pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.15063 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-16 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.IT· math.IT

Recognition: unknown

Physical Layer Deception as a Stackelberg Game: Strategy Regimes, Equilibrium, and Robust Design

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CR cs.ITmath.IT
keywords deceptiondistortionlayerphysicalstackelbergstrategytransmitterbaseline
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Physical layer deception (PLD) combines physical layer security (PLS) with deception: the transmitter actively misleads the eavesdropper with falsified information. We model the transmitter-eavesdropper interaction as a Stackelberg game in which the transmitter commits to a resource allocation and encryption strategy, and each receiver best-responds by selecting among three decryption modes: Perception, Dropping, and Exclusion. Using semantic distortion as the metric, we derive closed-form switching surfaces that partition the parameter space into strategy regimes and identify conditions under which each regime dominates. The robust operating point, at the peak of the worst-case distortion envelope, is shown to be a Stackelberg equilibrium; iterative best-response dynamics oscillate around it with strictly lower time-averaged security. We evaluate the design under Nakagami-m fading with static and adaptive transmitter strategies, benchmarked against a classical PLS baseline. Numerical results validate the regime characterization and show 12-55% higher eavesdropper distortion than the erasure-only baseline across all fading conditions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.