pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.15046 · v2 · pith:5T633GVQnew · submitted 2025-10-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Multi-species Dark Matter with Warmth and Randomness

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords multi-species dark matterBBGKY hierarchycosmic structurepower spectravelocity dispersionPoisson fluctuationsisocurvature perturbations
0
0 comments X

The pith

An analytic framework evolves cosmic structure for arbitrary mixes of cold, warm, and sparse dark matter species while including velocity dispersion and Poisson noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a general method to follow how multiple dark matter components with different masses, velocities, and densities grow into cosmic structure. It does so by solving a truncated BBGKY hierarchy through Volterra integral equations, yielding an efficient algorithm for the total, inter-species, and intra-species power spectra. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach handles mixtures that range from ordinary cold dark matter to warm particles or rare objects such as primordial black holes, and the results agree with simple estimates and N-body simulations in two-component test cases. The evolution of initially Poisson (isocurvature) versus adiabatic spectra is controlled by each species’ free-streaming and Jeans scales.

Core claim

By solving a truncated BBGKY hierarchy via Volterra integral equations, the framework computes the evolution of total, inter-, and intra-species power spectra for any number of dark matter components that have distinct mass fractions, velocity distributions, and number densities, ranging from cold particles to warm species and sparse populations such as primordial black holes or solitons.

What carries the argument

Truncated BBGKY hierarchy solved through Volterra integral equations, which folds in finite velocity dispersion and Poisson fluctuations for multiple species.

If this is right

  • Isocurvature spectra and adiabatic spectra evolve differently according to the velocity and density properties of the warm or sparse component.
  • The growth is governed by each species’ free-streaming scale and Jeans scale.
  • The method reproduces both analytic estimates and N-body simulation results for two-component mixtures.
  • The same equations apply to any number of components without changing the core algorithm.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could let modelers scan wide ranges of multi-species parameters before committing to expensive simulations.
  • It offers a natural route to include objects such as axion stars or boson stars alongside standard cold dark matter.
  • Extensions to include baryon-dark-matter interactions or redshift-dependent velocity distributions appear straightforward within the same integral-equation structure.

Load-bearing premise

The truncation of the BBGKY hierarchy stays accurate on the scales and for the species properties of interest, with velocity distributions supplied as fixed inputs.

What would settle it

N-body simulations of a two-component dark matter model with chosen velocity dispersions and densities that produce power spectra differing markedly from the analytic predictions at scales set by the free-streaming or Jeans lengths.

read the original abstract

We present a general analytic framework for the evolution of cosmic structure in multi-species dark matter models that simultaneously incorporates finite velocity dispersion and Poisson fluctuations. Our approach accommodates arbitrary numbers of dark matter components with distinct mass fractions, velocity distributions, and number densities -- ranging from cold particles to warm species and sparse populations such as primordial black holes or solitons. The framework is based on solving a truncated BBGKY hierarchy, whose solution is obtained by solving Volterra integral equations. We provide an efficient algorithm to solve for the total, as well as inter- and intra-species power spectra. Worked examples with two-component mixtures illustrate how isocurvature (initially Poisson) and adiabatic spectra evolve differently depending on the properties of the warm or sparse fraction. This evolution is controlled by the free-streaming and Jeans scales, and the results match analytic estimates and $N$-body simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents a general analytic framework for the evolution of cosmic structure in multi-species dark matter models that simultaneously incorporates finite velocity dispersion and Poisson fluctuations. The approach accommodates arbitrary numbers of dark matter components with distinct mass fractions, velocity distributions, and number densities. It is based on solving a truncated BBGKY hierarchy via Volterra integral equations to compute the total, inter-, and intra-species power spectra. Worked examples with two-component mixtures illustrate the distinct evolution of isocurvature (initially Poisson) and adiabatic spectra, controlled by free-streaming and Jeans scales, with results stated to match analytic estimates and N-body simulations.

Significance. If the truncation remains accurate, the framework would provide a computationally efficient analytic tool for exploring multi-component dark matter models, including mixtures of cold, warm, and sparse populations such as primordial black holes. The separation into total, cross, and auto spectra and the handling of both adiabatic and isocurvature initial conditions could facilitate studies of small-scale structure without requiring full N-body runs for every parameter combination.

major comments (1)
  1. [BBGKY truncation and solution method] The truncation of the BBGKY hierarchy at the two-point level (with velocity distributions treated as fixed inputs) is the central approximation. No explicit error bounds, scale-dependent residuals, or higher-moment closure tests are reported, particularly for sparse low-number-density components where Poisson fluctuations dominate. This directly affects the reliability of the claimed agreement with N-body simulations on free-streaming and Jeans scales.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation and definitions] The distinction between intra-species and inter-species power spectra in the multi-component generalization would benefit from a clearer summary table or explicit definitions early in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of assessing the accuracy of the BBGKY truncation. We address this central point below and commit to revisions that will strengthen the discussion of the approximation's regime of validity.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The truncation of the BBGKY hierarchy at the two-point level (with velocity distributions treated as fixed inputs) is the central approximation. No explicit error bounds, scale-dependent residuals, or higher-moment closure tests are reported, particularly for sparse low-number-density components where Poisson fluctuations dominate. This directly affects the reliability of the claimed agreement with N-body simulations on free-streaming and Jeans scales.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative error bounds and systematic higher-moment tests are not provided in the current manuscript. The framework solves the truncated hierarchy exactly via Volterra equations under the assumption that velocity distributions remain fixed inputs, which is motivated by the dominance of free-streaming and Jeans suppression on the scales of interest. Agreement with N-body simulations is shown for two-component mixtures through direct spectral comparisons, but we acknowledge this does not constitute a full closure validation, especially for very sparse populations. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection discussing the expected accuracy of the truncation, including qualitative estimates of residuals based on the suppression of higher correlations at large scales and references to prior BBGKY literature. We will also clarify the parameter regimes (e.g., number densities above a threshold where Poisson fluctuations remain perturbative) where the approximation is expected to hold. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation from standard truncated BBGKY hierarchy is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives total, inter-, and intra-species power spectra by solving a truncated BBGKY hierarchy expressed as Volterra integral equations, treating each species' velocity distribution as an explicit input. This is a direct adaptation of the standard BBGKY moment hierarchy from statistical mechanics to multi-component dark matter, with truncation at the two-point level stated as an approximation rather than a self-referential closure. No quoted step reduces the output spectra to quantities defined by the paper's own fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled from prior work by the same authors. External comparisons to N-body simulations and analytic free-streaming/Jeans estimates provide independent checks, keeping the central construction non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the standard BBGKY hierarchy from statistical mechanics and the assumption that truncation at the two-point level suffices for power spectra; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond user-specified species properties such as mass fractions and velocity distributions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The BBGKY hierarchy can be truncated while retaining accuracy for the evolution of density power spectra in the regimes of interest.
    The framework is explicitly based on solving a truncated BBGKY hierarchy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1189 out tokens · 70776 ms · 2026-05-21T20:57:20.403249+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Warm, not Fuzzy: Generalized Ultralight Dark Matter Limits from Milky Way Satellites

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generalizes ultralight DM mass limits from MW satellite abundances to peaked power spectrum models, yielding m > 6e-18 eV scaled by k_* at 95% confidence for different k_* regimes.

  2. Growth of Structure in Multi-species Wave Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives the power spectrum evolution and cross-spectra for arbitrary multi-species wave and particle dark matter, incorporating free-streaming, Jeans scales, and intrinsic fluctuations.

  3. Echoes of Global Cosmic Strings

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Global cosmic strings from symmetry breaking produce Nambu-Goldstone bosons whose cosmological signatures can be constrained by current and upcoming CMB and large-scale structure observations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

  2. [2]

    Drlica-Wagneret al.,Report of the Topical Group on Cosmic Probes of Dark Matter for Snowmass 2021,2209.08215

    A. Drlica-Wagner et al.,Report of the Topical Group on Cosmic Probes of Dark Matter for Snowmass 2021,2209.08215

  3. [3]

    Mondino, A.-M

    C. Mondino, A.-M. Taki, K. Van Tilburg and N. Weiner,First Results on Dark Matter Substructure from Astrometric Weak Lensing,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 111101 [ 2002.01938]

  4. [4]

    Sabti, J.B

    N. Sabti, J.B. Mu˜ noz and D. Blas,New Roads to the Small-scale Universe: Measurements of the Clustering of Matter with the High-redshift UV Galaxy Luminosity Function,Astrophys. J. Lett. 928(2022) L20 [2110.13161]

  5. [5]

    Gilman, A

    D. Gilman, A. Benson, J. Bovy, S. Birrer, T. Treu and A. Nierenberg,The primordial matter power spectrum on sub-galactic scales,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.512(2022) 3163 [2112.03293]

  6. [6]

    Delos and F

    M.S. Delos and F. Schmidt,Stellar streams and dark substructure: the diffusion regime,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.513(2022) 3682 [2108.13420]. – 10 –

  7. [7]

    Boylan-Kolchin, Stress testing ΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates, Nature Astron

    M. Boylan-Kolchin,Stress testingΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates,Nature Astron.7 (2023) 731 [2208.01611]

  8. [8]

    Chung, M

    D.J.H. Chung, M. M¨ unchmeyer and S.C. Tadepalli,Search for isocurvature with large-scale structure: A forecast for Euclid and MegaMapper using EFTofLSS,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 103542 [2306.09456]

  9. [9]

    Irˇ siˇ cet al., Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha for- est, Phys

    V. Irˇ siˇ c et al.,Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 043511 [2309.04533]

  10. [10]

    Delos,An analytical description of substructure-induced gravitational perturbations in stellar systems,Mon

    M.S. Delos,An analytical description of substructure-induced gravitational perturbations in stellar systems,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.529(2024) 2349 [2312.13338]

  11. [11]

    Esteban, A.H.G

    I. Esteban, A.H.G. Peter and S.Y. Kim,Milky Way satellite velocities reveal the dark matter power spectrum at small scales,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123013 [2306.04674]

  12. [12]

    Nadler, V

    E.O. Nadler, V. Gluscevic, T. Driskell, R.H. Wechsler, L.A. Moustakas, A. Benson et al., Forecasts for Galaxy Formation and Dark Matter Constraints from Dwarf Galaxy Surveys, Astrophys. J.967(2024) 61 [2401.10318]

  13. [13]

    R. An, E.O. Nadler, A. Benson and V. Gluscevic,COZMIC. II. Cosmological Zoom-in Simulations with Fractional non-CDM Initial Conditions,Astrophys. J.986(2025) 128 [2411.03431]

  14. [14]

    H. Xiao, L. Dai and M. McQuinn,Detecting dark matter substructures on small scales with fast radio bursts,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 023516 [2401.08862]

  15. [15]

    Ji and L

    L. Ji and L. Dai,Effects of Subhalos on Interpreting Highly Magnified Sources Near Lensing Caustics,2407.09594

  16. [16]

    de Kruijf, E

    J. de Kruijf, E. Vanzan, K.K. Boddy, A. Raccanelli and N. Bartolo,Searching for blue-tilted power spectra in the dark ages,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063507 [2408.04991]

  17. [17]

    Buckley, P

    M.R. Buckley, P. Du, N. Fernandez and M.J. Weikert,General Constraints on Isocurvature from the CMB and Ly-αForest,2502.20434

  18. [18]

    Boddy, J.A

    K.K. Boddy, J.A. Dror and A. Lam,Ultralight Dark Matter Statistics for Pulsar Timing Detection,2502.15874

  19. [19]

    Trost, J.S

    A. Trost, J.S. Bolton, A. Caputo, H. Liu, S. Cristiani and M. Viel,Constraints on dark photon dark matter from Lyman-αforest simulations and an ultrahigh signal-to-noise quasar spectrum, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083034 [2410.02858]

  20. [20]

    Fernandez, J.W

    N. Fernandez, J.W. Foster, B. Lillard and J. Shelton,Stochastic Gravitational Waves from Early Structure Formation,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 111002 [2312.12499]

  21. [21]

    Zeldovich and I.D

    Y.B. Zeldovich and I.D. Novikov,The hypothesis of cores retarded during expansion and the hot cosmological model,Soviet Astronomy10(1967) 602

  22. [22]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: The Power Spectrum and Evaporation of Early Structures

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald and D.N. Spergel,Primordial black holes as dark matter: The Power spectrum and evaporation of early structures,Astrophys. J. Lett.594(2003) L71 [astro-ph/0302035]

  23. [23]

    Inman and Y

    D. Inman and Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud,Early structure formation in primordial black hole cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 083528 [1907.08129]

  24. [24]

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Hawkins and F. Kuhnel,Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective,Phys. Rept.1054(2024) 1 [2306.03903]

  25. [25]

    Delos, A

    M.S. Delos, A. Rantala, S. Young and F. Schmidt,Structure formation with primordial black holes: collisional dynamics, binaries, and gravitational waves,JCAP12(2024) 005 [2410.01876]

  26. [26]

    Ivanov and S

    M.M. Ivanov and S. Trifinopoulos,Effective Field Theory Constraints on Primordial Black Holes from the High-Redshift Lyman-αForest,2508.04767. – 11 –

  27. [27]

    Gerlach, Y

    C. Gerlach, Y. Gouttenoire, A.J. Iovino and N. Leister,Closing the Mass Window for Stupendously Large Black Holes,2508.08238

  28. [28]

    Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh and T. Broadhurst,Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave,Nature Phys.10(2014) 496 [1406.6586]

  29. [29]

    Eberhardt and E

    A. Eberhardt and E.G.M. Ferreira,Ultralight fuzzy dark matter review,2507.00705

  30. [30]

    Kaup,Klein–gordon geon,Physical Review172(1968) 1331

    D.J. Kaup,Klein–gordon geon,Physical Review172(1968) 1331

  31. [31]

    Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,2411.16604

    S.-Y. Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,2411.16604

  32. [32]

    Axion Miniclusters and Bose Stars

    E.W. Kolb and I.I. Tkachev,Axion miniclusters and Bose stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 3051 [hep-ph/9303313]

  33. [33]

    Hogan and M

    C. Hogan and M. Rees,AXION MINICLUSTERS,Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 228

  34. [34]

    Are ultracompact minihalos really ultracompact?

    M.S. Delos, A.L. Erickcek, A.P. Bailey and M.A. Alvarez,Are ultracompact minihalos really ultracompact?,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 041303 [1712.05421]

  35. [35]

    Density profiles of ultracompact minihalos: Implications for constraining the primordial power spectrum

    M.S. Delos, A.L. Erickcek, A.P. Bailey and M.A. Alvarez,Density profiles of ultracompact minihalos: Implications for constraining the primordial power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 063527 [1806.07389]

  36. [36]

    Eggemeier, J

    B. Eggemeier, J. Redondo, K. Dolag, J.C. Niemeyer and A. Vaquero,First Simulations of Axion Minicluster Halos,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 041301 [1911.09417]

  37. [37]

    Delos and J

    M.S. Delos and J. Silk,Ultradense dark matter haloes accompany primordial black holes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.520(2023) 4370 [2210.04904]

  38. [38]

    Delos and G

    M.S. Delos and G. Franciolini,Lensing constraints on ultradense dark matter halos,Phys. Rev. D 107(2023) 083505 [2301.13171]

  39. [39]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy and G. Villadoro,More axion stars from strings,JHEP08(2024) 126 [2405.19389]

  40. [40]

    Halo Formation in Warm Dark Matter Models

    P. Bode, J.P. Ostriker and N. Turok,Halo formation in warm dark matter models,Astrophys. J. 556(2001) 93 [astro-ph/0010389]

  41. [41]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M.G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Constraining warm dark matter candidates including sterile neutrinos and light gravitinos with wmap and the lyman-alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063534 [astro-ph/0501562]

  42. [42]

    Warm Dark Matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: new constraints from high redshift Lyman-alpha forest data

    M. Viel, G.D. Becker, J.S. Bolton and M.G. Haehnelt,Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift lyman-alpha forest data,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 043502 [1306.2314]

  43. [43]

    Amin and M

    M.A. Amin and M. Mirbabayi,A Lower Bound on Dark Matter Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 221004 [2211.09775]

  44. [44]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open String Axiverse,2503.16387

  45. [45]

    Ling and M.A

    S. Ling and M.A. Amin,Free streaming in warm wave dark matter,JCAP02(2025) 025 [2408.05591]

  46. [46]

    Amin, M.S

    M.A. Amin, M.S. Delos and M. Mirbabayi,Structure Formation with Warm White Noise: Effects of Finite Number Density and Velocity Dispersion in Particle and Wave Dark Matter, 2503.20881

  47. [47]

    M.A. Amin, S. May and M. Mirbabayi,Early Growth of Structure in Warm Wave Dark Matter, 2506.12131

  48. [48]

    R. Liu, W. Hu and H. Xiao,Warm and fuzzy dark matter: Free streaming of wave dark matter, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023535 [2406.12970]. – 12 –

  49. [49]

    Long and M

    A.J. Long and M. Venegas,Free streaming of warm wave dark matter in modified expansion histories,2412.14322

  50. [50]

    R. Liu, W. Hu and H. Xiao,Interference with Gravitational Instability: Hot and Fuzzy Dark Matter,2504.01937

  51. [51]

    Harigaya, W

    K. Harigaya, W. Hu, R. Liu and H. Xiao,Universal lower bound on the axion decay constant from free streaming effects,2507.01956

  52. [52]

    Ling,Generating Moving Field Initial Conditions with Spatially Varying Boost,2506.23020

    S. Ling,Generating Moving Field Initial Conditions with Spatially Varying Boost,2506.23020

  53. [53]

    Multi-Component Dark Matter

    K.M. Zurek,Multi-Component Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 115002 [0811.4429]

  54. [54]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530 [0905.4720]

  55. [55]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1 [2303.04819]

  56. [56]

    Alexander, T

    S. Alexander, T. Manton and E. McDonough,Field theory axiverse,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 116019 [2404.11642]

  57. [57]

    Dark Matter and Structure Formation in the Universe

    J.R. Primack,Status of cold + hot dark matter cosmogony,Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements51(1996) 30 [astro-ph/9707285]

  58. [58]

    Schwabe, M

    B. Schwabe, M. Gosenca, C. Behrens, J.C. Niemeyer and R. Easther,Simulating mixed fuzzy and cold dark matter,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083518 [2007.08256]

  59. [59]

    Cyncynates, T

    D. Cyncynates, T. Giurgica-Tiron, O. Simon and J.O. Thompson,Resonant nonlinear pairs in the axiverse and their late-time direct and astrophysical signatures,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 055005 [2109.09755]

  60. [60]

    Vanzan, A

    E. Vanzan, A. Raccanelli and N. Bartolo,Dark ages, a window on the dark sector. Hunting for ultra-light axions,JCAP03(2024) 001 [2306.09252]

  61. [61]

    Lagu¨ e, B

    A. Lagu¨ e, B. Schwabe, R. Hloˇ zek, D.J.E. Marsh and K.K. Rogers,Cosmological simulations of mixed ultralight dark matter,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 043507 [2310.20000]

  62. [62]

    C.Y. Tan, A. Dekker and A. Drlica-Wagner,Mixed warm dark matter constraints using Milky Way satellite galaxy counts,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063079 [2409.18917]

  63. [63]

    Garcia-Gallego, V

    O. Garcia-Gallego, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M.G. Haehnelt, M. Viel and J.S. Bolton,Constraining mixed dark matter models with high-redshift Lyman-alpha forest data,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 043502 [2504.06367]

  64. [64]

    Evolution of cosmological dark matter perturbations

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor,Evolution of cosmological dark matter perturbations,Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 023531 [astro-ph/0203507]

  65. [65]

    Neutrino mass from Cosmology

    J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor,Neutrino mass from Cosmology,Adv. High Energy Phys.2012 (2012) 608515 [1212.6154]

  66. [66]

    C ¸elik and F

    S ¸. C ¸elik and F. Schmidt,Mixed Dark Matter and Galaxy Clustering: The Importance of Relative Perturbations,2508.21481

  67. [67]

    Verdiani, E

    F. Verdiani, E. Castorina, E. Salvioni and E. Sefusatti,The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure for Mixed Dark Matter Scenarios,2507.08792

  68. [68]

    Astrophysical Effects of Scalar Dark Matter Miniclusters

    K.M. Zurek, C.J. Hogan and T.R. Quinn,Astrophysical Effects of Scalar Dark Matter Miniclusters,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 043511 [astro-ph/0607341]

  69. [69]

    Primordial Black Holes as Generators of Cosmic Structures

    B. Carr and J. Silk,Primordial Black Holes as Generators of Cosmic Structures,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.478(2018) 3756 [1801.00672]

  70. [70]

    Irˇ siˇ c, H

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, H. Xiao and M. McQuinn,Early structure formation constraints on the ultralight axion in the postinflation scenario,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123518 [1911.11150]. – 13 – [71]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  71. [71]

    Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211]. [73]DEScollaboration,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 023520 [2105.13549]. [74]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measure...

  72. [72]

    Chabanier, M

    S. Chabanier, M. Millea and N. Palanque-Delabrouille,Matter power spectrum: from Ly α forest to CMB scales,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.489(2019) 2247 [1905.08103]

  73. [73]

    Tadepalli and T

    S.C. Tadepalli and T. Takahashi,Warm Dark Matter meets Cold Dark Matter Isocurvature, 2508.03805

  74. [74]

    Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter

    D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt,Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386]

  75. [75]

    Bottaro, E

    S. Bottaro, E. Castorina, M. Costa, D. Redigolo and E. Salvioni,From 100 kpc to 10 Gpc: Dark matter self-interactions before and after DESI observations,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023525 [2407.18252]

  76. [76]

    Bottaro, E

    S. Bottaro, E. Castorina, M. Costa, D. Redigolo and E. Salvioni,Unveiling Dark Forces with Measurements of the Large Scale Structure of the Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 201002 [2309.11496]

  77. [77]

    Graham, D

    P.W. Graham, D. Green and J. Meyers,Dark Forces Gathering,2508.20999

  78. [78]

    Grin, D.J.E

    D. Grin, D.J.E. Marsh and R. Hlozek,axionCAMB: Modification of the CAMB Boltzmann code,

  79. [79]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) IV: Efficient implementation of non-cold relics

    J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) IV: efficient implementation of non-cold relics,J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2011(2011) 032 [1104.2935]

  80. [80]

    Chudaykin, M.M

    A. Chudaykin, M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox and M. Simonovi´ c,Nonlinear perturbation theory extension of the Boltzmann code CLASS,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063533 [2004.10607]

Showing first 80 references.