pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.12982 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-16 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI· cs.SE

Out of Distribution Detection in Self-adaptive Robots with AI-powered Digital Twins

Erblin Isaku , Hassan Sartaj , Shaukat Ali , Beatriz Sanguino , Tongtong Wang , Guoyuan Li , Houxiang Zhang , Thomas Peyrucain This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 16:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AIcs.SE
keywords out-of-distribution detectiondigital twinsself-adaptive robotsTransformer modelMonte Carlo dropoutuncertainty quantificationexplainabilityrobot navigation
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Transformer digital twin detects out-of-distribution behaviors in self-adaptive robots by combining reconstruction error with predictive variance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Self-adaptive robots operating in uncertain environments need to spot out-of-distribution behaviors before they cause problems. The paper introduces ODiSAR, which builds a Transformer-based digital twin trained only on normal data to forecast robot states such as trajectories and vessel motion. It flags OOD cases by measuring high reconstruction error together with high predictive variance obtained through Monte Carlo dropout, and adds an explainability layer that ties each detection back to particular robot states. Tests on an office-navigating industrial robot and a maritime ship-navigation robot show the method reaching up to 98 percent AUROC while supplying interpretable signals that can guide self-adaptation.

Core claim

The paper claims that a Transformer digital twin, trained solely on normal operating data, detects out-of-distribution behaviors in self-adaptive robots by combining reconstruction error with predictive variance from Monte Carlo dropout, even under previously unseen conditions, and supplies an explainability layer that connects detections to specific states to support self-adaptation.

What carries the argument

Transformer-based digital twin that forecasts SAR states and detects OOD through the combination of reconstruction error and Monte Carlo dropout predictive variance, together with an explainability layer.

If this is right

  • The combined error-and-variance signal enables proactive detection of abnormal robot trajectories and vessel motion.
  • Detection performance reaches 98 percent AUROC, 96 percent TNR at TPR95, and 95 percent F1-score on the evaluated robots.
  • The explainability layer supplies state-specific insights that can directly inform self-adaptation decisions.
  • The same architecture works for both office-environment navigation and maritime ship navigation without retraining from scratch.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could lower the amount of labeled anomaly data needed for training detection systems in other autonomous platforms.
  • Similar digital-twin OOD detectors might be tested on drones or self-driving cars to check whether the error-variance combination transfers.
  • Experiments that inject controlled sensor noise could clarify whether the variance signal remains a reliable OOD indicator under realistic measurement errors.

Load-bearing premise

The digital twin trained only on normal data will produce reliable forecasts, and large reconstruction error or high predictive variance will indicate genuine out-of-distribution events rather than model inadequacy or sensor noise.

What would settle it

A test set containing true out-of-distribution samples on which the digital twin shows low reconstruction error and low predictive variance, or normal samples on which it shows high error and high variance, would falsify the detection method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.12982 by Beatriz Sanguino, Erblin Isaku, Guoyuan Li, Hassan Sartaj, Houxiang Zhang, Shaukat Ali, Thomas Peyrucain, Tongtong Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: ODiSAR in the context of the MAPLE-K loop—implemented inside self-adaptive robots. The DT, composed of DTM and DTC components, supports the Monitor and Analyze phases (shown in light colors), respectively, enabling interpretable OOD detection and adaptation within the MAPLE-K framework. demonstrate the application of ODiSAR with a robot operating in an office environment. Its digital twin helps OOD detecti… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the proposed Digital Twin-based approach ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example of structured JSON output for a forecast window (autonomous maritime vessel case study) flagged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of model confidence across different operational scenarios. Each bar reflects the proportion of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Self-adaptive robots (SARs) in complex, uncertain environments must proactively detect and address abnormal behaviors, including out-of-distribution (OOD) cases. To this end, digital twins offer a valuable solution for OOD detection. Thus, we present a digital twin-based approach for OOD detection (ODiSAR) in SARs. ODiSAR uses a Transformer-based digital twin to forecast SAR states and employs reconstruction error and Monte Carlo dropout for uncertainty quantification. By combining reconstruction error with predictive variance, the digital twin effectively detects OOD behaviors, even in previously unseen conditions. The digital twin also includes an explainability layer that links potential OOD to specific SAR states, offering insights for self-adaptation. We evaluated ODiSAR by creating digital twins of two industrial robots: one navigating an office environment, and another performing maritime ship navigation. In both cases, ODiSAR forecasts SAR behaviors (i.e., robot trajectories and vessel motion) and proactively detects OOD events. Our results showed that ODiSAR achieved high detection performance -- up to 98\% AUROC, 96\% TNR@TPR95, and 95\% F1-score -- while providing interpretable insights to support self-adaptation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents ODiSAR, a Transformer-based digital twin for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection in self-adaptive robots. The approach forecasts SAR states using reconstruction error combined with Monte Carlo dropout predictive variance, includes an explainability layer linking OOD to specific states, and reports evaluation results on two scenarios (office navigation robot and maritime ship navigation) with up to 98% AUROC, 96% TNR@TPR95, and 95% F1-score.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold after clarification, the work could provide a useful integration of digital twins with uncertainty-aware anomaly detection for robotics, supporting proactive self-adaptation in uncertain environments. The combination of reconstruction error and variance follows standard practices in autoencoder-style detection but is applied here to SAR trajectories with an added interpretability component.

major comments (1)
  1. [Evaluation] Evaluation section: the reported high AUROC, TNR@TPR95, and F1 scores rest on unexamined choices including training data volume, OOD injection or generation method, baseline comparators, and statistical significance tests. These details are load-bearing for validating that large reconstruction error or high predictive variance reliably indicates true OOD rather than model inadequacy or noise.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and method description would benefit from explicit notation for how reconstruction error and Monte Carlo dropout variance are combined into the final detection score.
  2. Figure captions for the explainability layer should include more detail on what specific SAR states are highlighted and how they map to adaptation actions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment on the evaluation details below and will revise the paper to incorporate additional information and analysis as outlined.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Evaluation section: the reported high AUROC, TNR@TPR95, and F1 scores rest on unexamined choices including training data volume, OOD injection or generation method, baseline comparators, and statistical significance tests. These details are load-bearing for validating that large reconstruction error or high predictive variance reliably indicates true OOD rather than model inadequacy or noise.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript lacks sufficient detail on these experimental choices, which limits the ability to fully interpret the reported metrics. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Evaluation section to explicitly report: (1) training data volume, including the number of trajectories, episodes, and total state samples used to train the Transformer digital twin for each of the two scenarios; (2) the OOD injection/generation method, describing how OOD events were created (e.g., by introducing unseen environmental perturbations such as novel obstacles in the office navigation task or unmodeled dynamics like sudden current changes in the maritime task); (3) baseline comparators, adding direct comparisons to standard OOD detection approaches such as vanilla autoencoders and isolation forests; and (4) statistical significance tests, including results from multiple independent runs with different random seeds, along with p-values or confidence intervals to confirm that performance differences are statistically meaningful. These additions will strengthen the argument that elevated reconstruction error combined with predictive variance specifically signals OOD rather than model limitations or noise. We have the underlying experimental data and will include the expanded descriptions and results in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in OOD detection derivation

full rationale

The paper describes a Transformer-based digital twin that forecasts SAR states and detects OOD via combined reconstruction error and Monte Carlo dropout predictive variance, with an added explainability layer. No equations, fitting procedures, or derivation steps are presented in the abstract or evaluation that reduce the reported detection performance (e.g., AUROC, TNR@TPR95) to quantities defined by the same fitted parameters or by self-citation chains. The method aligns with standard autoencoder-style anomaly detection and uncertainty quantification applied to robot trajectories, without self-definitional constructs, fitted-input predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work. Evaluation on two distinct robot scenarios provides external validation points rather than internal reduction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the premise that a Transformer trained on normal trajectories will generalize enough to flag genuine anomalies via reconstruction and variance; no new physical entities or ad-hoc constants are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Transformer architecture and training hyperparameters
    Model size, learning rate, dropout rate, and sequence length must be chosen or tuned on normal data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A digital twin trained on nominal robot trajectories can produce forecasts whose errors and uncertainties separate in-distribution from out-of-distribution states.
    This premise is required for the reconstruction-error-plus-variance detector to function as claimed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5778 in / 1375 out tokens · 50407 ms · 2026-05-18T16:39:44.885361+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    K-Sim® Navigation,

    “K-Sim® Navigation,” https://www.kongsberg.com/maritime/products/simulation/k-sim-navigation/, [Online; accessed 15-September-2025]

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    RoboSAPIENS,

    “RoboSAPIENS,” https://robosapiens-eu.tech/, [Online; accessed 25-March-2025]

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework,

    T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, and M. Koyama, “Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework,” inProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2019, pp. 2623–2631

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Concrete Problems in AI Safety

    D. Amodei, C. Olah, J. Steinhardt, P. Christiano, J. Schulman, and D. Mané, “Concrete problems in ai safety,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565, 2016. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Modeling and analyzing MAPE-K feedback loops for self-adaptation,

    P. Arcaini, E. Riccobene, and P. Scandurra, “Modeling and analyzing MAPE-K feedback loops for self-adaptation,” inProceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems, ser. SEAMS ’15. IEEE Press, 2015, pp. 13–23

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai,

    A. B. Arrieta, N. Díaz-Rodríguez, J. Del Ser, A. Bennetot, S. Tabik, A. Barbado, S. García, S. Gil-López, D. Molina, R. Benjaminset al., “Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai,”Information fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Self-adaptive fault diagnosis for unseen working conditions based on digital twins and domain generalization,

    M. S. Azari, S. Santini, F. Edrisi, and F. Flammini, “Self-adaptive fault diagnosis for unseen working conditions based on digital twins and domain generalization,”Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 254, p. 110560, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Digital twin enabled runtime verification for autonomous mobile robots under uncertainty,

    J. S. Betzer, J. Boudjadar, M. Frasheri, and P. Talasila, “Digital twin enabled runtime verification for autonomous mobile robots under uncertainty,” in2024 28th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT). IEEE, 2024, pp. 10–17

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Real-time out-of-distribution detection in learning-enabled cyber-physical systems,

    F. Cai and X. Koutsoukos, “Real-time out-of-distribution detection in learning-enabled cyber-physical systems,” in 2020 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS). IEEE, 2020, pp. 174–183

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Deep verifier networks: Verification of deep discrim- inative models with deep generative models,

    T. Che, X. Liu, Y . Ge, R. Zhang, C. Xiong, and Y . Bengio, “Deep verifier networks: Verification of deep discrim- inative models with deep generative models,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, no. 8, 2021, pp. 7002–7010

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Software engineering for self-adaptive systems: A second research roadmap,

    R. De Lemos, H. Giese, H. A. Müller, M. Shaw, J. Andersson, M. Litoiu, B. Schmerl, G. Tamura, N. M. Villegas, T. V ogelet al., “Software engineering for self-adaptive systems: A second research roadmap,” inSoftware Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II: International Seminar, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, October 24-29, 2010 Revised Selected and Invited Pa...

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning,

    Y . Gal and Z. Ghahramani, “Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning,” ininternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2016, pp. 1050–1059

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Leveraging digital twins for fault diagnosis in autonomous ships,

    A. Hasan, T. Asfihani, O. Osen, and R. T. Bye, “Leveraging digital twins for fault diagnosis in autonomous ships,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 292, p. 116546, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks

    D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, “A baseline for detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02136, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Generalized odin: Detecting out-of-distribution image without learning from out-of-distribution data,

    Y .-C. Hsu, Y . Shen, H. Jin, and Z. Kira, “Generalized odin: Detecting out-of-distribution image without learning from out-of-distribution data,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 10 951–10 960

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Leveraging digital twin and machine learning techniques for anomaly detection in power electronics dominated grid,

    I. N. Idrisov, D. Okeke, A. Albaseer, M. Abdallah, and F. M. Ibanez, “Leveraging digital twin and machine learning techniques for anomaly detection in power electronics dominated grid,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13474, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Digital twin-based out-of-distribution detection in autonomous vessels, 2025

    E. Isaku, H. Sartaj, and S. Ali, “Digital twin-based out-of-distribution detection in autonomous vessels,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19816, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Proactive anomaly detection for robot navigation with multi-sensor fusion,

    T. Ji, A. N. Sivakumar, G. Chowdhary, and K. Driggs-Campbell, “Proactive anomaly detection for robot navigation with multi-sensor fusion,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 4975–4982, 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression,

    V . Kuleshov, N. Fenner, and S. Ermon, “Accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2018, pp. 2796–2804

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Robotic safe adaptation in unprecedented situations: the robosapiens project,

    P. G. Larsen, S. Ali, R. Behrens, A. Cavalcanti, C. Gomes, G. Li, P. De Meulenaere, M. L. Olsen, N. Passalis, T. Peyrucainet al., “Robotic safe adaptation in unprecedented situations: the robosapiens project,”Research Directions: Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 2, p. e4, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    A simple unified framework for detecting out-of-distribution samples and adversarial attacks,

    K. Lee, K. Lee, H. Lee, and J. Shin, “A simple unified framework for detecting out-of-distribution samples and adversarial attacks,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Enhancing the reliability of out-of-distribution image detection in neural networks,

    S. Liang, Y . Li, and R. Srikant, “Enhancing the reliability of out-of-distribution image detection in neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02690, 2017

    work page arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,

    S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Research and application of transformer based anomaly detection model: A literature review,

    M. Ma, L. Han, and C. Zhou, “Research and application of transformer based anomaly detection model: A literature review,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.08975, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Digital twin-based self-learning decision- making framework for industrial robots in manufacturing,

    F. Mo, H. U. Rehman, J. C. Chaplin, D. Sanderson, and S. Ratchev, “Digital twin-based self-learning decision- making framework for industrial robots in manufacturing,”The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, pp. 1–20, 2025. 14

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Anomaly detection using machine learning and adopted digital twin concepts in radio environments,

    M. H. Moharam, O. Hany, A. Hany, A. Mahmoud, M. Mohamed, and S. Saeed, “Anomaly detection using machine learning and adopted digital twin concepts in radio environments,”Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 18352, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Explainable ai: interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning,

    G. Montavon, A. Binder, S. Lapuschkin, W. Samek, and K. Müller, “Explainable ai: interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning,”Spring er LNCS, vol. 11700, no. 1, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Tiago omni base ros 2 simulation,

    PAL Robotics, “Tiago omni base ros 2 simulation,” https://github.com/pal-robotics/omni_base_simulation, [On- line; accessed 02-April-2025]

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    The three sigma rule,

    F. Pukelsheim, “The three sigma rule,”The American Statistician, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 88–91, 1994

    work page 1994

  30. [30]

    Likelihood ratios for out-of-distribution detection,

    J. Ren, P. J. Liu, E. Fertig, J. Snoek, R. Poplin, M. Depristo, J. Dillon, and B. Lakshminarayanan, “Likelihood ratios for out-of-distribution detection,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 32, 2019

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    " why should i trust you?

    M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “" why should i trust you?" explaining the predictions of any classifier,” inProceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2016, pp. 1135–1144

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Breaking the loop: Aware is the new mape-k,

    B. P. Sanwouo, P. Temple, and C. Quinton, “Breaking the loop: Aware is the new mape-k,” inFSE’25-International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Digital twin system for vtol uav fault diagnosis based on px4,

    J. Song, D. Wang, Z. Chen, and K. Zhao, “Digital twin system for vtol uav fault diagnosis based on px4,” in International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems. Springer, 2022, pp. 2389–2401

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Diagnostic digital twin for anomaly detection in floating offshore wind energy,

    F. Stadtmann and A. Rasheed, “Diagnostic digital twin for anomaly detection in floating offshore wind energy,” inInternational Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, vol. 87851. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2024, p. V007T09A033

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Tiago omni base robot,

    TIAGo OMNI Base, “Tiago omni base robot,” https://wiki.ros.org/Robots/TIAGo-OMNI-base, [Online; accessed 28-April-2025]

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Design and implementation of digital twin-assisted simulation method for autonomous vehicle in car-following scenario,

    H. Xiong, Z. Wang, G. Wu, and Y . Pan, “Design and implementation of digital twin-assisted simulation method for autonomous vehicle in car-following scenario,”Journal of Sensors, vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 4879490, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Digital twin-based anomaly detection with curriculum learning in cyber-physical systems,

    Q. Xu, S. Ali, and T. Yue, “Digital twin-based anomaly detection with curriculum learning in cyber-physical systems,”ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1–32, 2023

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Generalized out-of-distribution detection: A survey,

    J. Yang, K. Zhou, Y . Li, and Z. Liu, “Generalized out-of-distribution detection: A survey,”International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 5635–5662, 2024. 15

    work page 2024