pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.05852 · v1 · pith:GYXMUCT6new · submitted 2025-09-06 · 📊 stat.ML · cs.LG· math.ST· stat.TH

Fisher Random Walk: Automatic Debiasing Contextual Preference Inference for Large Language Model Evaluation

classification 📊 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords inferencecontextuallanguagemodelpreferenceacrosscomparisonefficiency
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Motivated by the need for rigorous and scalable evaluation of large language models, we study contextual preference inference for pairwise comparison functionals of context-dependent preference score functions across domains. Focusing on the contextual Bradley-Terry-Luce model, we develop a semiparametric efficient estimator that automates the debiased estimation through aggregating weighted residual balancing terms across the comparison graph. We show that the efficiency is achieved when the weights are derived from a novel strategy called Fisher random walk. We also propose a computationally feasible method to compute the weights by a potential representation of nuisance weight functions. We show our inference procedure is valid for general score function estimators accommodating the practitioners' need to implement flexible deep learning methods. We extend the procedure to multiple hypothesis testing using a Gaussian multiplier bootstrap that controls familywise error and to distributional shift via a cross-fitted importance-sampling adjustment for target-domain inference. Numerical studies, including language model evaluations under diverse contexts, corroborate the accuracy, efficiency, and practical utility of our method.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective

    stat.ML 2026-04 accept novelty 2.0

    A statistical survey of RLHF for LLM alignment that connects preference learning and policy optimization to models like Bradley-Terry-Luce while reviewing methods, extensions, and open challenges.