Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Dirac quantum criticality in twisted double bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted double bilayer TMDs at hole filling $\nu=2$ undergo a continuous Dirac-semimetal-to-antiferromagnetic-insulator transition of Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg type.

desk verdict Solid HF phase diagram and a concrete new universality-class target for twisted double bilayer WSe2, but the Gross-Neuveu-Heisenberg claim is symmetry-inferred rather than RG-derived, and the abstract oversells it. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04561 v2 pith:B5ZEHWBC submitted 2025-09-04 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elhep-th

Jan Biedermann , Lukas Janssen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords twisteddoublebilayertransitionmetaldichalcogenidesDiracsemimetalantiferromagneticinsulatorGross-Neveu-Heisenberguniversalityclassmoir\'ehoneycomblatticeHartree-FockquantumcriticalityWSe2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that at two holes per moir\'e unit cell, an ABBA-stacked twisted double bilayer transition metal dichalcogenide behaves as a Dirac semimetal whose transition into an antiferromagnetic insulator, tuned by twist angle or pressure, is continuous. It identifies this transition with the (2+1)-dimensional relativistic Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg universality class with $N=2$ four-component Dirac fermions. If the claim is right, the insulating state observed in twisted double bilayer WSe$_2$ would be a N\'eel antiferromagnet with spin order oscillating on the moir\'e scale, and the transition would be a rare direct realization of a fermionic relativistic quantum critical point. The evidence comes from self-consistent Hartree-Fock phase diagrams, a strong-coupling analysis of competing orders, and a symmetry-based low-energy field theory for the critical behavior.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is a symmetry-constrained low-energy action, the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg model: an eight-component Dirac fermion field $\psi$ coupled through a Yukawa term to a real O(3) vector order parameter $\boldsymbol{\varphi}$ in (2+1)-dimensional space-time, with emergent relativistic invariance. The paper identifies this action from the microscopic symmetries: the low-energy fermions carry two moir\'e valleys, two bands, and two spin projections, while the antiferromagnetic order parameter is a spin vector that transforms under SU(2). The analysis combines a continuum moir\'e model with long-range Coulomb interactions, self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations, a strong-coupling chiral-limit argument that selects the two magnetic orders over a charge-density wave, and renormalization-group-invariant crossing-point analyses. The universal exponents quoted are $\beta\approx 1.21$, $\nu\approx 1.20$, $\eta_\varphi\approx 1.01$, and $z=1$, taken from interpolations between lower- and upper-critical-dimension expansions.

What would settle it

Measure the pressure-driven order parameter in a clean twisted double bilayer WSe$_2$ sample with twist just above $\theta_c\simeq 2.7^\circ$: if the staggered magnetization scales as $(p-p_c)^{0.37}$ rather than $(p-p_c)^{1.21}$, or if the transition is first-order, the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg classification is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At hole filling $\nu=2$, the noninteracting spectrum of ABBA-stacked twisted double bilayer TMDs hosts graphene-like Dirac cones at the moir\'e Brillouin-zone corners $\boldsymbol{\kappa}$ and $\boldsymbol{\kappa}'$. The paper argues that Coulomb interactions destabilize this Dirac semimetal at small twist angles, producing a N\'eel-type antiferromagnetic insulator whose staggered spin order has a wavelength set by the moir\'e lattice constant rather than the atomic lattice. The semimetal-to-insulator transition is claimed to be continuous, with emergent Lorentz invariance, and to belong to the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg universality class with eight-component Dirac fermions coupled to an O(3) order parameter. The authors further find that at even smaller twist angles a first-order level crossing leads to a ferromagnetic insulator, and that finite heterostrain gaps the Dirac cones already in the noninteracting limit, producing a crossover from Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg criticality at intermediate temperatures to ordinary (2+1)-dimensional Heisenberg criticality at the lowest temperatures.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at the transition the only critical fluctuations are the eight-component Dirac fermions and the O(3) antiferromagnetic order parameter, and that fluctuations beyond mean field keep the transition continuous.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is correct, twisted double bilayer WSe$_2$ just above the critical twist angle $\theta_c\simeq 2.7^\circ$ is a tunable Dirac quantum critical platform: applying uniaxial pressure of roughly 0.2 to 0.6 GPa drives the system across the semimetal-to-antiferromagnet transition at a fixed twist.
  • The insulating state observed experimentally at filling $\nu=2$ should show a moir\'e-scale spin-density modulation, which could be directly imaged with spin-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy or nitrogen-vacancy-center magnetometry.
  • Quantitative scaling follows from the universality class: the staggered magnetization grows as $(\theta_c-\theta)^{1.21}$ or $(p-p_c)^{1.21}$, the gap as $(\theta_c-\theta)^{1.20}$ with dynamical exponent $z=1$, and the dynamic spin structure factor at criticality scales as $1/\omega$ in the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg regime.
  • In strained samples, the same transition crosses over to (2+1)-dimensional Heisenberg criticality below the strain-induced gap, with smaller exponents $\beta\approx 0.37$ and $\nu\approx 0.71$, providing a sharp temperature-dependent signature.
  • A first-order antiferromagnet-to-ferromagnet transition is predicted at very small twist angles near $1^\circ$, accompanied by a level crossing and spin-split bands.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-based identification should apply to other twisted TMD stacks that form an emergent honeycomb lattice at the $\Gamma$ valley, not just WSe$_2$; the qualitative phase diagram may then transfer to Mo-based and S- or Se-based compounds.
  • Because the continuity of the transition is established within Hartree-Fock plus field-theoretic arguments, a non-perturbative calculation on the same continuum model, for example quantum Monte Carlo, would be a natural independent check of the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg assignment.
  • The strain-induced crossover predicts a specific measurable window, roughly $10\,\mathrm{K} < T < 200\,\mathrm{K}$, in which spin fluctuations follow $S(\omega,0)\sim 1/\omega$; observing the crossover above and below that window would distinguish this scenario from ordinary Heisenberg criticality already at accessible temperatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies twisted double bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides with ABBA stacking at hole filling ν=2 per moiré unit cell. Using a continuum model with long-range Coulomb interactions, the authors first perform a strong-coupling analysis that identifies ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic insulating candidates, and then carry out self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations as functions of twist angle, pressure, and heterostrain. They find a continuous quantum phase transition from a Dirac semimetal to an antiferromagnetic insulator, and claim that this transition belongs to the (2+1)-dimensional relativistic Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg universality class with N=2 four-component Dirac fermions. For finite heterostrain they predict a crossover from Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg to conventional O(3) Heisenberg criticality. The results are compared with recent experiments on twisted double bilayer WSe2, and the authors suggest that the experimentally observed insulator is a Néel-type antiferromagnet with moiré-scale spin modulation.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this work would identify a concrete moiré platform for realizing Dirac quantum criticality of the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg type, with crisp experimental predictions such as an order-parameter exponent β≈1.21, a gap scaling Δ∝(p-p_c)^{ν z} with ν≈1.20 and z=1, and a crossover in the spin structure factor. The paper is careful in many respects: it uses a realistic continuum model including remote-band contributions and a subtraction scheme, provides finite-size extrapolations and crossing-point analyses for the HF phase boundary, treats pressure and strain effects, and makes its data openly available. The strong-coupling analysis is elegant and gives a transparent mechanism for the competition between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic orders. However, the universality-class claim is not derived from the microscopic model, and the comparison with experiment relies on effective permittivity values that are fitted to gaps. These are load-bearing issues for the paper's main conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [VIII A, Eq. (30)] The central claim that the Dirac-semimetal-to-antiferromagnet transition 'belongs to' the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg universality class is inferred from symmetry rather than derived from the microscopic model. In Sec. VIII A, Eq. (30) is written down as the most general low-energy action consistent with the symmetries, and the critical exponents are quoted from the literature; no computation shows that the microscopic model flows to this fixed point. Hartree-Fock cannot rule out a fluctuation-driven first-order transition or the relevance of competing fermion bilinears and bosonic modes. To support the universality-class statement, the authors should either provide a microscopic RG analysis (e.g., a functional RG calculation from the continuum model) or explicitly soften the claim to state that the transition is consistent with GN-Heisenberg criticality under the assumption that the O(3) antiferromagnetic order parameter is the only critical mode.
  2. [V, Fig. 4(c)] The effective permittivity ε_eff is a free parameter, and in the experimental comparison the values ε_eff(1.9°)=51, ε_eff(2.5°)=109, and ε_eff(2.7°)=112 are obtained by matching the Hartree-Fock gap to the experimental gaps, including the critical angle θc=2.7°. The agreement of the phase boundary with experiment is therefore partly a calibration, not an independent prediction. The manuscript should clarify which features of the phase diagram are actually predicted (e.g., the continuous nature of the transition, the pressure dependence) and discuss the sensitivity of the boundary to the choice of ε_eff.
  3. [IV, Eqs. (21)-(23)] The strong-coupling analysis restricts to Slater determinants satisfying [Q,σ_z]=0 and compares only charge-density-wave, ferromagnetic, and antiferromagnetic orders. This does not exclude other instabilities such as valley-polarized, intervalley-coherent, or nematic orders, which could also be relevant near the quantum critical point. Since the universality-class identification in Sec. VIII A assumes that the antiferromagnetic order parameter is the only critical bosonic mode, the possibility of competing order must be addressed explicitly before the GN-Heisenberg classification can be regarded as established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II D] In the sentence 'and Δp⊥ is the pressure-induced change in interlayer spacing', the symbol Δp⊥ should be Δd⊥.
  2. [II B] The sentence 'Such internal screening effects is not captured' should read 'are not captured'.
  3. [V, Fig. 4] The crossing-point analysis for the renormalization-group invariants R_Δ and R_m is described in the text but the curves are not shown; including them would strengthen the evidence for a continuous transition.
  4. [VIII A] The quoted exponents β≈1.21, ν≈1.20, η_φ≈1.01 are presented without uncertainty estimates; please specify the expected accuracy of the interpolation from Ref. [78].
  5. [IX] The phrase 'spin-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy' should be 'spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy', since conventional STM does not provide spin resolution.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Only a minor interaction-parameter fit at the experimental critical point; the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg identification is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. V (Angle-tuned phase diagram), paragraph after Fig. 4(b), around the epsilon_eff estimates.]
    "we estimate ε_eff for twisted double bilayer WSe2 by matching the extrapolated Hartree-Fock gap Δ to experimental data from Ref. [35], yielding ε_eff(1.9°) ≃51, ε_eff(2.5°)≃109, and ε_eff(2.7°)≃112, the latter corresponding to the experimentally observed critical angle θ_c where the gap closes."

    At θ=2.7° the paper chooses ε_eff so that the Hartree-Fock gap vanishes at the experimentally observed critical angle. The statement that the theoretical phase boundary is consistent with the experimental critical point is therefore partly enforced by construction at that point, rather than being a fully independent prediction. The phase boundary at fixed ε_eff=110 (θ_c≈2.7°) is obtained independently from the HF crossing-point analysis, so the circularity is limited to the calibrated comparison point and does not enter the symmetry-based Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg analysis of Sec. VIII.

full rationale

The central universality claim does not reduce to a fitted input. Section VIII A constructs the Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg action from the SU(2) vector order parameter and the eight-component Dirac field by symmetry, and the quoted critical exponents come from prior field-theoretic and numerical studies (including external QMC work) rather than from the present fits. The ε_eff values in Sec. V are openly fitted to the experimental gap for the purpose of a realistic parameter estimate; this calibrates where the experiment sits in the (θ, ε_eff) plane but does not determine the phase-boundary shape away from the fitted points or the fixed-point identification. The assumption that no competing order becomes critical is a physics assumption and a possible correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction. Accordingly, only the minor fitted comparison point is flagged, and the score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central universal claim rests on the assumption that the low-energy theory is the GN-Heisenberg model with only the AFM order parameter (Eq. 30), on the SU(2) symmetry of the Γ-valley bands, and on the accuracy of the Hartree-Fock approximation. The main free parameter is ε_eff, which is fitted to experimental data and strongly influences the phase diagram. No new fundamental entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • ε_eff (effective dielectric permittivity) = 10, 40, 110 (varied); fitted 51 at 1.9°, 109 at 2.5°, 112 at 2.7°
    Controls interaction strength; the qualitative phase diagram (AFM vs FM vs DSM) depends strongly on it. Values are chosen to match the Hartree-Fock gap to experimental data, making the subsequent comparison to experiment partly a fit.
  • p0 (pressure scale for interlayer tunneling) = ≈ 5 GPa
    Estimated from ab initio results for layered TMDs; sets the pressure scale for the pressure-tuned transition. The critical pressure pc ≃ 0.2 GPa depends linearly on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SU(2) spin-rotation symmetry is preserved at the Γ-valley valence band edge; spin-orbit coupling is negligible.
    Required for the Gross-Neuveu-Heisenberg field theory; argued from band structure of Γ-valley double bilayer TMDs (Sec. II C) but not derived.
  • domain assumption At filling ν=2, the only low-energy electronic states are two spin-degenerate Dirac cones at κ and κ'.
    From the noninteracting continuum model (Sec. II); if other bands/valleys approached the Fermi level, the effective field theory would have additional fields.
  • ad hoc to paper The low-energy theory is the GN-Heisenberg action (Eq. 30), with the antiferromagnetic order parameter as the only critical bosonic mode.
    This is the central assumption of Sec. VIII A. The strong-coupling analysis considers CDW and FM as competitors but does not prove they are irrelevant at the transition.
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock mean-field theory captures the competition between candidate ground states and the continuity of the transition.
    The phase diagram (Figs. 2-6) is obtained with HF; fluctuation effects beyond HF could alter the ground state or the order of the transition.
  • ad hoc to paper Approximate chiral symmetry C at small twist angles, although no parameter choice makes it exact.
    Used in the strong-coupling analysis (Sec. IV) to derive the degeneracy of FM and AFM states; antichiral terms are treated perturbatively. This approximation affects quantitative energy competition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dirac quantum criticality in twisted double bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B5ZEHWBC

@misc{pith2026250904561,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dirac quantum criticality in twisted double bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B5ZEHWBC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04561}
}
abstract

We investigate the phase diagram of moir\'e double bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides with ABBA stacking as a function of twist angle and applied pressure. At hole filling $\nu = 2$ per moir\'e unit cell, the noninteracting system hosts a Dirac semimetal with graphene-like low-energy bands in the moir\'e Brillouin zone. At small twist angles, the Fermi velocity is reduced and interactions dominate the low-temperature behavior. A strong-coupling analysis identifies insulating ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates, characterized by spin-density modulations set by the moir\'e scale. Using a realistic continuum model with long-range Coulomb interactions, we perform self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations to study the competition between these states. Varying the twist angle or pressure drives a transition from a Dirac semimetal to an antiferromagnetic insulator, which breaks SU(2) spin rotation and two-fold lattice rotation symmetries. Within a renormalization group analysis of the most general symmetry-allowed low-energy field theory, we show that this semimetal-to-insulator transition is continuous and belongs to the (2+1)D relativistic Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg universality class with $N = 2$ four-component Dirac fermions. Finite heterostrain, relevant in realistic samples, induces a crossover from Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg universality at intermediate temperatures to conventional (2+1)D Heisenberg criticality at the lowest temperatures. Further decreasing the twist angle can cause a level crossing from the antiferromagnetic insulator into a ferromagnetic insulator with spin-split bands. Our results provide a comprehensive theoretical framework that complements and elucidates recent experiments in twisted double bilayer WSe$_2$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04561 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Real-space view of the two inner layers of ABBA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Hartree-Fock energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Charge density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Total and staggered magnetization densities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) shows the distorted real-space charge density in￾duced by heterostrain of magnitude 𝜖 = 0.5% at a twist angle of 𝜃 = 4 ◦ . For this strain strength, the strain-induced gap is small compared to the low-energy bandwidth, Δ𝜖 ∼ 1 meV, so the system will still appear se…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Schematic phase diagram of weakly-strained twisted dou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergent relativistic symmetry from interacting fermions on the honeycomb bilayer

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-03 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    QMC shows the continuous semimetal-insulator transition of interacting spinless fermions on the honeycomb bilayer belongs to the 2+1D Gross-Neveu-Ising class with eight Dirac flavors, confirming emergent relativistic ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [31]

    Janssen and H

    L. Janssen and H. Gies, Critical behavior of the (2 + 1)- dimensional Thirring model, Phys. Rev. D86, 105007 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [1]

    Overlap matrices Our calculations are based on a decomposition of the overlap matricesΛ(k, q)=Λ S(k, q)+ΛA(k, q) into simple symmetric and antisymmetric contributions ΛS/A(k, q) with respect to the chiral symmetry operator 𝜎𝑧 [52]: The combined 𝐶2𝑧T symmetry implies that the overlap matrices in the sublattice basis may contain terms involving 𝜎0 = 12 and𝜎...

  3. [2]

    q 2 12 ! , (10) which effectively removes the strain from the wavevector q before evaluating the Hamiltonian. III. HARTREE-FOCK APPROACH To investigate the phase diagram of the interacting model, we employ a Hartree-Fock mean-field decoupling, approximat- ing the many-body ground state by a single Slater determinant that is optimized self-consistently. Th...

  4. [3]

    We may therefore evaluate their energies using Hartree-Fock theory

    Hartree-Fock treatment The ground states we consider in the strong coupling limit are single Slater determinant states. We may therefore evaluate their energies using Hartree-Fock theory. For a given reduced density matrix𝑃, this amounts to calculating the Hartree-Fock energy 𝐸HF,S[𝑃]=⟨HS⟩ (B14) = 1 2𝐴 ∑︁ q 𝑉q ⟨𝜌S q𝜌S −q⟩− ¯𝜌S q⟨𝜌S −q⟩− ¯𝜌S −q⟨𝜌S q⟩ + ¯𝜌S...

  5. [4]

    Energy functional Due to the SU(2) symmetry of the Hamiltonian, we may simplify the computation of the Hartree-Fock energy by taking n·s→𝑠𝑧 in the following for the otherwise arbitrary unit vector n in Eq. (21). To proceed with the energy evaluation, we first note that the Fock contribution to Eq. (B16), 𝐸F,S[𝑃]= 1 2 ∑︁ k Tr 𝑃ℎS F[𝑃− 14] , (B19) vanishes ...

  6. [5]

    [52], we now rewrite the interacting Hamil- tonian in a form suitable for analytical arguments

    Strong-coupling Hamiltonian Following Ref. [52], we now rewrite the interacting Hamil- tonian in a form suitable for analytical arguments. As dis- cussed in Appendix A, the bare dispersionℎ(k) in Eq. (5) has the formℎ(k) = ℎ0(k)− ℎHF[𝑃ref]( k) with reference density matrix 𝑃ref. Rewriting 𝑃ref = 1 2(14+𝑄ref), we may express the dispersion as ℎ(k)=ℎ0(k)− ℎ...

  7. [6]

    Otsuka, S

    Y. Otsuka, S. Yunoki, and S. Sorella, Universal Quantum Crit- icality in the Metal-Insulator Transition of Two-Dimensional Interacting Dirac Electrons, Phys. Rev. X6, 011029 (2016)

    2016

  8. [7]

    Pujari, T

    S. Pujari, T. C. Lang, G. Murthy, and R. K. Kaul, Interaction- Induced Dirac Fermions from Quadratic Band Touching in Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 086404 (2016)

    2016

Show all 108 references
  1. [8]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011)

    2011

  2. [9]

    I. F. Herbut, Interactions and Phase Transitions on Graphene’s Honeycomb Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 146401 (2006)

    2006

  3. [10]

    I. F. Herbut, V. Juri ˇci´c, and O. Vafek, Relativistic Mott criti- cality in graphene, Phys. Rev. B80, 075432 (2009)

    2009

  4. [11]

    F. F. Assaad and I. F. Herbut, Pinning the Order: The Nature of Quantum Criticality in the Hubbard Model on Honeycomb Lattice, Phys. Rev. X3, 031010 (2013)

    2013

  5. [12]

    Janssen and I

    L. Janssen and I. F. Herbut, Antiferromagnetic critical point on graphene’s honeycomb lattice: A functional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B89, 205403 (2014)

    2014

  6. [13]

    S. Ray, B. Ihrig, D. Kruti, J. A. Gracey, M. M. Scherer, and L. Janssen, Fractionalized quantum criticality in spin-orbital liquids from field theory beyond the leading order, Phys. Rev. B 103, 155160 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    The fermionic operators 𝑓q = (𝑓q,ℓ,𝑠) annihilate electrons with wavector q, layer indexℓ = 1,..., 4, and spin index 𝑠 =↑,↓

    (2) Throughout this work, we adopt the convention thatq= k+ G denotes unrestricted momenta, where k lies within the moir ´e Brillouin zone and G is a moir´e reciprocal lattice vector. The fermionic operators 𝑓q = (𝑓q,ℓ,𝑠) annihilate electrons with wavector q, layer indexℓ = 1,...

  8. [15]

    S. Ray, M. Vojta, and L. Janssen, Quantum critical behavior of two-dimensional Fermi systems with quadratic band touching, Phys. Rev. B98, 245128 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Lee, Emergence of supersymmetry at a critical point of a lattice model, Phys

    S.-S. Lee, Emergence of supersymmetry at a critical point of a lattice model, Phys. Rev. B76, 075103 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Grover, D

    T. Grover, D. N. Sheng, and A. Vishwanath, Emergent Space- Time Supersymmetry at the Boundary of a Topological Phase, Science 344, 280 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    U. F. P. Seifert, X.-Y. Dong, S. Chulliparambil, M. Vojta, H.-H. Tu, and L. Janssen, Fractionalized Fermionic Quantum Crit- icality in Spin-Orbital Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 257202 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Schwab, L

    J. Schwab, L. Janssen, K. Sun, Z. Y. Meng, I. F. Herbut, M. Vojta, and F. F. Assaad, Nematic Quantum Criticality in Dirac Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 157203 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Z. H. Liu, M. Vojta, F. F. Assaad, and L. Janssen, Metallic and Deconfined Quantum Criticality in Dirac Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 087201 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Z. H. Liu, M. Vojta, F. F. Assaad, and L. Janssen, Critical prop- erties of metallic and deconfined quantum phase transitions in Dirac systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 125123 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    =(184, 356,−9) meV, realistic for twisted double bilayer WSe 2, are adopted from Ref. [49]. In order to diagonalize the Hamiltonian, we expand the eigenfunctions in a basis of plane waves as 𝜓k,𝑛(r) = ∑︁ G |G|≤ 4|G1,2| ∑︁ ℓ 𝑢k,𝑛;G,ℓ ei(k+G)· r|ℓ⟩, (A4) where the sum over recip...

  16. [24]

    Ray, Unconventional Gross-Neveu quantum criticality: Interaction-induced SO(3)-biadjoint insulator and emergent SU(3) symmetry, Phys

    S. Ray, Unconventional Gross-Neveu quantum criticality: Interaction-induced SO(3)-biadjoint insulator and emergent SU(3) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B109, 165137 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Fornoville and L

    M. Fornoville and L. Janssen, Fractionalized fermionic multicriticality in anisotropic Kitaev spin-orbital liquids, 15 arXiv:2505.01493

  18. [26]

    Vojta, Y

    M. Vojta, Y. Zhang, and S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transi- tions in d-Wave Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4940 (2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    Huh and S

    Y. Huh and S. Sachdev, Renormalization group theory of ne- matic ordering in 𝑑-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 78, 064512 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Hands, A

    S. Hands, A. Kocic, and J. Kogut, Four-Fermi Theories in Fewer Than Four Dimensions, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 224, 29 (1993)

    1993

  21. [29]

    Gies and L

    H. Gies and L. Janssen, UV fixed-point structure of the three- dimensional Thirring model, Phys. Rev. D82, 085018 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    Braun, H

    J. Braun, H. Gies, and D. D. Scherer, Asymptotic safety: A simple example, Phys. Rev. D83, 085012 (2011)

    2011

  23. [32]

    Gehring, H

    F. Gehring, H. Gies, and L. Janssen, Fixed-point structure of low-dimensional relativistic fermion field theories: Universal- ity classes and emergent symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 92, 085046 (2015)

    2015

  24. [33]

    Dabelow, H

    L. Dabelow, H. Gies, and B. Knorr, Momentum dependence of quantum critical Dirac systems, Phys. Rev. D 99, 125019 (2019)

    2019

  25. [34]

    Hands, Critical flavor number in the 2+ 1D Thirring model, Phys

    S. Hands, Critical flavor number in the 2+ 1D Thirring model, Phys. Rev. D99, 034504 (2019)

    2019

  26. [35]

    Cresswell-Hogg and D

    C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Line of Fixed Points in Gross-Neveu Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 201602 (2023)

    2023

  27. [36]

    Boyack, H

    R. Boyack, H. Yerzhakov, and J. Maciejko, Quantum phase transitions in Dirac fermion systems, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 979 (2021)

    2021

  28. [37]

    I. F. Herbut, Wilson-Fisher fixed points in the presence of Dirac fermions, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 38, 2430006 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    Biedermann and L

    J. Biedermann and L. Janssen, Twist-tuned quantum criticality in moir´e bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B112, L041109 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    Huang, N

    C. Huang, N. Parthenios, M. Ulybyshev, X. Zhang, F. F. As- saad, L. Classen, and Z. Y. Meng, Angle-tuned Gross-Neveu quantum criticality in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Commun. 16, 7176 (2025)

    2025

  31. [40]

    Parthenios and L

    N. Parthenios and L. Classen, Twisted bilayer graphene at charge neutrality: Competing orders of SU(4) Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B108, 235120 (2023)

    2023

  32. [41]

    Hawashin, M

    B. Hawashin, M. M. Scherer, and L. Janssen, Gross-Neveu-XY quantum criticality in moir´e Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B111, 205129 (2025)

    2025

  33. [42]

    L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, P. X. Nguyen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Relativistic Mott transition in strongly correlated artificial graphene, arXiv:2412.07150

    arXiv

  34. [43]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Cr´epel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nat. Commun. 12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  35. [44]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, L. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Kang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Chowdhury, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Continuous Mott transition in semiconductor moir ´e superlat- tices, Nature 597, 350–354 (2021)

    2021

  36. [45]

    Zhang, T

    Y. Zhang, T. Liu, and L. Fu, Electronic structures, charge trans- fer, and charge order in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Phys. Rev. B103, 155142 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Klebl, A

    L. Klebl, A. Fischer, L. Classen, M. M. Scherer, and D. M. Kennes, Competition of density waves and superconductivity in twisted tungsten diselenide, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012034 (2023)

    2023

  38. [47]

    Saigal, L

    N. Saigal, L. Klebl, H. Lambers, S. Bahmanyar, V. Anti ´c, D. M. Kennes, T. O. Wehling, and U. Wurstbauer, Collective Charge Excitations between Moir´e Minibands in Twisted WSe2 Bilayers Probed with Resonant Inelastic Light Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 046902 (2024)

    2024

  39. [48]

    Y. Yang, M. A. Morales, and S. Zhang, Ferromagnetic Semimetal and Charge-Density Wave Phases of Interacting Electrons in a Honeycomb Moir ´e Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 266501 (2024)

    2024

  40. [49]

    C. Xu, J. Li, Y. Xu, Z. Bi, and Y. Zhang, Maximally localized Wannier functions, interaction models, and fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in twisted bilayer MoTe 2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2316749121 (2024)

    2024

  41. [50]

    Angeli and A

    M. Angeli and A. H. MacDonald, Γ valley transition metal dichalcogenide moir ´e bands, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2021826118 (2021)

    2021

  42. [51]

    D. Pei, B. Wang, Z. Zhou, Z. He, L. An, S. He, C. Chen, Y. Li, L. Wei, A. Liang, J. Avila, P. Dudin, V. Kandyba, A. Gi- ampietri, M. Cattelan, A. Barinov, Z. Liu, J. Liu, H. Weng, N. Wang, J. Xue, and Y. Chen, Observation ofΓ-Valley Moir´e Bands and Emergent Hexagonal Lattice ...

    2022

  43. [52]

    Gatti, J

    G. Gatti, J. Issing, L. Rademaker, F. Margot, T. A. de Jong, S. J. van der Molen, J. Teyssier, T. K. Kim, M. D. Watson, C. Ca- cho, P. Dudin, J. Avila, K. C. Edwards, P. Paruch, N. Ubrig, I. Guti´errez-Lezama, A. F. Morpurgo, A. Tamai, and F. Baum- berger, Flat Γ Moir´e Bands ...

    2023

  44. [53]

    H. C. P. Movva, T. Lovorn, B. Fallahazad, S. Larentis, K. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. K. Banerjee, A. H. MacDonald, and E. Tutuc, TunableΓ−𝐾 Valley Populations in Hole-Doped Trilayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 107703 (2018)

    2018

  45. [54]

    B. A. Foutty, J. Yu, T. Devakul, C. R. Kometter, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and B. E. Feldman, Tunable spin and valley excitations of correlated insulators inΓ-valley moir´e bands, Nat. Mater. 22, 731–736 (2023)

    2023

  46. [55]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Rev. Mat.2, 17033 (2017)

    2017

  47. [56]

    Pan, E.-A

    H. Pan, E.-A. Kim, and C.-M. Jian, Realizing a tunable hon- eycomb lattice in ABBA-stacked twisted double bilayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043173 (2023)

    2023

  48. [57]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir ´e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

  49. [58]

    Tarnopolsky, A

    G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Origin of Magic Angles in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019)

    2019

  50. [59]

    Bultinck, E

    N. Bultinck, E. Khalaf, S. Liu, S. Chatterjee, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. Zaletel, Ground State and Hidden Symmetry of Magic-Angle Graphene at Even Integer Filling, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031034 (2020)

    2020

  51. [60]

    S. Liu, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, and A. Vishwanath, Nematic topological semimetal and insulator in magic-angle bilayer graphene at charge neutrality, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013033 (2021)

    2021

  52. [61]

    J. S. Hofmann, E. Khalaf, A. Vishwanath, E. Berg, and J. Y. Lee, Fermionic Monte Carlo Study of a Realistic Model of Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. X12, 011061 (2022)

    2022

  53. [62]

    F. M. Faulstich, K. D. Stubbs, Q. Zhu, T. Soejima, R. Dilip, H. Zhai, R. Kim, M. P. Zaletel, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Interacting models for twisted bilayer graphene: A quantum chemistry approach, Phys. Rev. B107, 235123 (2023). 16

    2023

  54. [63]

    Schutte, J

    W. Schutte, J. De Boer, and F. Jellinek, Crystal structures of tungsten disulfide and diselenide, J. Solid State Chem.70, 207 (1987)

    1987

  55. [64]

    Z. A. H. Goodwin, F. Corsetti, A. A. Mostofi, and J. Lischner, Attractive electron-electron interactions from internal screen- ing in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B100, 235424 (2019)

    2019

  56. [65]

    Z. A. H. Goodwin, V. Vitale, X. Liang, A. A. Mostofi, and J. Lischner, Hartree theory calculations of quasiparticle prop- erties in twisted bilayer graphene, Electron. Struct. 2, 034001 (2020)

    2020

  57. [66]

    Z. A. H. Goodwin, V. Vitale, F. Corsetti, D. K. Efetov, A. A. Mostofi, and J. Lischner, Critical role of device geometry for the phase diagram of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165110 (2020)

    2020

  58. [67]

    M. S. S ´anchez, J. Gonz ´alez, and T. Stauber, Fermi velocity and magic angle renormalization in twisted bilayer graphene, arXiv:2508.12825

    arXiv

  59. [68]

    Mu ˜noz Segovia, V

    D. Mu ˜noz Segovia, V. Cr ´epel, R. Queiroz, and A. J. Millis, Twist-angle evolution of the intervalley-coherent antiferromag- net in twisted WSe2, Phys. Rev. B112, 085111 (2025)

    2025

  60. [69]

    Y. H. Kwan, G. Wagner, N. Bultinck, S. H. Simon, and S. A. Parameswaran, Skyrmions in Twisted Bilayer Graphene: Sta- bility, Pairing, and Crystallization, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031020 (2022)

    2022

  61. [70]

    Brzezi ´nska, S

    M. Brzezi ´nska, S. Grytsiuk, M. R ¨osner, M. Gibertini, and L. Rademaker, Pressure-tuned many-body phases throughΓ-K valleytronics in moir ´e bilayer WSe 2, 2D Mater. 12, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  62. [71]

    Trambly de Laissardi`ere, D

    G. Trambly de Laissardi`ere, D. Mayou, and L. Magaud, Local- ization of Dirac Electrons in Rotated Graphene Bilayers, Nano Lett. 10, 804 (2010)

    2010

  63. [72]

    G. Du, L. Zhao, S. Li, J. Huang, S. Fang, W. Han, J. Li, Y. Du, J. Ming, T. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Kang, X. Li, W. Xu, and Y. Chen, Interlayer engineering of lattice dynamics and elastic constants of 2D layered nanomaterials under pressure, Nat. Commun. 16, 4901 (2025)

    2025

  64. [73]

    Y. Xie, B. Lian, B. J ¨ack, X. Liu, C.-L. Chiu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Spectroscopic signatures of many-body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 572, 101–105 (2019)

    2019

  65. [74]

    D. E. Parker, T. Soejima, J. Hauschild, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Bultinck, Strain-Induced Quantum Phase Transitions in Magic-Angle Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 027601 (2021)

    2021

  66. [75]

    Y. H. Kwan, G. Wagner, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, S. H. Simon, S. A. Parameswaran, and N. Bultinck, Kekul ´e Spiral Order at All Nonzero Integer Fillings in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. X11, 041063 (2021)

    2021

  67. [76]

    V. M. Pereira and A. H. Castro Neto, Strain Engineering of Graphene’s Electronic Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 046801 (2009)

    2009

  68. [77]

    Z. Bi, N. F. Q. Yuan, and L. Fu, Designing flat bands by strain, Phys. Rev. B100, 035448 (2019)

    2019

  69. [78]

    J. Kang, S. Tongay, J. Zhou, J. Li, and J. Wu, Band off- sets and heterostructures of two-dimensional semiconductors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 012111 (2013)

    2013

  70. [79]

    Zeng, W.-B

    F. Zeng, W.-B. Zhang, and B.-Y. Tang, Electronic structures and elastic properties of monolayer and bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides MX2 (M = Mo, W; X = O, S, Se, Te): A comparative first-principles study, Chin. Phys. B 24, 097103 (2015)

    2015

  71. [80]

    Canc `es and C

    E. Canc `es and C. Le Bris, Can we outperform the DIIS ap- proach for electronic structure calculations?, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 79, 82 (2000)

    2000

  72. [81]

    W. S. Yun, S. W. Han, S. C. Hong, I. G. Kim, and J. D. Lee, Thickness and strain effects on electronic structures of tran- sition metal dichalcogenides: 2H-𝑀𝑋 2 semiconductors (𝑀 = Mo, W;𝑋= S, Se, Te), Phys. Rev. B85, 033305 (2012)

    2012

  73. [82]

    Rosenstein, H.-L

    B. Rosenstein, H.-L. Yu, and A. Kovner, Critical exponents of new universality classes, Phys. Lett. B 314, 381 (1993)

    1993

  74. [83]

    Ray and L

    S. Ray and L. Janssen, Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg criticality from competing nematic and antiferromagnetic orders in bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B104, 045101 (2021)

    2021

  75. [84]

    N. Zerf, L. N. Mihaila, P. Marquard, I. F. Herbut, and M. M. Scherer, Four-loop critical exponents for the Gross-Neveu- Yukawa models, Phys. Rev. D96, 096010 (2017)

    2017

  76. [85]

    Ladovrechis, S

    K. Ladovrechis, S. Ray, T. Meng, and L. Janssen, Gross-Neveu- Heisenberg criticality from 2+𝜖 expansion, Phys. Rev. B107, 035151 (2023)

    2023

  77. [86]

    J. A. Gracey, Large𝑁𝑓 quantum field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830032 (2018)

    2018

  78. [87]

    Knorr, Critical chiral Heisenberg model with the functional renormalization group, Phys

    B. Knorr, Critical chiral Heisenberg model with the functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B97, 075129 (2018)

    2018

  79. [88]

    Parisen Toldin, M

    F. Parisen Toldin, M. Hohenadler, F. F. Assaad, and I. F. Herbut, Fermionic quantum criticality in honeycomb and 𝜋-flux Hub- bard models: Finite-size scaling of renormalization-group- invariant observables from quantum Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165108 (2015)

    2015

  80. [89]

    Y. Liu, Z. Wang, T. Sato, M. Hohenadler, C. Wang, W. Guo, and F. F. Assaad, Superconductivity from the condensation of topological defects in a quantum spin-Hall insulator, Nat. Commun. 10, 2658 (2019)

    2019

  81. [90]

    Y. Liu, Z. Wang, T. Sato, W. Guo, and F. F. Assaad, Gross- Neveu Heisenberg criticality: Dynamical generation of quan- tum spin Hall masses, Phys. Rev. B104, 035107 (2021)

    2021

  82. [91]

    Otsuka, K

    Y. Otsuka, K. Seki, S. Sorella, and S. Yunoki, Dirac electrons in the square-lattice Hubbard model with a 𝑑-wave pairing field: The chiral Heisenberg universality class revisited, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235105 (2020)

    2020

  83. [92]

    X. Y. Xu and T. Grover, Competing Nodal 𝑑-Wave Super- conductivity and Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 217002 (2021)

    2021

  84. [93]

    Buividovich, D

    P. Buividovich, D. Smith, M. Ulybyshev, and L. von Smekal, Hybrid Monte Carlo study of competing order in the extended fermionic Hubbard model on the hexagonal lattice, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235129 (2018)

    2018

  85. [94]

    Buividovich, D

    P. Buividovich, D. Smith, M. Ulybyshev, and L. von Smekal, Numerical evidence of conformal phase transition in graphene with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B99, 205434 (2019)

    2019

  86. [95]

    Ostmeyer, E

    J. Ostmeyer, E. Berkowitz, S. Krieg, T. A. L¨ahde, T. Luu, and C. Urbach, Semimetal–Mott insulator quantum phase transi- tion of the Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245105 (2020)

    2020

  87. [96]

    Ostmeyer, E

    J. Ostmeyer, E. Berkowitz, S. Krieg, T. A. L¨ahde, T. Luu, and C. Urbach, Antiferromagnetic character of the quantum phase transition in the Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B104, 155142 (2021)

    2021

  88. [97]

    T. C. Lang and A. M. L ¨auchli, Quantum Monte Carlo Sim- ulation of the Chiral Heisenberg Gross-Neveu-Yukawa Phase Transition with a Single Dirac Cone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 137602 (2019)

    2019

  89. [98]

    Herbut, A Modern Approach to Critical Phenomena (Cam- bridge University Press, 2007)

    I. Herbut, A Modern Approach to Critical Phenomena (Cam- bridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  90. [99]

    Campostrini, M

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Critical exponents and equation of state of the three- dimensional Heisenberg universality class, Phys. Rev. B 65, 144520 (2002). 17

    2002

  91. [100]

    M. V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer, Minimally subtracted six- loop renormalization of𝑂(𝑛)-symmetric𝜙4 theory and critical exponents, Phys. Rev. D96, 036016 (2017)

    2017

  92. [101]

    Cabrera, G

    S. Cabrera, G. De Polsi, and N. Wschebor, Conformal invari- ance constraints in the𝑂(𝑁) models: A study within the non- perturbative renormalization group, Phys. Rev. E111, 054126 (2025)

    2025

  93. [102]

    K. v. Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, O. Pietzsch, and R. Wiesen- danger, Interface-induced chiral domain walls, spin spirals and skyrmions revealed by spin-polarized scanning tunneling mi- croscopy, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 394002 (2014)

    2014

  94. [103]

    S. Hong, M. S. Grinolds, L. M. Pham, D. Le Sage, L. Luan, R. L. Walsworth, and A. Yacoby, Nanoscale magnetometry with NV centers in diamond, MRS Bull. 38, 155–161 (2013)

    2013

  95. [104]

    M. J. Mart ´ınez-P´erez and D. Koelle, NanoSQUIDs: Basics & recent advances, Phys. Sci. Rev.2, 20175001 (2017)

    2017

  96. [105]

    M. Rog, T. J. Blom, D. B. Boltje, J. D. de Haan, R. Fermin, J. Niu, Y. C. Doedes, M. P. Allan, and K. Lahabi, Tapping- mode SQUID-on-tip Microscopy with Proximity Josephson Junctions, arXiv:2508.21575

    arXiv

  97. [106]

    J. F. Schmidt, L. M. Eng, and S. D. Seddon, Toward 3D mag- netic force microscopy: Simultaneous torsional cantilever ex- citation to access a second, orthogonal stray field component, J. Appl. Phys. 136, 113904 (2024)

    2024

  98. [107]

    Hawashin, J

    B. Hawashin, J. Kleeschulte, D. Kurz, and M. M. Scherer, Mean-field study of the relativistic Mott transition and high- order van Hove singularity in twisted double bilayer WSe2, in preparation

  99. [108]

    Dirac quantum crit- icality in twisted double bilayer transition metal dichalco- genides

    J. Biedermann and L. Janssen, Data for “Dirac quantum crit- icality in twisted double bilayer transition metal dichalco- genides”, https://doi.org/10.25532/OPARA-936

    doi

  100. [109]

    S. Fang, R. Kuate Defo, S. N. Shirodkar, S. Lieu, G. A. Tritsaris, and E. Kaxiras, Ab initio tight-binding Hamiltonian for transi- tion metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B92, 205108 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.