationally, a CMB experiment that detects primordial B-mode polarization at the level predicted by single-field inflation would falsify the model's tensor-mode prediction; likewise, a measurement showing dark energy's equation of state is constant at $w = -1$ and acceleration never ends would falsify the cycle's late-time phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Claims a working cyclic universe in four-dimensional dilaton-gravity. Each cycle: the dilaton rolls toward weak coupling during contraction, crosses an enhanced symmetry point where $\chi$-particle production brakes and reverses it; with $\dot\phi > 0$, instant folded strings nucleate classically. Their stress-energy ($\rho_{\mathrm{IFS}}=0$, $p_{\mathrm{IFS}}=-\gamma \dot\phi^2/(3g_s^2)$) violates the null energy condition and produces a smooth bounce. Later, after radiation and matter domination, IFS friction creates an effective dark-energy density $V - V'/(\sqrt{8}\kappa)$ that is positive even when $V<0$, driving accelerated expansion with $w<-1$ that ends in slow contraction. A worked

Load-bearing premise

The scenario collapses if the effective description of a gas of instant folded strings — exact cancellation of positive bulk string energy against negative fold energy, giving $\rho_{\mathrm{IFS}} = 0$ and $p_{\mathrm{IFS}} = -\gamma \dot\phi^2/(3 g_s^2)$ — is spoiled by string-loop or curvature corrections, or if averaging the single-string stress tensor into the fluid equations (3.10) is invalid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The current cosmic acceleration is not eternal: dark energy changes with time, crosses $w = -1$, and eventually hands over to slow contraction, so expansion ends before the next bounce.
  • No primordial gravitational waves are generated, so CMB B-mode polarization should remain absent; a detection would contradict the model.
  • The universe has no initial singularity and no multiverse: every stage is described classically and perturbatively, keeping the model predictive.
  • The bounce occurs at low curvature with $g_s \ll 1$ and reheat temperature below the string scale, suppressing quantum-gravity and massive-string corrections throughout the cycle.
  • Net expansion per cycle (about $e^{45}$ in the worked example) dilutes entropy from earlier cycles, so each cycle starts with only the entropy generated by reheating.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the IFS fluid equations survive higher-order corrections, the same NEC-violating mechanism could appear in other time-dependent string backgrounds (for example near black-hole interiors), changing standard expectations about singularities there.
  • Because the dark-energy phase is triggered whenever $\dot\phi > 0$ in a dilaton-gravity cosmology, transient $w < -1$ phases may be a generic string-theory signature rather than a feature special to cyclic models.
  • The clear split between no-B-modes and observable-B-modes predictions means next-generation CMB polarization surveys can distinguish this class of cyclic models from inflation even if distance measurements agree.
  • The ESP stopping condition (4.8) is a critical threshold: if backreaction beyond the production formula (4.1) shifts it substantially, the cycle could collapse instead of bounce, making a full quantum treatment of $\chi$ production the natural next test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a complete cyclic bouncing cosmology in four-dimensional dilaton gravity, combining a perturbative dilaton potential, an enhanced symmetry point (ESP) that halts and reverses the dilaton, and instant folded strings (IFSs). The IFSs are claimed to violate the null energy condition, thereby mediating a nonsingular bounce, and later to source a transient dark-energy phase that matches current observations before transitioning to slow contraction. The authors provide analytic estimates for each stage, a worked numerical example with g_s<0.1 and T_rh~1e8 GeV, and state two falsifiable predictions: no primordial B-mode polarization and time-varying dark energy. The manuscript depends crucially on the IFS effective fluid equations imported from the authors' prior work [64], and it fits the dark-energy amplitude via the potential coefficient c_2.

Significance. If the construction is correct, this is a significant step: a cyclic universe built from string-theoretic ingredients, with a controlled background and explicit observational signatures, would address longstanding problems of inflationary cosmology. Independent spot checks confirm several algebraic identities, including the effective potential V_eff = V - V'/(sqrt(8) kappa), the form rho_DE = (1/2)c_2 g_s^6, the slow-contraction attractor epsilon = 9, and the existence of a non-singular bounce in the approximate equations. However, the central IFS fluid description is imported rather than derived, and there are sign and factor inconsistencies in the bounce and dark-energy formulas. The paper is promising but requires substantial revision before the claims are supported as written.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (3.5)–(3.10)] The transition from the single-IFS energy-momentum tensor (3.5) to the fluid description (3.7)–(3.8) and the equations of motion (3.10a–d) is not derived in this manuscript. The text asserts that a uniform gas has rho_IFS=0 due to near-cancellation, but the averaging over finite-lifetime IFSs, the use of the production rate (3.4), and the isotropization of null-fold configurations are not shown. Both the bounce (§5) and the IFS-induced dark energy (§6) depend on this import; without it the two central claims are unsupported. The authors should either provide the gas-averaging calculation or explicitly state it as an assumption with a clear validity range.
  2. [§5, Eqs. (5.5)–(5.7)] Solving (5.3b) with V'_chi = -lambda_chi n/a^3 gives rho_{r-IFS} = (sqrt(2)/kappa) lambda_chi n (1/a^3 - a_*/a^4), not Eq. (5.5), which is missing the factor lambda_chi. Consequently Eq. (5.6) is not the correct combination: the symbol g in 'g kappa |...|' is undefined, and if g is meant to be lambda_chi, the expression still does not match the solution of (5.3b). The bounce scale factor (5.7) should be a_b = a_*/(1 + kappa|Delta phi|/sqrt(2)) after the lambda_chi factors cancel, not the form displayed. Because (5.7) and (5.8) are the quantitative content of the bounce, this must be corrected and the subsequent analysis re-verified.
  3. [§6, Eqs. (6.6)–(6.7)] There is a sign-convention inconsistency in the central dark-energy formula. Under the convention stated in (6.5)–(6.6), with c_2 < 0 and V = c_1 g_s^4 + c_2 g_s^6 + ..., the effective potential is V_eff = V - V'/(sqrt(8) kappa) = -(1/2)c_2 g_s^6 > 0. Eq. (6.7) instead gives rho_DE = (1/2)c_2 g_s^6, which would be negative. Appendix A uses a different convention, V = -c_2 g_s^6 with c_2 > 0, yielding the positive rho_DE. The two conventions must be reconciled; as written, Eq. (6.7) is ambiguous and the sign of the dark-energy density depends on an unstated convention.
  4. [§6, Eq. (6.7) and Appendix A] The amplitude of the dark energy is fitted, not predicted. Appendix A states that c_2 is specified only after identifying g_s 'today' so that rho_DE matches the observed dark-energy density (Eqs. (A.12)–(A.13)), and the equation-of-state correction (6.8) is taken from the authors' prior work [64]. Thus the model predicts the time-dependence and the w<−1 to w>−1 crossing, but not the observed dark-energy scale. The abstract's phrase 'robustly predicts time-varying IFS-induced dark energy' should be qualified to make clear that the overall amplitude is an input, not an output, of the construction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.5)] The Bianchi identity for the IFS sector alone, with rho_IFS=0 and p_IFS<0, cannot hold for H != 0. Please clarify that this is an effective conservation law that includes energy exchange with the dilaton, consistent with the source term in Eq. (3.10d).
  2. [§5, Eq. (5.6)] The symbol g appearing in 'g kappa |phi_* - phi_ESP|/sqrt(2)' is undefined. If it is a typo, please correct it; the derivation of the bounce scale factor depends on this expression.
  3. [§4, Eq. (4.8)] The 'numerically precise' critical value 2.1131 x 10^-5 should be accompanied by a short derivation or a reference to the numerical method used; as written it appears as a magic number.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption describes V_eff as a double-valued function of phi, but the two branches are not labeled by the sign of phidot. Labeling the branches would help the reader connect the figure to the discussion in the text.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central IFS dynamics are imported from the authors' own [64] and the dark-energy amplitude is fitted to today's observations; the cyclic construction retains independent content.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3, Eqs. (3.7)-(3.8) and (3.10a-d); used in Sections 5 and 6]
    "In [64] it was shown that p_IFS = −γ φdot^2/(3 g_s^2) ... The resulting dilaton-gravity equations of motion that describe the cyclic evolution are [64]."

    The two headline effects—the NEC-violating bounce (Sec. 5) and the IFS-induced dark-energy phase (Sec. 6)—are obtained by solving Eqs. (3.10a-d), whose source terms and pressure are exactly the p_IFS formula imported from [64]. The paper does not re-derive the gas-averaged fluid form from the single-string tensor (3.5); it asserts the near-cancellation and then cites [64] for the pressure and equations of motion. Since [64] is by the same authors (Itzhaki and Peleg) and the formula contains a free parameter γ, the central physical mechanism is not established within the present derivation chain but rests on a load-bearing self-citation.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Appendix A, paragraph 'The potential' and Eq. (A.12)]
    "We specify c2 only after identifying the value of g_s “today,” so that our expression for the effective potential V_eff agrees with the dark-energy density observed today."

    The model's ρ_DE = (1/2)c2 g_s^6 (Eq. 6.7) is the quantity that 'accounts for the present phase of accelerated expansion.' The amplitude c2 is fixed by matching today's observed dark-energy density, so agreement at z=0 is by construction. The claimed prediction is the time variation, but the value of g_s today and the potential form are also chosen so that the dark-energy transition happens at the observed epoch; hence part of the 'prediction' is fitted input rather than derived output.

full rationale

The paper is a self-consistent construction rather than a derivation from a single first-principles calculation. Its genuinely independent pieces include the in-paper ESP stopping analysis (Sec. 4), the explicit bounce solution from the assumed equations (Sec. 5), and the slow-contraction phenomenology imported from external or semi-external literature. However, the two novel physical ingredients—NEC-violating IFS pressure and the IFS-induced dark energy—are taken directly from the authors' own [64] via Eqs. (3.7)-(3.8) and (3.10a-d). That self-citation is load-bearing because without p_IFS = −γ φdot^2/(3g_s^2) the bounce and the dark-energy phase do not follow. Additionally, the amplitude of the dark-energy density is fitted to today's observations by choosing c2 in Appendix A, so the model's agreement with the current accelerated-expansion scale is partly by construction. The time-dependence and no-tensor-mode claims are not direct fits and give the model some independent predictive content. Overall circularity is moderate, not total: score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on: (i) the IFS effective description imported from the same group's prior work ([64, 68, 70]); (ii) the standard ESP mechanism ([66]); (iii) an assumed perturbative potential with a specific sign structure; and (iv) seven free parameters, of which c_2 is fitted to the observed dark-energy density and the rest are constrained by consistency requirements or aesthetics. The only invented entities are the IFSs and their negative-energy decay products, both from prior work; the chi field is standard moduli trapping. The honest accounting is: one fitted amplitude, one unproven landscape assumption, and inherited IFS physics.

free parameters (7)
  • c_2 (two-loop dilaton potential coefficient) = not numerically quoted; fixed so rho_DE = (1/2) c_2 g_s^6 today equals the observed dark-energy density
    Appendix A: "We specify c_2 only after identifying the value of g_s today, so that our expression for the effective potential V_eff agrees with the dark-energy density observed today." Sign and size (|c_2| >> c_1, c_2 < 0) are assumed.
  • c_3 (three-loop coefficient) = chosen so g_s|max = sqrt(c_2/c_3) = 0.1 in the worked example (A.3)
    Positive coefficient that bounds the potential from below and sets the stopping point SP. Its existence and sign are postulated for the string landscape.
  • c_1 (one-loop coefficient) = omitted in the worked example; constrained c_1 < 0 with mu = gamma c_2/c_1 >> 1 (6.6)
    The g_s^4 term cancels out of the effective dark-energy potential (Section 6); its value enters only through mu.
  • gamma (IFS dimensionless pressure/lifetime coefficient) = gamma = 5e-17 in the worked example (A.10)
    Dimensionless coefficient in p_IFS = -gamma phidot^2/(3 g_s^2). Lower bound from observations (6.10), upper bound from e-fold count (A.11); the worked value is chosen as low as possible for the plot.
  • lambda_chi (ESP coupling) = lambda_chi = 10^-3 in the worked example (A.8)
    ESP coupling controlling the chi production rate (4.1); chosen two orders of magnitude below the criticality bound (4.8).
  • g_ESP / phi_ESP (position of the enhanced symmetry point) = g_s|min approximately g_ESP = 10^-10 in the worked example (A.6)
    Position of the ESP sets the weakest coupling reached and, through (A.5), the reheat temperature of about 10^8 GeV.
  • tau_chi (lifetime of chi particles) = tau_chi = 100 t_* in the worked example (A.9)
    Lifetime of the chi particles before decay; must exceed the stopping time t_* so the ESP can brake the dilaton and trigger the bounce. Chosen arbitrarily.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption IFS gas description: rho_IFS approximately 0 with p_IFS = -gamma phidot^2/(3 g_s^2) < 0 (3.7)-(3.8)
    Basis for both the bounce (Section 5) and the dark energy phase (Section 6). Imported from [64, 68]; the exact bulk/fold energy cancellation is not re-derived.
  • domain assumption IFS production rate Gamma_IFS = (d_mu phi)^2/(32 pi^6) Theta(phidot) (3.4)
    From [70]; the Theta(phidot) factor gives the cycle its built-in arrow of time, IFSs only when the dilaton runs toward strong coupling.
  • domain assumption ESP braking: chi becomes massless at phi_ESP with production n_chi = (lambda_chi phidot_ESP)^(3/2)/(2 pi)^3 and induced potential V_chi = lambda_chi n_chi |phi - phi_ESP| (2.2)-(2.3), (4.1)
    Standard moduli trapping from [66]; the only mechanism that halts the dilaton before collapse in the contracting phase.
  • ad hoc to paper Dilaton potential of the form V = sum c_j g_s^(2+2j) with c_1, c_2 < 0, mu >> 1, and positive higher-order terms (2.1), (6.6), (A.1)
    Required sign structure for the dark energy phase and for a bounded-below potential with a stopping point. The paper states this is plausible in the landscape, without a construction.
  • domain assumption IFS lifetime tau_IFS ~ l_s/g_s with decay products that are radiation-like and can carry negative energy (3.10d), (5.5)
    From [64]; the negative rho_{r-IFS} proportional to 1/a^4 term is what overtakes the positive chi density and triggers the bounce.
invented entities (2)
  • Instant folded strings (IFSs) independent evidence
    purpose: NEC-violating objects produced when phidot > 0; they mediate the bounce and generate the IFS-induced dark energy phase
    Introduced by Itzhaki in [65]; central here. Falsifiable handle: the predicted time-varying w(z) crossing -1 is testable with BAO surveys, and the no-B-mode prediction is testable with CMB experiments.
  • Negative-energy IFS decay radiation (rho_{r-IFS} < 0)
    purpose: Scales as 1/a^4 during contraction, overtakes the positive chi energy density, and forces H through zero at the bounce (5.5)-(5.7)
    Emergent property of the IFS sector from [64]; no independent observational handle beyond the same dark-energy signature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Instant Folded Strings, Dark Energy and a Cyclic Bouncing Universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MVHSACKM

@misc{pith2026250809745,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Instant Folded Strings, Dark Energy and a Cyclic Bouncing Universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MVHSACKM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09745}
}
abstract

We present a wholly self-consistent, complete cyclic bouncing cosmology based on components drawn from string theory and constructed in a way that is under perturbative control throughout (e.g., with temperature much less than the string scale and string coupling $g_s \ll 1$ at all times). The cyclic evolution is governed by standard dilaton-gravity in $(3+1)$-dimensions with a perturbatively generated potential and a coupling between the dilaton and a second field that becomes massless at $\phi= \phi_{ESP}$, resulting in an enhanced symmetry point (ESP) that prevents the dilaton from running all the way to zero coupling. A central role is played by instant folded strings (IFSs) - fundamental strings with the unusual property of being much lighter than the string mass while extending far beyond the string length, and violating the Null Energy Condition (NEC). IFSs are produced classically when the string coupling grows with time, which occurs at two critical points in each cycle. In turn, they fulfill a dual function: enabling cosmological bounces and initiating transient epochs of dark-energy domination that naturally transition into slow contraction. The resulting cosmology eliminates the cosmic singularity and multiverse problems of big bang inflationary models and robustly predicts time-varying IFS-induced dark energy and the absence of primordial B-mode polarization in the cosmic microwave background.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effects of the ekpyrotic mechanism on inflationary phase in loop quantum cosmologies

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In LQC and mLQC-I, tuned ekpyrotic-plus-inflation potentials can yield w>1 at the bounce and at least 60 e-folds of post-bounce inflation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [64]

    Instant Cosmology,

    N. Itzhaki and U. Peleg, “Instant Cosmology,”Journal of High Energy Physics, 12 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Difficulties with inflationary cosmology,

    R. Penrose, “Difficulties with inflationary cosmology,”A.ls N.Y.Acad.Sci., vol. 571, pp. 249–264, 1989

    work page 1989

  3. [2]

    Wave function of the universe,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Wave function of the universe,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 28, pp. 2960–2975, Dec 1983

    work page 1983

  4. [3]

    S. M. Carroll,From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. New York: Plume, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [4]

    Unitary Evolution and Cosmological Fine-Tuning,

    S. M. Carroll and H. Tam, “Unitary Evolution and Cosmological Fine-Tuning,” 7 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [5]

    Initial conditions problem in cosmological inflation revisited,

    D. Garfinkle, A. Ijjas, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Initial conditions problem in cosmological inflation revisited,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 843, p. 138028, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Smoothing and flattening the universe through slow contraction versus inflation,

    A. Ijjas, P. J. Steinhardt, D. Garfinkle, and W. G. Cook, “Smoothing and flattening the universe through slow contraction versus inflation,”Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics, vol. 2024, no. 07, p. 077, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Hori- zon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    A. D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Hori- zon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,”Phys.Lett., vol. B108, pp. 389–393, 1982

    work page 1982

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking,

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking,”Phys.Rev.Lett., vol. 48, pp. 1220–1223, 1982

    1982

  2. [9]

    A Prescription for Successful New Inflation,

    P. Steinhardt and M. S. Turner, “A Prescription for Successful New Inflation,” Phys.Rev., vol. D29, pp. 2162–2171, 1984

    1984

  3. [10]

    Natural inflation,

    P. J. Steinhardt, “Natural inflation,” inThe Very Early Universe(G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and S. T. C. Siklos, eds.), pp. 251–266, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983

    1983

  4. [11]

    The Birth of Inflationary Universes,

    A. Vilenkin, “The Birth of Inflationary Universes,”Phys.Rev., vol. D27, p. 2848, 1983

    1983

  5. [12]

    Eternal chaotic inflation,

    A. D. Linde, “Eternal chaotic inflation,”Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 81– 85, 1986

    1986

  6. [13]

    Eternally Existing Self-reproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,

    A. D. Linde, “Eternally Existing Self-reproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Lett., vol. B175, pp. 395–400, 1986. 34

    1986

  7. [14]

    Probabilities in the inflationary multiverse,

    J. Garriga, D. Schwartz-Perlov, A. Vilenkin, and S. Winitzki, “Probabilities in the inflationary multiverse,”JCAP, vol. 0601, p. 017, 2006

    2006

  8. [15]

    Carr, ed.,Universe or Multiverse?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007

    B. Carr, ed.,Universe or Multiverse?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

  9. [16]

    Eternal inflation and its implications,

    A. H. Guth, “Eternal inflation and its implications,”J. Phys., vol. A40, pp. 6811–6826, 2007

    2007

  10. [17]

    Prediction and explanation in the multiverse,

    J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, “Prediction and explanation in the multiverse,”Physical Review D, vol. 77, p. 043526, 2008

    2008

  11. [18]

    A brief history of the multiverse,

    A. Linde, “A brief history of the multiverse,”Reports on Progress in Physics, 2015

    2015

  12. [19]

    The quantum multiverse,

    Y. Nomura, “The quantum multiverse,”Scientific American, vol. 316, no. 3, pp. 28–35, 2017

    2017

  13. [20]

    Constraints on generalized inflationary cosmologies,

    L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, “Constraints on generalized inflationary cosmologies,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 244, pp. 541–548, 1984

    1984

  14. [21]

    The perturbation spectrum evolving from a quantum fluctuation in a de sitter space,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “The perturbation spectrum evolving from a quantum fluctuation in a de sitter space,”JETP Letters, vol. 30, pp. 682–685, 1983. Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30, 719–723 (1983)

    1983

  15. [22]

    Toward an understanding of foreground emis- sion in the bicep2 region,

    R. Flauger, J. C. Hill, and D. N. Spergel, “Toward an understanding of foreground emis- sion in the bicep2 region,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2014, no. 08, p. 039, 2014

    2014

  16. [23]

    A joint analysis of bicep2/keck array and planck data,

    BICEP2/Keck and P. Collaborations, “A joint analysis of bicep2/keck array and planck data,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, p. 101301, 2015

    2015

  17. [24]

    Improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves using planck, wmap, and bicep/keck observations through the 2018 observing season,

    B. Collaboration, “Improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves using planck, wmap, and bicep/keck observations through the 2018 observing season,”Physical Re- view Letters, vol. 127, p. 151301, 2021

    2018

  18. [25]

    Trans-planckian issues for inflationary cosmology,

    J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, “Trans-planckian issues for inflationary cosmology,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, p. 123501, 2001

    2001

  19. [26]

    On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,

    P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. Vafa, “On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,”Phys. Lett., vol. B784, pp. 271–276, 2018

    2018

  20. [27]

    The swampland: Introduction and review,

    E. Palti, “The swampland: Introduction and review,”Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 67, no. 6, p. 1900037, 2019. 35

    2019

  21. [28]

    Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,

    A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, “Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,”JHEP, vol. 09, p. 123, 2020

    2020

  22. [29]

    Trans-planckian censorship conjecture and early universe cosmol- ogy,

    R. Brandenberger, “Trans-planckian censorship conjecture and early universe cosmol- ogy,”International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 30, no. 14, p. 2140004, 2021

    2021

  23. [30]

    Holographic origin of tcc and the distance conjecture,

    A. Bedroya, “Holographic origin of tcc and the distance conjecture,”arXiv preprint, 2022

    2022

  24. [31]

    Tcc in the interior of moduli space and its implications for the string landscape and cosmology,

    A. Bedroya, Q. Lu, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Tcc in the interior of moduli space and its implications for the string landscape and cosmology,”arXiv preprint, 2024

    2024

  25. [32]

    Warm Inflation in the light of Swampland Criteria,

    S. Das, “Warm Inflation in the light of Swampland Criteria,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 99, no. 6, p. 063514, 2019

    2019

  26. [33]

    Distance, de Sitter and Trans-Planckian Censorship conjectures: the status quo of Warm Inflation,

    S. Das, “Distance, de Sitter and Trans-Planckian Censorship conjectures: the status quo of Warm Inflation,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 27, p. 100432, 2020

    2020

  27. [34]

    Strengthening the TCC Bound on Inflationary Cosmology,

    R. Brandenberger and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Strengthening the TCC Bound on Inflationary Cosmology,”JCAP, vol. 03, p. 047, 2020

    2020

  28. [35]

    Strengthening the de Sitter swamp- land conjecture in warm inflation,

    R. Brandenberger, V. Kamali, and R. O. Ramos, “Strengthening the de Sitter swamp- land conjecture in warm inflation,”JHEP, vol. 08, p. 127, 2020

    2020

  29. [36]

    Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland,

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, “Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland,”arXiv preprint, 2022

    2022

  30. [37]

    Bouncing Cosmology made simple,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Bouncing Cosmology made simple,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 35, no. 13, p. 135004, 2018

    2018

  31. [38]

    Super- smoothing through Slow Contraction,

    W. G. Cook, I. A. Glushchenko, A. Ijjas, F. Pretorius, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Super- smoothing through Slow Contraction,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 808, p. 135690, 2020

    2020

  32. [39]

    Robustness of slow contraction to cosmic initial conditions,

    A. Ijjas, W. G. Cook, F. Pretorius, P. J. Steinhardt, and E. Y. Davies, “Robustness of slow contraction to cosmic initial conditions,”JCAP, vol. 08, p. 030, 2020

    2020

  33. [40]

    Entropy, black holes, and the new cyclic universe,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Entropy, black holes, and the new cyclic universe,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 824, p. 136823, 2022

    2022

  34. [41]

    Ultralocality and slow contraction,

    A. Ijjas, A. P. Sullivan, F. Pretorius, P. J. Steinhardt, and W. G. Cook, “Ultralocality and slow contraction,”JCAP, vol. 06, p. 013, 2021. 36

    2021

  35. [42]

    The robustness of slow contraction and the shape of the scalar field potential,

    T. Kist and A. Ijjas, “The robustness of slow contraction and the shape of the scalar field potential,”JCAP, vol. 08, no. 08, p. 046, 2022

    2022

  36. [43]

    A Cyclic model of the universe,

    P. J. Steinhardt, N. Turok, and N. Turok, “A Cyclic model of the universe,”Science, vol. 296, pp. 1436–1439, 2002

    2002

  37. [44]

    A new kind of cyclic universe,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “A new kind of cyclic universe,”Phys. Lett., vol. B795, pp. 666–672, 2019

    2019

  38. [45]

    Dark energy, extra dimensions, and the Swampland,

    G. Montefalcone, P. J. Steinhardt, and D. H. Wesley, “Dark energy, extra dimensions, and the Swampland,”JHEP, vol. 06, p. 091, 2020

    2020

  39. [46]

    Rapidly descending dark energy and the end of cosmic expansion,

    C. Andrei, A. Ijjas, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Rapidly descending dark energy and the end of cosmic expansion,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 119, no. 15, p. e2200539119, 2022

    2022

  40. [47]

    DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,

    A. G. Adameet al., “DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 021, 2025

    2024

  41. [48]

    Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,

    K. Lodhaet al., “Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,” 3 2025

    2025

  42. [49]

    Superstrings in the Early Universe,

    R. H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, “Superstrings in the Early Universe,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 316, pp. 391–410, 1989

    1989

  43. [50]

    The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,

    J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, “The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 64, p. 123522, 2001

    2001

  44. [51]

    From big crunch to big bang,

    J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, N. Seiberg, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, “From big crunch to big bang,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 65, p. 086007, 2002

    2002

  45. [52]

    Cosmic Bounces and Cyclic Universes,

    J.-L. Lehners, “Cosmic Bounces and Cyclic Universes,”Class.Quant.Grav., vol. 28, p. 204004, 2011

    2011

  46. [53]

    G-Bounce,

    D. A. Easson, I. Sawicki, and A. Vikman, “G-Bounce,”JCAP, vol. 1111, p. 021, 2011

    2011

  47. [54]

    Nonperturbative analysis of the evolution of cosmological perturbations through a nonsingular bounce,

    B. Xue, D. Garfinkle, F. Pretorius, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Nonperturbative analysis of the evolution of cosmological perturbations through a nonsingular bounce,”Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 8, p. 083509, 2013

    2013

  48. [55]

    Towards Anisotropy-Free and Non-Singular Bounce Cosmology with Scale-invariant Perturbations,

    T. Qiu, X. Gao, and E. N. Saridakis, “Towards Anisotropy-Free and Non-Singular Bounce Cosmology with Scale-invariant Perturbations,”Phys.Rev., vol. D88, p. 043525, 2013. 37

    2013

  49. [56]

    Cosmological Perturbations Through a Non-Singular Ghost-Condensate/Galileon Bounce,

    L. Battarra, M. Koehn, J.-L. Lehners, and B. A. Ovrut, “Cosmological Perturbations Through a Non-Singular Ghost-Condensate/Galileon Bounce,”JCAP, vol. 1407, p. 007, 2014

    2014

  50. [57]

    Fermi-bounce cosmology and the fermion curvaton mechanism,

    S. Alexander, Y.-F. Cai, and A. Marciano, “Fermi-bounce cosmology and the fermion curvaton mechanism,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 745, pp. 97–104, 2015

    2015

  51. [58]

    Classically stable nonsingular cosmological bounces,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Classically stable nonsingular cosmological bounces,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 117, no. 12, p. 121304, 2016

    2016

  52. [59]

    Fully stable cosmological solutions with a non-singular classical bounce,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Fully stable cosmological solutions with a non-singular classical bounce,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 764, pp. 289–294, 2017

    2017

  53. [60]

    Space-time slicing in Horndeski theories and its implications for non-singular bouncing solutions,

    A. Ijjas, “Space-time slicing in Horndeski theories and its implications for non-singular bouncing solutions,”JCAP, vol. 1802, no. 02, p. 007, 2018

    2018

  54. [61]

    Spinor driven cosmic bounces and their cosmological perturbations,

    S. Farnsworth, J.-L. Lehners, and T. Qiu, “Spinor driven cosmic bounces and their cosmological perturbations,”Phys. Rev., vol. D96, no. 8, p. 083530, 2017

    2017

  55. [62]

    Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems,

    R. Brandenberger and P. P., “Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems,”Found. Phys., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 797–850, 2017

    2017

  56. [63]

    Cosmological Bounces Induced by a Fermion Condensate,

    G. Tukhashvili and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmological Bounces Induced by a Fermion Condensate,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 131, no. 9, p. 091001, 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    Stringy instability inside the black hole,

    N. Itzhaki, “Stringy instability inside the black hole,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, 2018

    2018

  58. [66]

    Beauty is attractive: Moduli trapping at enhanced symmetry points,

    L. Kofman, A. Linde, X. Liu, A. Maloney, L. Mcallister, and E. Silverstein, “Beauty is attractive: Moduli trapping at enhanced symmetry points,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, p. 30, may 2004

    2004

  59. [67]

    Is the Superstring Weakly Coupled?,

    M. Dine and N. Seiberg, “Is the Superstring Weakly Coupled?,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 162, pp. 299–302, 1985

    1985

  60. [68]

    The Averaged Null Energy Condition and the Black Hole Interior in String Theory,

    K. Attali and N. Itzhaki, “The Averaged Null Energy Condition and the Black Hole Interior in String Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 943, p. 114631, 2019

    2019

  61. [69]

    String Theory and The Arrow of Time,

    N. Itzhaki, “String Theory and The Arrow of Time,”JHEP, vol. 03, p. 192, 2021. 38

    2021

  62. [70]

    A worldsheet description of instant folded strings,

    A. Hashimoto, N. Itzhaki, and U. Peleg, “A worldsheet description of instant folded strings,”JHEP, vol. 02, p. 088, 2023

    2023

  63. [71]

    A smooth bouncing cosmology with scale invariant spectrum,

    P. Creminelli and L. Senatore, “A smooth bouncing cosmology with scale invariant spectrum,”JCAP, vol. 0711, p. 010, 2007

    2007

  64. [72]

    Scale-invariant perturbations in ekpyrotic cosmologies without fine-tuning of initial conditions,

    A. M. Levy, A. Ijjas, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Scale-invariant perturbations in ekpyrotic cosmologies without fine-tuning of initial conditions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 92, no. 6, p. 063524, 2015

    2015

  65. [73]

    Nonsingular ekpyrotic cosmology with a nearly scale-invariant spectrum of cosmological perturbations and gravitational waves,

    R. H. Brandenberger and Z. Wang, “Nonsingular ekpyrotic cosmology with a nearly scale-invariant spectrum of cosmological perturbations and gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, no. 6, p. 063522, 2020. Published March 20, 2020

    2020

  66. [74]

    Nearly scale-invariant curvature modes from entropy per- turbations during the graceful exit phase,

    A. Ijjas and R. Kolevatov, “Nearly scale-invariant curvature modes from entropy per- turbations during the graceful exit phase,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 10, p. L101302, 2021. 39

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.