pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.04400 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.IM· gr-qc

Artificial Precision Polarization Array: Sensitivity for the axion-like dark matter with clock satellites

Hanyu Jiang , Baoyu Xu , Yun-Long Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 01:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMgr-qc
keywords axion-like dark matterpulsar polarization arrayssatellite networksaxion-photon couplingMonte Carlo simulationsdark matter detectionsensitivity analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

A satellite network of pulsed transmitters and a receiver can set tighter limits on axion-photon coupling than natural pulsar observations for masses from 10^{-22} to 10^{-18} eV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an Artificial Pulsar Polarization Array (APPA) made of multiple satellite-based pulsed signal transmitters plus one dedicated receiver satellite. This controlled setup is intended to avoid the unknown periodic physical effects that complicate data from natural pulsars. Monte Carlo simulations combined with likelihood and frequentist analyses are used to forecast performance. The results indicate that APPA produces stricter 95 percent upper bounds on the axion-photon coupling g_aγ across the stated mass window and that a wider satellite spacing improves reach for lighter masses.

Core claim

The central claim is that APPA, by generating simulated observations through Monte Carlo methods and applying both likelihood and frequentist analyses, yields a tighter upper limit on the axion-photon coupling g_aγ at the 95 percent confidence level than conventional ground-based pulsar observations for axion masses between 10^{-22} and 10^{-18} eV, while also delivering superior detection sensitivity; a larger spatial scale of the satellite network further enhances sensitivity to lighter axions.

What carries the argument

The Artificial Pulsar Polarization Array (APPA), a satellite network of pulsed transmitters and a dedicated receiver that supplies controlled timing and polarization data to suppress unknown periodic effects.

If this is right

  • For axion masses 10^{-22} to 10^{-18} eV, APPA produces a tighter 95 percent C.L. upper bound on g_aγ than ground-based methods.
  • Larger satellite spacing increases the advantage for detecting lighter axions.
  • The controlled signals simplify data analysis by eliminating unknown periodic physical effects.
  • APPA achieves higher overall detection sensitivity across the target mass range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same satellite architecture could be adapted to search for other ultralight dark-matter candidates that couple to photons.
  • Precision timing between satellites might also support tests of fundamental physics beyond dark-matter searches.
  • Deployment of a small-scale prototype network would directly test whether the required timing and polarization stability can be achieved in orbit.

Load-bearing premise

The satellite network can be built and run with timing and polarization precision high enough to remove the unknown periodic effects that limit natural pulsar data.

What would settle it

A demonstration that realistic satellite timing jitter or polarization calibration errors remain comparable to those in natural pulsar data would remove the claimed sensitivity gain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.04400 by Baoyu Xu, Hanyu Jiang, Yun-Long Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Conceptual diagram for APPA. The satellite network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison between the APPA simulation results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. 95% C.L. upper limit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: indicates that a larger spatial scale of the satel￾lite network is more favorable for detecting axion signals, providing better sensitivity to light axions. Unlike obser￾vations using natural pulsars, in our work Eq. (III.4) in￾corporates the effect of f, for light axions with Compton wavelengths λcom ≥ L, g95% shows no significant varia￾tion on the order of magnitude. A similar behavior can also be seen i… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical simulation: The GLSP (red) derived from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The histogram (yellow, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The Histograms and corresponding PDFs of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The histogram of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The approaches to searching for axion-like signals based on pulsars include observations with pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) and pulsar polarization arrays (PPAs). However, these methods are limited by observational uncertainties arising from multiple unknown and periodic physical effects, which substantially complicate subsequent data analysis. To mitigate these issues and improve data fidelity, we propose the Artificial Pulsar Polarization Arrays (APPA): a satellite network comprising multiple pulsed signal transmitters and a dedicated receiver satellite. To constrain the axion-photon coupling parameter $g_{a\gamma}$, we generate simulated observations using Monte Carlo methods and investigate the sensitivity of APPA using two complementary approaches: Likelihood analysis and frequentist analysis. Simulations indicate that for the axion mass range of $10^{-22}-10^{-18}$ eV, APPA yields a tighter upper limit on $g_{a\gamma}$ (at the 95\% C.L.) than conventional ground-based observations, while also achieving superior detection sensitivity. Moreover, a larger spatial distribution scale of the satellite network corresponds to a greater advantage in detecting axions with lighter masses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Artificial Precision Polarization Arrays (APPA), a satellite network of pulsed signal transmitters and a dedicated receiver satellite, to search for axion-like dark matter via polarization rotation of artificial signals. Monte Carlo simulations combined with likelihood and frequentist analyses are used to forecast sensitivity, claiming that for axion masses 10^{-22}–10^{-18} eV, APPA yields tighter 95% C.L. upper limits on g_{aγ} than conventional ground-based pulsar polarization observations, with larger network scales providing greater advantage for lighter masses.

Significance. If the instrumental noise model is realistic, the work offers a controlled alternative to natural pulsar observations that could reduce uncertainties from unknown periodic effects and improve constraints on ultra-light axion-photon coupling in a mass range of interest for fuzzy dark matter. The dual statistical approach and explicit scaling with network size are positive features for forecasting future experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation and Analysis sections] The Monte Carlo simulation description does not specify how orbital dynamics, differential Doppler shifts across the satellite network, and receiver polarization calibration drifts are incorporated into the noise model. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the reported sensitivity improvement over ground-based observations assumes that only axion-induced rotations remain after suppression of periodic effects.
  2. [Results on sensitivity curves] The 95% C.L. upper-limit curves and detection-sensitivity statements rest on the assumption that artificial pulsed signals introduce no new systematics comparable to those in natural pulsars; no quantitative robustness tests or bounds on residual calibration or timing errors are provided to support this.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Notation for g_{aγ} and m_a should be checked for consistency between text, equations, and figure labels.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a single sentence summarizing the key noise-model assumptions used in the simulations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions that strengthen the presentation of our simulation methodology and sensitivity forecasts without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation and Analysis sections] The Monte Carlo simulation description does not specify how orbital dynamics, differential Doppler shifts across the satellite network, and receiver polarization calibration drifts are incorporated into the noise model. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the reported sensitivity improvement over ground-based observations assumes that only axion-induced rotations remain after suppression of periodic effects.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript provided insufficient detail on these elements of the noise model. In the revised version, we will expand the Simulation and Analysis sections with a dedicated subsection describing the incorporation of orbital dynamics via standard two-body Keplerian propagation with J2 perturbations, differential Doppler shifts corrected using onboard atomic clock timing residuals (assumed at the 10^{-12} level), and polarization calibration drifts modeled as slow-varying offsets mitigated by periodic transmitter polarization flips that allow differential measurements. These corrections are subtracted prior to the likelihood and frequentist analyses, leaving primarily the axion-induced rotation signal plus white noise. This explicit modeling will be supported by pseudocode and will directly justify why the sensitivity advantage over ground-based PPAs holds under realistic satellite conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on sensitivity curves] The 95% C.L. upper-limit curves and detection-sensitivity statements rest on the assumption that artificial pulsed signals introduce no new systematics comparable to those in natural pulsars; no quantitative robustness tests or bounds on residual calibration or timing errors are provided to support this.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include quantitative robustness tests against residual systematics. In the revision, we will add a new subsection and supplementary figure showing Monte Carlo results with injected residual calibration errors (0.1–2% polarization angle uncertainty) and timing jitter (1–10 ns). The updated 95% C.L. curves will demonstrate that APPA retains a sensitivity advantage over ground-based observations provided residuals remain below ~0.5%, a level we argue is attainable given the controllable artificial signals and satellite-grade instrumentation. This addition will quantify the assumption and bound the regime where the central claim remains valid. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis is self-contained

full rationale

The paper proposes an artificial satellite network (APPA) and computes its sensitivity to axion-induced polarization rotation via Monte Carlo forward simulations of pulsed signals, noise, and likelihood/frequentist analyses. These simulations generate synthetic data under assumed instrument performance and compare resulting 95% C.L. limits on g_aγ to external ground-based benchmarks; no parameter is fitted to real data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation chain supplies the central uniqueness or ansatz, and the claimed advantage does not reduce by construction to quantities defined inside the simulation inputs themselves. The derivation therefore remains independent of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard domain assumptions about axion-photon interactions and the ability to engineer clean artificial signals; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Axion-like particles induce detectable polarization rotation or birefringence in propagating electromagnetic signals.
    This is the physical mechanism that allows polarization arrays to constrain g_aγ.
  • domain assumption Satellite-based transmitters can produce pulsed signals whose polarization and timing are controllable to higher precision than natural pulsars.
    This underpins the claim that APPA mitigates the unknown periodic effects mentioned in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5729 in / 1362 out tokens · 33486 ms · 2026-05-18T01:01:55.920861+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Detecting Chiral Gravitational Wave Background with a Dipole Pulsar Timing Array

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A dipole pulsar timing array detects chiral nanohertz gravitational waves and extends PTA sensitivity into the microhertz regime.

  2. Detecting gravitational wave background with equivalent configurations in the network of space based optical lattice clocks

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Equivalent geometric transformations in optical lattice clock networks preserve the modulus of the overlap reduction function, enabling a four-spacecraft orbital configuration whose strain sensitivity is evaluated aga...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    pulsar polarization ar- ray(PPA)

    pulsar timing data have been used to look for this signature: the data lead to upper limits on the axion coupling and local density in the mass range ma ∼ O 10−23–10−21 eV. Independently, ultralight ax- ions coupled to photons can cause cosmic birefringence: coherent ALP oscillations rotate the plane of linear polarization of passing light. Constraints on...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The nearest pulsars lie at 120–170 pc, such as PSR J0437–4715 at about 157 pc

    Wide distance distribution of pulsars.The known pulsar population is predominantly concentrated within distances of a few kpc [45]. The nearest pulsars lie at 120–170 pc, such as PSR J0437–4715 at about 157 pc

    work page

  3. [3]

    Over such large propagation distances, pulsar signals are af- fected by a variety of complex astrophysical processes that tend to obscure potential axion induced signatures

    and PSR J2144–3933 at about 170 pc [47]. Over such large propagation distances, pulsar signals are af- fected by a variety of complex astrophysical processes that tend to obscure potential axion induced signatures. These effects collectively complicate the modeling and degrade the achievable signal-to-noise ratio (S/N)

    work page

  4. [4]

    As indicated in Eq

    Uncertainty in local dark matter energy density. As indicated in Eq. (II.10), the measurement of the ax- ion–photon coupling parameterg aγ requires knowledge of the dark matter energy densitiesρ s near the pulsar andρ o near the Solar System. However,ρ s is difficult to determine observationally and is subject to large un- certainties, which ultimately li...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Randomness of pulsar signal phase.The pulse phaseφ s of a pulsar signal is inherently random and in- determinate, which prevents the signal propagation time Tfrom being used to reliably determine the value of Θ in Eq. (II.10)

    work page

  6. [6]

    However, such measurements are in- evitably affected by ionospheric interference

    Complex and frequency-dependent ionospheric in- terference.In practical observations, most pulsar sig- nals are detected in the radio band, and ground-based radio telescopes therefore serve as the primary observa- tional instruments. However, such measurements are in- evitably affected by ionospheric interference. The Earth’s ionosphere induces Faraday ro...

    work page

  7. [7]

    artificial pulsars

    notes that the factorf yei, yej is negligible when yei ≫1, but must be retained wheny ei ≤1. For pulsars located at cosmological distances, the conditiony ei ≫1 is typically satisfied; in contrast, for the APPA consid- ered in this work, the satellite network occupies a sin- gle coherent axion domain, the parametery ei ≤1 and in practicey ei ≪1, thus sinc...

    work page

  8. [8]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. D16, 1791 (1977)

    work page 1977

  10. [10]

    Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  11. [11]

    Wilczek, Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    work page 1978

  12. [12]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, Axions In String Theory, JHEP 06, 051, arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Z. G. Berezhiani and M. Y. Khlopov, Cosmology of Spon- taneously Broken Gauge Family Symmetry, Z. Phys. C 49, 73 (1991)

    work page 1991

  14. [14]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  15. [15]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  16. [16]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  17. [17]

    Eberhardt and E

    A. Eberhardt and E. G. M. Ferreira, Ultralight fuzzy dark matter review (2025), arXiv:2507.00705 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Ann

    L. Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 247 (2021), arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Khmelnitsky and V

    A. Khmelnitsky and V. Rubakov, Pulsar timing signal from ultralight scalar dark matter, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2014(02), 019–019

    work page

  20. [20]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, Fuzzy cold dark matter: The wave properties of ultralight particles, Phys- ical Review Letters85, 1158–1161 (2000)

    work page 2000

  21. [21]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Ul- 10 tralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D95, 043541 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, Ultra-light dark matter, Astron. Astro- phys. Rev.29, 7 (2021), arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,

    D. Antypaset al., New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ul- tralight Dark Matter, (2022), arXiv:2203.14915 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Hlozek, D

    R. Hlozek, D. Grin, D. J. E. Marsh, and P. G. Ferreira, A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data, Phys. Rev. D91, 103512 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, and G. D. Becker, First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from lyman-αforest data and hydrodynamical simula- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 031302 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    D. J. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Physics Reports643, 1–79 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [28]

    Schive, T

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broadhurst, Cosmic structure as the quantum interference of a coherent dark wave, Nature Physics10, 496–499 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [29]

    Schive, M.-H

    H.-Y. Schive, M.-H. Liao, T.-P. Woo, S.-K. Wong, T. Chi- ueh, T. Broadhurst, and W.-Y. P. Hwang, Understanding the core-halo relation of quantum wave dark matter from 3d simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 261302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [30]

    P. Mocz, M. Vogelsberger, V. H. Robles, J. Zavala, M. Boylan-Kolchin, A. Fialkov, and L. Hernquist, Galaxy formation with becdm – i. turbulence and relaxation of idealized haloes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society471, 4559 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [32]

    Hayashi, E

    K. Hayashi, E. G. M. Ferreira, and H. Y. J. Chan, Nar- rowing the mass range of fuzzy dark matter with ultra- faint dwarfs, The Astrophysical Journal Letters912, L3 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [33]

    Ba˜ nares-Hern´ andez, A

    A. Ba˜ nares-Hern´ andez, A. Castillo, J. Martin Camalich, and G. Iorio, Confronting fuzzy dark matter with the rotation curves of nearby dwarf irregular galaxies, As- tronomy & Astrophysics676, A63 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [34]

    A. X. Gonz´ alez-Morales, D. J. E. Marsh, J. Pe˜ narrubia, and L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez, Unbiased constraints on ul- tralight axion mass from dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society472, 1346–1360 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [36]

    N. C. Amorisco and A. Loeb, First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from the dynamics of stellar streams in the milky way (2018), arXiv:1808.00464 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [37]

    & Price-Whelan, A

    A. Bonaca and A. M. Price-Whelan, Stellar streams in the gaia era (2024), arXiv:2405.19410 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [38]

    K. Blum, M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and L. Teodori, Brack- eting the soliton-halo relation of ultralight dark matter, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025 (06), 050

    work page

  36. [39]

    The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: Constraints on Ultra-light Axion Dark Matter through Galaxy Cluster Number Counts

    S. Zelmeret al., Constraints on ultra-light axion dark matter through galaxy cluster number counts (2025), arXiv:2502.03353 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [40]

    N. K. Porayko, X. Zhu, Y. Levin, L. Hui, G. Hobbs, A. Grudskaya, K. Postnov, M. Bailes, N. D. R. Bhat, W. Coles, S. Dai, J. Dempsey, M. J. Keith, M. Kerr, M. Kramer, P. D. Lasky, R. N. Manchester, S. Os lowski, A. Parthasarathy, V. Ravi, D. J. Reardon, P. A. Rosado, C. J. Russell, R. M. Shannon, R. Spiewak, W. van Straten, L. Toomey, J. Wang, L. Wen, and ...

    work page 2018

  38. [41]

    Kato and J

    R. Kato and J. Soda, Search for ultralight scalar dark matter with NANOGrav pulsar timing arrays, JCAP09, 036, arXiv:1904.09143 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 1904

  39. [42]

    N. K. Poraykoet al.(EPTA), Searches for signatures of ultralight axion dark matter in polarimetry data of the European Pulsar Timing Array, Phys. Rev. D111, 062005 (2025), arXiv:2412.02232 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [43]

    B. Wang, X. Yang, J.-J. Wei, S.-B. Zhang, and X.-F. Wu, Detecting extragalactic axion-like dark matter with polarization measurements of fast radio bursts, Commu- nications Physics8, 10.1038/s42005-025-02045-w (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02045-w 2025

  41. [44]

    T. Liu, X. Lou, and J. Ren, Pulsar polarization arrays, Physical Review Letters130, 10.1103/phys- revlett.130.121401 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2023

  42. [45]

    Gan, L.-T

    X. Gan, L.-T. Wang, and H. Xiao, Detecting axion dark matter with black hole polarimetry, Phys. Rev. D110, 063039 (2024), arXiv:2311.02149 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [46]

    L. M. B. Alves, A. G. Sullivan, X. Ji, D. Veske, I. Bartos, S. Will, Z. M´ arka, and S. M´ arka, Artificial precision tim- ing array: bridging the decihertz gravitational-wave sen- sitivity gap with clock satellites (2025), arXiv:2401.13668 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [47]

    Castillo, J

    A. Castillo, J. Martin-Camalich, J. Terol-Calvo, D. Blas, A. Caputo, R. T. G´ enova Santos, L. Sberna, M. Peel, and J. A. Rubi˜ no-Mart´ ın, Searching for dark-matter waves with ppta and quijote pulsar polarimetry, Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics2022(06), 014

    work page

  45. [48]

    Xueet al., First pulsar polarization array limits on ul- tralight axion-like dark matter (2024), arXiv:2412.02229 [astro-ph.HE]

    X. Xueet al., First pulsar polarization array limits on ul- tralight axion-like dark matter (2024), arXiv:2412.02229 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [49]

    Ivanov, Y

    M. Ivanov, Y. Kovalev, M. Lister, A. Panin, A. Pushkarev, T. Savolainen, and S. Troitsky, Constrain- ing the photon coupling of ultra-light dark-matter axion- like particles by polarization variations of parsec-scale jets in active galaxies, Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics2019(02), 059–059

    work page

  47. [50]

    J. W. Foster, N. L. Rodd, and B. R. Safdi, Revealing the dark matter halo with axion direct detection, Physical Review D97, 10.1103/physrevd.97.123006 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.123006 2018

  48. [51]

    G. P. Centers, J. W. Blanchard, J. Conrad, N. L. Figueroa, A. Garcon, A. V. Gramolin, D. F. J. Kim- ball, M. Lawson, B. Pelssers, J. A. Smiga, A. O. Sushkov, A. Wickenbrock, D. Budker, and A. Derevianko, Stochas- tic fluctuations of bosonic dark matter, Nature Commu- nications12, 10.1038/s41467-021-27632-7 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27632-7 2021

  49. [52]

    Dirson, J

    L. Dirson, J. P´ etri, and D. Mitra, The galactic popu- lation of canonical pulsars, Astronomy & Astrophysics 667, A82 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [53]

    J. P. W. Verbiest, M. Bailes, W. van Straten, G. B. Hobbs, R. T. Edwards, R. N. Manchester, N. D. R. Bhat, J. M. Sarkissian, B. A. Jacoby, and S. R. Kulkarni, Pre- cision timing of psr j0437–4715: An accurate pulsar dis- tance, a high pulsar mass, and a limit on the variation of newton’s gravitational constant, The Astrophysical Jour- 11 nal679, 675–680 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [54]

    Tiengo, R

    A. Tiengo, R. P. Mignani, A. De Luca, P. Esposito, A. Pellizzoni, and S. Mereghetti, X-ray and optical ob- servations of the closest isolated radio pulsar, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters412, L73–L77 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [55]

    C. Sotomayor-Beltranet al., Calibrating high-precision faraday rotation measurements for lofar and the next generation of low-frequency radio telescopes, Astronomy & Astrophysics552, A58 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [56]

    N. K. Porayko, A. Noutsos, C. Tiburzi, J. P. W. Verbiest, A. Horneffer, J. K¨ unsem¨ oller, S. Os lowski, M. Kramer, D. H. F. M. Schnitzeler, J. M. Ander- son, M. Br¨ uggen, J.-M. Grießmeier, M. Hoeft, D. J. Schwarz, M. Serylak, and O. Wucknitz, Testing the ac- curacy of the ionospheric faraday rotation corrections through lofar observations of bright nor...

    work page 2018

  54. [57]

    Oberoi and C

    D. Oberoi and C. J. Lonsdale, Media responsible for faraday rotation: A review, Radio Science47, RS0K08 (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [58]

    J. L. Han, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, G. J. Qiao, and W. van Straten, Pulsar rotation measures and the large-scale structure of the galactic magnetic field, The Astrophysical Journal642, 868–881 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [59]

    Pajares, J

    M. Pajares, J. Juan, J. Sanz, R. Or´ us P´ erez, A. Garc´ ıa-Rigo, J. Feltens, A. Komjathy, S. Schaer, and A. Krankowski, The igs vtec maps: A reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998, Journal of Geodesy 83, 263 (2008)

    work page 1998

  57. [60]

    New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction

    V. Anastassopouloset al.(CAST), New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction, Nature Phys.13, 584 (2017), arXiv:1705.02290 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [61]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, The European Physical Journal C71, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 (2011)

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011

  59. [62]

    J. W. Foster, Y. Kahn, R. Nguyen, N. L. Rodd, and B. R. Safdi, Dark matter interferometry, Phys. Rev. D 103, 076018 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [63]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [64]

    ASTROD-GW: Overview and Progress

    W.-T. Ni, ASTROD-GW: Overview and Progress, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22, 1341004 (2013), arXiv:1212.2816 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [65]

    J. T. VanderPlas, Understanding the lomb–scargle peri- odogram, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 236, 16 (2018)

    work page 2018