pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.02246 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-02 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech

Kinetically constrained cavity QED: from blockaded ferromagnetism to long-range quantum scars

Hossein Hosseinabadi , Riccardo J. Valencia-Tortora , Aleksandr N. Mikheev , Darrick E. Chang , Johannes Zeiher , Roderich Moessner , Jamir Marino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 10:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Rydberg blockadecavity QEDquantum many-body scarssuperradiant phasekinetically constrained modelslong-range interactionseigenstate thermalization hypothesisentanglement dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Restricting Rydberg-cavity systems to the strong blockade subspace produces a distinct blockaded ferromagnetic phase and long-range quantum scars with logarithmic entanglement growth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a minimal effective model for hybrid Rydberg-cavity systems by enforcing the strong Rydberg blockade and restricting the Hilbert space to the allowed subspace. This yields a one-dimensional kinetically constrained long-range interacting model that captures the essential physics when short-range Rydberg interactions dominate. At equilibrium the restricted model supports a blockaded ferromagnetic or superradiant phase in addition to paramagnetic and Néel phases. Out of equilibrium it hosts long-range quantum many-body scars that violate eigenstate thermalization and produce slow logarithmic entanglement growth instead of the linear growth typical of short-range scarred systems. A reader would care because the construction supplies a transparent, scalable framework for engineering and studying the competition between long-range cavity-mediated couplings and short-range blockade constraints in current experimental platforms.

Core claim

By focusing on the strong Rydberg blockade regime and projecting onto the corresponding subspace, the authors obtain a kinetically constrained long-range model whose equilibrium phase diagram includes a blockaded ferromagnetic/superradiant phase distinct from the conventional superradiant phase, while its dynamics feature long-range quantum many-body scars that evade thermalization and generate logarithmic entanglement growth.

What carries the argument

The kinetically constrained long-range model in one dimension obtained by restricting the Hilbert space to the subspace enforced by strong Rydberg blockade.

If this is right

  • The restricted model exhibits a blockaded ferromagnetic/superradiant phase that is distinct from the usual superradiant phase.
  • Long-range quantum many-body scars appear as atypical nonthermal eigenstates that violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis.
  • These scars produce logarithmic entanglement growth in contrast to the linear growth found in short-range scarred models.
  • The construction supplies a scalable and conceptually transparent framework for Rydberg-cavity experiments in the strong-interaction regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same blockade-restriction technique could be applied to two-dimensional or ladder geometries to search for higher-dimensional analogs of the blockaded phase and scars.
  • Logarithmic entanglement growth may imply slower information spreading that could be exploited for protecting quantum information in cavity-mediated systems.
  • Similar kinetic constraints might be engineered in other cavity-QED platforms that lack Rydberg atoms but possess tunable short-range repulsion.

Load-bearing premise

The strong Rydberg blockade regime permits a faithful effective description by restricting the Hilbert space without appreciable leakage or higher-order corrections from states outside the blockaded subspace.

What would settle it

Direct observation, in a one-dimensional Rydberg-cavity array under strong blockade, of either a ferromagnetic magnetization pattern or entanglement entropy that grows logarithmically rather than linearly with time would support the restricted model; significant population leakage outside the blockade subspace or strictly linear entanglement growth would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.02246 by Aleksandr N. Mikheev, Darrick E. Chang, Hossein Hosseinabadi, Jamir Marino, Johannes Zeiher, Riccardo J. Valencia-Tortora, Roderich Moessner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spectrum of the low-energy excitations for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dispersion of excitations in the paramagnetic phase and close [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) and (b), the overlap between the N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of entanglement entropy in the (PXP) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Entanglement dynamics in the (PXP) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rydberg-cavity systems are emerging as promising platforms for quantum simulation and quantum information processing. These hybrid architectures combine two complementary interaction mechanisms: cavity photons mediate collective long-range couplings, while Rydberg excitations generate strong short-range interactions. Together, they offer a setting for engineering many-body phases characterized by a hierarchy of interactions across widely different length scales. In this work, we introduce a minimal and scalable model for such systems. Focusing on the strong Rydberg blockade regime, we restrict the Hilbert space to the subspace enforced by the blockade, yielding a kinetically constrained long-range model in one spatial dimension. This approach both captures the physics of Rydberg-cavity experiments in the regime of strong Rydberg interactions and provides a conceptually transparent framework for studying the interplay of long-range and short-range interactions. At equilibrium, in addition to paramagnetic and N\'eel-ordered phases, the system supports a blockaded ferromagnetic/superradiant phase, distinct from the conventional superradiant phase. Out of equilibrium, we identify long-range quantum many-body scars, which are atypical nonthermal eigenstates that evade the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and giving rise to slow entanglement growth. In contrast to the linear-in-time entanglement growth characteristic of short-range scarred models, these long-range scars exhibit logarithmic entanglement dynamics. Our results establish a minimal yet versatile framework for Rydberg-cavity systems, and provide a stepping stone for future theoretical and experimental studies of this frontier platform in quantum many-body physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a minimal 1D kinetically constrained model for Rydberg-cavity QED systems obtained by projecting the full Hamiltonian onto the strong Rydberg blockade subspace (no double Rydberg excitations). Within this restricted model the authors report a blockaded ferromagnetic/superradiant phase distinct from the conventional superradiant phase, together with long-range quantum many-body scars that evade the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and produce logarithmic entanglement growth rather than the linear growth seen in short-range scarred systems.

Significance. If the effective description is controlled, the work supplies a transparent, scalable framework that isolates the interplay between cavity-mediated long-range couplings and short-range Rydberg blockade. The reported blockaded phase and long-range scars with slow entanglement dynamics would constitute a concrete advance in the study of hybrid long-range/short-range quantum many-body systems and could guide future Rydberg-cavity experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. [model construction / effective Hamiltonian] The central claims rest on the fidelity of the projected kinetically constrained Hamiltonian. In the model-construction section the authors restrict the Hilbert space to the blockade subspace but do not supply a perturbative expansion in 1/V (where V is the Rydberg blockade strength) or an explicit error bound quantifying leakage induced by the cavity-mediated virtual processes. Without such control it remains unclear whether the reported blockaded ferromagnetic phase and the long-range scars remain stable in the regime where the distinct superradiant behavior is claimed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [equilibrium phases] The distinction between the blockaded ferromagnetic/superradiant phase and the conventional superradiant phase would be clearer if the order parameters or correlation functions used to identify each phase were defined explicitly (e.g., in a dedicated paragraph or figure caption).
  2. [out-of-equilibrium dynamics] The logarithmic entanglement growth for the long-range scars is an interesting claim; a brief comparison plot or table contrasting the entanglement dynamics of the long-range versus short-range scarred models would strengthen the presentation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the significance of our results and for the constructive comment on the construction of the effective Hamiltonian. We address the concern point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claims rest on the fidelity of the projected kinetically constrained Hamiltonian. In the model-construction section the authors restrict the Hilbert space to the blockade subspace but do not supply a perturbative expansion in 1/V (where V is the Rydberg blockade strength) or an explicit error bound quantifying leakage induced by the cavity-mediated virtual processes. Without such control it remains unclear whether the reported blockaded ferromagnetic phase and the long-range scars remain stable in the regime where the distinct superradiant behavior is claimed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit perturbative control of the projection would strengthen the presentation. In the strong-blockade regime that defines our model, the Rydberg interaction V is taken to be the largest energy scale, so that the cavity-mediated terms induce only virtual processes suppressed by 1/V. In the revised manuscript we will add a short subsection deriving the leading-order virtual corrections and providing a simple bound on the leakage amplitude out of the blockade subspace. This analysis will confirm that the blockaded ferromagnetic phase and the long-range scars remain stable throughout the parameter window in which we report their distinct phenomenology. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; effective model follows from standard blockade projection

full rationale

The paper constructs its kinetically constrained model by restricting the Hilbert space to the strong Rydberg blockade subspace, a standard physical approximation in Rydberg-cavity systems rather than a self-referential definition or fitted input. From this effective long-range model the blockaded ferromagnetic phase and long-range scars are derived via direct analysis of the projected Hamiltonian. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks of Rydberg blockade physics and does not rely on tautological renaming or prediction-by-fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the strong-blockade subspace restriction as an accurate effective description; no free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Strong Rydberg blockade restricts the Hilbert space to a kinetically constrained subspace that faithfully captures the physics
    This approximation is invoked to derive the minimal long-range model from the full Rydberg-cavity Hamiltonian.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5841 in / 1395 out tokens · 41264 ms · 2026-05-18T10:25:58.985344+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Constants phi_golden_ratio echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    D e⇒ | σx_i | e⇒ / D e⇒ | e⇒ = 2 / (2 + φ) + O(φ^{-2L}) ≈ 0.55, where φ = (1 + √5)/2 ≈ 1.6 is the golden ratio.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Extensive mixed-state entanglement in kinetically constrained superradiance

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Local Boolean kinetic constraints added to Dicke superradiance generate extensive mixed-state entanglement and a hierarchy of long-range entangled singlet dark states while retaining superradiant N^2 scaling.

  2. Kinetically constrained superradiance

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kinetically constrained superradiance splits Dicke superradiance into selective collective decay channels that trap finite-momentum spin waves and produce dissipation-generated entanglement.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    We begin with the limit∆≫1, where the interaction term becomes negligible

    Qualitative analysis Considerable insight into the ground state structure of the system as a function of∆can be obtained on physical grounds, as we now discuss. We begin with the limit∆≫1, where the interaction term becomes negligible. In this case, the ground state is a classical paramagnet (PM), given by a product state of atomic ground states: |ΩPM⟩ = ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    However, as we will show using exact numerical results in Section IV A 2, this ansatz does not describe the true FM ground state

    This suggests a transition from the FM to the N ´eel phase is associated with the restoration of theZ 2 symmetry. However, as we will show using exact numerical results in Section IV A 2, this ansatz does not describe the true FM ground state. Although the FM phase does break theZ 2 symmetry, it remains translationally invariant. Taking this observation i...

    work page

  3. [3]

    As an unbiased indicator of phase transitions, we use the half-chain entanglement entropyS L/2

    Numerical results Following the discussion of the previous section, we numerically diagonalize ˜Hin the blockade subspace to study its ground state phases. As an unbiased indicator of phase transitions, we use the half-chain entanglement entropyS L/2. Deep within conventional ordered phases, entanglement is typically weak, as the ground states can often b...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Nonetheless, in finite-sized systems, such a symmetric metastable state can be adiabatically prepared [67, 68], similar to the phenomenon of supercooling in liquids [69, 70]

    In the thermodynamic limit, infinitesimal symmetry-breaking fields are expected to drive the system toward one of the symmetry-broken N ´eel states. Nonetheless, in finite-sized systems, such a symmetric metastable state can be adiabatically prepared [67, 68], similar to the phenomenon of supercooling in liquids [69, 70]. Finally, in the intermediate regi...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Zero detuning (∆ =0) As discussed earlier, the case∆ =0 is closely related to the standard PXP model. Consequently, we follow a similar approach to analyzing entanglement dynamics by tracking the evolution of the half-chain entanglement entropy, S L/2(t)=−Tr A ρA(t) lnρ A(t) ,(43) whereρ A(t) is the reduced density matrix of a subsystem Aof sizeL/2, obtai...

    work page

  6. [6]

    This agreement can be attributed to the fact that, at short times, the number of spin flips remains small, and the blockade projectors (Eq

    We find that, when initialized in the vacuum state, the entanglement growth in both the (PXP) 2 and LMG models agrees at early times, with their corresponding curves nearly overlapping. This agreement can be attributed to the fact that, at short times, the number of spin flips remains small, and the blockade projectors (Eq. (6)) have a negligible effect o...

    work page

  7. [7]

    hysteresis type phenomenon

    Finite detuning (∆,0) Having discussed the case of vanishing∆ =0, we now turn to the more general regime of finite∆. As we shall demonstrate, the interplay between the blockade constraint and long-range interactions gives rise to a non- trivial dependence of the entanglement dynamics on∆, exhibiting a marked asymmetry between positive and negative values....

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2020

  8. [8]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Altman, K

    E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Demler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriksson, K.- M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Koll´ar, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe, K. Murch, Z. Nazario, K.-K. Ni, A. C. Potter, P. Roushan, M. Saffman, M. Schleier-Smith, I. Siddiqi, R. Simmonds, M. S...

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, Cavity qed with quantum gases: new paradigms in many-body physics, Advances in Physics70, 1–153 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  13. [13]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model, Annals of Physics76, 360 (1973)

    work page 1973

  14. [14]

    Kirton, M

    P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the dicke model: From equilibrium to 15 nonequilibrium, and vice versa, Advanced Quantum Technologies2, 1800043 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature464, 1301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Baumann, R

    K. Baumann, R. Mottl, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Exploring symmetry breaking at the dicke quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 140402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Landig, L

    R. Landig, L. Hruby, N. Dogra, M. Landini, R. Mottl, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Quantum phases from competing short- and long-range interactions in an optical lattice, Nature 532, 476 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    L ´eonard, A

    J. L ´eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Supersolid formation in a quantum gas breaking a continuous translational symmetry, Nature543, 87 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Piazza and P

    F. Piazza and P. Strack, Umklapp superradiance with a collisionless quantum degenerate fermi gas, Physical Review Letters112, 143003 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Y . Chen, Z. Yu, and H. Zhai, Superradiance of degenerate fermi gases in a cavity, Physical Review Letters112, 143004 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Keeling, M

    J. Keeling, M. Bhaseen, and B. Simons, Fermionic superradiance in a transversely pumped optical cavity, Physical Review Letters112, 143002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Helson, T

    V . Helson, T. Zwettler, F. Mivehvar, E. Colella, K. Roux, H. Konishi, H. Ritsch, and J.-P. Brantut, Density-wave ordering in a unitary fermi gas with photon-mediated interactions, Nature618, 716 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Zwettler, G

    T. Zwettler, G. Del Pace, F. Marijanovic, S. Chattopadhyay, T. B ¨uhler, C.-M. Halati, L. Skolc, L. Tolle, V . Helson, G. Bolognini, A. Fabre, S. Uchino, T. Giamarchi, E. Demler, and J. P. Brantut, Nonequilibrium dynamics of long-range interacting fermions, Phys. Rev. X15, 021089 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    B. P. Marsh, Y . Guo, R. M. Kroeze, S. Gopalakrishnan, S. Ganguli, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Enhancing associative memory recall and storage capacity using confocal cavity qed, Phys. Rev. X11, 021048 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Gopalakrishnan, B

    S. Gopalakrishnan, B. L. Lev, and P. M. Goldbart, Frustration and glassiness in spin models with cavity-mediated interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 277201 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Strack and S

    P. Strack and S. Sachdev, Dicke quantum spin glass of atoms and photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 277202 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    B. P. Marsh, R. M. Kroeze, S. Ganguli, S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Entanglement and replica symmetry breaking in a driven-dissipative quantum spin glass, Phys. Rev. X14, 011026 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    R. M. Kroeze, B. P. Marsh, D. A. Schuller, H. S. Hunt, A. N. Bourzutschky, M. Winer, S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Directly observing replica symmetry breaking in a vector quantum-optical spin glass, Science0, eadu7710, https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adu7710

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adu7710

  29. [29]

    B. P. Marsh, D. A. Schuller, Y . Ji, H. S. Hunt, G. Z. Socolof, D. P. Bowman, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, A multimode cavity qed ising spin glass, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22658 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Hosseinabadi, D

    H. Hosseinabadi, D. E. Chang, and J. Marino, Quantum-to- classical crossover in the spin glass dynamics of cavity qed simulators, Physical Review Research6, 043313 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Hosseinabadi, D

    H. Hosseinabadi, D. E. Chang, and J. Marino, Far from equilibrium field theory for strongly coupled light and matter: Dynamics of frustrated multimode cavity qed, Physical Review Research6, 043314 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Lesanovsky, Many-body spin interactions and the ground state of a dense rydberg lattice gas, Phys

    I. Lesanovsky, Many-body spin interactions and the ground state of a dense rydberg lattice gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 025301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti ´c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V . Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L ¨auchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hundreds of rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V . S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. L¨auchli, M. P. Zaletel, T. Lahaye, N. Y . Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous symmetry breaking in a two- dimensional rydberg array, Nature616, 691 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    de L ´es´eleuc, V

    S. de L ´es´eleuc, V . Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. B ¨uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms, Science365, 775 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Semeghini et al., Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, abi8794 (2021), arXiv:2104.04119 [quant-ph]

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V . Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242–1247 (2021), arXiv:2104.04119 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physi...

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature551, 579–584 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven rydberg atom arrays, Science371, 1355–1359 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nature Physics14, 745–749 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    W. W. Ho, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Periodic orbits, entanglement, and quantum many-body scars in constrained models: Matrix product state approach, Physical Review Letters122, 040603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi ´c, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nature Physics17, 675–685 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Reports on Progress in Physics85, 086501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    R. J. Valencia-Tortora, N. Pancotti, M. Fleischhauer, H. Bernien, and J. Marino, Rydberg platform for nonergodic chiral quantum dynamics, Physical Review Letters132, 223201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    R. J. Valencia-Tortora, N. Pancotti, and J. Marino, Kinetically constrained quantum dynamics in superconducting circuits, PRX Quantum3, 020346 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    L. W. Clark, N. Schine, C. Baum, N. Jia, and J. Simon, Observation of laughlin states made of light, Nature582, 41 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Stolz, H

    T. Stolz, H. Hegels, M. Winter, B. R ¨ohr, Y .-F. Hsiao, L. Husel, G. Rempe, and S. D ¨urr, Quantum-logic gate between two optical photons with an average efficiency above 40%, Phys. 16 Rev. X12, 021035 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Vaneecloo, S

    J. Vaneecloo, S. Garcia, and A. Ourjoumtsev, Intracavity rydberg superatom for optical quantum engineering: Coherent control, single-shot detection, and opticalπphase shift, Phys. Rev. X12, 021034 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Deist, J

    E. Deist, J. A. Gerber, Y .-H. Lu, J. Zeiher, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Superresolution microscopy of optical fields using tweezer-trapped single atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 083201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Deist, Y .-H

    E. Deist, Y .-H. Lu, J. Ho, M. K. Pasha, J. Zeiher, Z. Yan, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Mid-circuit cavity measurement in a neutral atom array, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 203602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Z. Yan, J. Ho, Y .-H. Lu, S. J. Masson, A. Asenjo-Garcia, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Superradiant and subradiant cavity scattering by atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 253603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    B. Hu, J. Sinclair, E. Bytyqi, M. Chong, A. Rudelis, J. Ramette, Z. Vendeiro, and V . Vuleti´c, Site-selective cavity readout and classical error correction of a 5-bit atomic register, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 120801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Gelhausen, M

    J. Gelhausen, M. Buchhold, A. Rosch, and P. Strack, Quantum-optical magnets with competing short- and long- range interactions: Rydberg-dressed spin lattice in an optical cavity, SciPost Physics1, 004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    T. O. Puel and T. Macr`ı, Confined meson excitations in rydberg- atom arrays coupled to a cavity field, Physical Review Letters 133, 106901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Bacciconi, H

    Z. Bacciconi, H. B. Xavier, M. Marinelli, D. S. Bhakuni, and M. Dalmonte, Local vs nonlocal dynamics in cavity-coupled rydberg atom arrays, Physical Review Letters134, 213604 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    A. N. Mikheev, H. Hosseinabadi, and J. Marino, Prethermalization of light and matter in cavity-coupled rydberg arrays, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06267 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Hosseinabadi, O

    H. Hosseinabadi, O. Chelpanova, and J. Marino, User-friendly truncated wigner approximation for dissipative spin dynamics, PRX Quantum6, 030344 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Ribeiro, J

    P. Ribeiro, J. Vidal, and R. Mosseri, Thermodynamical limit of the lipkin-meshkov-glick model, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 050402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    A. S. Buyskikh, M. Fagotti, J. Schachenmayer, F. Essler, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth and correlation spreading with variable-range interactions in spin and fermionic tunneling models, Phys. Rev. A93, 053620 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Pappalardi, A

    S. Pappalardi, A. Russomanno, B. ˇZunkoviˇc, F. Iemini, A. Silva, and R. Fazio, Scrambling and entanglement spreading in long-range spin chains, Phys. Rev. B98, 134303 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Lerose and S

    A. Lerose and S. Pappalardi, Origin of the slow growth of entanglement entropy in long-range interacting spin systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 012041 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Donner, T. Macr `ı, G. Pagano, S. Ruffo, and A. Trombettoni, Long-range interacting quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics95, 035002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Marino, Universality class of ising critical states with long- range losses, Physical Review Letters129, 050603 (2022)

    J. Marino, Universality class of ising critical states with long- range losses, Physical Review Letters129, 050603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Lipkin, N

    H. Lipkin, N. Meshkov, and A. Glick, Validity of many- body approximation methods for a solvable model: (i). exact solutions and perturbation theory, Nuclear Physics62, 188 (1965)

    work page 1965

  66. [66]

    Lesanovsky and H

    I. Lesanovsky and H. Katsura, Interacting fibonacci anyons in a rydberg gas, Phys. Rev. A86, 041601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  67. [67]

    A. Das, K. Sengupta, D. Sen, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Infinite-range ising ferromagnet in a time-dependent transverse magnetic field: Quench and ac dynamics near the quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B74, 144423 (2006)

    work page 2006

  68. [68]

    Marino, M

    J. Marino, M. Eckstein, M. S. Foster, and A. M. Rey, Dynamical phase transitions in the collisionless pre-thermal states of isolated quantum systems: theory and experiments, Reports on Progress in Physics85, 116001 (2022), arXiv:2201.09894 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, A. Pi ˜neiro Orioli, and J. Marino, Far-from-equilibrium universality in the two-dimensional heisenberg model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2122599119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Russomanno, F

    A. Russomanno, F. Iemini, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Floquet time crystal in the lipkin-meshkov-glick model, Phys. Rev. B 95, 214307 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Lerose, J

    A. Lerose, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Prethermal quantum many-body kapitza phases of periodically driven spin systems, Phys. Rev. B100, 104306 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Slow holes in the triangular ising antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B62, 14122 (2000)

    work page 2000

  74. [74]

    Omran, H

    A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, A. S. Zibrov, H. Pichler, S. Choi, J. Cui, M. Rossignolo, P. Rembold, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Generation and manipulation of schr ¨odinger cat states in rydberg atom arrays, Science365, 570 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    Senoo, A

    A. Senoo, A. Baumg ˜A¯Irtner, J. W. Lis, G. M. Vaidya, Z. Zeng, G. Giudici, H. Pichler, and A. M. Kaufman, High-fidelity entanglement and coherent multi-qubit mapping in an atom array, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13632 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    F. C. Frank, Supercooling of liquids, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences215, 43 (1952)

    work page 1952

  77. [77]

    C. A. Angell, Supercooled water, inWater and Aqueous Solutions at Subzero Temperatures, edited by F. Franks (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1982) pp. 1–81

    work page 1982

  78. [78]

    J. Ye, S. Sachdev, and N. Read, Solvable spin glass of quantum rotors, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 4011 (1993)

    work page 1993

  79. [79]

    Schachenmayer, B

    J. Schachenmayer, B. P. Lanyon, C. F. Roos, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth in quench dynamics with variable range interactions, Phys. Rev. X3, 031015 (2013)

    work page 2013

  80. [80]

    Zeiher, R

    J. Zeiher, R. van Bijnen, P. Schauß, S. Hild, J.-y. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-body interferometry of a rydberg- dressed spin lattice, Nature Physics12, 1095 (2016)

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.