pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.09636 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-11 · ⚛️ nucl-ex

Current problems of studying relativistic dissociation of light nuclei in nuclear emulsion

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex
keywords relativistic dissociationlight nucleinuclear emulsionalpha clusteringinvariant masscarbon-12 excitationsunstable states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Excitations of carbon-12 to specific states dominate the relativistic break-up of carbon and oxygen into alpha particles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports progress in identifying unstable excited states in the relativistic dissociation of light nuclei recorded in nuclear emulsion. Identification relies on invariant masses computed from the most precise and complete measurements of relativistic fragment emission angles under the approximation of momentum conservation per nucleon. A sympathetic reader cares because these observations clarify how nuclear excitations and clustering appear in high-energy dissociation processes of light nuclei. The work establishes the leading contributions from the 12C(0+2) and 12C(3-) states in three-alpha and four-alpha channels and estimates roles for other states in nitrogen dissociation while opening paths to non-alpha clustering.

Core claim

It is established that excitations 12C(0+2) and 12C(3-) lead in the dissociation 12C to 3 alpha and 16O to 4 alpha. The contribution of 9B and 12C(0+2) decays to the leading channel of 3HeH dissociation of the 14N nucleus is estimated. The motivation and beginning of the analysis of the relativistic dissociation 16O to 12C alpha are presented. Events at the 7Be to 6Li p and 11C to 7Be alpha coupling thresholds point to the prospect of moving beyond alpha-particle clustering.

What carries the argument

Invariant mass determined from accurate measurements of relativistic fragment emission angles in the approximation of conservation of momentum per nucleon of the parent nucleus.

If this is right

  • The 12C(0+2) and 12C(3-) states provide the leading contributions to 12C dissociation into three alphas and 16O dissociation into four alphas.
  • Decays via 9B and 12C(0+2) account for a measurable share of the 3HeH channel in 14N dissociation.
  • The newly motivated 16O to 12C alpha channel offers an additional probe of clustering at relativistic energies.
  • Threshold events observed in 7Be to 6Li p and 11C to 7Be alpha indicate that dissociation can proceed through structures beyond simple alpha-particle clustering.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These angle-based invariant-mass techniques could be applied to dissociation data from other light nuclei to map additional excited states.
  • Confirmation in independent detector systems would strengthen the case for using such states as benchmarks in nuclear reaction models.
  • The observed threshold couplings suggest that future emulsion or electronic detector runs could quantify the relative weight of non-alpha configurations in light-nucleus breakup.

Load-bearing premise

The approximation that momentum per nucleon is conserved from the parent nucleus enables reliable invariant mass calculation from emission angles alone.

What would settle it

High-resolution angle measurements in emulsion that produce invariant-mass distributions lacking clear peaks at the accepted energies of the 12C(0+2) and 12C(3-) states within the three-alpha and four-alpha channels would contradict the claimed dominance of these excitations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09636 by A.A. Zaitsev, D.A. Artemenkov, I.G. Zarubina, N.G. Peresadko, N.K. Kornegrutsa, N. Marimuthu, P.I. Zarubin, V.V. Rusakova.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Macrophotograph of the coherent dissociation event of the nucleus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Distribution over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Distribution over invariant masses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distribution of 3-prong events C + He (+ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results of measurements of events [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Distribution of invariant masses of rare events [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Coherent dissociation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The progress of the study of unstable states in relativistic dissociation events of light nuclei in nuclear emulsion is presented. Identification of these states is possible by means of the invariant mass determined from the most accurate and complete measurements of relativistic fragment emission angles in the approximation of conservation of momentum per nucleon of the parent nucleus. It is established that excitations $^{12}\mathrm{C}(0^{+}_{2})$ and $^{12}\mathrm{C}(3^{-})$ lead in the dissociation $^{12}\mathrm{C} \rightarrow 3\alpha$ and $^{16}\mathrm{O} \rightarrow 4\alpha$. The contribution of $^{9}\mathrm{B}$ and $^{12}\mathrm{C}(0^{+}_{2})$ decays to the leading channel of $^{3}\mathrm{HeH}$ dissociation of the $^{14}\mathrm{N}$ nucleus is estimated. The motivation and the beginning of the analysis of the relativistic dissociation $^{16}\mathrm{O}$$\rightarrow$$^{12}\mathrm{C}\alpha$ are presented. The presented relativistic dissociation events at the $^{7}\mathrm{Be}$$\rightarrow$$^{6}\mathrm{Li}p$ and $^{11}\mathrm{C}$$\rightarrow$$ ^{7}\mathrm{Be}\alpha$ coupling threshold point to the prospect of moving beyond $\alpha$-particle clustering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports progress in experimental studies of relativistic dissociation of light nuclei (^{12}C, ^{16}O, ^{14}N, ^{7}Be, ^{11}C) in nuclear emulsion. It claims that invariant-mass reconstruction from precise fragment emission angles, under the approximation of momentum conservation per nucleon, establishes that the ^{12}C(0^{+}_{2}) (Hoyle) and ^{12}C(3^{-}) states dominate the ^{12}C → 3α and ^{16}O → 4α channels; it also estimates contributions from ^{9}B and ^{12}C(0^{+}_{2}) in ^{14}N dissociation and initiates analysis of the ^{16}O → ^{12}Cα channel while noting prospects for studying couplings beyond α-clustering.

Significance. If the state identifications are robust, the work supplies new experimental constraints on the role of specific low-lying excitations in relativistic dissociation of light nuclei, potentially illuminating α-clustering and nuclear-structure questions at energies inaccessible to low-energy experiments. The emulsion technique's high angular resolution is a noted strength for such measurements.

major comments (2)
  1. Invariant-mass method (described in the abstract and results sections): the central claim that ^{12}C(0^{+}_{2}) and ^{12}C(3^{-}) lead in the 3α and 4α channels rests on peaks reconstructed solely from measured angles under the momentum-per-nucleon conservation approximation. For the Hoyle state (E* ≈ 7.65 MeV) the relative momenta are only a few MeV/c; any unaccounted longitudinal momentum spread from Fermi motion or excitation-energy partitioning therefore shifts or broadens the reconstructed mass by an amount comparable to the state separation. The manuscript does not report a quantitative propagation of this uncertainty or a Monte-Carlo closure test that injects realistic momentum distributions and recovers the input peaks.
  2. Results presentation (abstract and main text): no error bars, sample sizes, or full event tables are provided for the selected dissociation events, preventing assessment of the statistical significance of the reported leading contributions or the robustness of post-hoc event selections.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the phrasing 'lead in the dissociation' is imprecise; replace with a quantitative statement of relative contributions or fractions.
  2. Notation: consistent use of superscripts for excitation labels (e.g., 0^{+}_{2}) should be checked throughout for typographical uniformity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments identify areas where additional quantitative support would strengthen the presentation of our experimental observations. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Invariant-mass method (described in the abstract and results sections): the central claim that ^{12}C(0^{+}_{2}) and ^{12}C(3^{-}) lead in the 3α and 4α channels rests on peaks reconstructed solely from measured angles under the momentum-per-nucleon conservation approximation. For the Hoyle state (E* ≈ 7.65 MeV) the relative momenta are only a few MeV/c; any unaccounted longitudinal momentum spread from Fermi motion or excitation-energy partitioning therefore shifts or broadens the reconstructed mass by an amount comparable to the state separation. The manuscript does not report a quantitative propagation of this uncertainty or a Monte-Carlo closure test that injects realistic momentum distributions and recovers the input peaks.

    Authors: We agree that the momentum-per-nucleon approximation, although widely employed in relativistic emulsion studies where transverse momenta dominate, merits explicit validation against longitudinal spreads. The exceptional angular resolution of the emulsion technique reduces many sources of uncertainty, yet a dedicated propagation of the effects noted by the referee would improve confidence in the peak assignments. In the revised manuscript we will add a Monte Carlo closure test that incorporates realistic Fermi-motion distributions and excitation-energy partitioning to quantify any broadening or shift of the reconstructed invariant-mass peaks. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results presentation (abstract and main text): no error bars, sample sizes, or full event tables are provided for the selected dissociation events, preventing assessment of the statistical significance of the reported leading contributions or the robustness of post-hoc event selections.

    Authors: As the manuscript is a concise progress report on an ongoing experimental program, detailed numerical summaries were omitted to focus on the principal observations. We will incorporate the total number of analyzed events for each dissociation channel together with statistical uncertainties on the reported fractional contributions. Full event lists will be supplied as supplementary material in the revised submission, enabling independent evaluation of selection criteria and significance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical observations under stated approximation

full rationale

The manuscript presents experimental results from nuclear-emulsion measurements of fragment emission angles in relativistic dissociation of light nuclei. Identification of states such as ^{12}C(0^{+}_{2}) and ^{12}C(3^{-}) is performed by computing invariant mass from those angles under the explicit approximation of momentum-per-nucleon conservation. No derivation chain, fitted parameters, or self-citation is invoked that would make the reported dominance of these states equivalent to the input data by construction. The central claims remain direct empirical findings rather than tautological outputs, consistent with the absence of any load-bearing mathematical reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis depends on standard assumptions of relativistic kinematics and momentum conservation per nucleon; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Approximation of conservation of momentum per nucleon of the parent nucleus when reconstructing invariant mass from fragment emission angles
    Invoked to enable state identification from measured angles in relativistic dissociation events.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5800 in / 1217 out tokens · 54928 ms · 2026-05-18T18:03:59.186582+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The $^{8}$Be nucleus and the Hoyle state in dissociation of relativistic nuclei

    nucl-ex 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Relativistic nuclear dissociation in emulsion reveals increasing contributions from 8Be(0+), 9B, and 12C Hoyle state with higher alpha multiplicity, consistent with cluster fusion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    For convenience, the 3 FIG

    and 9B are identified by upper limits on the invari- ant masses of pairs and tripletsQ2α,Q 3α andQ 2αp, determined in the approximation of conservation of momentum per nucleon of the parent nucleus [16]. For convenience, the 3 FIG. 1. Macrophotograph of the coherent dissociation event of the nucleus16O→C + He with a momentum of 4.5 GeV/cper nucleon; the g...

  2. [2]

    Further justification of the approach used is provided by the presented estimate of the contribution of16O→ 12C(3−)αto 4α-particle coherent dissociation

    and 12C(3−) decays in the relativistic dissociation of 12C nuclei was established in this way [4]. Further justification of the approach used is provided by the presented estimate of the contribution of16O→ 12C(3−)αto 4α-particle coherent dissociation. The 12C(0+

  3. [3]

    enhancement appeared in the coherent dissociation16O→4αmotivated a search in the distributionQ4α for 16O(0+

  4. [4]

    Its relevance lies in testing the hypothesis of the structure of16O(0+

    excitation at only 660 keV above the 4αthreshold (14.4 MeV) [16]. Its relevance lies in testing the hypothesis of the structure of16O(0+

  5. [5]

    The increase in the probability of 8Be(0+) and 12C(0+

    as a 4α-particle Bose-Einstein condensate decaying into12C(0+ 2)αor 2 8Be(0+) [11]. The increase in the probability of 8Be(0+) and 12C(0+

  6. [6]

    with the number ofα-particles, subsequently established in the fragmentation of heavier nuclei, allows us to propose the fusion 2α→ 8Be(0+)α→ 12C(0+ 2)α→ 16O(0+

  7. [7]

    [16]. At the same time, due to the extremely small energy gap of16O(0+ 6)→ 12C(0+ 2)α, equal to only 296 keV, the theoretically estimated width of this decay is also extremely small, and the channel16O(0+ 6)→ 12C(0+ 1)αis proposed as an alternative [7], including in a framework of the search for decays of the predicted 5α- condensate [13]. The search for ...

  8. [8]

    In the case of16O(0+ 6)→ 12C(0+ 1)α, one of theα-particles in 4 the quartet serves as a kind of catalyst, removing the need for an electromagnetic transition

    with the formation ofe+e− pairs or 2γ-decay0 + →2 + →0 + with a probability of 1/2500. In the case of16O(0+ 6)→ 12C(0+ 1)α, one of theα-particles in 4 the quartet serves as a kind of catalyst, removing the need for an electromagnetic transition. The coexistence of the decays12C(0+ 2)αand 12C(0+ 1)αwithin the 165 keV width of16O(0+ 6) cannot be ruled out. ...

  9. [9]

    The contribution of 12C(0+

    and 12C(3−) to the dissociation of12C→3αare 43±4, 9±1, 19±2%, respectively. The contribution of 12C(0+

  10. [10]

    The ratio of 12C(0+

    decays to the statistics of 8Be(0+) is 26±4%, and 12C(3−) is 45±6%. The ratio of 12C(0+

  11. [11]

    While accounting for about a third of the statistics12C→3α, in the case of 12C→ α8Be(0+) the total contribution of12C(0+

    to 12C(3−) is 0.47± 0.06. While accounting for about a third of the statistics12C→3α, in the case of 12C→ α8Be(0+) the total contribution of12C(0+

  12. [12]

    Despite the increase in combinatory,8Be(0+) and 12C(0+

    and 12C(3−) reaches two thirds. Despite the increase in combinatory,8Be(0+) and 12C(0+

  13. [13]

    When normalized to 5 the number of events, an approximately twofold increase in8Be(0+) and 12C(0+

    appeared in the distributions of 641 coherent dissociation events16O→4αoverQ 2α andQ 3α [16]. When normalized to 5 the number of events, an approximately twofold increase in8Be(0+) and 12C(0+

  14. [14]

    was found compared to the 12C case. The main part of the distribution atQ3α >1 MeV, extending to 20 MeV and having a wide maximum at 1< Q2α <5 MeV, is described by the Rayleigh distribution with a parameter of 3.8 MeV. The coincidence of this value within the errors with the 12C case and the identification of 12C(3−) in it indicated the possibility of the...

  15. [15]

    In turn, they can arise in decays of more complex states, for example, IAS 13N∗(15.1)

    [4, 19]. In turn, they can arise in decays of more complex states, for example, IAS 13N∗(15.1). The statistics of measured events 14N→3α+ H has been brought to 128, including 29 "white" stars, and14N→3αwith target fragments - 54. Figure 3a shows theQ2α distribution ofα-particle pairs. The average value of⟨Q2α⟩in 62 events containingα-pairs with opening an...

  16. [16]

    The events of the 3He channel without H in the fragmentation cone are not discussed in the context of 12C(0+

    signal, these events coincide approximately half with the events with 9B candidates. The events of the 3He channel without H in the fragmentation cone are not discussed in the context of 12C(0+

  17. [17]

    Figure 3d shows theQ3αp distribution of 3αpquadruples, for which this problem is not significant

    due to their smaller statistics and the possible contribution of the excitation decays9Be(1.67)→2α(n) [4]. Figure 3d shows theQ3αp distribution of 3αpquadruples, for which this problem is not significant. It shows the expected position of the IAS signal13N∗(15.065). When it decays to 9Bα, 12C(0+ 2)por 12C(3−)p, 8Be(0+) should be present. However, introduc...

  18. [18]

    leads to a radical compression of this distribution with ⟨Q3αp⟩equal to 2.5±0.1 MeV at RMS 0.6 MeV. IV. DISSOCIA TION 16O→ 12Cα There are measurements of the emission angles and total momenta of fragmentsPfr 11000 interactions of 16O nuclei at the momentumP0 = 3.25 GeV/cper nucleon in the 1-meter liquid hydrogen bubble chamber of JINR (VPK-100), placed in...

  19. [19]

    Thus, the 12C +αchannel dominate, which allows one to neglect the others

    can contribute to the broadening of theP C/P0 distribution. Thus, the 12C +αchannel dominate, which allows one to neglect the others. Figure 4d shows the distribution over the invariant mass of the Q12Cα pairs for the entire sample and 64 events highlighted in Fig. 4a. The calculations are performed in the approximation of conservation of the initial mome...

  20. [20]

    region. Recently, an accelerated search for C + He events has been started by transverse scanning of NTE layers irradiated in the 1980s at the JINR Synchrophasotron in a beam of16O nuclei at 4.5 GeV/cper nucleon. The directions in pairs of converging traces of He and a heavier fragment are measured and traced to the interaction vertex (Fig. 1). To date, 6...

  21. [21]

    They correspond to 26 and 45% in12C→ 8Be(0+)α(43%) and 37 and 52% in16O→ 8Be(0+)2α (62%)

    and 12C(3−) decays, which constitute 11 and 19% in the 12C→3αdissociation, increase to 22 and 32% in the 16O→4αdissociation. They correspond to 26 and 45% in12C→ 8Be(0+)α(43%) and 37 and 52% in16O→ 8Be(0+)2α (62%). Thus, the first two excitations of12C above theα-particle binding threshold lead in the relativistic dissociation of these nuclei. The number ...

  22. [22]

    However, there is an overlap

    to the leading channel of 3HeH dissociation of the 14N nucleus are estimated at 23 and 10%. However, there is an overlap. It is unclear whether the resolution limit has been reached or whether there is a more fundamental overlap of9B and 12C(0+ 2). The joint condition on9B or12C(0+

  23. [23]

    An analysis of the binary dissociation 16O→ 12C(0+ 1)αat 4.5 GeV/cper nucleon has been started to search for the decay of the excited state16O(0+

    indicates that theα-particles and protons in events with9B or12C(0+ 2), but not attributed to decays, are close to them in the invariant mass 3αp. An analysis of the binary dissociation 16O→ 12C(0+ 1)αat 4.5 GeV/cper nucleon has been started to search for the decay of the excited state16O(0+

  24. [24]

    About two thirds of the 70 measured events have an invariant mass below 14 MeV, and 12% above this threshold indicate such a possibility

    at 15.1 MeV. About two thirds of the 70 measured events have an invariant mass below 14 MeV, and 12% above this threshold indicate such a possibility. The assumptions made about12C(0+

  25. [25]

    Having a similar shape, the invariant mass distribution of such pairs confirms the possibility of identifying16O(0+ 6) with a multiple increase in statistics

    andαwere verified against hydrogen bubble chamber data in a magnetic field. Having a similar shape, the invariant mass distribution of such pairs confirms the possibility of identifying16O(0+ 6) with a multiple increase in statistics. This conclusion stimulated the beginning of a similar analysis of the emulsion irradiated with 16O→nuclei at 15 GeV/cper n...

  26. [26]

    The measurements of the first events found are added to Fig

    formation. The measurements of the first events found are added to Fig. 5 (shaded). Rare events 7Be→ 6Lipand 11C→ 7Beα, concentrated at the thresholds of invariant masses, indicate the prospect of expanding the list of unstable states formed in relativistic dissociation. With angular resolution, the difference in magnetic rigidities allows investigat- ing...

  27. [27]

    Freer,In: Lect

    M. Freer,In: Lect. Notes in Phys.Clustering in Light Nuclei; from the Stable to the Exotic, 879, The Euroschool on Exotic Beams, Vol. IV, 1 (Springer Int. Publ., 2014)

  28. [28]

    Lombardo and D

    I. Lombardo and D. Dell’Aquila, Clusters in light nuclei: history and recent developments,La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento46(2023) 521

  29. [29]

    "Tomography" of the cluster structure of light nuclei via relativistic dissociation

    P.I. Zarubin, Tomography of the Cluster Structure of Light Nuclei via Relativistic Dissociation, Lect. Notes in Phys.875, 51 (Springer Int. Publ., 2014); arXiv:1309.4881

  30. [30]

    Artemenkov, N.K

    D.A. Artemenkov, N.K. Kornegrutsa, N.G. Peresadko, V.V. Rusakova, A.A. Zaitsev, P.I. Zaru- bin and I.G. Zarubina,Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33(2024) 2441015; arXiv:2409.14814. 13

  31. [31]

    The BECQUEREL Project web-site

  32. [32]

    Ajzenberg-Selove,Nucl

    F. Ajzenberg-Selove,Nucl. Phys. A490(1988) 1; TUNL Nuclear Data Evaluation Project

  33. [33]

    Funaki, H

    Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, W. von Oertzen, G. Roepke, P. Schuck, A. Tohsaki and T. Yamada, Phys. Rev. C80(2009) 064326

  34. [34]

    Wiringa, S.C

    R.B. Wiringa, S.C. Pieper, J. Carlson and V.R.,Phys. Rev. C62(2000) 014001

  35. [35]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T.A. Lähde, D. Lee and U.-G. Meißner,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 192501

  36. [36]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T.A. Lähde, D. Lee and U.-G. Meißner,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 252501

  37. [37]

    Tohsaki, H

    A. Tohsaki, H. Horiuchi, P. Schuck and G. Röpke,Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017) 011002

  38. [38]

    B. Zhou, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchiet al.,Front. Phys.15(2020) 14401

  39. [39]

    B. Zhou, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchiet al.,Nature Commun.14(2023) 8206

  40. [40]

    S. Shen, S. Elhatisari, T.A. Lähdeet al.,Nature Commun.14(2023) 2777

  41. [41]

    Zaitsev, D.A

    A.A. Zaitsev, D.A. Artemenkov, V.V. Glagolev, M.M. Chernyavsky, N.G. Peresadko, V.V. Rusakova and P.I. Zarubin,Phys. Lett. B820(2021) 136460; arXiv:2102.09541v2

  42. [42]

    Artemenkovet al.,Eur

    D.A. Artemenkovet al.,Eur. Phys. J. A56(2020) 250; arXiv:2004.10277v2

  43. [43]

    Clustering features of the $^7$Be nucleus in relativistic fragmentation

    N.K. Kornegrutsaet al.,Few Body Syst.55(2014) 102; arXiv:1410.5162v1

  44. [44]

    Charge Topology of the Coherent Dissociation of Relativistic C-11 and N-12 Nuclei

    D.A. Artemenkovet al., Phys. Atom. Nuclei78(2015) 794–799; arXiv:1411.5806

  45. [45]

    Mitsovaet al.,Phys

    E. Mitsovaet al.,Phys. Part. Nucl.53(2022) 456; arXiv:2011.06265v2

  46. [46]

    Glagolev, K.G

    V.V. Glagolev, K.G. Gulamov, V.D. Lipinet al.,Eur. Phys. J. A11(2001) 285

  47. [47]

    Zaitsev, P.I

    A.A. Zaitsev, P.I. Zarubin and N.G. Peresadko,Phys. Atom. Nucl.84(2021) 1641; arXiv:2207.13568v1

  48. [48]

    Peresadkoet al.,Phys

    N.G. Peresadkoet al.,Phys. Atom. Nucl.70(2007) 1226. 14