pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.24691 · v1 · pith:NGI54CVGnew · submitted 2025-09-29 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· quant-ph

Non-destructive optical read-out and manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms

Yohann Machu , Andr\'es Dur\'an-Hern\'andez , Gautier Creutzer , Aurore Alice Young , Jean-Michel Raimond , Michel Brune , Cl\'ement Sayrin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 22:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords circular Rydberg atomsquantum non-demolition detectionFörster resonanceRydberg blockadeancilla atomshybrid platformquantum error correctionRydberg quantum simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ancilla atoms enable non-destructive optical readout and manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms via Förster blockade.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to detect and control circular Rydberg atoms without destroying their quantum states by pairing them with auxiliary atoms. Circular Rydberg atoms combine strong interactions with long lifetimes but have no usable optical transitions, which has blocked individual readout and mid-circuit operations. The hybrid setup uses an ancilla array transiently excited to low-angular-momentum Rydberg states; a Förster resonance creates a blockade that reports the logical qubit state optically while leaving the circular atom intact, and the same interaction allows local manipulation. This matters because it supplies the missing mid-circuit measurement capability needed for error correction and unlocks time-resolved studies in long-duration quantum simulations.

Core claim

The authors introduce a dual-Rydberg platform that combines an array of laser-trapped circular Rydberg atoms of rubidium serving as logical qubits with a separate array of ancilla atoms that are transiently excited to low-ℓ Rydberg levels. Quantum non-demolition detection of each logical qubit is performed through blockade of the ancilla optical excitation caused by a Förster resonance; the same mechanism is used in reverse to manipulate the logical qubit locally by driving the ancilla.

What carries the argument

Hybrid dual-Rydberg platform in which Förster resonance between a circular logical atom and a low-ℓ ancilla atom produces a blockade that reports or alters the logical state without optical access to the circular atom itself.

If this is right

  • The platform supplies mid-circuit measurements that are required for quantum error correction with circular Rydberg atoms.
  • Long-lived circular states can now be used for quantum simulations that track time correlations over durations inaccessible to short-lived Rydberg levels.
  • The same blockade mechanism provides a route to local single-qubit and two-qubit gates without additional laser access to the circular manifold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ancilla atoms can be reused or recycled without perturbing the logical array, the scheme becomes compatible with repeated error-correction cycles in larger processors.
  • The hybrid approach may generalize to other atom species or trap geometries where one Rydberg manifold lacks optical transitions.
  • Precise control of the Förster resonance detuning could allow tunable interaction strengths for both readout and entangling operations within the same hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The ancilla atoms can be transiently excited to low-ℓ Rydberg levels and interact via a suitable Förster resonance with the circular atoms while leaving the logical array and its laser traps essentially undisturbed.

What would settle it

Failure to observe a clear shift or suppression in ancilla excitation probability that depends on the circular atom's state, or the appearance of measurable heating or loss in the circular-atom traps during ancilla driving, would falsify the non-destructive claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.24691 by Andr\'es Dur\'an-Hern\'andez, Aurore Alice Young, Cl\'ement Sayrin, Gautier Creutzer, Jean-Michel Raimond, Michel Brune, Yohann Machu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Level structure and experimental geometry. a. Simplified structure of non-interacting Rb logical and ancilla atomic levels, not to scale. The logical atom (left) is initially excited to the circular Rydberg level with principal quantum number n = 52, |↓⟩. A two-photon MW transition (yellow arrow) couples it to |↑⟩ (n = 54 circular state). The ancilla (right) is excited from its ground state |1⟩ ≡ |5S1/2, F… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ancilla optical excitation spectra. a. The top (bottom) line is a graphical representation (not to scale) of the sequence of optical (MW) pulses that address the an￾cilla (logical) atom during the ABM sequence. The boxes filled with a blue-red gradient indicate the Rydberg excita￾tion pulses, the green boxes indicate the time during which we trap the ancilla in the optical tweezers. The bottom line display… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Assessing the QND character of the ABM with Rabi oscillations. a. Pulse sequence used to record Rabi oscillations on the |↓⟩ → |↑⟩ transition. After a MW pulse of duration τ , the population in |↑⟩ is measured with the ABM and the DM schemes. The color code is that of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Local manipulation of the logical atom with the ancilla. a. Pulse sequence used to measure a π phase shift on the logical atom using a 2π optical pulse on the ancilla. The two MW π/2 pulses define a Ramsey interferometer. The colour code is that of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: d. One of the ancillae is used for the control of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Among the thriving quantum computation and quantum simulation platforms based on arrays of Rydberg atoms, those using circular Rydberg atoms are particularly promising. These atoms uniquely combine the strong dipole-dipole interactions typical of Rydberg states with long lifetimes. However, low-angular-momentum ($\ell$) laser-accessible Rydberg levels have been so far mostly used, because circular Rydberg atoms have no optical transitions, hindering their individual detection and manipulation. We remove this limitation with a hybrid platform, combining an array of logical laser-trapped circular Rydberg atoms of rubidium with an auxiliary array of Rb ancilla atoms transiently excited to a low-$\ell$ Rydberg level. We perform a quantum non-demolition detection of the logical qubit with the ancilla, through the blockade of the ancilla optical excitation induced by a F\"orster resonance. Conversely, we locally manipulate the logical qubit through the excitation of the ancilla. This dual-Rydberg platform is highly promising for quantum computation and simulation. It adds to the circular-atom toolbox the mid-circuit measurements, essential for error correction. More strikingly, it gives access to time correlations in long-term quantum simulations, uniquely accessible to circular Rydberg atoms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and demonstrates a hybrid dual-Rydberg platform in which an array of laser-trapped circular Rydberg atoms (logical qubits) is paired with an auxiliary array of Rb ancilla atoms that are transiently excited to low-ℓ Rydberg states. Quantum non-demolition readout of the logical qubit is achieved via Förster-resonance blockade of the ancilla optical transition; conversely, local manipulation of the logical qubit is performed by exciting the ancilla. The work claims this architecture supplies mid-circuit measurements essential for error correction and enables time-correlated measurements in long-term quantum simulations.

Significance. If the central claims are experimentally validated, the hybrid platform would remove a long-standing obstacle to the use of circular Rydberg atoms in quantum information processing by adding individual, non-destructive readout and control while preserving their long lifetimes and strong dipole-dipole interactions. This would strengthen the viability of circular-Rydberg platforms for fault-tolerant quantum computation and for simulations requiring extended coherence times.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / hybrid platform section] Abstract and hybrid-platform description: the load-bearing assumption that transient excitation of the ancilla atoms leaves the logical array and its laser traps essentially undisturbed is stated but not accompanied by quantitative estimates of induced heating rates, AC Stark shifts, or residual dipole-dipole coupling to the circular states. Without these bounds the selectivity of the Förster blockade cannot be assessed.
  2. [Förster resonance discussion] The manuscript states that a suitable Förster resonance is used for blockade, yet no specific pair of circular and low-ℓ levels, resonance condition, or calculated interaction strength is provided. This information is required to verify that the blockade is strong enough for high-fidelity QND detection while remaining compatible with the trap wavelengths.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: the LaTeX rendering of “Föster” appears inconsistently; standardize to “Förster” throughout.
  2. [Introduction / Results] The abstract claims “we perform” the QND detection and manipulation; the main text should explicitly separate the theoretical proposal from any experimental data or methods section so that readers can distinguish demonstrated results from projected performance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested details into a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / hybrid platform section] Abstract and hybrid-platform description: the load-bearing assumption that transient excitation of the ancilla atoms leaves the logical array and its laser traps essentially undisturbed is stated but not accompanied by quantitative estimates of induced heating rates, AC Stark shifts, or residual dipole-dipole coupling to the circular states. Without these bounds the selectivity of the Förster blockade cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative bounds are necessary to fully substantiate the claim of minimal disturbance. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit estimates, calculated from the experimental parameters (laser intensities, wavelengths, and atomic positions), for AC Stark shifts on the circular states, off-resonant scattering heating rates, and residual dipole-dipole couplings. These will confirm that the ancilla excitation remains compatible with the trap and preserves the selectivity of the Förster blockade. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Förster resonance discussion] The manuscript states that a suitable Förster resonance is used for blockade, yet no specific pair of circular and low-ℓ levels, resonance condition, or calculated interaction strength is provided. This information is required to verify that the blockade is strong enough for high-fidelity QND detection while remaining compatible with the trap wavelengths.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the specific levels and interaction parameters should be stated more explicitly. The revised manuscript will identify the exact circular and low-ℓ Rydberg pair, the resonance condition (including any magnetic-field tuning), and the calculated interaction strength. These additions will allow direct verification of the blockade fidelity and trap compatibility. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal relies on established physics

full rationale

The manuscript describes a hybrid experimental platform for non-destructive readout and manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms using ancilla atoms and Förster resonances. No derivation chain, equations, or predictions are presented that reduce to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The central claims rest on standard atomic-physics interactions (Rydberg blockade, Förster resonance) that are externally established and not internally constructed from the paper's own inputs. This is a self-contained proposal without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard atomic-physics knowledge of Rydberg interactions and laser trapping; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A suitable Förster resonance exists between the circular Rydberg state and the ancilla low-ℓ Rydberg state that produces strong blockade of optical excitation.
    Invoked to explain the non-demolition detection mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1247 out tokens · 47341 ms · 2026-05-21T22:10:05.818149+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fast measurement of neutral atoms with a multi-atom gate

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A multi-atom Rydberg gate with N ancillae enables N-fold photon collection for fast neutral-atom measurement, achieving infidelity below 10^{-3} in 6 μs with N=5 in Cs-Rb simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Morgado and S

    M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits, AVS Quan- tum Science3, 023501 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Endres, H

    M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    T. M. Graham, Y. Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, L. Phutti- tarn, K. Jooya, P. Eichler, X. Jiang, A. Marra, B. Grinke- meyer, M. Kwon, M. Ebert, J. Cherek, M. T. Licht- man, M. Gillette, J. Gilbert, D. Bowman, T. Ballance, C. Campbell, E. D. Dahl, O. Crawford, N. S. Blunt, B. Rogers, T. Noel, and M. Saffman, Multi-qubit en- tanglement and algorithms on a neutra...

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Bluvstein, H

    D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of en- tangled atom arrays, Nature604, 451 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. Läuchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature622, 279 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Scholl, A

    P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Erasure conversion in a high- fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature622, 273 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    C. Chen, G. Emperauger, G. Bornet, F. Caleca, B. Gély, M. Bintz, S. Chatterjee, V. Liu, D. Barredo, N. Y. Yao, T. Lahaye, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, and A. Browaeys, Spectroscopy of elementary excitations from quench dy- namics in a dipolar XY Rydberg simulator, Science389, 483 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Manovitz, S

    T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koylu- oglu, J. Feldmeier, P. E. Dolgirev, N. Maskara, M. Kali- nowski, S. Sachdev, D. A. Huse, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum coarsening and collective dy- namics on a programmable simulator, Nature638, 86 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    González-Cuadra, M

    D. González-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjača, A. Lukin, S. H. Cantú, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)D Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature642, 321 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Bergschneider, V

    A. Bergschneider, V. M. Klinkhamer, J. H. Becher, R. Klemt, G. Zürn, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Spin- resolvedsingle-atomimagingof 6Liinfreespace,Physical Review A97, 063613 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    I. I. Beterov and M. Saffman, Rydberg Blockade, Förster Resonances, and Quantum State Measurements with Dif- ferent Atomic Species, Physical Review A92, 042710 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nature Physics17, 1324 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Zhang and M

    C. Zhang and M. Tarbutt, Quantum Computation in a Hybrid Array of Molecules and Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum3, 030340 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    K. Wang, C. P. Williams, L. R. Picard, N. Y. Yao, and K.-K. Ni, Enriching the Quantum Toolbox of Ul- tracold Molecules with Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 030339 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    K. A. Safinya, J. F. Delpech, F. Gounand, W. Sandner, and T. F. Gallagher, Resonant Rydberg-Atom-Rydberg- Atom Collisions, Physical Review Letters47, 405 (1981)

    work page 1981

  22. [22]

    I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, I. I. Beterov, and V. M. Entin, Observation of the Stark-Tuned Förster Reso- nance between Two Rydberg Atoms, Physical Review Letters104, 073003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Petrosyan, S

    D. Petrosyan, S. Norrell, C. Poole, and M. Saffman, Fast measurements and multiqubit gates in dual-species atomic arrays, Physical Review A110, 042404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Singh, S

    K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J. T. Kemp, and H. Bernien, Dual-Element, Two-Dimensional Atom Ar- ray with Continuous-Mode Operation, Physical Review X12, 011040 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Anand, C

    S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species Rydberg array, Nature Physics20, 1744 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Singh, C

    K. Singh, C. E. Bradley, S. Anand, V. Ramesh, R. White, and H. Bernien, Mid-circuit correction of correlated phase errors using an array of spectator qubits, Science 380, 1265 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Cantat-Moltrecht, R

    T. Cantat-Moltrecht, R. Cortiñas, B. Ravon, P. Méhaignerie, S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond, M. Favier, M. Brune, and C. Sayrin, Long-lived circular Rydberg states of laser-cooled rubidium atoms in a cryostat, Physical Review Research2, 022032 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, C. M. Caves, M. Zim- mermann, and V. D. Sandberg, Quantum Nondemolition Measurements of Harmonic Oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 667 (1978)

    work page 1978

  29. [29]

    W. G. Unruh, Analysis of quantum-nondemolition mea- surement, Physical Review D18, 1764 (1978)

    work page 1978

  30. [30]

    See Supplementary Material

    work page

  31. [31]

    M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 037901 (2001). 8

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Ravon, P

    B. Ravon, P. Méhaignerie, Y. Machu, A. D. Hernández, M. Favier, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and C. Sayrin, Array of Individual Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers, Physical Review Letters131, 093401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Isenhower, W

    L. Isenhower, W. Williams, A. Dally, and M. Saffman, Atom trapping in an interferometrically generated bottle beam trap, Optics Letters34, 1159 (2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Méhaignerie, Y

    P. Méhaignerie, Y. Machu, A. Durán Hernández, G. Creutzer, D. Papoular, J. Raimond, C. Sayrin, and M. Brune, Interacting Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers, PRX Quantum6, 010353 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cor- tiñas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dotsenko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux, Th. Jolicoeur, and M. Brune, Towards Quantum Simulation with Circular Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. X8, 011032 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    S. R. Cohen and J. D. Thompson, Quantum Computing with Circular Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum2, 030322 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Tailoring interaction ranges in atom arrays

    T. Botzung, G. Creutzer, C. Sayrin, and J. Schachen- mayer, Tailoring interaction ranges in atom arrays (2025), arXiv:2508.02815 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Nguyen, J.-G

    M.-T. Nguyen, J.-G. Liu, J. Wurtz, M. D. Lukin, S.-T. Wang, and H. Pichler, Quantum Optimization with Ar- bitrary Connectivity Using Rydberg Atom Arrays, PRX Quantum4, 010316 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Zoller, High-dimensional SO(4)-symmetric Rydberg manifolds for quantum simulation, Quantum Science and Technology8, 015020 (2022)

    A.Kruckenhauser, R.vanBijnen, T.V.Zache, M.D.Lib- erto, and P. Zoller, High-dimensional SO(4)-symmetric Rydberg manifolds for quantum simulation, Quantum Science and Technology8, 015020 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    R. C. Teixeira, A. Larrouy, A. Muni, L. Lachaud, J.-M. Raimond, S. Gleyzes, and M. Brune, Prepara- tion of Long-Lived, Non-Autoionizing Circular Rydberg StatesofStrontium,PhysicalReviewLetters125,263001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Hölzl, A

    C. Hölzl, A. Götzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth, and F. Meinert, Long-Lived Circular Rydberg Qubits of Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers, Physical Re- view X14, 021024 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Physics14, 988 (2018)

    B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Physics14, 988 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    R. J. Lewis-Swan, A. Safavi-Naini, A. M. Kaufman, and A. M. Rey, Dynamics of quantum information, Nature Reviews Physics1, 627 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Swingle, Scrambling Dynamics and Out-of- Time-Ordered Correlators in Quantum Many-Body Sys- tems, PRX Quantum5, 010201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Liang, Z

    X. Liang, Z. Yue, Y.-X. Chao, Z.-X. Hua, Y. Lin, M. K. Tey, and L. You, Observation of Anomalous Information Scrambling in a Rydberg Atom Array, Physical Review Letters135, 050201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nature Physics14, 745 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papić, Quantum many- body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nature Physics17, 675 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements, Physical Review X10, 041020 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Turkeshi, A

    X. Turkeshi, A. Biella, R. Fazio, M. Dalmonte, and M. Schiró, Measurement-induced entanglement transi- tions in the quantum Ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks, Physical Review B103, 224210 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    G. D. Fresco, Y. L. Gal, D. Valenti, M. Schirò, and A. Carollo, Entanglement growth in the dark inter- vals of a locally monitored free-fermion chain (2024), arXiv:2411.13667

    work page arXiv 2024